Review Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Immunol. Nov 27, 2014; 4(3): 141-148
Published online Nov 27, 2014. doi: 10.5411/wji.v4.i3.141
Transgenic plants for allergen-specific immunotherapy
Tomoe Nishimura, Mayumi Saeki, Osamu Kaminuma, Takachika Hiroi, Allergy and Immunology Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan
Fumio Takaiwa, Genetically Modified Organism Research Center, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan
Author contributions: Saeki M designed and wrote the paper; Kaminuma O, Nishimura T, Takaiwa F and Hiroi T contributed to editing of the paper.
Supported by Grant-in-Aid for Agri-health Project from the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan to Takaiwa F and Hiroi T, JSPS KAKENHI to Saeki M No. 24791817 and 26860122; and that to Kaminuma O, No. 24500501; and Grant-in-Aid of Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation to Kaminuma O.
Correspondence to: Takachika Hiroi, DDS, PhD, Allergy and Immunology Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 2-1-6, Kamikitazawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan. hiroi-tk@igakuken.or.jp
Telephone: +81-3-53163266 Fax: +81-3-53163153
Received: March 28, 2014
Revised: July 29, 2014
Accepted: September 4, 2014
Published online: November 27, 2014
Processing time: 235 Days and 17.8 Hours

Abstract

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) is an effective treatment for allergic diseases. Although subcutaneous and sublingual ITs are currently used, safer, easier, and more effective IT is under development. Induction of immune tolerance by oral administration of allergen has been proven, though oral IT has not been applied clinically. It is mainly because a large amount of purified allergen is required to induce oral tolerance. To overcome this problem, plants, peculiarly rice, have been investigated as allergen vehicles for oral IT. Rice can store a considerable amount of expressed allergen in its seeds and the accumulated allergen is stable and resistant to gastrointestinal digestion. Therefore, we have developed transgenic rice seeds (Tg rice) in which major epitopes of cedar pollen or house dust mites are expressed. We are establishing Tg rice with demonstrated efficacy in murine models of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma by oral administration at practical doses. In addition, the amount, distribution, and allergenicity of the expressed allergen have been improved in our Tg rice. Rice-based oral IT is a promising new concept in IT for the treatment of allergic diseases.

Key Words: Allergic disease; Asthma; Oral immunotherapy; Rhinitis; Transgenic rice

Core tip: We aim to establish clinically applicable oral immunotherapy by employing transgenic rice seeds (Tg rice) in which allergen epitopes are expressed. We have identified a suitable allergen packaging system, modified allergens to reduce their allergenicity, selected high allergen-producing lines, and evaluated their efficacy in allergic disease models. We are thus nearly ready to start clinical trials of our Tg rice for the treatment of Japanese cedar pollinosis.



INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma has markedly increased in industrialized countries, and it is a major health concern[1-3]. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) leads to immune tolerance, a state of immune unresponsiveness, by repeated allergen administration, and has been recognized as an effective therapeutic method[4,5]. Oral IT, which is based on oral allergen administration, is a relatively conventional method to induce allergen-specific immune tolerance. However, this IT has yet to be applied clinically because of several problems[6-8], particularly the lack of an efficient oral allergen delivery system. We recently showed that rice seeds can be used as a carrier for oral IT. The factors favoring their use are ease of consumption for individuals of all ages, the ability to store a considerable amount of allergen, stability at room temperature for 2-3 years, resistance to digestive enzymes and low pH[9-12]. Therefore, to establish clinically applicable oral IT, we have been developing transgenic rice seeds (Tg rice) expressing full-length allergen or epitopes of Japanese cedar pollen or house dust mites. Oral IT with Tg rice is set to become one of the most useful tools to treat allergic diseases. This review summarizes the progression and prospects of allergen-specific ITs for allergic diseases, with a focus on Tg rice-based oral IT.

SUBCUTANEOUS AND SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY

Currently, subcutaneous IT (SCIT) and sublingual IT (SLIT) are two major IT modes used for clinical treatment of pollen- or house dust-mediated allergic diseases[13-16]. Since SCIT was initially described by Noon in 1911[17], it has been the most popular mode of IT for allergic diseases. Although the immunological mechanisms by which SCIT induces immune tolerance are not completely understood, researchers have demonstrated the production of IgE-blocking antibody, alteration of the Th1/Th2 balance in favor of Th1 responses, and the induction of regulatory T cells by this therapy[18-22]. Nevertheless, repeated systemic injection of allergens by SCIT is inconvenient and heightens the risk of severe side effects, including anaphylactic shock[23,24]. Therefore, SLIT has been developed as an alternative, noninvasive IT[25,26]. Since it was initially described by Scadding et al[27] in 1986, its clinical market share has become approximately 45% of the total allergen-specific IT treatments performed in Europe[28]. Although the incidence of anaphylaxis is reduced in SLIT, several side effects associated with allergenicity have been reported[23,29]. In addition, SLIT requires the patient to retain the allergen solution or tablet under the tongue, something that is difficult for small children. Therefore, several trials are in progress to develop safer, easier, and more efficient IT by modifying allergens, adjuvants, and routes of administration[30-34]. For example, to avoid IgE-dependent side effects, peptide IT using dominant T-cell epitopes has been proposed in both SCIT and SLIT[35,36], and various alternative routes of allergen administration such as oral[37-39], epicutaneous[40], and intralymphatic[41,42] have been investigated.

ORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR ALLERGIC DISEASES

Induction of immune tolerance by oral administration of specific allergen has been recognized for a century[43-45]. Even though the mechanisms of oral tolerance have not been fully defined, many studies have suggested that low-dose allergens induce cellular activation, which was adoptively transferable in vivo, and that high-dose allergens induce nontransferable clonal anergy and/or deletion[46-50]. The characteristics of the immune system in the intestinal mucosa suggest some patients unresponsive to SCIT or SLIT are curable by oral IT[51,52]. Thus, several attempts have been made to use oral IT to treat allergic diseases since the 1920s[53]. Recently, clinical trials of oral IT for patients with autoimmune diseases have also been performed[37-39], although this therapy is yet to be used for human diseases. The greatest obstacle to its clinical application is the amount of allergen required. Oral IT requires about 200 times larger quantities of allergens to induce immune tolerance in comparison to SCIT[54]. Therefore, researchers hope to develop systems for effective allergen delivery to the intestinal mucosa to achieve clinical applications of oral IT. In this regard, there is concern that oral administration of a large amount of allergen may lead adverse effects such as impaired clearance of secondary bacterial infections due to excess suppression of immune function. However, almost all of adverse effects reported in clinical studies of oral IT were relatively mild, and no systemic immunological suppression have been observed[43,44,54]. Therefore, such risks in oral IT seem to be negligible.

PLANT-BASED VACCINES

In order to meet the requirement of large amounts of allergen in oral IT, several allergen-expressing plants have been developed. During early studies in the 1990s, tobacco was used as a model transgenic plant for expressing allergen[55]. Since then, the feasibility of plants such as potato, banana, tomato, and rice has been explored by introducing heat-labile enterotoxin, hepatitis B antigen, respiratory syncytial virus antigen, and cholera toxin[9,56-59]. The use of plants as allergen vehicles offers several advantages over genetically engineered and/or purified allergens. The cost of production is lower, no refrigeration is required for storage, and contamination with mammalian pathogens hardly occurs in transgenic plants[60]. In addition, the walls of plant cells in which the expressed allergen accumulate are resistant to the acidic environment of the stomach[60]. The edible parts of plants such as fruits and crop seeds are easy to administer to people of all ages.

RICE SEED AS AN ALLERGEN CARRIER

Rice is the major food staple commonly eaten daily throughout Asia. Allergens expressed in rice seeds are stable at room temperature for 2-3 years[9,10]. Rice seeds mainly express three endogenous proteins: alcohol-soluble prolamin, acid- and alkaline-soluble glutelin, and saline-soluble globulin. Two characteristic organs, protein body (PB)-I and PB-II, mediate storage of these proteins in rice seeds[61-63]. Prolamin is composed of three isoforms (10, 13, and 16-kDa) synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and retained in the ER lumen; then, it forms the smooth and spherical protein body PB-I[61,64]. Four glutelin isoforms (GluA, GluB, GluC, and GluD) are initially synthesized in the ER, and then they are transported to the protein storage vacuole, PB-II[65,66]. The α-globulin is also deposited in PB-II. It has been reported that exogenous proteins can be made to accumulate in PB-I and/or PB-II of rice seeds by expressing them with the promoters of glutelin (GluB-1, GluB-4), 26-kDa globulin, or 10-kDa and 16-kDa prolamin[67]. Allergen accumulated in PBs is protected from the gastrointestinal digestive enzymes and low pH environment[10,12,13]. In particular, PB-I is characterized by higher digestion resistance and it seems to be an ideal capsule for efficient allergen delivery to the intestinal immune system[68]. For these reasons, rice seeds have been recognized as one of the most feasible allergen carriers for oral IT.

RICE SEED-BASED ORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR ALLERGIC RHINITIS

Seasonal allergic rhinitis caused by Japanese cedar pollen is a serious health concern in Japan. Over 26% of the Japanese population has this disease[69-71]. Two major allergens, Cryptomeria japonica (Cry j) 1 and Cry j 2, have been identified in the pollen[72,73]. To avoid the IgE-mediated side effects seen with SCIT and SLIT, we have developed several types of Tg rice that accumulate modified fusion proteins of Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 epitope peptides (Table 1)

Table 1 Characteristics of transgenic rices for oral immunotherapy against allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma.
Tg rice nameTarget diseaseTarget allergenExpression plasmid construction
Allergen accumulation
Pharmacological effectRef.
PromoterCoding proteinKDEL sequenceLocalizationYield
Cry jAllergic rhinitisCryptomeria Japonica pollen (Japanese cedar pollen)GluB-1Fusion protein of mouse T-cel epitopes in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2, and glycinin A1aB1babsencepresumaply PB-II7 μg/grainIgE and IgG CD4+ T-cell proliferation Th2 cytokine Histamine Sneezing↓↓↓↓↓[74]
7CrpAllergic rhinitisCryptomeria Japonica pollen (Japanese cedar pollen)GluB-1Fusion protein of seven human T-cell epitopes in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2presencePB-I and PB-II62 μg/grainCD4+ T-cell proliferation IgE↓↓[79]
Shuffled Cry jAllergic rhinitisCryptomeria Japonica pollen (Japanese cedar pollen)Prolamin (16-kDa) GluB Prolamin (10-kDa) GluB-1Fusion protein of deconstructed full-length Cry j 1, Cry j 2, and glutelinspresencePB-I10-25 μg/grainIgE and IgG CD4+ T-cell proliferation Th2 cytokine Histamine Sneezing Eosinophilia↓↓↓↓↓↓[84]
Der p 1Bronchial asthmaDermatophagoides Pteronyssinus (House dust mite)GluB-1Human and mouse T-cell epitopes in Der p 1absencePB-I90 μg/grainIgE and IgG CD4+ T-cell proliferation Th2 cytokine Eosinophilia Bronchial hyperreactivity↓↓↓↓↓[89-91]
Der f 2Bronchial asthmaDermatophagoides Farinae (House dust mite)GluB-1Cysteine residue-mutated full-length Der f 2presenceDer f 2 body15-30 μg/grainIgE and IgG[99]
Cry j Tg rice

First, we established Tg rice expressing a fusion protein of mouse T-cell epitope peptides in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2, and a soybean storage protein, glycinin A1aB1b (Cry j Tg rice)[74]. A1aB1b is located in PB-II when expressed in Tg rice seeds with the GluB-1 promoter[75]; the fusion protein was expected to be accumulated in PB-II[74]. Oral administration of Cry j Tg rice to cedar pollen-immunized mice inhibited allergen-induced IgE and IgG responses, CD4+ T-cell proliferation, and T helper 2 (Th2) cytokine synthesis (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13). In addition, allergen-induced serum histamine elevation and sneezing response were suppressed[74].

7Crp Tg rice

Since Cry j Tg rice was effective in the mouse model of allergic rhinitis, we developed Tg rice for application in the human body. Seven dominant human T-cell epitopes were identified in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2[76-78]. We have demonstrated that 92% of 48 patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis showed positive T-cell responses to the fusion protein in which the seven epitopes were linked (7Crp). This 7Crp was not reactive to cedar pollen-specific IgE in the patients’ sera[79]. These findings suggest 7Crp has the potential to modulate cedar pollen-mediated T-cell responses without inducing IgE-dependent side effects. We developed three lines of Tg rice accumulating 7Crp[79]. The first line expressed 7Crp under GluB-1 promoter regulation without its signal peptide and failed to express the allergen protein, although its transcript was detectable. We concluded that absence of the signal peptide caused 7Crp instability. By adding GluB-1 signal peptide, 7Crp was accumulated in the Tg rice. In addition, high 7Crp expression in the Tg rice was achieved by adding a C-terminal ER retention signal (KDEL sequence). Finally, we established Tg rice expressing 7Crp with GluB-1 signal peptide as well as the KDEL sequence (7Crp Tg rice). After verifying accumulation of 7Crp in PB-I and PB-II, the effect of 7Crp Tg rice on allergic responses was examined in the mouse model[79]. Oral administration of 7Crp Tg rice to B10.S mice that recognize one of the seven epitopes suppressed allergen-induced IgE and T-cell responses[79].

Shuffled Cry j Tg rice

There are inter-individual differences in the sequence recognition of T-cell epitopes because of a variety of MHC class II haplotypes[80-82]. Therefore, peptide IT with only major T-cell epitopes does not seem to be effective for all patients. The molecular shuffling method has been used to preserve immunogenicity/tolerogenicity (T-cell reactivity) and reduce allergenicity (IgE reactivity)[32,83]. Based on this strategy, we improved our Tg rice to induce immune tolerance in a more efficient manner. Cry j 1 was divided into three overlapped fragments to disrupt its tertiary structure, and these fragments were shuffled and inserted into the middle of glutelins. The tertiary structure of Cry j 2 was also destroyed following its reconstruction to be a mosaic molecule by insertion of the KDEL sequence. After the abrogation of allergenicity in these fragments was verified[84], Tg rice accumulating three Cry j 1/glutelin fusions and one restructured Cry j 2 was established (shuffled Cry j Tg rice)[84]. The expressed allergens were successfully localized in PB-I. Oral administration of shuffled Cry j Tg rice to cedar pollen-immunized mice inhibited allergen-induced IgE and IgG responses, CD4+ T-cell proliferation, and Th2 cytokine synthesis. Consistent with this finding, allergen-induced sneezing response, serum histamine elevation, and infiltration of eosinophils in the nose were attenuated[84].

RICE SEED-BASED ORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR BRONCHIAL ASTHMA

House dust mites (HDM) are strongly associated with the development of allergic diseases, such as bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis[85,86]. Specifically, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p)- and Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f)-derived allergens are important components of indoor allergens associated with bronchial asthma[87,88]. The major HDM allergens are classified into two groups: group 1 (Der p 1 and Der f 1), mainly derived from feces, and group 2 (Der p 2 and Der f 2) derived from the bodies. Therefore, for application to treatment for bronchial asthma, two types of Tg rice accumulating modified Der p 1 and Der f 2 peptides have been established (Table 1).

Der p 1 Tg rice

First, we created Tg rice expressing both human and mouse T-cell epitopes of Der p 1 (Der p 1 Tg rice)[89,90]. By using the technique established to develop Cry j-related Tg rice, the expressed allergen was efficiently deposited in PB-I[90]. Oral administration of Der p 1 Tg rice to Der p 1-immunized mice suppressed allergen-induced IgE and IgG responses, CD4+ T-cell proliferation, and Th2 cytokine synthesis. In addition, allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration into the lungs and bronchial hyperreactivity were diminished[90], suggesting that rice seed-based oral IT is useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma.

Administration of lower doses (approximately 5 g/kg per day) also suppressed allergen-induced lung eosinophilia[91]. Interestingly, the production of allergen-specific IgE was not affected unlike in the high-dose experiment (approximately 50 g/kg per day)[91]. Although we cannot explain why the low-dose Der p 1 Tg rice was not effective for IgE production, it was suggested that the efficacy of oral IT is not mainly caused by suppression of IgE responses. Most importantly, effective attenuation of allergic inflammation was accomplished at a dose of Tg rice that is achievable through daily consumption.

Der f 2 Tg rice

Der f 2 contains three disulfide bonds (Cys8-Cys119, Cys21-Cys27, and Cys73-Cys78), two of which (Cys8-Cys119 and Cys73-Cys78) are critical for IgE-binding[92-96]. In contrast, T-cell epitopes of the group 2 allergens are distributed over the entire protein[94,97]. We constructed three Der f 2 derivatives in which cysteine residues were mutated: ΔC lacked all three disulfide bonds, C8/119S lacked the Cys8-Cys119 bond, and 8-119C lacked the Cys21-Cys27 and Cys73-Cys78 bonds[98]. Binding activity with HDM-specific IgE was markedly decreased in ΔC, followed by C8/119S and 8-119C. Then, three lines of Tg rice expressing these Der f 2 derivatives were established (Der f 2 Tg rice). The localization of the expressed allergen in the Tg rice was unique. Thus, Der f 2 derivatives aggregated and formed a PB-like structure, named the Der f 2 body, distinguishable from PB-I and PB-II by its electron density. Oral administration of Der f 2 Tg rice containing C8/119S, 8-119C, or both to Der f 2-immunized mice inhibited allergen-induced IgE and IgG responses[98], suggesting the potential of this Tg rice to treat HDM-mediated allergic responses. Interestingly, IgE and IgG responses were not affected by Der f 2 Tg rice containing ΔC. ΔC was water-soluble and rapidly degraded by digestive enzymes in comparison to other Der f 2 derivatives[98]. These data strongly suggest allergen digestibility is critical for the efficacy of oral IT using Tg rice. Further studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of Der f 2 Tg rice in treating asthma symptoms.

SAFETY OF RICE SEED-BASED ORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY

So far a series of oral IT trials have raised several safety concerns including gastrointestinal symptoms[43,44,54]. However, such adverse effects were not observed in cynomolgus macaques at least by daily oral administration of high-dose 7Crp Tg rice for 26 wk[99]. Although further investigation into its safety is required, Tg rice-based oral IT may be safer than other modes of IT.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated the potential of Tg rice-based oral IT for treating allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma in preclinical animal studies. Because rice-based oral IT is highly effective an does not produce side effects, this mode of treatment promises to become a new approach to oral IT that will improve the quality of treatment for allergic diseases, replacing established drug therapies and other types of IT. A clinical trial of Tg rice is under development to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tg rice-based oral IT in human subjects.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Huang L, Yeligar SM S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

References
1.  Devereux G. The increase in the prevalence of asthma and allergy: food for thought. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:869-874.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Subbarao P, Mandhane PJ, Sears MR. Asthma: epidemiology, etiology and risk factors. CMAJ. 2009;181:E181-E190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 281]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 300]  [Article Influence: 20.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Latvala J, von Hertzen L, Lindholm H, Haahtela T. Trends in prevalence of asthma and allergy in Finnish young men: nationwide study, 1966-2003. BMJ. 2005;330:1186-1187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Moingeon P, Mascarell L. Induction of tolerance via the sublingual route: mechanisms and applications. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:623474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Larché M. Specific immunotherapy. Br Med Bull. 2000;56:1019-1036.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Sánchez-García S, Rodríguez del Río P, Escudero C, García-Fernández C, Ramirez A, Ibáñez MD. Efficacy of oral immunotherapy protocol for specific oral tolerance induction in children with cow’s milk allergy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012;14:43-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Calvani M, Giorgio V, Miceli Sopo S. Specific oral tolerance induction for food. A systematic review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;42:11-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Staden U, Rolinck-Werninghaus C, Brewe F, Wahn U, Niggemann B, Beyer K. Specific oral tolerance induction in food allergy in children: efficacy and clinical patterns of reaction. Allergy. 2007;62:1261-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Tokuhara D, Yuki Y, Nochi T, Kodama T, Mejima M, Kurokawa S, Takahashi Y, Nanno M, Nakanishi U, Takaiwa F. Secretory IgA-mediated protection against V. cholerae and heat-labile enterotoxin-producing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by rice-based vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8794-8799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 88]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Nochi T, Takagi H, Yuki Y, Yang L, Masumura T, Mejima M, Nakanishi U, Matsumura A, Uozumi A, Hiroi T. Rice-based mucosal vaccine as a global strategy for cold-chain- and needle-free vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:10986-10991.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Streatfield SJ. Mucosal immunization using recombinant plant-based oral vaccines. Methods. 2006;38:150-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Takaiwa F. Seed-based oral vaccines as allergen-specific immunotherapies. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7:357-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Lin SY, Erekosima N, Kim JM, Ramanathan M, Suarez-Cuervo C, Chelladurai Y, Ward D, Segal JB. Sublingual immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013;309:1278-1288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 159]  [Article Influence: 14.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Chelladurai Y, Suarez-Cuervo C, Erekosima N, Kim JM, Ramanathan M, Segal JB, Lin SY. Effectiveness of subcutaneous versus sublingual immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1:361-369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Di Bona D, Plaia A, Leto-Barone MS, La Piana S, Di Lorenzo G. Efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with grass allergens for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis-based comparison. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:1097-1107.e2.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 10.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Khinchi MS, Poulsen LK, Carat F, André C, Hansen AB, Malling HJ. Clinical efficacy of sublingual and subcutaneous birch pollen allergen-specific immunotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy study. Allergy. 2004;59:45-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Noon L. Prophylactic inoculation against hay fever. Lancet. 1911;177:1572-1573.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Nouri-Aria KT, Wachholz PA, Francis JN, Jacobson MR, Walker SM, Wilcock LK, Staple SQ, Aalberse RC, Till SJ, Durham SR. Grass pollen immunotherapy induces mucosal and peripheral IL-10 responses and blocking IgG activity. J Immunol. 2004;172:3252-3259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Jutel M, Akdis M, Budak F, Aebischer-Casaulta C, Wrzyszcz M, Blaser K, Akdis CA. IL-10 and TGF-beta cooperate in the regulatory T cell response to mucosal allergens in normal immunity and specific immunotherapy. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:1205-1214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Pilette C, Nouri-Aria KT, Jacobson MR, Wilcock LK, Detry B, Walker SM, Francis JN, Durham SR. Grass pollen immunotherapy induces an allergen-specific IgA2 antibody response associated with mucosal TGF-beta expression. J Immunol. 2007;178:4658-4666.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Ebner C, Siemann U, Bohle B, Willheim M, Wiedermann U, Schenk S, Klotz F, Ebner H, Kraft D, Scheiner O. Immunological changes during specific immunotherapy of grass pollen allergy: reduced lymphoproliferative responses to allergen and shift from TH2 to TH1 in T-cell clones specific for Phl p 1, a major grass pollen allergen. Clin Exp Allergy. 1997;27:1007-1015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Hawrylowicz CM, O’Garra A. Potential role of interleukin-10-secreting regulatory T cells in allergy and asthma. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:271-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  John M Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy to treat allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Clinicians. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2013; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Stewart GE, Lockey RF. Systemic reactions from allergen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992;90:567-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Yukselen A, Kendirli SG, Yilmaz M, Altintas DU, Karakoc GB. Two year follow-up of clinical and inflammation parameters in children monosensitized to mites undergoing subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2013;31:233-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Saporta D. Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous injection immunotherapy in allergic patients. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:492405.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Scadding GK, Brostoff J. Low dose sublingual therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis due to house dust mite. Clin Allergy. 1986;16:483-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Cox L, Jacobsen L. Comparison of allergen immunotherapy practice patterns in the United States and Europe. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;103:451-459; quiz 459-461, 495.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Canonica GW, Bousquet J, Casale T, Lockey RF, Baena-Cagnani CE, Pawankar R, Potter PC, Bousquet PJ, Cox LS, Durham SR. Sub-lingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009. Allergy. 2009;64 Suppl 91:1-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 121]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Ye YL, Chuang YH, Chiang BL. Strategies of mucosal immunotherapy for allergic diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;8:453-461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Klimek L, Pfaar O. A comparison of immunotherapy delivery methods for allergen immunotherapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2013;9:465-474; quiz 475.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Valenta R. The future of antigen-specific immunotherapy of allergy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:446-453.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Casale TB, Stokes JR. Future forms of immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:8-15; quiz 16-17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Cox L, Compalati E, Kundig T, Larche M. New directions in immunotherapy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:178-195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Johansen P, von Moos S, Mohanan D, Kündig TM, Senti G. New routes for allergen immunotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1525-1533.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Jutel M, Solarewicz-Madejek K, Smolinska S. Recombinant allergens: the present and the future. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1534-1543.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Anagnostou K, Islam S, King Y, Foley L, Pasea L, Bond S, Palmer C, Deighton J, Ewan P, Clark A. Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1297-1304.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 318]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 306]  [Article Influence: 30.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Patriarca G, Nucera E, Roncallo C, Pollastrini E, Bartolozzi F, De Pasquale T, Buonomo A, Gasbarrini G, Di Campli C, Schiavino D. Oral desensitizing treatment in food allergy: clinical and immunological results. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:459-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Meglio P, Bartone E, Plantamura M, Arabito E, Giampietro PG. A protocol for oral desensitization in children with IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. Allergy. 2004;59:980-987.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Senti G, von Moos S, Tay F, Graf N, Sonderegger T, Johansen P, Kündig TM. Epicutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy ameliorates grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis: A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:128-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 125]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Hylander T, Latif L, Petersson-Westin U, Cardell LO. Intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy: an effective and safe alternative treatment route for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:412-420.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 105]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Senti G, Crameri R, Kuster D, Johansen P, Martinez-Gomez JM, Graf N, Steiner M, Hothorn LA, Grönlund H, Tivig C. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for cat allergy induces tolerance after only 3 injections. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:1290-1296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 195]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 204]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Sudo K, Taniuchi S, Takahashi M, Soejima K, Hatano Y, Nakano K, Shimo T, Koshino H, Kaneko K. Home-based oral immunotherapy (OIT) with an intermittent loading protocol in children unlikely to outgrow egg allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014;10:11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Murakami D, Kubo K, Sawatsubashi M, Kikkawa S, Ejima M, Saito A, Kato A, Komune S. Phase I/II study of oral immunotherapy with Cry j1-galactomannan conjugate for Japanese cedar pollinosis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41:350-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Weiner HL. Oral tolerance, an active immunologic process mediated by multiple mechanisms. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:935-937.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Friedman A, Weiner HL. Induction of anergy or active suppression following oral tolerance is determined by antigen dosage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:6688-6692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Gregerson DS, Obritsch WF, Donoso LA. Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Distinct mechanisms of resistance are induced by low dose vs high dose feeding protocols. J Immunol. 1993;151:5751-5761.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Chen Y, Kuchroo VK, Inobe J, Hafler DA, Weiner HL. Regulatory T cell clones induced by oral tolerance: suppression of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science. 1994;265:1237-1240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Whitacre CC, Gienapp IE, Orosz CG, Bitar DM. Oral tolerance in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. III. Evidence for clonal anergy. J Immunol. 1991;147:2155-2163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Chen Y, Inobe J, Marks R, Gonnella P, Kuchroo VK, Weiner HL. Peripheral deletion of antigen-reactive T cells in oral tolerance. Nature. 1995;376:177-180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:331-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Weiner HL, da Cunha AP, Quintana F, Wu H. Oral tolerance. Immunol Rev. 2011;241:241-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 430]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 442]  [Article Influence: 34.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Pollia JA. Dermatitis, Urticaria, and Aggravation of Nasal Symptoms from Oral Administration of Pollen Suspensions. Cal West Med. 1939;50:25.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Taudorf E, Laursen LC, Lanner A, Björksten B, Dreborg S, Søborg M, Weeke B. Oral immunotherapy in birch pollen hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1987;80:153-161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Mason HS, Lam DM, Arntzen CJ. Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:11745-11749.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Sandhu JS, Krasnyanski SF, Domier LL, Korban SS, Osadjan MD, Buetow DE. Oral immunization of mice with transgenic tomato fruit expressing respiratory syncytial virus-F protein induces a systemic immune response. Transgenic Res. 2000;9:127-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Kumar GB, Ganapathi TR, Revathi CJ, Srinivas L, Bapat VA. Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic banana plants. Planta. 2005;222:484-493.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Haq TA, Mason HS, Clements JD, Arntzen CJ. Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science. 1995;268:714-716.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Korban SS, Krasnyanski SF, Buetow DE. Foods as production and delivery vehicles for human vaccines. J Am Coll Nutr. 2002;21:212S-217S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Walmsley AM, Arntzen CJ. Plants for delivery of edible vaccines. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000;11:126-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Yamagata H, Tanaka K. The site of synthesis and accumulation of rice storage proteins. Plant and cell phisiology. 1986;27:135-145.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Krishnan HB, Franceschi VR, Okita TW. Immunochemical studies on the role of the Golgi complex in protein-body formation in rice seeds. Planta. 1986;169:471-480.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 170]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 127]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Oparka KJ, Harris N. Rice protein-body formation: all types are initiated by dilation of the endoplasmic reticulum. Planta. 1982;154:184-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Saito Y, Shigemitsu T, Yamasaki R, Sasou A, Goto F, Kishida K, Kuroda M, Tanaka K, Morita S, Satoh S. Formation mechanism of the internal structure of type I protein bodies in rice endosperm: relationship between the localization of prolamin species and the expression of individual genes. Plant J. 2012;70:1043-1055.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Takahashi H, Saito Y, Kitagawa T, Morita S, Masumura T, Tanaka K. A novel vesicle derived directly from endoplasmic reticulum is involved in the transport of vacuolar storage proteins in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:245-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Chargelegue D, Obregon P, Drake PM. Transgenic plants for vaccine production: expectations and limitations. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:495-496.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Qu le Q, Takaiwa F. Evaluation of tissue specificity and expression strength of rice seed component gene promoters in transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2004;2:113-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Takagi H, Hiroi T, Hirose S, Yang L, Takaiwa F. Rice seed ER-derived protein body as an efficient delivery vehicle for oral tolerogenic peptides. Peptides. 2010;31:1421-1425.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  PG-MARJ Committee Practical Guideline for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Japan―Perennial Rhinitis and Pollinosis-2009 Edition. 6th ed. Tokyo: Life Science 2009; (in Japanese).  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
70.  Okamoto Y, Horiguchi S, Yamamoto H, Yonekura S, Hanazawa T. Present situation of cedar pollinosis in Japan and its immune responses. Allergol Int. 2009;58:155-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Tanihara S, Oki I, Ojima T, Nakamura Y, Yanagawa H. Process and current status of the epidemiologic studies on cedar pollinosis in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1999;9:20-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Yasueda H, Yui Y, Shimizu T, Shida T. Isolation and partial characterization of the major allergen from Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983;71:77-86.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Taniai M, Ando S, Usui M, Matuhasi T. Identification of the second major allergen of Japanese cedar pollen. Allergy. 1990;45:309-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Takagi H, Hiroi T, Yang L, Tada Y, Yuki Y, Takamura K, Ishimitsu R, Kawauchi H, Kiyono H, Takaiwa F. A rice-based edible vaccine expressing multiple T cell epitopes induces oral tolerance for inhibition of Th2-mediated IgE responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:17525-17530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Katsube T, Kurisaka N, Ogawa M, Maruyama N, Ohtsuka R, Utsumi S, Takaiwa F. Accumulation of soybean glycinin and its assembly with the glutelins in rice. Plant Physiol. 1999;120:1063-1074.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
76.  Hirahara K, Saito S, Serizawa N, Sasaki R, Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Taniguchi Y, Kaminogawa S, Shiraishi A. Oral administration of a dominant T-cell determinant peptide inhibits allergen-specific TH1 and TH2 cell responses in Cry j 2-primed mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102:961-967.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
77.  Hirahara K, Tatsuta T, Takatori T, Ohtsuki M, Kirinaka H, Kawaguchi J, Serizawa N, Taniguchi Y, Saito S, Sakaguchi M. Preclinical evaluation of an immunotherapeutic peptide comprising 7 T-cell determinants of Cry j 1 and Cry j 2, the major Japanese cedar pollen allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:94-100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
78.  Sone T, Morikubo K, Miyahara M, Komiyama N, Shimizu K, Tsunoo H, Kino K. T cell epitopes in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen allergens: choice of major T cell epitopes in Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 toward design of the peptide-based immunotherapeutics for the management of Japanese cedar pollinosis. J Immunol. 1998;161:448-457.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
79.  Takagi H, Hirose S, Yasuda H, Takaiwa F. Biochemical safety evaluation of transgenic rice seeds expressing T cell epitopes of Japanese cedar pollen allergens. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:9901-9905.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
80.  Sone T, Dairiki K, Morikubo K, Shimizu K, Tsunoo H, Mori T, Kino K. Recognition of T cell epitopes unique to Cha o 2, the major allergen in Japanese cypress pollen, in allergic patients cross-reactive to Japanese cedar and Japanese cypress pollen. Allergol Int. 2009;58:237-245.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Immonen A, Farci S, Taivainen A, Partanen J, Pouvelle-Moratille S, Närvänen A, Kinnunen T, Saarelainen S, Rytkönen-Nissinen M, Maillere B. T cell epitope-containing peptides of the major dog allergen Can f 1 as candidates for allergen immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2005;175:3614-3620.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
82.  Masuyama K, Chikamatsu K, Ikagawa S, Matsuoka T, Takahashi G, Yamamoto T, Endo S. Analysis of helper T cell responses to Cry j 1-derived peptides in patients with nasal allergy: candidate for peptide-based immunotherapy of Japanese cedar pollinosis. Allergol Int. 2009;58:63-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Gafvelin G, Parmley S, Neimert-Andersson T, Blank U, Eriksson TL, van Hage M, Punnonen J. Hypoallergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy by directed molecular evolution of mite group 2 allergens. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3778-3787.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
84.  Wakasa Y, Takagi H, Hirose S, Yang L, Saeki M, Nishimura T, Kaminuma O, Hiroi T, Takaiwa F. Oral immunotherapy with transgenic rice seed containing destructed Japanese cedar pollen allergens, Cry j 1 and Cry j 2, against Japanese cedar pollinosis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11:66-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Thomas WR, Smith WA, Hales BJ, Mills KL, O’Brien RM. Characterization and immunobiology of house dust mite allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002;129:1-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
86.  Platt-Mills TA, Sporik RB, Chapman MD, Heymann PW. The role of indoor allergens in asthma. Allergy. 1995;50:5-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
87.  Platts-Mills TA, Vervloet D, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, Chapman MD. Indoor allergens and asthma: report of the Third International Workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100:S2-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
88.  Kawamoto S, Aki T, Yamashita M, Tategaki A, Fujimura T, Tsuboi S, Katsutani T, Suzuki O, Shigeta S, Murooka Y. Toward elucidating the full spectrum of mite allergens--state of the art. J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;94:285-298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
89.  Suzuki K, Kaminuma O, Yang L, Motoi Y, Takai T, Ichikawa S, Okumura K, Ogawa H, Mori A, Takaiwa F. Development of transgenic rice expressing mite antigen for a new concept of immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;149 Suppl 1:21-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Suzuki K, Kaminuma O, Yang L, Takai T, Mori A, Umezu-Goto M, Ohtomo T, Ohmachi Y, Noda Y, Hirose S. Prevention of allergic asthma by vaccination with transgenic rice seed expressing mite allergen: induction of allergen-specific oral tolerance without bystander suppression. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011;9:982-990.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Saeki M, Nishimura T, Kaminuma O, Suzuki K, Takai T, Mori A, Takada K, Takaiwa F, Hiroi T. Inhibition of allergen-induced airway inflammation by low-dose oral immunotherapy with transgenic rice seeds independently of immunoglobulin e synthesis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;158 Suppl 1:66-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Johannessen BR, Skov LK, Kastrup JS, Kristensen O, Bolwig C, Larsen JN, Spangfort M, Lund K, Gajhede M. Structure of the house dust mite allergen Der f 2: implications for function and molecular basis of IgE cross-reactivity. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:1208-1212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
93.  Nishiyama C, Fukada M, Usui Y, Iwamoto N, Yuuki T, Okumura Y, Okudaira H. Analysis of the IgE-epitope of Der f 2, a major mite allergen, by in vitro mutagenesis. Mol Immunol. 1995;32:1021-1029.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
94.  Inoue R, Matsuoka T, Kondo N, Nishimura Y, Matsushita S. Identification of Dermatophagoides farinae-2-derived peptides and class II HLA molecules recognized by T cells from atopic individuals. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1997;114:354-360.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
95.  O’Brien RM, Thomas WR, Nicholson I, Lamb JR, Tait BD. An immunogenetic analysis of the T-cell recognition of the major house dust mite allergen Der p 2: identification of high- and low-responder HLA-DQ alleles and localization of T-cell epitopes. Immunology. 1995;86:176-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
96.  Takai T, Yokota T, Yasue M, Nishiyama C, Yuuki T, Mori A, Okudaira H, Okumura Y. Engineering of the major house dust mite allergen Der f 2 for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15:754-758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
97.  Joost van Neerven R, van t’Hof W, Ringrose JH, Jansen HM, Aalberse RC, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML. T cell epitopes of house dust mite major allergen Der p II. J Immunol. 1993;151:2326-2335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
98.  Yang L, Hirose S, Suzuki K, Hiroi T, Takaiwa F. Expression of hypoallergenic Der f 2 derivatives with altered intramolecular disulphide bonds induces the formation of novel ER-derived protein bodies in transgenic rice seeds. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:2947-2959.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Domon E, Takagi H, Hirose S, Sugita K, Kasahara S, Ebinuma H, Takaiwa F. 26-Week oral safety study in macaques for transgenic rice containing major human T-cell epitope peptides from Japanese cedar pollen allergens. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57:5633-5638.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]