Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Urol. Sep 12, 2020; 9(1): 9-15
Published online Sep 12, 2020. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v9.i1.9
Published online Sep 12, 2020. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v9.i1.9
Table 1 Comparison of compliance between original and modified patient reported outcome measure
Original – complied | Original – not complied | |
Modified – complied | 15 | 32 |
Modified – not complied | 1 | 6 |
Table 2 Relationship between sexual function and quality of life
Quality of life – happy | Quality of life – unhappy | |
Sexual function – happy | 30 | 0 |
Sexual function – unhappy | 11 | 3 |
Positive predictive value = 100% | ||
Negative predictive value = 78% |
Table 3 Relationship between urinary flow and quality of life
Quality of life – happy | Quality of life – unhappy | |
Urinary flow – happy | 48 | 1 |
Urinary flow – unhappy | 7 | 4 |
Positive predictive value = 97% | ||
Negative predictive value = 63% |
Table 4 Relationship between urinary flow and sexual function
Sexual function – happy | Sexual function – unhappy | |
Urinary flow – happy | 29 | 10 |
Urinary flow – unhappy | 1 | 4 |
Positive predictive value = 59% | ||
Negative predictive value = 9% |
- Citation: Ong M, Duncan C, McGrail M, Desai DJ. Evaluation of patient reported outcome measures post urethroplasty: Piloting a “Trifecta” approach. World J Clin Urol 2020; 9(1): 9-15
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v9/i1/9.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v9.i1.9