Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 12, 2019; 8(1): 1-8
Published online Mar 12, 2019. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v8.i1.1
Published online Mar 12, 2019. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v8.i1.1
Operating Surgeon | No. TURP performed | Mean PRS (g/min) | % Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade II | % Successful outcome at 3 mo |
Consultant A | 21 | 0.59 | 14 | 95 |
Consultant C | 9 | 0.40 | 11 | 100 |
Consultant D | 20 | 0.23 | 10 | 85 |
Consultant E | 38 | 0.43 | 16 | 82 |
Trainee 1 | 10 | 0.31 | 0 | 80 |
Trainee 2 | 27 | 0.36 | 0 | 93 |
Surgeon | No. of Significant complications/total TURPs | Bleeding | Post-operative sepsis |
Consultant A | 3/21 | 2 | 1 |
Consultant C | 1/9 | 0 | 1 |
Consultant D | 2/20 | 1 | 1 |
Consultant E | 6/38 | 3 | 3 |
Trainee 1 | 0/10 | - | - |
Trainee 2 | 0/27 | - | - |
Mean PRS (g/min) in first half of cases | Mean PRS (g/min) in second half of cases | |
Trainee 1 | 0.29 | 0.33 |
Trainee 2 | 0.26 | 0.48 |
- Citation: Donati-Bourne J, Nour S, Angova E, Delves G. Prostate resection speed: A key factor for training and broad outcomes? World J Clin Urol 2019; 8(1): 1-8
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v8/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v8.i1.1