Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2016; 5(1): 60-65
Published online Mar 24, 2016. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
Table 1 Patient characteristics
RP (n = 54)TP (n = 37)P
Age at time of surgery, mean (SD)56.5 (13)57.2 (11.6)0.801
BMI (SD)31.1 (5.8)32.1 (7.0)0.511
Race
Asian1 (1.9%)00.452
Black3 (5.6%)3 (8.1%)
Hispanic7 (13.0%)2 (5.4%)
Other 01 (2.7%)
White43 (79.6%)31 (83.8%)
Sex
Female17 (31.5%)17 (46.0%)0.163
Male37 (68.5%)20 (54.1%)
Preoperative creatinine, mean (SD)0.95 (0.21) n = 530.90 (0.17) n = 360.271
Table 2 Tumor characteristics
RP (n = 54)TP (n = 37)P
Renal location
Left20 (37.0%)22 (59.5%)0.043
Right34 (63.0%)15 (40.5%)
Pathologic tumor size (cm), mean (SD)3.1 (1.6) n = 532.9 (1.2) n = 360.541
Surgical margin
Negative50 (98.0%)32 (91.4%)0.302
Positive1 (2.0%)3 (8.6%)
RENAL score, mean (SD)6.5 (1.9)6.6 (1.8)0.711
Radius
142 (77.8%)33 (89.2%)0.412
210 (18.5%)4 (10.8%)
32 (3.7%) 0
Exophytic
129 (53.7%)15 (40.5%)0.412
220 (37.0%)19 (51.4%)
35 (9.3%)3 (8.1%)
Nearness
123 (42.6%)15 (40.5%)0.943
28 (14.8%)5 (13.5%)
323 (42.6%)17 (46.0%)
Location relative to polar line
130 (55.6%)19 (51.4%)0.513
212 (22.2%)6 (16.2%)
312 (22.2%)12 (32.4%)
Table 3 Operative factors
RP (n = 54)TP (n = 37)P
Total operative time (SD)180.7 (62.3)227.8 (59.0)< 0.0011
Robot console time, mean (SD)126.9 (40.0)164.3 (51.3)< 0.0011
WIT, median (IQR)428.0 (20-31)27.0 (21-31)0.963
n = 23n = 28
Conversion
No52 (96.3%)32 (86.5%)0.122
Yes2 (3.7%)5 (13.5%)
EBL, median (IQR)32.5 (20-100)150.0 (50-250)< 0.0013
Table 4 Renal function
RP (n = 54)TP (n = 37)P
Preoperative creatinine, mean (SD)0.95 (0.21)0.90 (0.17)0.271
n = 53n = 36
Postop creatinine, mean (SD)1.0 (0.21)1.0 (0.18)0.671
n = 46n = 28