Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2015; 4(1): 27-37
Published online Mar 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.27
Published online Mar 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.27
Table 1 Health effects of non-adherence[2]
Increased morbidity |
Treatment failures |
Exacerbation of disease |
More frequent physician visits |
Increased hospitalizations |
Decreased HRQoL |
Decreased survival |
Death |
Economic impact: lost wages, sick time |
Table 2 Interventions categories[2]
More instruction of patients |
Counseling about target disease, compliance with therapy, side-effects |
Automated telephone, computer-assisted patient monitoring and counseling |
Manual telephone |
Family interventions |
Increasing convenience of care |
Simplified dosing |
Different formulations |
Self-monitoring strategies |
Reminders |
Dose-dispensing units/charts |
Appointments and refill reminders |
Reinforcement or rewards for improved adherence in reduced frequency of visits |
Crisis intervention |
Direct observation |
Lay health mentoring |
Comprehensive pharmaceutical care |
Psychological therapy |
Table 3 Factors associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy
Age of patients: Younger (specially adolescent) and older patients (> 55 yr) |
Gender: Male (or female), not having a female partner |
Socioeconomics and cultural: Poor health coverage, poor health access, costs of treatment, difficulty in transportation, poor social support, unmarried, no family, non caucasian, inmigrant, lack of general education and specific education about renal transplantation, lower income, lower socioeconomic class, poor socioeconomic background, greater parental distress and lower family cohesion in family functioning |
Medication: Complex medical regimens, higher number of drugs, longer post-transplant, toxicity and side effects, poor tolerance of medication, higher number of doctors, poor provider-patient rapport, patient implicitly seen as defaulter |
Psychological: Psychological (dependency, high levels of anxiety and hostility; in children, poorer behavioral functioning and greater distress) and psychiatric illness (depression), low self-efficacy with med intake, perceptions of immunosuppressive therapy as not needed to keep the kidney, significant positive relationship between pre-tx non-adherence and post-tx non-adherence (past behaviour predicts future behaviour), evolution of disease is a matter of chance, forgetfulness, rebelliousness, poor perception of health, poor satisfaction, low health-related quality of life, addictions, lack of coping strategies and avoidance behavior |
Patient morbidity: Comorbidity, receiving a transplant from a live donor, retransplant, non-insulin-dependent diabetes |
Other: No research, opportunities for improving adherence through optimizing the health care system or training the health care work remain hidden |
- Citation: Ortega F, Díaz-Corte C, Valdés C. Adherence to immunosuppressor medication in renal transplanted patients. World J Clin Urol 2015; 4(1): 27-37
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v4/i1/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.27