Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Urol. Jul 24, 2014; 3(2): 54-65
Published online Jul 24, 2014. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v3.i2.54
Table 1 Indications and relative contraindications for each surgical approach
IndicationsRelative contraindications
OS-A
Adrenocortical carcinoma with radiographic evidence of extra-adrenal extension (stage III-IV)Amenable to minimally-invasive approach
Extension of adrenal vein tumor thrombus into IVC
Size larger than 10-12 cmSize < 10 cm
Concomitant open procedure
Paraganglioma
Multiple prior abdominal surgeries
MI-A
Non-functioning and functioning adrenal tumors, including pheochromocytomaLocally-advanced tumors (stage III-IV)
Isolated adrenal metastasesKnown, relatively large adrenocortical carcinoma (complete resection is essential for cure)
Size < 10 cmSize larger than 10-12 cm
Adrenocortical carcinoma, consider only if stage I-II and < 10 cmMultiple prior abdominal surgeries (or discussion of possibility of conversion)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2
LESS-A
For patients who consider cosmesis to be of great importanceSurgeon inexperience with LESS-A
Size < 4-5 cmSize > 5 cm
Non-functioning and functioning adrenal tumors, including pheochromocytomaAdrenocortical carcinoma
Isolated adrenal metastasesMultiple prior abdominal surgeries
BMI < 30 kg/m2
Table 2 Outcomes from select studies comparing minimally-invasive adrenalectomy to open surgical adrenalectomy
Ref.NMean tumor size (cm)ACC or MET (%)1OT (min)EBL (mL)LOS (d)Conversion (%)Complications (%)
Assalia et al[116]581 MI-A2.80.91841542.9-10.9
753 OS-A4.15.81623097.2-35.8
Lee et al[59]358 MI-A-13.6174-4.1-3.6
311 OS-A-44.5234-9.4-17.4
Eichhorn-Wharry et al[119]1980 MI-A-4.1146-2.8-1.8
592 OS-A-18.4186-6.7-7.6
Lombardi et al[120]30 MI-A7.7100135-5.303.4
126 OS-A9100129-9.3-5.6
Mir et al[121]18 MI-A710029815004245.0
26 OS-A1310027311006-20.0
Donatini et al[79]13 MI-A5.5100--708.0
21 OS-A6.8100--9-14.0
Bittner et al[122]356 MI-A3.25.9159-2.56.211.0
46 OS-A8.528.2197-9.1-50.0
Table 3 Summary of the most recent meta-analyses comparing laparoscopic techniques for adrenalectomy
Ref.RAL-A vs MI-A
TL-A vs RL-A
LESS-A vs MI-A
Brandao et al[30]Nigri et al[27]Wang et al[41]
n6001205443
Mean tumor size (cm)3.86, 3.784.0, 3.32.7, 3.43
(Odds ratio, CI)NA0.48 (-0.21-1.18)- 0.69 (-1.11--0.26)
P-valueNS0.170.002
Mean operating time (min)175, 148132, 136113.1, 92.7
(Estimate, CI)5.88 (-6.02-17.79)-11.07 (-41.38-19.24)14.97 (4.69-25.24)
P-value0.330.470.004
Mean EBL (mL)44, 69115, 8574.2, 79.7
(Estimate, CI)-18.21 (-29.11--7.32)29.7 (-10.32-69.72)-1.4 (-9.72-6.91)
P-value< 0.00010.150.74
Mean LOS3.78, 3.176.4, 5.53.82, 4.38
(Estimate, CI)-0.43 (-0.56--0.30)0.66 (-0.11-1.43)-0.5(-1.02-0.02)
P-value< 0.00010.090.06
Mean % conversion rate4.4, 7.17.23, 7.747.8, 1.2
(Odds ratio, CI)0.82 (0.39-1.75)NA4.66 (0.88-24.64)
P-value0.61NA0.07
Mean % complication rate3.6, 6.88, 614.2, 10.1
(Odds ratio, CI)-0.04 (-0.07--0.00)0.923 (0.58-1.46)1.83 (0.88-3.81)
P-value0.050.730.1
Table 4 Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy vs minimally-invasive adrenalectomy: Overview of the outcomes from available comparative studies (adapted from Rane et al[8] and Wang et al[41])
Ref.NMean tumor size (cm)ACC or MET (%)1OT (min)EBL (mL)LOS (d)Conversion (%)Complications (%)
Jeong et al[36]9 TLESS-A2.901691783.211 (1 to MI-A)11
17 MI-A4.301452053.55.8 (1 to OS-A)5.8
Walz et al[40]47 RLESS-A2.32.156< 102.48.5 (to TLESS-A)8.5
47 TLESS-A2.6040< 103.106.4
Ishida et al[39]10 TLESS-A2.80125125.200
10 MI-A4.50120156.900
Shi et al[38]19 RLESS-A2.1055306011
38 MI-A2.404218607.9
Kwak et al[123]10 TLESS-A3.30127-4.5010
12 MI-A38113-4.10-
Vidal et al[124]20 TLESS-A3095Min3.000
20 TL-A3080Min2.500
Wang et al[125]13 TLESS-A27.7149795.2031
26 TL-A2.40113936.3012
Tunca et al[126]22 TLESS-A3.3064482.45-0
74 TL-A4.74.168383-0
Lin et al[127]21 RLESS-A-0145Min200
28 MI-A-09550403.6