Review Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Urol. Mar 24, 2015; 4(1): 38-47
Published online Mar 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i1.38
Genetics and male infertility
Gulay Gulec Ceylan, Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, Yildirim Beyazit University, 06520 Ankara, Turkey
Cavit Ceylan, Department of Urology, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Training Hospital, 06520Ankara, Turkey
Author contributions: Ceylan GG and Ceylan C contributed equally to this work.
Conflict-of-interest: There is no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Gulay Gulec Ceylan, MD, Department of Medical Genetics, Medical School, Yildirim Beyazit University, Bilkent, 06520 Ankara, Turkey. gulayceylan23@gmail.com
Telephone: +90-312-2912525 Fax: +90-312-2912728
Received: April 8, 2014
Peer-review started: April 8, 2014
First decision: June 6, 2014
Revised: December 21, 2014
Accepted: January 9, 2015
Article in press: January 12, 2015
Published online: March 24, 2015
Processing time: 351 Days and 6.1 Hours

Abstract

The goal of this review is to explain the requirement for understanding the genetic structure of infertility arising from male factor and to discuss the essentials of these genetic elements (2). The majority of the population is affected by this disorder caused by male factor infertility (1); but the etiologies are still unknown. After the primary genetic structure in infertile phenotypes is searched, an evaluation can be made. Thus the reasons causing infertility can be discovered and patients can benefit from effective therapies (1). Publications about male infertility within the recent 10 years in the Pubmed database were discussed (1). There are some approachments for describing the function of specific genes, but no adequate study is present to be useful for diagnosing and treating male infertility (1). Male fertility and fertility in offspring of males are considerably affected by the exact transition of epigenetic information (1). When the genetic factors playing a role in male infertility were analysed, significant steps will be taken for treating patients and determining the reasons of idiopathic infertility (1). Developments in technology associated with the impact of genetics may enable to specify the etiology of male infertility by determining specific infertile phenotype marks (1).

Key Words: Male infertility, Chromosomal abnormality, Y chromosome microdeletion, Genetics, Azoospermia factor

Core tip: In the case of being unable to be pregnant after regular unprotected intercourse for one year (6), it is defined as infertility, affecting about 10%-15% of all the couples. Male factor is responsible for about half of cases (6). Genes playing a role in testicular differentiation and full spermatogenesis are found in human Y chromosome (6). The main goal of this study is to mention the various chromosomal abnormalities and deletions of Y chromosome, which cause infertility; for this reason (14) it is important to know the genetic mechanisms that are responsible from the infertility especially for the clinicians.



GENETICS AND MALE INFERTILITY

Infertility is mentioned when a female is unable to be pregnant after 1 year of unprotected regular intercourse, and this problem is encountered in 10%-15% of couples[1] (4). Male infertility is seen in about 30%-55% of cases of infertility[2,3] (4). If there is no pregnancy before, it is called as primary infertility; it results in live birth or not, if there is at least one pregnancy before, it is named as secondary infertility[1]. Infertility is encountered in 10%-15% of couples in the reproductive age as a significant health problem[2,3] (16). Approximately one third of infertility cases arise from pathologies due to the male, one third due to female, and one third due to both partners. Therefore the male factor is responsible for at least 50% of infertile couples[4]. Medical treatment for infertility is requested by only 1 in 13 men of reproductive age[4] (4). According to data created using standard diagnostic protocols of the World Health Organization (WHO), the female factor has been found in 37% of infertile partners, the male factor in 8%, both factors together in 35% and the cause is unknown in 5%[5].

Male infertility

Infertility (infertility with male factor) occurs in approximately 50% of infertile couples due to causes associated with male partner being unable to product spermatozoa in adequate number to enable fertility[6]. In 40% of infertile population, qualitative and quantitative sperm production abnormalities are detected. In 60%-70% of cases, the source of reduced testicular sperm function is unclear[3]. The sources of male infertility can be classified as follows: (1) Idiopathic; (2) Mechanic urogenital obstruction (vas deferens, ductal system, etc.); (3) Physical trauma; (4) Infection; (5) Life style (obesity, psychological problems, age, exercise, drugs, smoking)[7]; (6) Varicocele; (7) Endocrine disorders[3,8]; (8) Malignity[9]; (9) Cryptorchidism[10-12]; and (10) Genetic causes.

Spermatogenesis changes may occur due to many reasons such as systemic diseases, cryptorchidism, endocrinological diseases, obstruction in the seminal tract, and infections. Human spermatogenesis disorders frequently (50%) occur idiopathically and because of genetic causes. Mutations in genes under hypothalamic/pituitary control of spermatogenesis are described and these mutations are responsible for some types of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism[10-12].

Azoospermia is observed in 1% of all men, 10%-15% of infertile men[4,13]. Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia or serious oligospermia is a private group in male infertility. Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermic men (INOA) is one of the primary causes of unperceived infertility; these are eugonadal and have primary infertility, low testicular volume, and high FSH levels; all of these are suggestive of testicular lesion to be likely congenital[14]. If azoospermia is due to severe intrinsic testicular defect, a prominent increase is seen at serum FSH level while serum FSH level is lower than normalcy in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Genetic reasons in male infertility

Genetic disorders, such as chromosomal anomalies and monogenic diseases, have been established to be responsible from 10%-15% of infertility conditions[15]. A great number of genetic reasons causing male infertility are defined in humans[16]. Genetic alterations in infertile men usually lead to reduced spermatogenesis, genital structural abnormalities, decreased testicular size, hypogonadism and sperm dysfunction[17].

Genetic anomalies can be categorized in four main groups: (1) Y chromosome microdeletions; (2) Chromosomal abnormalities; (3) Gene mutations and polymorphisms; and (4) Epigenetic disorders[18].

Y chromosome and fertility: Human Y chromosome includes the genes which are necessary for spermatogenesis and development of gonadal differentiation in favor of testis[19-21]. Although human Y chromosome incorporates nucleotides over 60 billion, it is the chromosome with the lowest number of gene in proportion to other chromosomes. Y chromosome plays a role as genetic marker of male characteristic properties and demonstrates many interesting biologic features[22]. While the proximal site of the short arm (Yp) and the long arm (Yq) of Y chromosome is euchromatic site, the distal site of Y chromosome is heterochromatin site and the length of this site is variable[23]. Male specific site forming 85% of Y chromosome carries MSY (male specific site of Y), 3 euchromatic (x-transposed, x degenerated, ampliconic), and a heterochromatic mosaic chain. To date, 156 transcription units, 78 protein-coding genes, and 27 different proteins associated with Y chromosome have been defined[22]. There are pseudoautosomal border site, PABY1 and PABY2 pseudoautosomal sites on Yp and Yq arms, respectively, and homologues on X chromosome. Sites other than these sites do not participate to meiotic recombination. Accordingly, this situation leaves 95% of Y chromosome as non-recombinant[22,24].

Human Y chromosome, so as its majority consists of repetition elements, includes a limited number of functional genes; additionally some alphoid repetitions incorporate major human short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) and a few satellite sequence family. Alphoid sequences are conglomerated near the Y chromosome centromere and can be distinguished from other chromosomes. The majority of Alu repetitions of Y chromosome show quite less similarity with genomic Alu sequence. Alu sequence is the most found repetition element in human genome[22]. As non-coding repetitive DNA is more, deletions are frequently seen in Y chromosome[7]. Some different spermatogenic differences are caused by Y chromosome microdeletions. These include hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest, Sertoli cell only syndrome (SCOS)[23,25,26]. Infertility may also occur with autosomal genes controlling mutations or paracrine systems in protooncogenes in the infertility signal mechanism as well as Y-linked sequences[22].

Y chromosome and testis determining factor: Numerous genes have been examined during researching factor or factors determining testis development. H-Y antigen (Histocompatibility Antigen) and ZFY (Zinc Finger Protein, Y-linked) gene are among these. Today, however, these factors are accepted not to have a role in determinating testis. The gene which is required for differentiation of bipotential gonad in favor of testis is testis determining factor (TDF) This gene is not adequate, although it is necessary for differentiation. Proteins produced by 1.1 kb-length transcripts formed by single exon of SRY defined in Yp11.3 band and having no intron have a length of 204 amino acids and include homologue sequences related to HMG-BOX. HMG (high mobility group)-BOX is a DNA-binding motif that is composed of 79-amino acids which is strongly protected. It enables acceleration or deceleration of transcription in gene and suppression or activation of the target gene by helping DNA bending. SRY gene can suppress the only active copy of SRVX in normal 46 XY men and 47 XXY men with Klinefelter syndrome; thus freed autosomal locus can carry out testis formation. SRVX is active in 46 XX females and enables differentiation of bipotential gonad in favor of ovary by suppressing autosomal genes. If SRVX is in case of two active copies, SRY will be unable to adequately decrease functions of SRVX and testis formation will be prevented. This model explains that X, Y, and autosomal genes work together in gonadal differentiation[5,19-21].

Y chromosome and azoospermia factor: Many genes on the autosomal and Y chromosome control germ cell development. Gene and gene families involving in spermatogenesis are available in the long arm of Y chromosome and have a crucial importance in germ cell development and differentiation[27,28]. In infertile men, microdeletions in the long arm of Y chromosome (Yq) can be morbific cause[3]. Y chromosome is separated into 7 deletion periods. Each of these spaces is also separated into subperiods. The hypothesis that one or one group gene on Y chromosome exists, having a place in human spermatogenesis, has been reported by Tiepolo et al[27] for the first time in 1976. Genes which are crucial in spermatogenesis are localized on 11.23 band in the long arm of Y chromosome. This band is at the 5th and 6th deletion interval. This site is known as azoospermic factor sites (AZF). While AZFa is on the proximal Yq11, AZFb and AZFc are on the distal Yq11. These sites do not conflict with each other. RNA-binding proteins are encoded by these AZF genes. They take part in gene expression, RNA metabolism, packaging, transport to cytoplasm, and splicing regulation[27]. In 1992, Vollrath et al[29] arranged a deletion map with 43 intervals of Y chromosome; these sites also contain the sites extending along Y chromosome and called “sequence tagged sites” (STS)[3,20,26,28-30]. In male infertility and spermatogenic disorder after Klinefelter syndrome, Y chromosome microdeletions are the second closest reason[21,31,32]. Therefore, genetic screening of AZF deletions must be absolutely performed in studies of male infertility. With discovery of human Y chromosome sequence, molecular mechanism of Y chromosome microdeletions has been understood to carry out as a result of homologue recombination between similar pieces in palindromic sequences. This also results in deletions or rearrangements of Y chromosome[21,33]. Some patients with idiopathic male infertility may be caused by microdeletions on the long arm of Y chromosome (11). Y chromosome microdeletions usually are not found in karyotype and responsible for loss of genes forming AZF factor[14,33]. Furthermore, microdeletions in these AZF sites are related with different testicular histology exchanging from Sertoli cell only syndrome to hypospermatogenesis as well as azoospermia[3].

Each AZF site deletion causes different phenotypic effects[8]. In the study performed by Sargent et al[34], AZFa site in 4 infertile men have been examined, and deletion has been detected in one only[34]. Deletions in the AZFb site have been found to be related to azoospermia, oligospermia, and normospermia. Deletions of the AZFc site have been shown to be associated with azoospermia and serious oligospermia[35]. In many cases, deletions in the AZF site have been demonstrated to lead to loss of spermatogenesis. AZFc is the site where the most deletion is found among three AZF sites; AZFb site follows that[36].

Y chromosome microdeletion has been defined in 9% of azoospermic infertile men and 11.6% of severe oligospermic men. In other words, although Y chromosome microdeletions are the closest molecular hereditary reason in infertile men, there is no deletion in 85% of azoospermic men and 90% of oligospermic men because other Y chromosome-dependent factors, for example some re-arrangements such as changes in repetition sequences in gene families with multicopy, polymorphism or mutations in Y chromosome-specific genes, and duplication, contribute to infertile phenotype[37]. That triggering AZF site deletions may be a Y chromosome haplotype. For this reason, some individuals may prone to more novo deletion. Advanced paternal age may also trigger loss of Y sequences[38].

Y chromosome deletion mechanism: In clinical and molecular studies performed since 1994, the role of Y chromosome genes and Y chromosome microdeletions in male infertility have been examined[37]. Analysis of microdeletions in patients tries to reveal the roles of gene or gene families in spermatogenesis regulation[22]. Frequently seeing de novo Y deletions is attributed to impetuous decrement of genetic material. Y chromosome’s structural difference may be associated with elements repeated alongside chromosome to be more and these repetitions to be seen in the site (homologue site between X and Y chromosomes) where recombination is done. Furthermore, specific Y chromosome sequences increasing AZF deletion sites are available, and consequently some individuals are able to be predisposed for de novo deletions more than the others. High fatherly age is also considered to increase Y chromosome gene sequence loss[39].

Y chromosome molecular screening indications: Y chromosome microdeletion screening helps to understand the reason for azoospermia or oligospermia in patients and to determine prognosis. Which patients need for Y chromosome molecular screening can be determined as follows: according to world literature, deletions are clinically seen in those who are azoospermic or have a spermiogram counts of 1 × 106 /mL. Infrequently, deletion can be seen in infertile patients who have a sperm concentration of 1-5 × 106 /mL (3). Although microdeletion is more frequent in patients selected by testicular histology, for example, in patients with Sertoli cell only syndrome (SCOS), it is unable to give certain selection criteria about which patients are a nominee for molecular analysis[23,40]. Deletion screening must be suggested for severe oligospermic or azoospermic patients being a candidate for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or TESE/ICSI because TESE should not be performed in patients who have (3) complete deletion in the AZFa site or in cases with complete deletion in the AZFb site or AZFb+c site. Additionally, deletions in the AZFc site can pass male offspring if an assisted reproductive method is used[29,41]. Therefore, detection of deletion has a prognostic importance and is crucial in therapeutic approach[32,42]. To date, it has been reported that only 17 male and 18 female ICSI babies were borned from fathers with Yq microdeletion; while these babies are phenotypically normal, one male baby only has been diagnosed with pulmonary atresia and left ventricular hypoplasia. Generally, molecular diagnosis indication for Y chromosome microdeletion is a crucial clinical decision varying from case to case, and it is quite important that clinicians approve this diagnosis for which patients[31]. Diagnostic evaluations of deletions are carried out by polymerase chain reaction of selected sites on Y chromosome. MSY-specific sequence tagged sites (STS) primers implify nameless genes, in other words common genes, in chromosome or genes[43]. That being important in diagnosis of Y chromosome microdeletion is which STS primers in Y chromosome will be used. The sites where STS primers used are found should not be polymorphic; they should be the sites where deletions are specifically known in men influenced by oligo/azoospermia with respect to microdeletion clinically certain[31].

Deletions found in the Y chromosome site where deletion events are less frequently seen have been reported to result in severe infertility as in AZFa. Increasing the number of STS in sites where deletions are mostly found, for example as in AZFc, will inform about the dimensions of deletion. Based on these principles, well screening of the important sites of Y chromosome can be achieved by 20-30 STS. In the study performed by Pryor et al[44] (1997), only one STS deletion found in oligozoospermic patients has been revealed to represent a polymorphism not leading to infertility of patient. However, it is suggested in this study that these STSs should not be excluded from STS panel while evaluating Y chromosome in an infertile patient as these deletions are also found in infertile patients[44].

Other Y chromosome genes: Another gene that takes part in spermatogenesis is CDY, the chromodomain protein Y-linked gene. It is located on Yq. It is explicited in the testis. It can be involved in enabling the exchange of histones in spermatogenesis. It also helps the proteins which adjust transcription easier accession to the postmeiotic sperm DNA. This is occurred by the acetylation of histones[34]. During evolution, functional separation from CDY gene’s autosomal homologue and migration to the Y chromosome are considered (CDYL, located on chromosome 6) (1). Thus the gene becomes interesting to study[45] (1). The TSPY gene is located on the short arm of the Y chromosome; it also has transcripts on the long arm of the chromosome[46]. Protein of the gene expressed in the testis has been identified in spermatogonia[47] (1). The TSPY gene signals spermatogonia in order to enter meiosis, thus it may regulate the timing of spermatogenesis[48] (1). In a study about copy number diversity of the TSPY gene, it was reported that there were more copies in infertile patients[49] (1). This stands for further investigation of TSPY to specify its position in infertility (1).

Chromosomes in fertility and chromosomal abnormalities

Condensed chromosomes involve in gamete formation, also in premeiotic divisions, meiosis, fertilization, and all consecutive mitotic divisions. So, chromosomal errors can also be a ground of investigation to identify the role of genetics in male factor infertility[50]. Chromosomal abnormalities are accountable from nearly 5% of male infertility. The prevalence rises to 15% azoospermic cases[51]. Chromosomal abnormalities found in infertile men are classified as numerical abnormalities (gonosomal aneuploidy) and structural abnormalities[7,10]. While sex chromosomal abnormalities are more frequently encountered in azoospermic patients, autosomal abnormalities are mostly seen in oligospermic patients. The frequency of reciprocal translocation, Robertsonian translocation and inversion is increased in infertile men compared to newborn population[52].

Numerical chromosome abnormalities: The most common reason of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men is aneuploidy, or alterations in chromosome number[50]. The rate of aneuploidy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia is exclusively high[53] (1), especially in their sexuality chromosomes. Despite different quantity of genetic material from normal sperms in aneuploid sperm, these sperms can prosperously fertilize the oocyte (1). Ultimately, their offspring gain an incorrect chromosome number[54] (1). Classical trisomies (trisomy 21) and sex chromosome trisomies (XXY or XYY) are within numeral abnormalities that can be mosaic or non-mosaic. Another kind of numeric abnormalities is aneuploidy seen in sperm[7,10]. The most seen numerical chromosome abnormalities are emphasized below.

Klinefelter syndrome: Klinefelter syndrome is the most prevalent chromosomal abnormality induced by aneuploidy. It is present in 5% of men with severe oligozoospermia and in 10% of azoospermia[55]. The syndrome usually gives rise to the arrest of spermatogenesis at the primary spermatocyte stage, but rarely later stages of sperm growth are detected[3]. Klinefelter syndrome has two types (1): nonmosaic, 47, XXY; and mosaic, 47, XXY/46, XY. Although formerly believed to be infertile, it has been predicted that 25% of nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome cases have sperm in their ejaculate[2]. Patients with Klinefelter syndrome may become pregnant using ICSI, but there is a risk for producing offspring with chromosomal abnormalities[10,11] (1). This syndrome is characterized by the presence of one or more X chromosome. Extra X chromosome can come paternally or maternally. In 67% of studies, both X chromosomes have been reported to come maternally. Maternal and paternal ages are high. Even if extra X chromosome originates either maternally or paternally, clinic of patients does not change[5]. Extra X chromosome occurs with nondisjunction in the paternal meiosis I by a possibility over 50%, in the maternal meiosis I or II by a possibility of 40%; the rest ensues postzygotically[8]. A male prototype with Klinefelter syndrome is usually characterized by a long height, narrow shoulder, wide hip, rare body hiring, gynecomastia, small penis, androgen failure, azoospermia, and decreased verbal intelligence. A little part of them is diagnosed before puberty[55]. Variably spermatogenic disorders are present in these patients, but men are generally sterile unless karyotype is not mosaic. Even in non-mosaic cases, germ cells which function and have 46 XY karyotype have been encountered; this is because patients are gonadal mosaic. Therefore, reproductive men with Klinefelter syndrome are predisposed to have an aneuploidic child[8]. Men with Klinefelter syndrome are under more risk in terms of breast cancer and osteoporosis. Therefore, diagnosing the syndrome is not important only for reproductive health, but also for long term general health of patient[56]. In treatment of patients with Klinefelter syndrome, androgen replacement must be done for cases where especially puberty is delayed or not seen and for patients whose testosterone levels are under normalcy according their ages[5].

47, XYY syndrome: It is seen by 0.1%-0.4% in newborns. They have no other phenotypic characteristic except their typical long height. They have aggressive and antisocial characteristic by 1%-2%. Even if spermatogenic evaluation varies between normalcy and azoospermia, they are generally fertile. The results varying from various maturation arrest forms to complete germinal aplasia are obtained from testicular biopsies of those who are infertile. Though LH and testosterone levels are normal in a bulk of patients, FSH level is detected as normal or high similar with germ cell injury[5]. Through Y chromosome non-disjunction in the paternal meiosis II, 47 XYY syndrome is considered to occur. This syndrome causes hormonal imbalance, affecting human chorionic gonadotropin function. Fertility may occur as a result of gonadal mosaicism. Marker chromosome carriers are under high infertility risk due to meiotic arrest and instability[7].

Mixed gonadal dysgenesis: Phenotypically, mixed gonadal dysgenetic patients can be male, female, or ambiguous genitalia. Sex is identified according to the appearance of sexual organs at birth. There is normal karyotype in approximately 33% of these patients. This situation is suggestive of that there are disorders also apart from sex chromosome aneuploidy. There is normal Leydig cell population if a unilateral testis is in scrotum; however, no germ cells are present in seminiferous tubules. If testis is intraabdominal, there is a tendency to malignancies belonging to male and female[16].

Structural chromosome abnormalities: Inversions (paracentric or pericentric), balanced translocations (Robertsonian/reciprocal, autosomal/gonosomal) and Y chromosome deletions are among structural abnormalities that cause male infertility[7,10].

Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations: Chromosomal translocations are also a type of aneuploidy[18]. Genetic material at the break points of genes can be lost because of translocations (1). Autosomal translocations are 4-10 times more frequent in infertile males when compared with normal males. In infertile males, the prevalence of Robertsonian translocations is only 0.8%, but in general population it is nearly 9 times lower than in the infertile males[45].

Robertsonian translocations are generally seen in 1.6% and 0.09% of oligozoospermic and azoospermic men, respectively[45]. Those who carry Robertsonian translocations can have a normal phenotype but they could be infertile due to an absence of gamete production (2) (1). Fluorescent in situ hybridization, with probes added for prevalent translocations, is proposed to detect the chromosomal composition of the sperm[57]. As patients with translocation between Y chromosome and autosomal chromosomes transmit azoospermia into their male children, they can also cause male gamete deformities or idiopathic sterility[58]. Reciprocal translocations can cause diminished fertility, spontaneous abortions, and birth defects according to the site of translocation. Inter-chromosome translocations can cause meiotic mistake and cell death. Severe spermatogenic arrest and azoospermia can be seen in men with reciprocal X-autosomal translocation[8]. Reciprocal Y-autosomal translocations cause abnormal spermatogenesis because of abnormal sex chromosome matching. The most common reciprocal translocation in infertile men is the translocation between 13q and 14q [t(13q14q)]. Meiotic studies were performed in infertile men carrying t(13q14q) and t(14q21q) and these studies showed that rearranged autosomes can lead to infertility during spermatogenesis in meiosis. Nucleolar organizer regions (NOR) are found on the short heterochromatic arms of acrocentric chromosomes. These regions are needed in RNA synthesis. Therefore, Robertsonian translocations which lost their NORs cause cell disturbance, germ cell death, and decrease in fertility[7]. Translocations seen in infertile men are mostly reciprocal and such translocations are seen mostly in oligospermic men (1.7%) more frequent than azoospermic men (0.6%)[59].

Autosomal inversions: The site of polymorphic chromosomal alternatives in infertile men should be specified. The relationship between a great number of normal variant and undermined spermatogenesis is not certain yet. The incidence of polymorphic chromosomal variants in infertile men spread over a quite wide area (3.46%-35.7%). The most frequently occurring heterochromatic version is the pericentric inversion of chromosome with number 9 by a frequency of 1%-1.65% in normal population and 1.17%-5% in infertile men [inv(9)(p11q13)][59]. These inversions are related to azoospermia and severe oligoastenoteratospermia. Accordingly, translocations and inversions transmit into child at a higher rate than normalcy as hereditary in pregnancies via ICSI or IVF[16]. Y chromosome heterochromatin region corresponds to the distal Yq12. This region is genetically inactive and its length varies in normal population[60]. Raised length of the heterochromatin region of the long arm of Y chromosome has been declared by 7.14% and 1.4% in infertile men in normal population, respectively. Polymorphisms of Y chromosome are considered to be one of the reasons affecting spermatogenesis[61,62].

46, XX male syndrome: It is encountered in 20000 live births. Generally, phenotypic appearance, sexual and psychosocial identities are in favor of male; however, semen analyses indicate azoospermia. Even if most cases are sporadic, autosomal recessive inheritance has been also reported. In 10% cases, phenotypically ambiguous genital and hypospadias can be encountered. In 33% of cases, gynecomastia and tubular hyalinization in testis biopsy, tubular fibrosis and pseudoadenomatous conglomeration in Leydig cells are detected. While FSH is found high as secondary to spermatogenesis disorder, testosterone level is low or at the bottom level of normalcy. Despite XX genotype as a result of translocation of SRY gene between Xp and Yp tips during paternal meiosis, primitive gonad differentiates in favor of testis. Translocation of the distal Yp tip carrying SRY gene to any autosome can also cause a similar phenotype. Another alternative is, with a mutation in SRVX gene, removal of inhibition of this gene on another gene with autosomal localization. In conclusion, AZF gene is lack in patients and azoospermia is in question[5].

Gene mutations and polymorphisms

As patients with obstructive azoospermia may carry cystic fibrosis mutation, in patients with severe oligospermia or non-obstructive azoospermia, microdeletion may be present in the long arm of Y chromosome[63]. It is known that specific gene mutations affect testicular formation, internal and external genitalia development, and spermatogenesis negatively. Syndromes affecting genitourinary tract may also affect ductal function and/or ejaculation. A great number of genetic reasons causing male infertility are defined in humans[45].

X-linked genes: There are numerous X-linked genes represented in the testis and it is considered that they take role in gametogenesis (1). The androgen receptor (AR) gene is localised on Xq (the long arm of the X chromosome)[48,64]. In meiosis, its act is the conversion of spermatocytes, so it can round spermatids during spermatogenesis[65]. In a current study, it has been detected that while mutations are present in AR gene of approximately 2% of infertile men, the controls had none[45] (1). The AR gene mutations can also cause (1) androgen insensitivity syndrome. The AR gene has also two polymorphisms. These polymorphisms are important in the studies for their part in male factor infertility. The CAG and GGC polymorphisms are established on exon 1. They code for polyglutamine and polyglycine stretches, respectively[51]. The CAG polymorphism has been investigated more extensively than the GGC polymorphism. It has been determined that longer lengths of the CAG polymorphisms are related with diminished transcriptional activity of the AR gene in infertile men, so this means that longer polyglutamine tracts are concerned with male factor infertility[51]. In some studies, it has been observed that shorter CAG polymorphisms can be in relationship with higher quality sperm and altered levels of spermatogenesis[66]. Both of these polymorphisms may be affected by ethnical impacts, because studies in Europe couldn’t find a relationship between the CAG polymorphism and infertility, but studies in men from Asia, Singapore and Australia detected a relationship between infertility and these polymorphisms[67,68].

USP26 is another gene that is found on the long arm of the X chromosome. It is expressed in the early stages of spermatogenesis[69]. It takes part in histone disposal during spermatogenesis and also the corruption and rebuilding of proteins[45]. It has been found that there is an intercourse between the gene and infertility[70].

The TAF7L gene has also been studied to find if it is a probable participant to infertility in men. The TAF7L gene is expressed in the testis and related with the autosomal TAF7 gene which is a transcription factor[45]. As transcription factor regulators control the spatial and temporal aspects, they are important in spermatogenesis[71] (1). Kallmann syndrome (KS), another genetic disorder, is inherited as both X-linked and autosomal that can also lead to infertility in males. It is also called as idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and is combined with anosmia or hyposmia. A defect in the migration of the GnRH neurons causes this disorder[72] (1). It is characterized with low levels of sex steroids and low to normal levels of FSH and LH[73].

Epigenetic errors

There are some epigenetic regulatory mechanisms that are necessary for normal embryogenesis. These are: (1) functional role of centrosome; (2) DNA methylation; (3) histone modifications; (4) chromatin remodeling; and (5) RNA transcripts and telomere length.

The best example of the sperm epigenetic contribution to the embryo is methylation. Because if paternal methylation is abnormal, the human embryos cannot develop. DNA methylation, also called as “imprinting”, is important in the choice of which genes, from parental or maternal genomes will be expressed in the embryo[50].

In epigenetics, there are some clinical methods such as direct methods (i.e., single-cell gel electrophoresis) or indirect methods (i.e., sperm chromatin integrity assays). All of these methods are used to detect the quality of sperm DNA. But, existing data haven’t verified any correlation between DNA unity and pregnancy outcomes in ART and natural conception. So, no evidence is present for functional role of DNA integrity testing as a previsor of fertility[74] (1).

Genotype/phenotype correlation: As there is no deletion in the majority of normospermic men, Y microdeletions have been reported to be specific for spermatogenic disorder[37]. Although fertility is concordant with Y deletions, it reveals the fact that proper fertilization can carry out even in the less number of sperm, depending on fertility status of female partner. Therefore, considering Y deletions as the reason for oligo/azoospermia rather than infertility will be more appropriate. Deletion of the entire AZFa region results in complete SCOS and azoospermia. Deletion of isolated genes in the AZFa region such as USP9Y or DBY is associated with a variable testicular phenotype. Such deletions have been defined sporadically only to date. AZFb and AZFb+c complete deletions (P5/proximal P1, P5/distal P1, P4/distal P1) are descriptive of spermatogenic arrest or SCOS resulted in azoospermia. In patients with AZFa region complete deletion, no any sperm has been encountered in the procedure of testicular sperm extraction (TESE). As in AZFa deletion complete deletion, the diagnosis of AZFb or AZFb+c complete deletions is incompatible with correction of the number of sperm, and ICSI should not be suggested for these patients[31]. AZFc region deletions are in relationship with a variable clinic and histological phenotype[31,41,75]. Generally, AZFc deletions are appropriate with residual spermatogenesis. AZFc deletions can be available in azoospermic or vigorous oligospermic men and rarely transmit into male offspring. The possibility to obtain sperm with TESE is high in men with azoospermia and AZFc deletion; so they can have a child with ICSI. Male children of these patients will be those with AZFc deletion[31]. Phenotypes related to deletions are variable, and generally there is no connection between clinic phenotype and localization of deletion[11].

Treatment in male infertility

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: ICSI has been propounded by Palermo et al[76] for the first time in 1992 and achieved a new breakthrough in treatment of serious infertility with male factor. But the ICSI pregnancy rates obtained from IVF centers around the world is lower (30%-50%)[76,77]. With definition of ICSI, although there is oligospermia or azoospermia, men with Y chromosome microdeletion have a possibility to have a child, using spermatozoa obtained surgically or from ejaculate. When diagnosed with Y chromosome microdeletion, couples should be informed about reproductive methods. The majority (79%) of infertile partners with Y chromosome microdeletion choose ICSI in terms of fertility problem. But, when ICSI is used, if child becomes a male, he will likely experience the same microdeletion and fertility problems[11,26,38]. While the success rate in infertile couples treated with ICSI is 76%, this ratio is 15% in those who receive standard IVF therapy, for example intrauterine insemination[78]. Due to the development of assisted reproductive techniques (ART), clinicians are in need of understanding how genetics is crucial in male factor infertility cases (1) because new technologies, such as ICSI, permit the men with suboptimal sperm quality to cope with natural selection mechanisms and produce a viable zygote[51]. As ART, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and ICSI, includes relatively new procedures, the frequency of the inheritance of mutations via these procedures and their impact on future generations are not yet exactly comprehended[57] (1) As a result, it is esential to identify the underlying genetic structure of male infertility to develop appropriate screens for abnormal phenotypes and to discover more effective solutions for infertile couples’ problems[54] (1).

CONCLUSION

Numerous genes are responsible for male fertility, including spermatogenesis and sperm function. Because men who have undigested infertility can hold genetic abnormalities that may accommodate their reproductive potential, further researches are needed to determine such cases (2).

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Mishra PK S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

References
1.  Barbieri RL. Female infertility. Reproductive endocrinology. 5th ed. Pensylvania: Elsevier Inc 2004; 633-668.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Tuarnaye H. Gamete source and manupulation. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a WHO meeting. Geneva: WHO 2002; 83-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Mittal RD, Singh G, Srivastava A, Pradhan M, Kesari A, Makker A, Mittal B. Y chromosome micro-deletions in idiopathic infertility from Northern India. Ann Genet. 2004;47:331-337.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  O’Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SE. Mitochondrial DNA deletions and nuclear DNA fragmentation in testicular and epididymal human sperm. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1565-1570.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Özdiler E, Aydos K.  Klinik Androloji. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 2000; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Bienvenu T, Patrat C, Jouannet P. [Molecular detection of Y chromosome microdeletions: a new approach based on the denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003;31:639-646.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Griffin DK, Finch KA. The genetic and cytogenetic basis of male infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2005;8:19-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Thangaraj K, Gupta NJ, Pavani K, Reddy AG, Subramainan S, Rani DS, Ghosh B, Chakravarty B, Singh L. Y chromosome deletions in azoospermic men in India. J Androl. 2003;24:588-597.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Richard SM, Bianchi NO, Bianchi MS, Peltomäki P, Lothe RA, Pavicic W. Ethnic variation in the prevalence of AZF deletions in testicular cancer. Mutat Res. 2004;554:45-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Siffroi JP, Chantot-Bastaraud S, Ravel C. [Genetic origin of spermatogenesis impairments: clinical aspects and relationships with mouse models of infertility]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003;31:504-515.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  García Rodríguez J, Martín Benito JL, Rodríguez Martínez JJ, Jalón Monzón A, Rodríguez Faba O, Fernández Gómez JM, Regadera Sejas J. [Infertility caused by AZF microdeletions. A new case of azoospermia]. Actas Urol Esp. 2002;26:801-803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Bar-Shira Maymon B, Yogev L, Yavetz H, Lifschitz-Mercer B, Schreiber L, Kleiman SE, Botchan A, Hauser R, Paz G. Spermatogonial proliferation patterns in men with azoospermia of different etiologies. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1175-1180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Hu Z, Xia Y, Guo X, Dai J, Li H, Hu H, Jiang Y, Lu F, Wu Y, Yang X. A genome-wide association study in Chinese men identifies three risk loci for non-obstructive azoospermia. Nat Genet. 2012;44:183-186.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 110]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
14.  Giannouli C, Goulis DG, Lambropoulos A, Lissens W, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Papadimas J. Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia: a cross-sectional study in 61 Greek men. Int J Androl. 2004;27:101-107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Bailey JA, Gu Z, Clark RA, Reinert K, Samonte RV, Schwartz S, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Eichler EE. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science. 2002;297:1003-1007.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 980]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 957]  [Article Influence: 43.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Kadıoğlu A, Çayan S, Semerci B, Orhan İ, Aşçı R, Yaman MÖ, Usta MF, Kendirci M.  Erkek Reprodüktif Sistem hastalıkları ve Tedavisi. İstanbul: Acar Matbaacılık 2004; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Hargreave TB. Genetic basis of male fertility. Br Med Bull. 2000;56:650-671.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Esteves SC, Agarwai A. The azoospermic male: current knowledge and future perspectives. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:1-4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Lipshultz LI, Howards SS.  Infertility in the male. 3rd ed. USA: Mosby 1997; .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Girardi SK, Mielnik A, Schlegel PN. Submicroscopic deletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1635-1641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 100]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Hucklenbroich K, Gromoll J, Heinrich M, Hohoff C, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Partial deletions in the AZFc region of the Y chromosome occur in men with impaired as well as normal spermatogenesis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:191-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 94]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ali S, Hasnain SE. Genomics of the human Y-chromosome. 1. Association with male infertility. Gene. 2003;321:25-37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Foresta C, Moro E, Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions and alterations of spermatogenesis. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:226-239.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Ali S, Hasnain SE. Molecular dissection of the human Y-chromosome. Gene. 2002;283:1-10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Gudeloglu A, Parekattil SJ. Update in the evaluation of the azoospermic male. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:27-34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  van Golde RJ, Wetzels AM, de Graaf R, Tuerlings JH, Braat DD, Kremer JA. Decreased fertilization rate and embryo quality after ICSI in oligozoospermic men with microdeletions in the azoospermia factor c region of the Y chromosome. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:289-292.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O. Localization of factors controlling spermatogenesis in the nonfluorescent portion of the human Y chromosome long arm. Hum Genet. 1976;34:119-124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 619]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 659]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Dada R, Gupta NP, Kucheria K. Yq microdeletions--azoospermia factor candidate genes and spermatogenic arrest. J Biomol Tech. 2004;15:176-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Vollrath D, Foote S, Hilton A, Brown LG, Beer-Romero P, Bogan JS, Page DC. The human Y chromosome: a 43-interval map based on naturally occurring deletions. Science. 1992;258:52-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 296]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 312]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  El Awady MK, El Shater SF, Ragaa E, Atef K, Shaheen IM, Megiud NA. Molecular study on Y chromosome microdeletions in Egyptian males with idiopathic infertility. Asian J Androl. 2004;6:53-57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Krausz C, Hoefsloot L, Simoni M, Tüttelmann F. EAA/EMQN best practice guidelines for molecular diagnosis of Y-chromosomal microdeletions: state-of-the-art 2013. Andrology. 2014;2:5-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 306]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 257]  [Article Influence: 25.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Eloualid A, Rhaissi H, Reguig A, Bounaceur S, El Houate B, Abidi O, Charif M, Louanjli N, Chadli E, Barakat A. Association of spermatogenic failure with the b2/b3 partial AZFc deletion. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34902.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Vogt PH. Genomic heterogeneity and instability of the AZF locus on the human Y chromosome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004;224:1-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Sargent CA, Boucher CA, Kirsch S, Brown G, Weiss B, Trundley A, Burgoyne P, Saut N, Durand C, Levy N. The critical region of overlap defining the AZFa male infertility interval of proximal Yq contains three transcribed sequences. J Med Genet. 1999;36:670-677.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Affara NA. The role of the Y chromosome in male infertility. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2001;2001:1-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Layman LC. Human gene mutations causing infertility. J Med Genet. 2002;39:153-161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Krausz C, Forti G, McElreavey K. The Y chromosome and male fertility and infertility. Int J Androl. 2003;26:70-75.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Raicu F, Popa L, Apostol P, Cimponeriu D, Dan L, Ilinca E, Dracea LL, Marinescu B, Gavrila L. Screening for microdeletions in human Y chromosome--AZF candidate genes and male infertility. J Cell Mol Med. 2003;7:43-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Krausz C, McElreavey K. Y chromosome and male infertility. Front Biosci. 1999;4:E1-E8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Kamp C, Huellen K, Fernandes S, Sousa M, Schlegel PN, Mielnik A, Kleiman S, Yavetz H, Krause W, Küpker W. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7:987-994.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 113]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Oates RD, Silber S, Brown LG, Page DC. Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men with microdeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2813-2824.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 189]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 174]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Hamada AJ, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. A comprehensive review of genetics and genetic testing in azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68 Suppl 1:39-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 118]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 10.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Skaletsky H, Kuroda-Kawaguchi T, Minx PJ, Cordum HS, Hillier L, Brown LG, Repping S, Pyntikova T, Ali J, Bieri T. The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes. Nature. 2003;423:825-837.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1494]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1395]  [Article Influence: 66.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Pryor JL, Kent-First M, Muallem A, Van Bergen AH, Nolten WE, Meisner L, Roberts KP. Microdeletions in the Y chromosome of infertile men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:534-539.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 326]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 292]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  O’Flynn O’Brien KL, Varghese AC, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 289]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 279]  [Article Influence: 19.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Lardone MC, Parodi DA, Valdevenito R, Ebensperger M, Piottante A, Madariaga M, Smith R, Pommer R, Zambrano N, Castro A. Quantification of DDX3Y, RBMY1, DAZ and TSPY mRNAs in testes of patients with severe impairment of spermatogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13:705-712.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Schnieders F, Dörk T, Arnemann J, Vogel T, Werner M, Schmidtke J. Testis-specific protein, Y-encoded (TSPY) expression in testicular tissues. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:1801-1807.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 146]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Nuti F, Krausz C. Gene polymorphisms/mutations relevant to abnormal spermatogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:504-513.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Vodicka R, Vrtel R, Dusek L, Singh AR, Krizova K, Svacinova V, Horinova V, Dostal J, Oborna I, Brezinova J. TSPY gene copy number as a potential new risk factor for male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:579-587.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Emery BR, Carrell DT. The effect of epigenetic sperm abnormalities on early embryogenesis. Asian J Androl. 2006;8:131-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Ferlin A, Raicu F, Gatta V, Zuccarello D, Palka G, Foresta C. Male infertility: role of genetic background. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:734-745.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 319]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 297]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Quilter CR, Svennevik EC, Serhal P, Ralph D, Bahadur G, Stanhope R, Sütterlin M, Delhanty JD, Taylor KE. Cytogenetic and Y chromosome microdeletion screening of a random group of infertile males. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:301-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Palermo GD, Colombero LT, Hariprashad JJ, Schlegel PN, Rosenwaks Z. Chromosome analysis of epididymal and testicular sperm in azoospermic patients undergoing ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:570-575.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 109]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Carrell DT. Contributions of spermatozoa to embryogenesis: assays to evaluate their genetic and epigenetic fitness. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:474-484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Visootsak J, Graham JM. Klinefelter syndrome and other sex chromosomal aneuploidies. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 185]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 157]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Bojesen A, Gravholt CH. Klinefelter syndrome in clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4:192-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 177]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 190]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Pardalidis N, Karakitsios K, Mantzavinos T, Giotitsas N, Loutradis D, Dimitriadis F, Saito M, Miyagawa I. Genetic and epigenetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Asian J Androl. 2006;8:643-673.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Conte RA, Kleyman SM, Klein V, Bialer MG, Verma RS. Characterization of a de novo t(Y; 9) (q11.2; q22) by FISH technique. Ann Genet. 1996;39:10-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Lissitsina J, Mikelsaar R, Punab M. Cytogenetic analyses in infertile men. Arch Androl. 2006;52:91-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Akkari Y, Lawce H, Kelson S, Smith C, Davis C, Boyd L, Magenis RE, Olson S. Y chromosome heterochromatin of differing lengths in two cell populations of the same individual. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:304-306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Penna Videaú S, Araujo H, Ballesta F, Ballescá JL, Vanrell JA. Chromosomal abnormalities and polymorphisms in infertile men. Arch Androl. 2001;46:205-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Wiland E, Wojda A, Kamieniczna M, Szczygieł M, Kurpisz M. Infertility status of male individuals with abnormal spermiogram evaluated by cytogenetic analysis and in vitro sperm penetration assay. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:CR394-CR400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Levron J, Aviram-Goldring A, Madgar I, Raviv G, Barkai G, Dor J. Sperm chromosome abnormalities in men with severe male factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:479-484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Wang PJ, McCarrey JR, Yang F, Page DC. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat Genet. 2001;27:422-426.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 602]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 587]  [Article Influence: 25.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  De Gendt K, Swinnen JV, Saunders PT, Schoonjans L, Dewerchin M, Devos A, Tan K, Atanassova N, Claessens F, Lécureuil C. A Sertoli cell-selective knockout of the androgen receptor causes spermatogenic arrest in meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:1327-1332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 561]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 558]  [Article Influence: 27.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Lazaros L, Xita N, Kaponis A, Zikopoulos K, Sofikitis N, Georgiou I. Evidence for association of sex hormone-binding globulin and androgen receptor genes with semen quality. Andrologia. 2008;40:186-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Rajpert-De Meyts E, Leffers H, Petersen JH, Andersen AG, Carlsen E, Jørgensen N, Skakkebaek NE. CAG repeat length in androgen-receptor gene and reproductive variables in fertile and infertile men. Lancet. 2002;359:44-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Yong EL, Loy CJ, Sim KS. Androgen receptor gene and male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:1-7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Stouffs K, Lissens W, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Possible role of USP26 in patients with severely impaired spermatogenesis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:336-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 70]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Paduch DA, Mielnik A, Schlegel PN. Novel mutations in testis-specific ubiquitin protease 26 gene may cause male infertility and hypogonadism. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:747-754.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Kimmins S, Kotaja N, Davidson I, Sassone-Corsi P. Testis-specific transcription mechanisms promoting male germ-cell differentiation. Reproduction. 2004;128:5-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Bhagavath B, Layman LC. The genetics of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25:272-286.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Burris AS, Rodbard HW, Winters SJ, Sherins RJ. Gonadotropin therapy in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: the response to human chorionic gonadotropin is predicted by initial testicular size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;66:1144-1151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 133]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 136]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S178-S180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Luetjens CM, Gromoll J, Engelhardt M, Von Eckardstein S, Bergmann M, Nieschlag E, Simoni M. Manifestation of Y-chromosomal deletions in the human testis: a morphometrical and immunohistochemical evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2258-2266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2301]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1944]  [Article Influence: 60.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Ryu HM, Lin WW, Lamb DJ, Chuang W, Lipshultz LI, Bischoff FZ. Increased chromosome X, Y, and 18 nondisjunction in sperm from infertile patients that were identified as normal by strict morphology: implication for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:879-883.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Lewis-Jones I, Aziz N, Seshadri S, Douglas A, Howard P. Sperm chromosomal abnormalities are linked to sperm morphologic deformities. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:212-215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]