Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Urol. Nov 24, 2015; 4(3): 100-103
Published online Nov 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i3.100
Published online Nov 24, 2015. doi: 10.5410/wjcu.v4.i3.100
Figure 1 Effects of different source-to-target distance.
A: Distance 2 cm, SWV = 3.08 m/s; B: As the distance becomes greater (4.9 cm), the SWV decreases (2.40 m/s). SWV: Shear wave velocity.
Figure 2 Effects of anisotropy.
A: Distance 1.7 cm, SWV = 3.55 m/s; B: Distance 2.2 cm, SWV = 2.32 m/s. The SWV difference between the two measurements is greater than what is expected considering only the source-to-target distance. This is an effect of renal anisotropy and a consequence of an incorrect orientation of the ROI. SWV: Shear wave velocity; ROI: Region of interest.
- Citation: Zaffanello M, Bruno C. Clinical perspective on renal elasticity quantification by acoustic radiation force impulse: Where we are and where we are going. World J Clin Urol 2015; 4(3): 100-103
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v4/i3/100.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v4.i3.100