Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Pediatr. Nov 9, 2021; 10(6): 177-191
Published online Nov 9, 2021. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v10.i6.177
Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Ref.
Year
Timing of data collection
Study design
Country
Population size
Cases with PH
Prevalence of PH
De Rubens et al[48]2003RetrospectiveObservationalMexico2754114.90909
Shah et al[33]2004RetrospectiveObservationalCanada1752413.71429
Cua et al[35]2007RetrospectiveObservationalUSA58712.06897
Weijerman et al[40]2010ProspectiveCohortNetherlands820253.04878
Banjar et al[41]2012RetrospectiveObservationalSaudi Arabia594474.57
Mourato et al[42]2013RetrospectiveCross-sectionalBrazil1384230.43478
Sharma et al[43]2013ProspectiveObservationalIndia351851.42857
Shrestha et al[36]2013ProspectiveObservationalNepal502142
Espinola-Zavaleta et al[44]2015ProspectiveObservationalMexico city12710280.31496
Bermudez et al[34]2015RetrospectiveObservationalBrazil1207574.722452
Zonouzi et al[45]2015ProspectiveCross-sectionalIran1102320.90909
Joffre et al[6]2016RetrospectiveObservationalFrance661928.78788
Okeniyi et al[37]2017ProspectiveObservationalNigeria701420
Bush et al[38]2018RetrospectiveCohortUSA125234627.63578
Martin et al[39]2018RetrospectiveCohortIreland1214133.8843
Zahari et al[46]2019RetrospectiveCohortMalaysia75416021.22016
Alsuwayfee et al[47]2020ProspectiveCross-sectionalIraq762330.26
Table 2 Screening methodology of the included studies
Ref.
Diagnosis established by
Age group, (mean ± SD, yr)
Sex (M:F)
Diagnostic criteria for PH
De Rubens et al[48]EchocardiographyLess than 16 yr1:1NM
Shah et al[33]EchocardiographyNewborn10:7Right to left shunting at ductal or atrial level in the absence of severe pulmonary parenchymal disease
Cua et al[35]EchocardiographyNeonate25:33Right-to-left shunt at the ductal level or flattening of the IVS in the absence of a PDA
Weijerman et al[40]EchocardiographyNeonateNMRight-to-left shunt at the ductal level
Banjar et al[41]Echocardiography3.3 ± 3.934:25> 50% of systolic systemic pressure
Mourato et al[42]EchocardiographyInfant61:77mPAP > 25 mmHg
Sharma et al[43]EchocardiographyLess than 12 yr4:3mPAP >25 mmHg
Shrestha et al[36]Echocardiography4 mo to 12 yr1:1.4NM
Espinola-Zavaleta et al[44]EchocardiographyUp to 18 yr64:63mPAP > 30 mm Hg
Bermudez et al[34]EchocardiographyUp to 11 moNMmPAP > 25 mmHg
Zonouzi et al[45]Echocardiography1 mo-20 yr53:57NM
Joffre et al[6]Echocardiography1mo-16 yr2:1NM
Okeniyi et al[37]Echocardiography3 mo-9 yr3:4NM
Bush et al[38]Echo or catheterizationBirth to 21 yr688:564mPAP > 25 mmHg; IVS flattening, RV dilation, or presence of RV hypertrophy
Martin et al[39]EchocardiographyNeonate62:59Right to-left shunt across the PDA, IVS bowing into the left ventricle, or the presence of a TR jet
Zahari et al[46]EchocardiographyNewborn189:225IVS flattening, a dilated main pulmonary artery, and dilated right cardiac chambers
Alsuwayfee et al[47]Echocardiography< 15 yr0.85:1mPAP > 25 mmHg
Table 3 Quality assessment of the included studies
STROBE quality of reporting
Ref.
The title and abstract (Item 1)
Introduction (Item 2-3)
Methods (Item 4-12)
Results (Item 13-17)
Discussion and other information (Item 18-22)
Quality score (0-22)
De Rubens et al[48]1264215
Shah et al[33]0252312
Cua et al[35]1253415
Weijerman et al[40]1244415
Banjar et al[41]1244415
Mourato et al[42]1252414
Sharma et al[43]1253415
Shrestha et al[36]1244415
Espinola-Zavaleta et al[44]1253314
Bermudez et al[34]1242413
Zonouzi et al[45]1243515
Joffre et al[6]1252414
Okeniyi et al[37]1253314
Bush et al[38]1253516
Martin et al[39]1254416
Zahari et al[46]1253415
Alsuwayfee et al[47]1254416
Table 4 Risk of bias assessment of included studies using the Hoy et al[26] 2012 tool
Ref.
Representation
Sampling
Random selection
Non response bias
Data collection
Case definition
Reliability and validity of study tool
Method of data collection
Prevalence period
Numerator and denominator
Summary assessment
De Rubens et al[48]HRHRHRHRHRHRLRLRHRLRHR
Shah et al[33]HRHRHRHRHRHRLRLRHRLRHR
Cua et al[35]LRLRLRLRLRLRLRLRHRLRLR
Weijerman et al[40]HRHRHRHRHRLRLRLRHRLRMR
Banjar et al[41]HRHRLRHRLRHRLRLRLRLRMR
Mourato et al[42]HRHRHRHRLRLRLRLRHRLRMR
Sharma et al[43]HRLRLRHRLRLRLRLRLRLRLR
Shrestha et al[36]LRLRLRHRLRLRLRLRHRLRLR
Espinola-Zavaleta et al[44]LRLRLRHRHRHRLRLRHRLRMR
Bermudez et al[34]LRLRHRHRLRHRLRLRHRLRMR
Zonouzi et al[45]HRHRHRHRLRHRLRLRHRLRMR
Joffre et al[6]HRHRHRHRHRHRHRHRLRLRHR
Okeniyi et al[37]LRLRLRHRHRLRLRLRHRLRLR
Bush et al[38]LRLRLRHRHRLRLRLRHRLRLR
Martin et al[39]LRLRLRHRHRLRLRLRHRLRLR
Zahari et al[46]HRLRHRHRLRHRLRLRHRLRMR
Alsuwayee et al[47]HRHRHRHRLRLRLRLRLRLRMR
Table 5 Prevalence in different subgroups
Stratification group
Number of studies
Total number of subjects
Total number of events
I2
P value
Prevalence
95%CI
Sex
Male480121028.220.24324.318.8-30.6
Female469518956.440.07626.218.8-35.3
Age
Infant (< 1 yr)7327335695.350.00013.46.6-25.4
Children (> 1 yr)9206160794.680.00033.722.6-47.0
Region
Asia6108428993.680.00038.423.7-55.7
Not Asia11430971897.920.00019.810.9-33.2
Studies published
Before 2011413289793.790.0009.44.1-20.2
2011 - 202013406591097.130.00033.022.5-45.4
Risk of bias
High risk35168476.200.01517.811.6-26.5
Moderate risk8211943797.910.00034.016.6-57.1
Low risk6275848697.630.00020.09.3-37.7
Etiology
Cardiac772437297.060.00014.47.4-26.1
Non-cardiac772435296.630.0008.94.4-17.5