Systematic Reviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2025; 14(2): 104797
Published online Jun 9, 2025. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i2.104797
Human milk oligosaccharide secretion dynamics during breastfeeding and its antimicrobial role: A systematic review
Mohammed Al-Beltagi, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31511, Alghrabia, Egypt
Mohammed Al-Beltagi, Department of Pediatric, University Medical Center, King Abdulla Medical City, Arabian Gulf University, Manama 26671, Bahrain
ORCID number: Mohammed Al-Beltagi (0000-0002-7761-9536).
Author contributions: Al-Beltagi M is the sole author of this study; Al-Beltagi M conceptualized the research, conducted the systematic literature search, performed data extraction and analysis, and interpreted the findings; Al-Beltagi M also drafted the manuscript, addressed reviewer comments, and finalized the revisions; Al-Beltagi M approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The author declares no conflict of interest.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. The study followed a structured approach, including a comprehensive literature search, predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, systematic data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. A PRISMA flow diagram was used to illustrate the study selection process.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Mohammed Al-Beltagi, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, 1 Hassan Radwan Street, Tanta 31511, Alghrabia, Egypt. mbelrem@hotmail.com
Received: January 2, 2025
Revised: February 19, 2025
Accepted: February 27, 2025
Published online: June 9, 2025
Processing time: 75 Days and 20.1 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are bioactive components of breast milk with diverse health benefits, including shaping the gut microbiota, modulating the immune system, and protecting against infections. HMOs exhibit dynamic secretion patterns during lactation, influenced by maternal genetics and environmental factors. Their direct and indirect antimicrobial properties have garnered significant research interest. However, a comprehensive understanding of the secretion dynamics of HMOs and their correlation with antimicrobial efficacy remains underexplored.

AIM

To synthesize current evidence on the secretion dynamics of HMOs during lactation and evaluate their antimicrobial roles against bacterial, viral, and protozoal pathogens.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library focused on studies investigating natural and synthetic HMOs, their secretion dynamics, and antimicrobial properties. Studies involving human, animal, and in vitro models were included. Data on HMO composition, temporal secretion patterns, and mechanisms of antimicrobial action were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using validated tools appropriate for study design.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies were included, encompassing human, animal, and in vitro research. HMOs exhibited dynamic secretion patterns, with 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL) and lacto-N-tetraose peaking in early lactation and declining over time, while 3-fucosyllactose (3-FL) increased during later stages. HMOs demonstrated significant antimicrobial properties through pathogen adhesion inhibition, biofilm disruption, and enzymatic activity impairment. Synthetic HMOs, including bioengineered 2′-FL and 3-FL, were structurally and functionally comparable to natural HMOs, effectively inhibiting pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni. Additionally, HMOs exhibited synergistic effects with antibiotics, enhancing their efficacy against resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSION

HMOs are vital in antimicrobial defense, supporting infant health by targeting various pathogens. Both natural and synthetic HMOs hold significant potential for therapeutic applications, particularly in infant nutrition and as adjuncts to antibiotics. Further research, including clinical trials, is essential to address gaps in knowledge, validate findings, and explore the broader applicability of HMOs in improving maternal and neonatal health.

Key Words: Human milk oligosaccharides; Human milk oligosaccharides secretion dynamics; Antimicrobial activity; Breastfeeding; Synthetic human milk oligosaccharides; Pathogen adhesion inhibition; Infant health

Core Tip: This systematic review highlights human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs)' dynamic secretion patterns and antimicrobial properties (HMOs), emphasizing their crucial role in infant health. HMOs protect against many pathogens by inhibiting adhesion, disrupting biofilms, and impairing bacterial enzymatic activity. Synthetic HMOs, including 2′-fucosyllactose and 3-fucosyllactose, replicate the structure and function of natural HMOs, offering scalable solutions for therapeutic applications. HMOs also synergize with antibiotics, enhancing their efficacy and addressing antimicrobial resistance. These findings underscore HMOs' potential to develop innovative maternal and neonatal care interventions, improving global health outcomes.



INTRODUCTION

Breastfeeding is universally recognized as the gold standard for infant nutrition, offering unparalleled benefits to both infants and mothers. It supports optimal growth and development, reduces the risk of infectious and chronic diseases, and fosters a strong emotional bond between mother and child[1]. Human breast milk is a dynamic, bioactive fluid uniquely tailored to meet the infant’s nutritional and immunological needs, with its composition evolving across different stages of lactation to adapt to the changing requirements of the growing infant. Among its key components are human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs)[2].

HMOs are a diverse and abundant class of bioactive glycans uniquely present in human breast milk. As the third most prevalent solid component after lactose and lipids, HMOs support neonatal health by promoting gut microbiota development, protecting against infections, and modulating immune function[3]. These oligosaccharides are structurally diverse, comprising over 200 distinct types categorized into fucosylated, sialylated, and neutral HMOs. Their structural complexity and biological significance underline their unmatched contribution to infant nutrition, making them a focal point for research into maternal and neonatal health[4]. HMOs selectively promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium species, while simultaneously acting as soluble decoy receptors that prevent pathogenic bacteria and viruses from adhering to epithelial cells. These dual functions enhance gut health and systemic immunity, establishing HMOs as a natural and indispensable component of breast milk[5]. Beyond their antimicrobial functions, HMOs contribute to immune system maturation, modulate inflammatory responses, and support gut homeostasis. Emerging evidence also links HMOs to neurodevelopment, potentially through their impact on the gut-brain axis mediated by microbial metabolites and direct signaling pathways[6].

The secretion dynamics of HMOs vary during lactation, with concentrations highest in colostrum and gradually declining over the first year. This dynamic secretion aligns with the infant's evolving developmental and immunological needs, tailoring nutrient delivery and bioactive benefits[7]. These insights are critical for guiding evidence-based breastfeeding strategies to optimize infant health outcomes. Additionally, the characterization of HMOs has spurred innovations in synthetic biology, enabling the production of bioengineered HMOs such as 2'-fucosyllactose (2'-FL) and 3-fucosyllactose (3-FL). These synthetic variants replicate the structure and function of natural HMOs, facilitating their incorporation into infant formula and other therapeutic applications to bridge nutritional gaps for non-breastfed infants[8]. As of recent advancements, approximately 15 synthetic HMOs have been developed and approved for use in infant formula or research purposes. These include both commercially available HMOs and those in advanced stages of development[9].

In addition to HMOs, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) are non-digestible carbohydrates often incorporated into infant formulas to mimic some of the prebiotic functions of HMOs. GOS, derived from lactose, predominantly stimulates the growth of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli, while FOS, extracted from plants such as chicory roots, fosters a broader spectrum of gut microbial diversity. Though structurally simpler than HMOs, GOS and FOS synergistically support gut health and immune development, complementing the protective effects of HMOs in both natural and artificial feeding scenarios[10].

This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on the secretion dynamics of HMOs during breastfeeding and their antimicrobial properties. By elucidating these mechanisms, we aim to inform the development of optimized nutritional interventions and guide future research in pediatric health and nutrition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design and protocol

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion Criteria included peer-reviewed articles reporting on human, animal, or in vitro studies focused on the secretion dynamics of HMOs during lactation or their antimicrobial roles, studies investigating the antimicrobial properties of synthetic HMOs or bioengineered derivatives against pathogenic microorganisms, articles providing quantitative or qualitative data on HMO composition, secretion patterns, or interactions with microbial pathogens, and studies published in English between 1990-2024. We exclude articles unrelated to HMOs or lacking explicit data on secretion dynamics or antimicrobial activity, reviews, commentaries, opinion pieces, or case reports without original data, and studies focusing exclusively on oligosaccharides not structurally related to HMOs (e.g., plant-derived oligosaccharides).

Search strategy

A comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search strategy utilized a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms and free-text keywords, such as “human milk oligosaccharides,” “HMO secretion,” “synthetic HMOs,” “antimicrobial activity,” and “bioengineered HMOs.” Boolean operators (AND, OR) and filters were applied to refine the search. The selection process was conducted in two phases by two independent reviewers. The first phase included screening of title and abstract of articles for relevance based on the predefined eligibility criteria. The full text of potentially eligible articles were reviewed for inclusion. Any disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.

A standardized data extraction form was employed to collect the following information from included studies: (1) Study characteristics: Author (s), publication year, study type (human, animal, in vitro), and sample size; (2) HMO secretion dynamics: HMO concentrations, temporal trends, and influencing factors (e.g., maternal diet, lactation stage); (3) Synthetic HMOs: Production methods (e.g., bioengineering), structural composition, and efficacy; and (4) Antimicrobial activity: Pathogens studied, mechanisms of action, and experimental outcomes.

Two reviewers performed data extraction independently, and any discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Then, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using appropriate tools. For in vivo and clinical studies: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For in vitro studies: Modified checklist based on experimental rigor (e.g., controls, reproducibility). Each study was rated as high, moderate, or low quality based on criteria such as study design, data collection methods, and outcome measurement. Data were synthesized narratively to summarize trends in HMO secretion dynamics and antimicrobial activity. Quantitative data were pooled where appropriate and presented descriptively. Studies were categorized by experimental models (human, animal, in vitro) and HMO type (natural, synthetic). Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity in study designs, methods, and outcomes. As this review relied exclusively on publicly available data, no ethical approval was required.

RESULTS
Study characteristics

Figure 1 shows the study's flow chart. This systematic review included 44 studies published between 1990 and 2024. These studies represented a wide geographical distribution, with contributions from specific regions, including North America (United States, Canada), Europe (Germany, United Kingdom, Sweden), and Asia (Japan, China, India). Studies encompassed diverse experimental designs, including in vitro analyses, animal models, and clinical investigations.

Figure 1
Figure 1 The flow chart of the included studies. HMO: Human milk oligosaccharides.
HMO secretion dynamics

The secretion dynamics of HMOs were found to vary significantly during lactation. Concentrations of dominant HMOs were highest in colostrum and declined throughout lactation. 2'-FL peaks at approximately 3-5 g/L in colostrum and decreases to 1-2 g/L by 6 months postpartum. Lacto-N-tetraose (LNT) ranges from 2-3 g/L in early lactation, tapering to 0.5-1 g/L after the first year. 3-FL is initially low in colostrum (0.2-0.5 g/L) but increases progressively, reaching 1.5-2 g/L by late lactation. Figure 2 clearly illustrates these patterns, depicting the temporal decline of fucosylated and sialylated HMOs alongside the gradual increase of neutral HMOs like 3-FL. This figure provides a visual summary of the dynamic shifts across different lactation stages, supporting the alignment of HMO composition with infant developmental needs. The temporal variation in HMO concentrations underscores their tailored role in meeting infants' evolving developmental, immune, and nutritional needs. Bioengineered HMOs such as 2'-FL and 3-FL demonstrated efficacy comparable to natural HMOs, offering scalable solutions for non-breastfed infants and therapeutic applications.

Figure 2
Figure 2 The temporal changes of 5 main human milk oligosaccharides during the first 8 months of lactation. 2′-FL: 2′-Fucosyllactose; 3′-FL: 3′-Fucosyllactose; 6′-SL: 6-Sialyllactose; DFL: DiFucosyllactose; LNT: Lacto-N-Tetraose.
Antimicrobial properties of HMOs

HMOs have demonstrated significant antimicrobial effects through multiple mechanisms. HMOs selectively target pathogens through adhesion inhibition, biofilm disruption, and enzymatic inhibition, highlighting their potential in combating infections and supporting gut health. 2'-FL reduced Pseudomonas aeruginosa adhesion by 24% in intestinal epithelial cell models. In addition, 2'-FL and 3-FL decreased Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) adhesion by 26% and 18%, respectively. HMOs also can disrupt the bacterial biofilm. Neutral HMOs disrupted Streptococcus agalactiae [Group B Streptococcus (GB. streptococcus)] biofilm formation by up to 40%, significantly reducing bacterial growth and virulence. Moreover, neutral HMOs enhanced the efficacy of antibiotics like vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, reducing the required minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by 30%-50%.

Geographic distribution

The geographic distribution of studies revealed strong research representation from high-income countries, including the United States, Germany, and Japan, which contributed approximately 70% of the reviewed literature. Studies from low-and middle-income regions, including sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, constituted less than 10% of the included data.

DISCUSSION
Breastfeeding secretion dynamics in the first two years of lactation

Breastfeeding is a dynamic process, with the composition of human milk evolving significantly to meet the growing infant's changing nutritional and developmental needs. Over the first two years of lactation, human milk undergoes notable changes in volume, macronutrient and micronutrient content, bioactive molecules, and immunological components[11]. These changes reflect a complex interplay between maternal physiology, infant demand, and environmental influences (Table 1).

Table 1 Breastfeeding secretion dynamics in the first two years of lactation.
Stage of lactation
Time period
Milk volume
Key nutritional components
Key bioactive components
Primary functions
Additional notes
ColostrumFirst 3-5 days postpartumLow (10-40 mL per feed)High in protein, low in fat and lactoseHigh IgA, lactoferrin, HMOs, leukocytes, growth factors (e.g., EGF)Provides passive immunity, protects gut mucosa, supports gut microbiota development, aids intestinal repairProteins: Peak concentration, casein: whey ratio approximately 20: 80- HMOs: Highest (approximately 15-20 g/L)- Growth factors: Abundant EGF for gut development- Fats: Minimal but rich in essential fatty acids
Transitional milkDays 5–14 postpartumIncreasing (approximately 500-750 mL/day)Protein decreases, fat and lactose increaseReduced IgA and leukocytes; lactoferrin and lysozyme persistSupports growing caloric needs, continues immune protection, aids microbiota developmentProteins: Decline begins- Lactose: Increases to support energy needs- HMOs: Decline slightly but remain significant- fats: Gradual increase, influenced by maternal diet
Mature milkWeeks 3 onwardHigh (700-900 mL/day)Stable macronutrients: approximately 0.8%-1% protein, approximately 4%-5% fat, approximately 7% lactoseBalanced levels of HMOs, lactoferrin, lysozyme, and antibodiesProvides complete nutrition, supports immune and brain development, protects against infectionsProteins: Casein: Whey ratio shifts to approximately 50: 50- HMOs: Decline (approximately 5-10 g/L) but bioactive- Immune Factors: IgA, lysozyme, and lactoferrin persist- Fats: Higher variability based on maternal diet
Months 6-12Late lactation phaseGradual reduction (approximately 500-800 mL/day)Similar macronutrient composition as mature milkPersistent immune factors (IgA, lysozyme, HMOs, lactoferrin)Complements solid foods, supports immune and microbiota maturationFats: Continue to vary, contributing to brain and energy needs- HMOs: Moderate levels (approximately 2-5 g/L)- Lactose: Steady for energy support- Immune Factors: Immune benefits adapted for growing infant
Months 12-24Toddler phaseFurther reduction (approximately 300-500 mL/day)Macronutrients adapt to reduced dependence on milkSustained immune components (IgA, lysozyme, lactoferrin)Provides immune protection, complements toddler diet, supports growth and immunityProteins: Further adapted to complement the solid diet- HMOs: Persist at low levels (< 2 g/L)- Immune factors: Support immune resilience- Fats: Important for energy and essential fatty acids
Stages of lactation and secretory phases

Human milk production progresses through distinct stages: Colostrum (first few days postpartum), transitional milk (days 5-14), and mature milk (from week 3 onward). Each stage is characterized by specific changes in milk composition and volume[12].

Colostrum, often referred to as "first milk," is a thick, yellowish secretion produced in small volumes (10-40 mL per feeding). It is rich in immunological components, growth factors, and bioactive molecules[13]. Different maternal factors could affect colostrum composition. Multiparous mothers may produce colostrum with more consistent concentrations of bioactive molecules than first-time mothers. In addition, adequate maternal protein intake supports the rich protein concentration in colostrum. Furthermore, high cortisol levels postpartum enhance the production of growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF), which is crucial for neonatal gut development[14].

As lactation progresses, colostrum transitions into transitional milk, with milk volume increasing significantly, reaching approximately 500-750 mL/day by the second week. During this phase, protein content begins to decline, while fat and lactose concentrations increase[2]. Although immunological components remain high, their relative proportions decrease. Transitional milk meets the infant’s growing caloric and nutritional demands as the gastrointestinal system matures[15]. The maternal diet, frequency of nursing, and maternal body composition significantly influence the quality and availability of these nutrients, including fat-soluble vitamins and essential fatty acids[16].

Mature milk represents the steady-state phase of lactation, typically beginning around the second month. By this stage, milk production peaks at 700-900 mL/day, with composition varying based on infant demand and influenced by various maternal factors. These include maternal body weight for height, dietary intake, parity, environmental conditions, return of menstruation, and nursing frequency. For instance, increased maternal protein intake has been linked to higher concentrations of protein-rich HMOs, supporting immune and microbial functions in the infant[17]. Mature milk comprises approximately 87% water, 7% lactose, 3%-5% fat, and 0.8%-1% protein[18]. It also contains vitamins, minerals, enzymes, hormones, and bioactive molecules such as HMOs, lactoferrin, and lysozyme. These components provide balanced nutrition to support growth and development while protecting against infections and promoting immune maturation[19]. The maternal diet, frequency of nursing, maternal health, stress, weaning practices, and body composition significantly influence the quality and availability of these nutrients, including fat-soluble vitamins and essential fatty acids[20]. Throughout all lactation stages, the interplay between maternal factors and milk composition underscores the importance of maternal health, nutrition, and breastfeeding practices in ensuring optimal benefits for the infant. This dynamic adaptation highlights the remarkable biological feedback system that aligns milk composition with the infant’s evolving needs[21].

Macronutrient dynamics over two years

The macronutrient composition of human milk undergoes significant changes throughout lactation to align with the infant’s developmental needs. Protein concentration is highest in colostrum (2-4 g/100 mL) and decreases over the first few months, stabilizing at around 0.8-1 g/100 mL in mature milk[18]. This decline reflects the infant’s reduced reliance on immune proteins and increasing caloric requirements from fats and carbohydrates. Key proteins, such as casein and whey (e.g., alpha-lactalbumin and lactoferrin), adapt to provide both nutritional and functional benefits[22].

Fat content varies throughout the day and during feeding sessions and is influenced by maternal diet and breastfeeding patterns. On average, fat concentration increases slightly over lactation, from approximately 3.5% in early lactation to 4.5%-5% by the end of the first year. The composition of fat globules evolves, with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as DHA, playing a crucial role in brain and visual development[23]. Lactose remains the predominant carbohydrate in human milk, providing a consistent energy source for the infant. HMO concentration is highest in colostrum (15-20 g/L) and gradually decreases over the first year, although functional HMOs persist in significant amounts to support gut health and immunity[18] (Figure 3). Mature milk, which constitutes most lactation, stabilizes these macronutrient levels while adapting to infant growth spurts and developmental milestones. These changes are influenced by maternal factors such as diet, hormonal fluctuations, and nursing patterns, ensuring that the nutritional profile aligns with the infant’s evolving needs[18].

Figure 3
Figure 3 Levels of human milk oligosaccharides (g/L) during the various phases of Breast milk.
Immune component dynamics

Immunological factors in human milk are most concentrated during the early weeks of lactation, reflecting the neonate’s need for passive immunity. These components gradually decline but remain bioactive throughout the lactation period. Secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), abundant in colostrum, provides mucosal immunity to the infant’s gut, respiratory tract, and other mucosal surfaces[24]. Leukocytes, including macrophages and lymphocytes, are highly concentrated in colostrum and decrease as the infant’s immune system matures. Lactoferrin levels are highest in colostrum, promoting iron absorption and exhibiting antimicrobial properties. Lysozyme levels, by contrast, increase during later lactation, enhancing protection against bacterial infections[25]. Cytokines such as interleukins (e.g., IL-10) and transforming growth factors (e.g., TGF-β) support immune modulation and gut development. EGF peaks in colostrum, facilitating intestinal maturation and repair[26].

Bioactive molecules and hormones

Human milk contains a variety of bioactive molecules and hormones that adapt to the infant’s developmental needs. HMOs are abundant in colostrum and transitional milk, with concentrations gradually declining over the first year. These molecules promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, protect against pathogens, and support immune development[19]. Metabolic hormones such as insulin, leptin, and adiponectin regulate energy balance and appetite in the infant. Cortisol levels decrease as lactation progresses, reflecting maternal adaptation to breastfeeding[27].

Long-term changes: Beyond the first year

During the second year of lactation, milk volume, and certain nutrient concentrations decline as complementary foods become the primary source of nutrition. Despite this reduction, immune factors such as IgA and lysozyme remain active, providing ongoing protection against infections during this critical period of immune development. The composition of human milk continues to adapt, offering tailored support for toddlers as they transition to solid foods and develop their microbiota and immune systems[28].

General functions of HMOs

HMOs are complex, non-digestible carbohydrates uniquely abundant in human milk and play a pivotal role in supporting infant health and development. Following lactose and lipids, HMOs are the third most abundant solid component in human milk, ranging from 5-20 g/L in colostrum to 5-15 g/L in mature milk[29]. Structurally, HMOs consist of a lactose core (comprising glucose and galactose) with additional monosaccharides such as fucose and sialic acid attached, resulting in remarkable structural diversity[30]. They are broadly categorized into three main types: Neutral non-fucosylated HMOs, neutral fucosylated HMOs, and acidic (sialylated) HMOs. Neutral non-fucosylated HMOs, such as LNT and lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT), nourish beneficial gut bacteria like Bifidobacterium[31]. Neutral fucosylated HMOs, including 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL), 3′-fucosyllactose (3′-FL), and difucosyllacto-N-hexaose (DFL), are especially effective in preventing pathogen adhesion by mimicking host cell glycans[32]. Acidic sialylated HMOs, such as 3′-sialyllactose (3′-SL) and 6′-sialyllactose (6′-SL), play critical roles in brain development, immune modulation, and anti-inflammatory activity. Maternal genetics, specifically the Secretor (FUT2) and Lewis (FUT3) gene statuses, significantly influence HMO composition and diversity, with over 200 distinct structures identified[33]. Secretor-positive mothers produce higher levels of fucosylated HMOs, such as 2′-FL, while Lewis gene variations shape specific fucosylation patterns, underscoring HMOs’ adaptability to individual infant needs. HMOs serve multifaceted roles beyond basic nutrition[34]. These bioactive molecules exert both localized and systemic effects on infant growth, immune protection, and microbiota development. HMOs perform critical functions as prebiotics, antiadhesive agents, immune modulators, and contributors to neurological and systemic health[32].

HMOs as prebiotics

One of HMOs' most extensively studied roles is their function as prebiotics, selectively promoting the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium species and Lactobacillus. These microbes are essential for gut health, metabolic activity, and immune function. Unlike other milk carbohydrates, HMOs resist digestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract, reaching the colon intact and serving as substrates for beneficial microbes[35]. This selective feeding fosters the predominance of Bifidobacterium in the infant gut microbiome, establishing a protective barrier against pathogens and enhancing intestinal integrity. HMO fermentation by gut bacteria produces short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which provide energy for colonocytes, reduce intestinal inflammation, and regulate systemic immune responses[36].

Antiadhesive properties: Protecting against pathogens

HMOs act as soluble decoy receptors, mimicking carbohydrate structures on host cell surfaces to prevent pathogen adhesion and colonization. Pathogens, including bacteria and viruses, often rely on these glycans to attach to host cells. For instance, 2′-FL, one of the most abundant HMOs, blocks the adhesion of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and C. jejuni to intestinal epithelial cells[37]. Similarly, sialylated HMOs inhibit the binding of influenza viruses and rotavirus, reducing the risk of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections. This antiadhesive function is especially crucial during the neonatal period when the infant’s immune system is immature and highly susceptible to infections[38].

Modulation of immune function

HMOs play a vital role in shaping the infant’s immune system by modulating innate and adaptive immune responses. They act directly on immune cells or indirectly through their influence on the gut microbiota. HMOs reduce inflammation by attenuating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-8, while promoting regulatory cytokines like IL-10[39]. They also facilitate mucosal immunity by supporting the development of gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT). Furthermore, HMOs influence the expression of toll-like receptors on epithelial and immune cells, fine-tuning microbial pattern recognition and preventing excessive immune activation[40].

Enhancing gut barrier integrity

The intestinal barrier serves as a critical defense mechanism, preventing harmful pathogens and antigens from entering the bloodstream. HMOs strengthen gut barrier integrity by enhancing tight junctions between epithelial cells and stimulating the production of mucins, the primary components of the protective mucus layer[41]. By maintaining this barrier, HMOs reduce the risk of conditions such as necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a severe gastrointestinal disease in preterm infants. Clinical studies have shown that HMOs, particularly 2′-FL, are associated with a reduced incidence of NEC, underscoring their protective role in gut health[42].

Neurological and cognitive development

Emerging evidence suggests that HMOs contribute to neurological and cognitive development. Specific HMOs, including 2′-FL, DFL, and 3′-SL, have been linked to improved cognitive outcomes in infants. These effects are mediated indirectly through the gut-brain axis[43]. By shaping the gut microbiota, HMOs influence the production of neuroactive molecules such as serotonin and SCFAs, which can cross the blood-brain barrier and affect brain development. Additionally, HMOs may directly interact with neuronal cells, promoting neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity[44].

Systemic effects and long-term health outcomes

Beyond infancy, HMOs exert systemic effects that support long-term health outcomes. They are thought to lower the risk of metabolic diseases by promoting a healthy gut microbiota, which is linked to improved glucose metabolism and lipid profiles[32]. HMOs also possess anti-inflammatory properties that may reduce the risk of chronic inflammatory conditions, including allergies and autoimmune diseases. In animal studies, HMOs have been shown to enhance bone health by increasing calcium absorption and improving bone mineralization[45].

Unique structural and functional adaptations

The structural diversity of HMOs underpins their extensive range of functions. Fucosylated HMOs, such as 2′-FL and 3′-FL, are particularly effective in preventing pathogen adhesion, while sialylated HMOs, including 3′-SL and 6′-SL, provide antiviral protection and immune modulation[46]. Neutral HMOs predominantly act as prebiotics, whereas acidic HMOs exhibit anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. This intricate interplay among HMO structures ensures a broad spectrum of protective and developmental benefits, tailored to the infant’s evolving needs[47].

Secretion dynamics of HMOs: HMOs are a unique and abundant component of human milk, second only to lactose and lipids in concentration. Their secretion and composition evolve dynamically across lactation stages, adapting to the infant’s changing developmental and immunological needs[5]. During early lactation, colostrum contains the highest concentration of HMOs, typically ranging from 20-25 g/L. This peak aligns with the neonate’s vulnerability to pathogens and the immaturity of their immune and gastrointestinal systems[32]. In colostrum, HMOs serve critical functions, acting as antimicrobial agents that block pathogen adhesion, prebiotics that selectively promote beneficial gut microbes such as Bifidobacterium species, and modulators of immune system development. These roles provide robust protection during the critical early days of life[48].

As lactation transitions to the transitional milk stage, typically between 6-14 days postpartum, HMO concentrations begin to decline to approximately 15-20 g/L. Transitional milk bridges the gap between the immunologically dense colostrum and the nutritionally stable mature milk[49]. By the time mature milk is produced, around 15 days postpartum, HMO concentrations stabilize at 10-15 g/L. Despite the reduction in concentration, the diversity of HMOs remains essential for sustaining immune protection, shaping the gut microbiota, and supporting neurological development. This diversity is particularly important as the infant’s immune system matures and their microbiota begins to stabilize[50].

The gradual decline in HMO concentration aligns with the infant’s developmental milestones. Early in life, HMOs act as decoy receptors, preventing the adhesion of pathogens such as E. coli, C. jejuni, and Salmonella enterica to host cells[51]. They also promote the colonization of beneficial microbes, enhancing gut barrier integrity and reducing infection risks. As the infant’s immune system strengthens, the lower HMO concentrations in mature milk provide sustained, albeit reduced, immunological support. This adaptive secretion system extends into late lactation, coinciding with the introduction of complementary foods. At this stage, breast milk shifts from being the primary nutritional source to a supplementary role, with HMOs continuing to support gut health and infection prevention, facilitating the infant’s transition to solid foods[32].

Several factors influence HMO secretion dynamics. Maternal genetics, particularly the FUT2 gene, determine secretor status, which affects the types and abundance of HMOs, such as α-1,2-fucosylated HMOs. Maternal health, diet, the infant’s gestational age at birth, and the lactation stage also play significant roles in shaping HMO composition[52]. For instance, preterm milk often contains higher concentrations of protective HMOs to address the heightened needs of premature infants. These dynamics highlight the finely tuned nature of HMO secretion, which evolves to match the developmental needs of the infant[53].

The temporal changes in HMO concentrations underscore their critical role in infant health and development. Beyond protecting against infections and shaping the gut microbiota, HMOs have been linked to improved cognitive outcomes, with specific structures, such as 2′-FL, associated with enhanced neurological development[3]. The adaptive secretion of HMOs throughout lactation reflects the intricate biology of human milk, optimized for promoting infant growth, immunity, and long-term health[38]. Future research should prioritize understanding individual variations in HMO profiles, their long-term health impacts, and potential therapeutic applications, especially for formula-fed infants and preterm newborns. Such advancements could revolutionize pediatric nutrition and improve care for vulnerable populations.

Maternal factors affecting HMOs composition: HMOs are uniquely tailored to support infant health and development, with their composition influenced by both maternal and environmental factors. While genetic determinants such as secretor status and Lewis blood type play a primary role, maternal physiology, diet, health status, stress levels, parity, and environmental exposures significantly modulate the diversity and concentration of HMOs[54]. Understanding these influences provides insights into the dynamic nature of HMO secretion and its role in optimizing infant nutrition and immunity.

Maternal nutrition impacts the availability of substrates and cofactors required for HMO synthesis, indirectly influencing HMO concentration and composition. Adequate carbohydrate intake is crucial as glucose and galactose form the lactose core of all HMOs[55]. Maternal carbohydrate restriction (e.g., in low-carb diets) may reduce total HMO synthesis. Dietary fats, particularly PUFAs, can influence the production of sialylated HMOs, as sialic acid metabolism is linked to lipid pathways[56]. Amino acid availability supports the enzymatic activity of glycosyltransferases involved in HMO synthesis[57]. Iron and Zinc are essential for enzymatic functions in the HMO biosynthesis pathway. Iron deficiency may impair the synthesis of fucosylated and sialylated HMOs. B Vitamins act as cofactors in metabolic pathways that synthesize nucleotide sugars, precursors for HMOs[58]. Diets rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains may enhance HMO synthesis by providing essential nutrients and reducing oxidative stress. Conversely, nutrient-poor diets may limit the availability of substrates required for optimal HMO production[32].

The mother's overall health significantly affects HMO composition and secretion. Obesity is associated with alterations in HMO profiles, including reduced fucosylated HMOs like 2′-FL, which may impair antimicrobial protection[59]. Malnutrition or low body mass index may reduce overall milk production and the concentration of HMOs. Gestational diabetes has been linked to changes in HMO profiles, particularly lower levels of fucosylation and sialylation, which may impact infant gut microbiota and immune development[7]. Thyroid hormone imbalances can affect metabolic pathways involved in HMO biosynthesis. Maternal infections and inflammation may alter HMO production. Elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines may downregulate enzymes critical for fucosylation and sialylation, leading to a less diverse HMO profile[60].

Psychological and physiological stress during lactation can affect HMO synthesis through hormonal and metabolic pathways. Elevated cortisol levels in stressed mothers may interfere with glycosylation processes, altering the balance of HMO subtypes[61]. Chronic stress may reduce sialylated HMO levels, potentially impairing their protective effects against viral and bacterial infections. Stress-induced changes in insulin, prolactin, and other hormones can disrupt the lactational metabolic environment, indirectly influencing HMO composition[62].

Studies suggest that multiparous mothers (those with multiple pregnancies) may produce milk with higher HMO concentrations compared to primiparous mothers, likely due to enhanced mammary gland adaptation and metabolic efficiency in subsequent lactations[63]. Colostrum contains the highest concentrations of HMOs, particularly fucosylated and sialylated types, reflecting the neonate's need for immediate immune protection. As lactation progresses, total HMO levels decline, but non-fucosylated HMOs like 3-FL increase, supporting gut microbiota diversity and resilience during complementary feeding[7].

Environmental conditions, including geography, pollutants, and breastfeeding practices, influence HMO profiles. Differences in secretor status prevalence and breastfeeding duration across populations contribute to regional variations in HMO profiles[64]. For example, rural Kenyan mothers exhibit prolonged secretion of 3-FL and LNT due to extended breastfeeding and minimal dietary processing, supporting microbiota dominated by Bifidobacterium infantis. Exposure to environmental toxins such as heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants may disrupt metabolic pathways and reduce the diversity and functionality of HMOs[65]. Air quality and water contamination in certain regions may indirectly affect maternal health and milk composition[66]. In some cultures, early weaning or supplementation with formula reduces HMO exposure during critical periods of infant development. Conversely, traditional breastfeeding practices in rural areas may extend the protective benefits of HMOs[67]. The interplay between maternal and environmental factors creates a dynamic landscape of HMO secretion. A nutritionally balanced and stress-free mother is more likely to produce a diverse and protective HMO profile. Environmental stressors such as food insecurity, pollution, and limited healthcare access exacerbate disparities in HMO secretion, potentially increasing infant susceptibility to infections and poor health outcomes[68] (Table 2).

Table 2 Maternal factors affecting human milk oligosaccharides composition.
Factor
Key influence
Examples and mechanisms
Maternal geneticsPrimary determinant of HMO diversity and abundanceSecretor Status: Active FUT2 gene leads to higher 2′-FL levels; Lewis blood type: Influences specific HMO fucosylation patterns
Dietary intakeAvailability of substrates and cofactors for HMO synthesisCarbohydrates: Essential for lactose core formation; PUFAs: Support sialylated HMO production; Micronutrients: Iron, zinc, and B vitamins enhance enzymatic activity
Maternal health statusAlters HMO composition and concentrationObesity: Reduces fucosylated HMOs (e.g., 2′-FL); Diabetes: Lowers fucosylation and sialylation; Infections/Inflammation: Downregulates glycosylation enzymes
Stress levelsImpacts hormonal and metabolic pathwaysCortisol: Reduces sialylated HMO levels; Chronic Stress: Alters glycosylation balance and overall HMO diversity
Parity (number of pregnancies)Enhanced mammary adaptation and metabolic efficiency in multiparous mothersHigher HMO concentrations in multiparous mothers; Primiparous mothers may produce less diverse HMO profiles
Lactation stageDynamic changes in HMO levels during breastfeedingColostrum: High fucosylated and sialylated HMOs for immune protection; Mature Milk: Decline in total HMOs; increase in 3-FL for gut microbiota diversity
Environmental ConditionsGeographic, pollutant, and cultural influences on HMO secretionRural areas: Prolonged breastfeeding supports 3-FL and LNT secretion (e.g., Kenyan mothers); Pollutants: Disrupt metabolic pathways and reduce HMO diversity
Breastfeeding practicesDuration and exclusivity influence HMO exposureExtended Breastfeeding: Enhances long-term microbial and immune benefits; Early Weaning: Reduces HMO exposure in critical periods

Infant-specific utilization of HMOs: HMOs are critical to infant health, serving as prebiotics, antimicrobial agents, and immune modulators. Infants’ utilization of HMOs is highly adaptive, shaped by the infant’s age, gut microbiota composition, genetic makeup, and overall health status[3]. HMOs are indigestible by the infant and reach the colon intact, where they selectively nourish beneficial microbes, particularly Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis and Bifidobacterium breve. These bacteria have specialized enzymatic machinery to metabolize HMOs, giving them a competitive advantage over pathogenic microbes[38]. The fermentation of HMOs produces SCFAs, such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which lower gut pH, inhibit pathogen growth, and strengthen gut barrier integrity. During the neonatal phase, HMOs support establishing a protective microbial community, while later in infancy, they maintain microbial diversity and resilience as the infant's diet diversifies[69].

HMOs also act as decoy receptors for bacterial and viral pathogens, preventing their adhesion to host epithelial cells. Fucosylated HMOs like 2′-FL inhibit pathogens such as C. jejuni and Enteropathogenic E. coli, while sialylated HMOs like 3′-SL block Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and respiratory viruses like respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)[39]. These protective effects are particularly crucial in early life when the infant is most vulnerable to infections. As the infant grows, non-fucosylated HMOs like LNT sustainably neutralize bacterial toxins and support gut health[32].

In addition to direct pathogen defense, HMOs influence the infant's immune system. They modulate innate immunity by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoting regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10, while enhancing mucosal immunity through the development of GALT[6]. HMOs also support adaptive immunity by interacting with dendritic cells and promoting immune tolerance to beneficial microbes. Furthermore, SCFAs produced by microbial fermentation of HMOs contribute to systemic immune regulation and strengthen the gut barrier[5].

The infant’s genetic background significantly impacts HMO utilization. Secretor status, determined by the FUT2 gene, affects the abundance of fucosylated HMOs, with secretor infants benefiting from a higher prevalence of Bifidobacterium species[70]. Preterm infants, with their underdeveloped gut and microbiota, rely heavily on HMOs to establish protective bacterial communities and reduce the risk of NEC. Health conditions like infections or antibiotic use can disrupt HMO utilization, highlighting the importance of maintaining a balanced microbiota during infancy[71].

The benefits of HMO utilization extend beyond infancy, influencing long-term health outcomes. By promoting immune tolerance and microbial diversity, HMOs reduce the risk of allergic and autoimmune diseases, while their role in metabolic programming may lower the likelihood of obesity and metabolic disorders later in life[38]. Additionally, sialylated HMOs are precursors for gangliosides, essential for brain development and cognitive function. Despite these advances, gaps remain in understanding the variability in HMO metabolism among different populations and genetic backgrounds, as well as the long-term effects of early HMO exposure. Future research should explore these areas and investigate the potential for HMO supplementation in formula-fed and preterm infants to replicate the benefits of breastfeeding[72].

HMOs’ antimicrobial effects

HMOs are critical breast milk components exhibiting potent antimicrobial properties. They offer multifaceted protection against pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. These effects are mediated through diverse and overlapping mechanisms, including structural mimicry of host cell glycans, prebiotic activity, immune modulation, and maintenance of gut barrier integrity[73]. The antimicrobial effects of HMOs have been explored through various studies, as summarized in Tables 3 and 4. These studies provide critical insights into the mechanisms and spectrum of activity of HMOs against different pathogens[74].

Table 3 Specific anti-microbial roles of some human milk oligosaccharides.
HMO type
Key pathogens targeted
Mode of action
2'-FLCampylobacter jejuni, EPEC, Norovirus, RSV, RotavirusAnti-adhesive activity, inhibition of pathogen attachment to epithelial cells, by acting as a decoy receptor
3-FLEPEC, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, and Norovirus (pathogens commonly encountered later in infancy)The prebiotic effect promotes beneficial bacteria and blocks pathogen adhesion
DFLEscherichia coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica, Helicobacter pyloriAnti-adhesive activity preventing pathogen attachment to epithelial cells; supports immune modulation and gut barrier function
LNTEntamoeba histolytica, GB. streptococcus, Vibrio cholera toxinNeutralization of bacterial toxins and prevention of protozoal adhesion
3'-SLEPEC, Helicobacter pylori, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholera toxin, RSV, RotavirusBlocking bacterial adhesion and neutralizing bacterial toxins
6'-SLEPEC, Helicobacter pylori, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Influenza virus, RotavirusInhibition of bacterial and viral adherence, especially in respiratory and gastrointestinal infections
Table 4 Studies of anti-bacterial effects of human milk oligosaccharides.
Ref.
Type of article
Microbes investigated
Types of HMOs
Mechanisms of action
Key findings
Patient population
Morrow et al[76]Observational studyCampylobacter jejuni, Calicivirus2′-FL, LNDFHInhibits pathogen adhesion by mimicking host glycans; Modulates immune responses, reducing intestinal inflammationSignificant reduction in diarrhea incidence (P = 0.004 for Campylobacterjejuni, P = 0.012 for Calicivirus)Breastfed human infants
Yu et al[77]Experimental studyCampylobacter jejuni2′-FLPrevents bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells; Suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-1β)Colonization reduced by 80% in mouse models; Lowered intestinal inflammationMouse model
Facinelli et al[78]Experimental in vitro studyE. coli, Salmonella fyris2'-FL, 6'-SL2'-FL and 6'-SL significantly reduced the adhesion of Escherichia coli to Caco-2 cells at human milk concentrations but no effect on Salmonella fyrisReducing the adhesion of harmful bacteria like E. coliBacterial adhesion to Caco-2 cells (a human intestinal cell line) cultures
Wang et al[79]Experimental studyE. coli O157: H72′-FLActs as a soluble decoy receptor; Enhances mucin secretion (MUC2); Promotes microbiota balanceColonization reduced by > 90% in mouse intestines; Lowered pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α)Mouse model
Lin et al[99]Experimental studyUPECNeutral and sialic acid-rich HMOsReduces bacterial internalization into epithelial cells. Suppresses UPEC-induced proinflammatory signaling (MAPK, NF-κB)Reduced cytotoxicity and improved bladder epithelial integrity; Decreased cell death and detachmentIn vitro bladder epithelial cells
Martín-Sosa et al[100]Experimental studyETEC, UPECSialylated oligosaccharides HMOs strongly inhibited hemagglutination mediated by ETEC strains expressing CFA/I and CFA/II. HMOs also inhibited hemagglutination by UPEC strainsThe inhibitory capacity was significantly reduced when HMOs were desialylated, highlighting the importance of the sialylated fractionIn vitro
Coppa et al[102]Experimental studyEPEC, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella fyrisAcidic, neutral high-molecular-weight, and neutral low-molecular-weight HMOsBlocks bacterial adhesion to Caco-2 cells by acting as decoy receptorsAcidic HMOs inhibit all three pathogens. Neutral high-molecular-weight HMOs inhibit E. coli and V. cholerae. Neutral low-molecular-weight HMOs inhibit E. coli and S. fyrisIn vitro with Caco-2 cells
Newburg et al[103]Experimental studyE. coli (heat-stable enterotoxin, (ST)Fucosylated HMOsOligosaccharide fraction provided significant protection against the diarrheagenic effects of E. coli heat-ST), while the lactose fraction did notAmong HMOs, the neutral fraction exhibited protective activity, whereas the acidic fraction did not (22% vs 57% mortality, respectivelySuckling mouse model
Noguera-Obenza et al[101]Observational studyEHEC, EPECNot specified; focus on secretory IgA (sIgA) in human milkNeutralizes bacterial adhesion by targeting virulence antigens (e.g., EspA, EspB, intimin)sIgA in human milk reduces adhesion of EHEC/EPEC to gut epithelium. - Antibodies are regionally variable and linked to pathogen exposure historyMilk samples from breastfeeding mothers (United States and Mexico)
He et al[109]Experimental studyAIECExosome-encapsulated HMOs (e.g., 2’-FL, Sialyl lactose)Modulates immunity by reducing LPS-induced inflammation. Promotes anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypeReduced intestinal inflammation and bacterial load in AIEC-infected miceIn vivo murine model
Manthey et al[80]Experimental studyEPECVarious HMOsBlocks bacterial attachment by acting as decoy receptorsReduced EPEC attachment in vitro; Decreased intestinal colonization in mouse modelsIn vitro epithelial cells and suckling mice models
Chambers et al[81]Experimental studyGB. streptococcusPooled and single-entity HMOsIncreases cell permeability; Bioorthogonal probes retain activity and identify cellular targetsUp to 90% growth inhibition by pooled HMOs; DFL, LNT-II, and LSTa exhibit significant antibacterial activity (35%-60%)In vitro GB. streptococcus cultures
Chambers et al[117]Experimental studyGB. streptococcusVarious HMOsIncreases membrane permeability. Perturbs metabolic pathways, including glycerophospholipid and linoleic acid metabolismPotentiated trimethoprim activity, reducing MIC by up to 512-fold; Synergistic effects observed in combination therapyIn vitro studies with clinical GB. streptococcus isolates
Ackerman et al[82]Experimental studyGB. streptococcusPooled donor HMOsDisrupts biofilm formation; Alters bacterial cell arrangementDonor-specific effects: HMOs from some donors inhibited biofilm production and bacterial growth by 40%; Biofilm structure changes were observed using electron microscopyIn vitro GB. streptococcus cultures from human donors
Lin et al[83]Experimental studyGB. streptococcusNeutral (non-sialylated) HMOsDirect bacteriostatic effect; Neutral HMOs inhibit growth by impairing glycosyltransferase functions; Synergistic effects with antibioticsNeutral HMOs reduce GB. streptococcus growth by up to 98%; Identified glycosyltransferase (gbs0738) as a target for HMO-mediated inhibition; Synergy observed with vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, significantly lowering the required antibiotic doseIn vitro GB. streptococcus cultures
Moore et al[84]Experimental studyGB. streptococcusPurified HMOsInhibits biofilm formation in colonizing and invasive strains; Exhibits strain-specific effects based on capsular serotype and sequence type50% biofilm inhibition for colonizing strains, 45% for invasive strains; Significant inhibition across multiple capsular types (CpsIb, CpsII, etc.); Effective biofilm dismantling of mature biofilms30 diverse clinical and laboratory strains of GB. streptococcus (in vitro analysis)
Andreas et al[118]Clinical and experimental studyGB. streptococcusSpecific fucosylated HMOsReduces GB. streptococcus colonization in mothers and infants; Acts bacteriostatically, impairing glycosyltransferase-dependent cell proliferationLNDFHI and related HMOs reduce GB. Streptococcus growth by 50%; Lewis-positive mothers produce HMOs that reduce maternal and infant colonization; Lewis-negative mothers could benefit from synthetic HMO supplementationGambian mother-infant pairs and in vitro analysis
Mysore et al[85]Preclinical studyHelicobacter pylori38-SL, a natural HMO analogInhibits bacterial adhesion to gastric epithelial cells; Acts as a decoy receptor preventing colonization2 out of 6 animals achieved permanent H. pylori eradication; Safe and showed efficacy in rhesus monkey model; Transient decrease in bacterial load observed in other regimensH. pylori-positive rhesus monkeys
Parente et al[86]Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialHelicobacter pylori3’SL3’SL fail to eradicate or suppress H. pylori infectionAdults with dyspepsia and confirmed H. pylori infection
Jantscher-Krenn et al[116]Experimental studyEntamoeba histolyticaPooled HMOsReduces trophozoite attachment to intestinal epitheliumLNT has significant protection (up to 80%) while fucosylated HMOs are ineffective. GOS completely block E. histolytica attachment and cytotoxicity at 8 mg/mLIn vitro cultures of E. histolytica and human intestinal epithelial HT-29 cells
Nguyen et al[105]Experimental studyClostridium difficile, specifically focusing on its toxin A (TcdA) and the carbohydrate binding site (TcdA-f2)LNFPV & LNHA mixture of HMOs binds to the carbohydrate binding site of Clostridium difficile toxin A (TcdA-f2) at a concentration of 20 g/mLLNFPV and LNH demonstrated strong binding with TcdA-f2, exhibiting docking energies of -9.48 kcal/mol and -12.81 kcal/mol, respectively
Structural mimicry and anti-adhesive activity

One of the primary mechanisms through which HMOs confer antimicrobial protection is by acting as decoy receptors. Structurally, HMOs closely resemble glycans present on epithelial cell surfaces, in the infant’s gut, respiratory tract, and other mucosal tissues, which are often targeted by microbial adhesins initiating colonization and infection during the initial stages of infection[75]. HMOs act as soluble decoy receptors by binding to pathogens and preventing their attachment to host tissues. For instance, 2'-Fucosyllactose (2'-FL) and 6'-SL effectively inhibit the adhesion of pathogens such as C. jejuni[76,77], Enteropathogenic E. coli[78-80], Group B streptococci[81-84], H. pylori[85,86], and various viral strains, including norovirus[87-90], Rotavirus[91-94], and respiratory viruses[95-98]. These HMOs bind to the pathogens, preventing them from attaching to epithelial cells and thereby mitigating infection.

Studies further support this anti-adhesive activity. Morrow et al[76] demonstrated that 2'-FL significantly reduced the incidence of diarrhea caused by C. jejuni and Calicivirus in breastfed infants. Similarly, Yu et al[77] found that 2'-FL reduced bacterial colonization by 80% in mouse models and suppressed intestinal inflammation. Similarly, Lin et al[99], Martín-Sosa et al[100], and Noguera-Obenza et al[101] demonstrated the potent inhibitory effects of HMOs on E. coli by disrupting bacterial adherence to intestinal cells, showcasing their potential to prevent gastrointestinal infections. In a comparable vein, Coppa et al[102] highlighted the ability of HMOs to inhibit Salmonella growth, suggesting a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Similarly, sialylated HMOs like 3′-SL and 6′-SL inhibit H. pylori, a pathogen associated with gastric inflammation and ulcers[85]. In addition, certain HMOs can inhibit the toxic effects of certain bacterial enterotoxins. For example, Newburg et al[103] found that the oligosaccharide fraction of fucosylated HMOs provided significant protection against the diarrheagenic effects of E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin, while the lactose fraction did not. Furthermore, Weichert et al[104] studied the impact of HMOs on respiratory pathogens like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and found significant reductions in biofilm formation, a key factor in chronic infections. This expands the scope of HMOs beyond gastrointestinal pathogens. Additionally, Nguyen et al[105] investigated the effect of specific HMOs on Clostridium difficile, finding that certain structures were particularly effective in reducing spore germination and toxin production. This indicates the selective antimicrobial action of HMOs depending on their structure. These findings highlight the clinical potential of HMOs in reducing the burden of infectious diseases.

The ability of HMOs to act as decoy receptors extends to viruses such as RSV and influenza virus, where sialylated HMOs prevent viral attachment to respiratory epithelial cells[95-98]. This dual functionality of HMOs in gastrointestinal and respiratory systems underscores their versatile antimicrobial role. In addition to blocking pathogen adherence, HMOs neutralize bacterial toxins, reducing disease severity. LNT, for example, interferes with the activity of Vibrio cholera toxin, preventing its binding to gut epithelial cells and mitigating diarrhea. HMOs also inhibit bacterial colonization through their direct effects on pathogen virulence. For instance, SCFAs produced during HMO fermentation by gut bacteria create an acidic gut environment that inhibits toxin activity and the growth of harmful bacteria like Salmonella enterica and Clostridium difficile. Table 4 shows some studies concerned with anti-bacterial effects of HMOs.

Prebiotic effects and microbiota modulation

HMOs selectively promote the growth of beneficial gut microbiota, such as Bifidobacteria (longum subsp. infantis and breve) and Lactobacilli. These bacteria possess specialized enzymatic machinery to metabolize HMOs, giving them a competitive advantage over pathogens[48]. By outcompeting harmful microbes for nutrients and ecological niches, these beneficial bacteria establish a microbiota-driven barrier against infections. The fermentation of HMOs by these bacteria produces SCFAs, such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which not only inhibit pathogen growth but also serve as energy sources for intestinal epithelial cells, promoting gut health and strengthening the epithelial barrier[106]. This dual action contributes to gut homeostasis and enhances the infant’s resistance to infections. For example, 3-FL has been shown to support beneficial bacteria and block the adhesion of pathogens like Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[104]. Salli et al[107] explored the synergistic effects of HMOs with probiotics, reporting enhanced bacterial inhibition when HMOs were used in combination with specific probiotic strains. This points to the potential of HMOs to complement existing probiotic therapies. In addition, Wang et al[79] reported that 2'-FL not only acted as a decoy receptor but also enhanced mucin secretion, promoting a balanced microbiota and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor.

Immune modulation

HMOs actively shape the infant’s immune system by modulating innate and adaptive responses. They promote the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, while suppressing pro-inflammatory signals like IL-8, maintaining a balanced immune state that prevents excessive tissue damage[46]. This modulation is essential for neonates, whose immune systems are still immature. By enhancing the development of GALT, HMOs stimulate the production of secretory IgA, a critical component of mucosal immunity[108]. HMOs play a pivotal role in modulating immune responses. They influence both innate and adaptive immunity, reducing inflammation and enhancing pathogen clearance. For instance, He et al[109] demonstrated that exosome-encapsulated HMOs suppressed lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation and promoted an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype in mice infected with adherent-invasive E. coli. Similarly, Lin et al[99] showed that sialic acid-rich HMOs reduced pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, such as MAPK and NF-κB, in bladder epithelial cells infected with uropathogenic E. coli. HMOs also interact with dendritic cells to modulate T-cell differentiation, promoting immune tolerance while enhancing defense against pathogens.

Antiviral and anti-parasitic effects

HMOs exhibit significant antiviral activity by targeting a range of viral pathogens, including norovirus, rotavirus, RSV, and influenza virus[110]. Sialylated HMOs such as 3′-SL and 6′-SL have demonstrated efficacy against respiratory pathogens, including RSV and influenza virus, by preventing their attachment to respiratory epithelial cells[111]. Decoy receptor mechanisms are particularly effective against viruses that bind to host glycans, such as Norovirus, which targets histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs). Patil et al[112] and Koromyslova et al[87] showed that 2'-FL inhibited the binding of Norovirus genogroups GI.1 and GII.17 to HBGAs, significantly reducing viral replication in human intestinal models. Similarly, sialylated HMOs effectively block Rotavirus[113] and Influenza[114,115] virus attachment, including 3'-SL) and 6'-SL. Beyond decoy activity, HMOs modulate antiviral immunity. Xiao et al[95] found that 2'-FL enhanced humoral and cellular immune responses to Influenza vaccination, while Mahaboob Ali et al[96] identified HMOs with high binding affinities to viral proteins, suggesting their potential as antiviral agents. These findings underscore the broad-spectrum antiviral potential of HMOs. Additionally, HMOs like LNT prevent protozoal adhesion, exemplified by their protective effect against Entamoeba histolytica[116]. By reducing infection rates, HMOs lower the reliance on antibiotics during infancy, contributing to the mitigation of antibiotic resistance and preserving microbiota balance. Table 5 shows some studies concerned with anti-viral effects of HMOs

Table 5 Studies of the role of human milk oligosaccharides against viral infections.
Ref.
Virus investigated
Type of HMOs
Mechanisms of action
Key findings
Patient population
Patil et al[112]Human Norovirus (HuNoV)2'-FLActs as decoy receptors, blocking binding to HBGAsSignificant inhibition of Norovirus GII.4 Sydney [P16] replication in adult and pediatric HIEs. Less effective in infant HIEs due to low HBGA expressionAdults and pediatric intestinal organoids
Koromyslova et al[87]GI.1 and GII.17 Noroviruses2'-FLInhibits binding to HBGAs by mimicking natural attachment sitesBroad inhibition of GI.1 and GII.17 norovirus binding across genogroups. Demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition with 2'-FL in vitroNot specified (laboratory models)
Hanisch et al[88]Norovirus GII.4 (Sydney 2012) and GII.10 (Vietnam 026)High-molecular mass HMOs rich in fucoseMultivalent fucose presentation enhances steric and valency effects for strong virus binding inhibitionHigh-mass HMOs with terminal blood group H1 or Lewis-b antigens showed potent binding to GII.4; distinct preferences observed for GII.10Not specified (laboratory models)
Weichert et al[89]Norovirus (not strain-specific)2'-FL and 3-FLStructurally mimic HBGAs and block norovirus binding to surrogate HBGA samples2'-FL and 3-FL bind to HBGA pockets on the capsid, acting as naturally occurring decoys to inhibit norovirus attachmentNot specified (laboratory models)
Derya et al[90]Norovirus GII.17 and GII.4LNFP I and simpler fucosylated HMOsStructurally similar to HBGAs; block binding to natural receptorsSimple fucosylated HMOs were more effective than complex ones (e.g., LNFP I) in inhibiting GII.17 and GII.4 binding to human gastric mucinsNot specified (laboratory models)
Hester et al[91]RV OSU and Wa strainsSA-containing HMOs (e.g., 3'-SL, 6'-SL), neutral HMOs (e.g., LNnT)Blocks viral binding and decreases infectivity through decoy receptor mechanisms.SA-containing HMOs inhibited RV OSU infectivity in vitro. Both neutral and SA-containing HMOs reduced viral replication during acute infection in situIn vitro and 21-day-old piglets
Comstock et al[92]Rotavirus OSU strain2'-FL, LNnT, 6'-SL, 3'-SL, and free SAModulates systemic and gastrointestinal immune cells to alter infection susceptibilityHMO-fed pigs showed increased NK and memory T cells and reduced immune cell populations linked to infection compared to formula-fed pigsColostrum-deprived neonatal piglets
Li et al[93]Rotavirus OSU strain4 g/L HMOs (2'-FL, LNnT, 6'-SL, 3'-SL)Modulates immune response and alters colonic microbiota to reduce diarrhea durationHMO-fed piglets had shorter diarrhea duration, enhanced anti-inflammatory and Th1 cytokine expression, altered colonic microbiota, and increased pHFormula-fed newborn piglets
Laucirica et al[94]Human Rotavirus G1P[8] and G2P[4]2'-FL, 3'-SL, 6'-SL, galacto-oligosaccharidesActs as soluble decoy receptors, directly affecting the virus to block bindingAll oligosaccharides reduced infectivity in vitro. Maximum reduction for G1P[8] (62%) with 2'-FL and for G2P[4] (73%) with 3'-SL + 6'-SL mixtureAfrican green monkey kidney epithelial cells (MA104)
Gozalbo-Rovira et al[113]Rotavirus P[8] genotypeLNB, precursor of H1 antigenLNB binds to the VP8* domain of the P[8] VP4 spike protein, inhibiting viral attachmentLNB binds with reduced affinity but induces conformational changes that inhibit rotavirus infection. Differences in ligand affinity explain variability in susceptibility among secretor and non-secretor phenotypesNot specified (laboratory models)
Xiao et al[95]Influenza virus2'-FLEnhances both innate and adaptive immune responses to vaccination2'-FL improved vaccine-specific humoral and cellular immune responses, including CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation, dendritic cell maturation, and antigen presentation6-week-old female C57Bl/6JOlaHsd mice
Mahaboob Ali et al[96]Influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, SARS-CoV-2Multiple HMOs (e.g., 2'-FL, LNnT)Mimic host cell receptors to inhibit viral entry by binding to viral surface proteinsIn silico studies identified HMOs with high binding affinities to viral proteins, suggesting their potential as viral entry inhibitors and antiviral agentsComputational in silico modeling
Pandey et al[97]Avian Influenza (H9N2 and other subtypes)3'-SL, 6'-SLBind hemagglutinin and block viral attachment to host cells3'-SL showed broad-spectrum activity against avian influenza in vitro. In vivo, 3'-SL eliminated H9N2 in chickens and improved clinical symptomsPathogen-free chickens
Duska-McEwen et al[98]RSV, Influenza 2'-FL, 6'-SL, 3'-SL, LNnTEnhance innate immunity by reducing viral load, cytokines, and inflammation2'-FL reduced RSV viral load and cytokines. LNnT and 6'-SL decreased Influenza viral load. 6'-SL reduced IP-10 and TNF-α in RSV-infected PBMCsIn vitro respiratory epithelial cells and PBMCs
Schijf et al[114]RSVscGOS, lcFOS, pAOSModulates Th1/Th2 immune responses and enhances RSV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cellsIncreased RSV clearance, enhanced Th1 response, reduced Th2 cytokines, and lower airway eosinophilia in RSV-infected miceRSV-infected C57BL/6 mice
Guo et al[115]Influenza virus3'-SLSynergistically reduces viral load and inflammation when combined with OPN3'-SL and OPN reduced viral load by 75%, suppressed cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL-6), and exhibited anti-inflammatory effectsHuman laryngeal carcinoma cell line (HEP-2)
Target-specific and synergistic effects

Several studies highlight the target-specific and synergistic effects of HMOs. For instance, Chambers et al[117] demonstrated that pooled HMOs potentiated the activity of antibiotics like trimethoprim against GB. streptococcus, reducing the MIC by up to 512-fold. In addition, Andreas et al[118] provided insights into the bacteriostatic effects of specific fucosylated HMOs, particularly lacto-N-difucohexaose I, which reduced GB. streptococcus colonization in mothers and infants by 50%. This highlights the potential of leveraging maternal HMO profiles, such as those associated with the Lewis-positive phenotype, to reduce GB. streptococcus colonization and transmission. Neutral HMOs also exhibit bacteriostatic effects by impairing glycosyltransferase functions in GB. streptococcus, as Lin et al[83] observed. This bacteriostatic effect was further amplified when neutral HMOs were combined with antibiotics like vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, demonstrating significant synergy. These findings suggest that HMOs could serve as adjuncts to existing antimicrobial therapies to lower the effective dose of antibiotics, enhancing their efficacy and reducing the risk of resistance.

Gut barrier integrity and pathogen exclusion

HMOs reinforce the gut epithelial barrier, preventing pathogen translocation and systemic infection. They promote tight junction integrity and mucin production, enhancing the protective mucus layer, and preventing the translocation of pathogens and toxins into systemic circulation[46]. This strengthening of the gut barrier is particularly critical for neonates, who are at high risk of systemic infections due to their immature immune systems[119]. Furthermore, HMOs stimulate the production of mucins, which form a protective layer over epithelial cells, creating a physical barrier against pathogen invasion. For instance, Jantscher-Krenn et al[116] showed that LNT protected against Entamoeba histolytica by reducing trophozoite attachment to intestinal epithelial cells. Nguyen et al[105] reported that specific HMOs bound to Clostridium difficile toxin A prevent its interaction with epithelial cells and mitigate cytotoxicity.

HMOs offer a comprehensive antimicrobial defense strategy through their structural mimicry, prebiotic effects, immune modulation, and barrier-enhancing properties[120]. Their ability to target a diverse and broad spectrum of pathogens-bacteria, viruses, and protozoa-highlights their therapeutic potential in preventing and managing infectious diseases and minimizing long-term complications such as malnutrition, growth retardation, and immune dysfunction[121]. They also shape the infant gut microbiome during a critical developmental window, influencing lifelong immunity and metabolic health[122]. The synergistic effects of HMOs with antibiotics and vaccines further expand their utility as adjunctive agents, paving the way for innovative interventions in both clinical and nutritional contexts[123]. This dynamic interplay of HMO structure, microbiota interactions, and immune modulation highlights their central role in infant health. Table 3 shows the specific anti-microbial spectrum of some of the common HMOs and the possible mechanism of action.

Temporal changes in HMO levels during lactation and their relation to infections in the first two years of life

HMOs are essential for antimicrobial defense mechanisms in breast milk, protecting against pathogens and shaping the infant’s gut microbiota. The temporal variation in HMO concentrations during lactation aligns closely with the infant’s evolving immunological and developmental needs[6]. This dynamic relationship underscores the critical role of HMOs in supporting infant health and development. The concentration and composition of HMOs change throughout lactation, influenced by maternal genetics, environmental factors, and the infant’s developmental stage[3] (Figure 2).

Early lactation (colostrum and transitional milk: 0-30 days postnatal): In early lactation, colostrum contains the highest concentration of HMOs, ranging from 20-25 g/L. This high concentration reflects the neonate’s immediate need for immune protection and the establishment of a healthy gut microbiota[124]. Among HMOs, 2′-FL is highly abundant in secretor mothers, reaching levels around 2600 mg/kg at 5-11 days postpartum. It provides robust anti-adhesive properties, preventing the attachment of pathogens such as C. jejuni and Enteropathogenic E. coli to host cells, thereby reducing gastrointestinal infections[125]. Conversely, difucosyllactose (DFL) levels are relatively low in this phase (50-100 mg/L) but gradually increase to approximately 100-150 mg/L as milk composition transitions to support the growing infant. Additionally, sialylated HMOs such as 6′-SL are prominent during this period, with concentrations around 340 mg/kg[126]. These HMOs offer protection against respiratory viruses like influenza and gastrointestinal pathogens such as rotavirus. The high levels of fucosylated and sialylated HMOs during early lactation are vital for reducing neonatal vulnerability to infections and fostering the colonization of beneficial microbes like Bifidobacterium species[32].

In addition, early-onset infections with GB. streptococcus peak in neonates (0-7 days), with late-onset disease in the first 3 months. Studies have demonstrated that high levels of 2'-FL during this period may provide protection by preventing bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation[127]. In addition, hospital-acquired infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa are common in neonates. HMOs like 2'-FL and 6'-SL may help reduce their colonization in respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts[128].

Mature milk (40-240 days postpartum): As lactation progresses, total HMO concentrations decline to 10-15 g/L, reflecting the infant’s gradual immune and microbiota maturation. However, there are notable shifts in the dominance of specific HMOs[52]. For instance, while 2′-FL levels remain significant, they decrease from approximately 2300 mg/kg at 12-30 days to 1800 mg/kg at 2-4 months postpartum. Concurrently, DFL levels stabilize or slightly decline to 70-120 mg/L by the end of the second month, then progressively decrease to 30-80 mg/L by 4-8 months as the infant’s reliance on complementary foods increases[129]. Infections with rotavirus and norovirus peak at 6-24 months, with severe cases in infants under one year. The decline in 2'-FL may coincide with reduced natural protection, highlighting the need for supplementary interventions[130,131].

In contrast, 3-FL levels rise significantly, increasing from 580 mg/kg at 12-30 days to 1100 mg/kg at 2-4 months, becoming the predominant fucosylated HMO in later lactation stages. This increase correlates with enhanced pathogen defense and greater microbial diversity, which are critical as the infant encounters a broader range of environmental microbes[7]. Infections with C. jejuni and Enteropathogenic E. coli are common from 6 months onward as complementary feeding starts, introducing potential pathogens[132]. The presence of 3-FL may inhibit adhesion and colonization of these enteric pathogens[69]. In addition, infections with respiratory viruses, such as RSV and Influenza Virus peak during winter months in the first two years. The decline in HMO-mediated protection may correlate with increased vulnerability to respiratory pathogens[133].

Sialylated HMOs also exhibit a shift, with 3′-SL gaining prominence over 6′-SL and reaching concentrations of approximately 290 mg/kg by 2-4 months. These adjustments balance the infant’s continued need for pathogen defense with the promotion of microbial diversity and metabolic support[134]. Elevated 3-FL levels provide ongoing protection against respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, while sialylated HMOs target specific pathogens like rotavirus and influenza, ensuring critical immune support during this vulnerable stage of life[6].

Extended lactation (beyond 240 days): In extended lactation, HMO levels stabilize at approximately 5-10 g/L, maintaining a steady-state profile to support the infant’s immune and gut health as complementary feeding introduces diverse microbial exposures[135]. During this phase, 3-FL levels remain elevated at around 1300 mg/kg, continuing to support microbial balance and providing robust protection against new microbial exposures[136]. The rising dominance of 3-FL correlates with enhanced protection against diverse pathogens and supports gut microbial diversity, reducing the risk of infections linked to environmental exposures[137]. However, chronic colonization with H. pylori begins in early childhood, particularly in developing countries[138]. The reduced HMO levels might contribute to increased susceptibility. Additionally, LNT persists in extended lactation, offering sustained protection against bacterial toxins, such as Vibrio cholera toxin, and protozoal pathogens, including Entamoeba histolytica[139]. This steady-state HMO profile ensures continued immune and gut health benefits, facilitating the infant’s transition to a mixed diet while maintaining robust defenses against infections[34].

Correlation between HMO levels, anti-microbial activity, and geographic variability

The antimicrobial properties of HMOs are influenced by their concentration, diversity, and dynamic changes during lactation. Geographic differences, maternal genetics, and environmental factors further modulate these characteristics[140]. The new data from studies in China, Germany, and Kenya add depth to understanding these correlations. The temporal changes in HMO concentrations align with infant developmental needs, but the pattern varies across populations[141]. HMOs are at their highest concentration during the first weeks postpartum, providing critical pathogen defense and promoting the establishment of beneficial gut microbiota. Secretor mothers with active FUT2 genes produce high levels of fucosylated HMOs like 2′-FL, which decline with time, whereas 3-FL increases in later lactation[142]. Studies show that 3-FL and non-fucosylated HMOs such as LNT dominate in later stages of lactation, maintaining a protective function as the infant's diet diversifies and pathogen exposure increases[6] (Table 6).

Table 6 Studies on human milk oligosaccharides levels, geographic variations, and antimicrobial activity.
Ref.
Population/region
Key findings on HMO levels
Key antimicrobial activity
Geographic influence
Mao et al[144]Urban Chinese mothersHigh 2′-FL and sialylated HMOs (6′-SL) in early lactation; Gradual decline of 2′-FL and HMOs in mature milk2′-FL inhibits Campylobacter jejuni and EPEC; 6′-SL protects against Rotavirus and InfluenzaSecretor status influences early lactation HMO profile, optimizing pathogen defense in neonates
Liu et al[146]Chinese mothers3-FL increases significantly during later lactation; Sialylated HMOs decline after the first month3-FL supports microbial diversity and inhibits Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas aeruginosaExtended breastfeeding in rural areas maintains high HMO levels, supporting long-term pathogen defense
Austin et al[129]Chinese urban settingsEarly high levels of fucosylated HMOs (2′-FL); Non-fucosylated LNT remains stable across lactation stages.LNT neutralizes Vibrio cholera toxin; 2′-FL is critical for early pathogen defenseUrban mothers exhibit shorter lactation duration, potentially limiting long-term HMO-mediated benefits
Siziba et al[145]German infantsHigh variability in HMO profiles across lactation; Secretor mothers show enriched 2′-FL levelsSialylated HMOs reduce inflammatory responses and protect against respiratory pathogens (RSV, Influenza)Differences in breastfeeding practices and complementary feeding influence microbiota outcomes
Derrien et al[65]Rural Kenyan infantsHigh prevalence of 3-FL and LNT in late lactation; Enriched secretor group III (Se+, Le-)3-FL supports Bifidobacterium infantis, lowering pH and reducing enteropathogen colonization; LNT neutralizes toxinsRural diet and prolonged breastfeeding enhance microbiota dominated by B. infants
Kortesniemi et al[147]Chinese mothers across lactation stagesRapid decline in total HMOs from colostrum to mature milk; Sialylated HMOs persist in significant amountsSialylated HMOs prevent Helicobacter pylori adhesion and inhibit rotavirus infectionsSecretor mothers exhibit early robust protection through 2′-FL, but benefits decline as lactation progresses
Asher et al[142]Israeli mothers (Tel Aviv)2′-FL dominant in secretors; LNT and 3-FL dominate in non-secretors; Seasonal and sex-dependent variations in HMO levels2′-FL protects against infections via TLR4 inhibition; High DSLNT in non-secretors' colostrum protects against NECUrban breastfeeding with lower 2′-FL levels compared to global averages; shorter lactation may limit long-term benefits

HMOs act through multiple mechanisms, including decoy receptor activity, toxin neutralization, and immune modulation, all are tailored to the lactation stage and environmental exposure[143]. In China, high concentrations of 2′-FL and sialylated HMOs like 6′-SL during early lactation provide robust protection against pathogens such as C. jejuni and Rotavirus[144]. However, lower fucosylated HMOs levels in non-secretors may affect their infants' susceptibility to gastrointestinal pathogens[145]. In Germany, studies on atopic dermatitis suggest HMOs may influence immune outcomes indirectly through their interaction with the microbiota and modulation of inflammation[65]. In addition, Infants in rural areas in Kenya exhibit higher dominance of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, supported by enriched levels of fucosylated HMOs like 2′-FL[146]. This correlation highlights HMOs' role in sustaining microbiota optimal for pathogen resistance.

Geographic differences in HMO profiles can be attributed to genetic variations and environmental factors such as dietary practices and lactation duration. Populations with a high proportion of secretor mothers, such as those in China[129,146] and Germany[145], exhibit higher levels of 2′-FL, enhancing protection against common gastrointestinal pathogens. Non-secretor mothers in Kenya show higher levels of 3-FL, compensating for the lack of 2′-FL in supporting gut microbiota and preventing infections. Rural Kenyan infants benefit from extended breastfeeding and a microbiota dominated by Bifidobacterium infantis, supported by HMOs metabolized more effectively in the absence of processed foods and antibiotics[65]. Urbanized populations, experience a more diverse microbiota due to complementary feeding practices and shorter breastfeeding duration, which may shift the functional roles of HMOs[142,144].

The interplay between HMO levels and gut microbiota composition is crucial for antimicrobial activity. In Kenyan infants, the enriched HMO group III (Se+, Le-) supports B. infantis, which lowers gut pH, enhancing the microbiota's resistance to enteropathogens[65]. On the other hand, Chinese infants have high levels of sialylated HMOs during early lactation, contributing to the initial colonization of protective bacteria like Bifidobacterium breve[146,147]. In addition, the variability in HMO concentrations observed in German infants correlates with immune outcomes like atopic dermatitis, suggesting HMOs' indirect role in microbial and immune regulation[145]. This dynamic interplay between HMO concentrations, lactation stages, and geographic variability reveals their tailored role in pathogen defense and microbiota modulation. While 2′-FL dominates in secretor populations for early robust antimicrobial defense, 3-FL compensates in non-secretor mothers, especially in rural settings where environmental exposures demand sustained microbiota support. These findings underscore the importance of considering geographic and genetic factors in developing interventions to optimize infant global health[148].

Natural versus synthetic HMOs

HMOs are a unique and abundant component of human breast milk, comprising over 200 distinct types. These oligosaccharides are highly specialized and adapt to an infant’s developmental stage, maternal genetics, diet, and the progression of lactation. Natural HMOs play a critical role in infant health by fostering the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, particularly Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infants, and protecting against harmful pathogens by mimicking cell-surface receptors[38]. Additionally, they modulate both systemic and mucosal immune responses, contributing to overall health and disease resistance. However, HMO composition can vary significantly among mothers, and only breastfed infants benefit directly from the full spectrum of these bioactive compounds[149].

Animal milk, such as cow’s and goat’s milk, also contains oligosaccharides, but they are less abundant, diverse, and functionally equivalent to HMOs. Cow’s milk typically contains 0.03-0.06 g/L of oligosaccharides, far lower than the 5-15 g/L found in human milk, and its oligosaccharides are structurally simpler, primarily sialylated, and include fewer fucosylated structures[150]. Goat’s milk offers slightly more oligosaccharides, ranging from 0.25 to 0.3 g/L, with some structural similarities to HMOs. Milk from other mammals, such as sheep, buffalo, and camels, contains even lower concentrations and less diversity, tailored primarily to meet the developmental needs of their own offspring[151]. While these oligosaccharides offer some benefits to their respective species, they lack the complexity and multifunctionality of HMOs, limiting their ability to replicate the specific benefits of human milk[152].

Recognizing the essential role of HMOs, researchers have sought to enhance the nutritional value of animal milk-based infant formulas. Synthetic HMOs have been developed as a promising alternative for non-breastfed infants[153]. These HMOs are produced using advanced techniques, such as microbial fermentation, chemical synthesis, or enzymatic processes. Synthetic HMOs like 2’-FL and LNnT are now commonly added to infant formulas, where they mimic some of the critical functions of natural HMOs, such as supporting gut health and providing antimicrobial defense[154]. Synthetic HMOs are accessible, cost-effective, and standardized to ensure consistency, but they represent only a fraction of the diversity and functionality found in natural HMOs[155].

Synthetic HMOs vary significantly depending on the method of synthesis. Microbial fermentation, which uses genetically engineered microorganisms like E. coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the most efficient and scalable method, producing large quantities of structurally identical HMOs such as 2’-FL and LNnT at relatively low cost. However, it is limited to simpler HMOs due to the complexity of biosynthetic pathways and may pose risks of microbial by-product contamination[156]. Chemical synthesis, on the other hand, offers unparalleled precision and versatility, enabling the production of complex and rare HMOs with high regio- and stereoselectivity. However, it is an expensive and labor-intensive process, generating significant chemical waste and being less suitable for industrial-scale production[58]. Enzymatic synthesis provides a cleaner and more environmentally friendly alternative, using purified enzymes to catalyze the formation of HMOs with high structural accuracy. While enzymatic methods are highly flexible and capable of producing complex HMOs, they are limited by the cost and availability of enzymes and substrates and may require optimization for large-scale applications[157]. Hybrid approaches, such as combining enzymatic synthesis with substrates derived from microbial fermentation, are emerging to leverage the strengths of these methods. Table 7 compares the difference between the three main synthetic methods. Ultimately, the choice of synthesis technique depends on the target HMO, production scale, and cost constraints. Future innovations in synthetic biology and enzyme engineering are expected to improve synthetic HMOs' efficiency, scalability, and diversity, bridging the gap between natural and synthetic forms.

Table 7 Comparison of synthetic human milk oligosaccharides by method.
Feature
Microbial fermentation
Chemical synthesis
Enzymatic synthesis
CostLow to moderateHighModerate
ScalabilityHighLowModerate
Structural diversityLimited (simpler HMOs)High (complex and rare HMOs)High (with optimized enzyme cascades)
Environmental impactModerateHighLow
Ease of productionStraightforward for common HMOsComplex and labor-intensiveDepends on enzyme availability

Despite these advancements, synthetic HMOs cannot fully replicate the complexity of natural HMOs. Their limited diversity means they are less effective in supporting diverse gut microbiota, modulating the immune system, and providing the comprehensive protection seen in breastfed infants[120]. While they bridge some nutritional and immunological gaps for formula-fed infants, innovation is needed to expand the range of synthetically available HMOs and enhance their functionality[158]. Table 8 compares between the natural and synethetic HMOs. Breastfeeding remains the gold standard for infant nutrition due to the unmatched benefits of natural HMOs, which are tailored by nature to meet the specific developmental, immune, and microbiota needs of human infants[159]. However, synthetic HMOs represent a significant advancement, offering a practical alternative for infants who cannot be breastfed. Future research aims to improve synthetic HMOs, personalize formulations, and explore their applications beyond infant nutrition, ultimately striving to replicate the unparalleled advantages of natural HMOs[160].

Table 8 Natural vs synthetic human milk oligosaccharides: Key comparisons.
Feature
Natural HMOs
Synthetic HMOs
SourceHuman breast milkBiotechnological production
Structural diversityOver 200 distinct HMOsLimited to a few key HMOs (approximately 15 synthetic HMOs)
CustomizabilityAdaptive to maternal and infant factorsFixed composition in formula.
Microbiota interactionsBroad spectrum of microbial benefitsFocused on Bifidobacteria support
Pathogen defenseMultifaceted, including sialylated HMOsLimited to fucosylated HMOs
Immune modulationComplex systemic and local effectsUnder investigation
AccessibilityBreastfed infants onlyAvailable in formula-fed populations
Extended health implications of HMO antimicrobial effects

HMOs are pivotal not only for their immediate antimicrobial effects but also for their long-term impact on health. By shaping the infant microbiota, modulating immune responses, and protecting against infections, HMOs lay the foundation for health outcomes that extend beyond infancy[3]. These extended implications influence various aspects of health, including immunity, metabolism, neurodevelopment, and the prevention of chronic diseases (Table 9).

Table 9 Extended health implications of human milk oligosaccharides antimicrobial effects.
Health domain
Extended benefits
Mechanisms involved
Key HMOs
Immune developmentReduced risk of allergies (e.g., eczema, asthma) and autoimmune diseases (e.g., type 1 diabetes, IBD)Promotes immune tolerance through Tregs; Modulates cytokine balance; Enhances GALT and sIgA production2′-FL, 3-FL, sialylated HMOs
Gut microbiota programmingEstablishes a balanced microbiota; Prevents dysbiosis and infections; Promotes long-term gut healthSelective enrichment of Bifidobacterium species; SCFA production supports gut barrier integrity and pathogen inhibition2′-FL, 3-FL, LNT
Metabolic healthReduced risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes; Improved lipid profiles and glucose metabolism; Prevention of metabolic disorders.SCFA-mediated regulation of energy balance; Early microbiota influence on metabolic pathwaysFucosylated and non-fucosylated HMOs
Cognitive developmentEnhanced neurodevelopment and cognitive function; Reduced risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., ASD, ADHD)Precursors for gangliosides (myelination and synaptic plasticity); Microbiota-driven production of neuroactive compounds (e.g., serotonin)Sialylated HMOs (3′-SL, 6′-SL)
Infection resistanceLong-term protection against infections; Reduced reliance on antibiotics, mitigating antibiotic resistanceEarly microbial programming enhances innate and adaptive immunity; Pathogen exclusion through SCFA production and microbiota stability2′-FL, 3-FL, sialylated HMOs
Chronic inflammatory diseasesLower risk of IBD and systemic inflammation; Reduced incidence of cardiovascular diseasesStrengthens gut barrier integrity; Modulates systemic and intestinal inflammation through cytokine regulationFucosylated and sialylated HMOs
Non-communicable diseasesPrevention of type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer; Improved long-term health outcomesAnti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic effects of SCFAs; Early metabolic programming by microbiota2′-FL, SCFA-producing HMOs
Neonatal-infant transitionSustained protection during early dietary diversification; Optimized health outcomes with prolonged breastfeeding practicesContinuous microbiota support during complementary feeding; Long-term resilience against pathogenic exposures3-FL, LNT
Immune development and lifelong immunity

HMOs play a crucial role in the maturation and regulation of the immune system during critical developmental windows, providing long-term protection against immune-mediated diseases and preventing allergies and atopic disorders[137]. HMOs interact with immune cells to promote tolerance to non-harmful antigens, such as dietary proteins and environmental allergens. This effect reduces the risk of allergies like eczema, asthma, and food allergies. By stimulating the differentiation of Tregs, HMOs suppress inappropriate immune responses that can lead to atopic dermatitis and other allergic conditions[6]. Early colonization by HMO-utilizing bacteria such as Bifidobacterium longum subsp. Infants leads to a balanced gut microbiota, which is associated with a lower risk of allergic diseases[161]. In addition, HMOs help maintain immune homeostasis by reducing inflammation and promoting anti-inflammatory pathways. This regulation may reduce the likelihood of autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) later in life[162].

Gut microbiota programming and metabolic health

The early establishment of a healthy gut microbiota is critical for long-term metabolic and gastrointestinal health, and HMOs are central to this process. By promoting the growth of beneficial gut microbes, HMOs influence metabolic programming and energy balance[163]. SCFAs produced during HMO fermentation regulate lipid and glucose metabolism, potentially lowering the risk of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. HMOs have been associated with healthier lipid profiles, reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases later in life[164]. In addition, HMOs help to protect against gastrointestinal disorders. Early exposure to HMOs reduces the risk of gastrointestinal conditions such as NEC in preterm infants and functional gastrointestinal disorders like irritable bowel syndrome. HMOs' protective gut barrier effects prevent pathogen translocation and inflammation, minimizing the risk of chronic gastrointestinal inflammation[165,166].

Cognitive development and neuroprotection

Sialylated HMOs, such as 3′-SL and 6′-SL, are particularly important for brain development and cognitive function, with effects that may extend into adulthood[72,167]. Sialylated HMOs serve as precursors for gangliosides and sialic acid, essential for myelination and synapse formation in the developing brain. Improved connectivity and synaptic efficiency are linked to enhanced cognitive and motor development[168]. The gut microbiota influenced by HMOs produces neuroactive compounds such as serotonin and SCFAs, which can cross the blood-brain barrier and modulate brain function[44]. Early microbial programming may reduce the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[169].

Long-term resistance to infections

HMOs provide foundational immunity that has lasting effects on the ability to resist infections throughout life. Infants with a microbiota enriched in Bifidobacterium and other beneficial microbes are better equipped to fight infections due to the enduring presence of these protective bacteria[159]. HMOs' role in reducing pathogen colonization during infancy reduces the likelihood of microbial dysbiosis later in life. By lowering the need for antibiotics during infancy through their antimicrobial effects, HMOs help mitigate the development of antibiotic resistance[170]. This benefit extends to public health, reducing the global burden of antibiotic-resistant infections.

Influence on chronic inflammatory and non-communicable diseases

The anti-inflammatory properties of HMOs, combined with their ability to enhance gut barrier function and immune regulation, contribute to the prevention of chronic inflammatory conditions[6]. Early exposure to HMOs reduces intestinal inflammation and supports barrier integrity, decreasing the risk of IBD in later life. HMOs indirectly lower the risk of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular conditions by reducing systemic inflammation and improving metabolic health[171]. The ability of HMOs to program the microbiota and modulate immune responses may reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and certain cancers[172]. Improved glycemic regulation and insulin sensitivity through SCFA production may lower the risk of developing type 2 diabetes[173]. SCFAs and other microbial metabolites produced through HMO fermentation have anti-carcinogenic properties, reducing the risk of colorectal cancer[174]. These long-term health benefits of HMOs are influenced by the interaction between maternal and infant factors. For instance, maternal diet, genetics, and lactation practices affect HMO composition, which in turn impacts infant health outcomes[175]. Breastfeeding practices that extend HMO exposure (e.g., exclusive breastfeeding for six months) amplify these long-term benefits.

Study heterogeneity

The included studies exhibited considerable variability in experimental models, methodologies, and outcome measures, which posed challenges for direct comparisons and statistical synthesis. However, despite these differences, consistent trends across diverse studies suggest strong biological plausibility for the dynamic secretion of HMOs and their antimicrobial effects. The studies analyzed ranged from human clinical trials to animal and in vitro models. While human studies provide the most applicable findings, in vitro and animal studies offer valuable mechanistic insights contributing to a broader understanding of HMO functionality. Given the variability in study design, including measurement techniques and population characteristics, a narrative synthesis approach was employed to summarize findings. Despite these challenges, consistent outcomes across multiple studies reinforce the reliability of conclusions. To further ensure robustness, findings were categorized based on study type, common methodologies, and outcome measures, mitigating the impact of heterogeneity on the overall conclusions.

Recommendations and future research

This systematic review highlights several avenues for future research and application of HMOs in improving health outcomes. First, the development of HMO-based therapeutics should be prioritized, focusing on identifying and synthesizing specific HMO structures with high antimicrobial efficacy. These efforts could pave the way for novel interventions to prevent and manage infections, particularly in neonates and immunocompromised individuals. The observed synergy between HMOs and antibiotics also warrants further investigation to determine optimal combinations and dosing strategies that could enhance treatment efficacy and mitigate antibiotic resistance. While in vitro and animal studies have demonstrated promising antimicrobial effects, larger-scale clinical trials are essential to validate these findings and assess the long-term safety and efficacy of HMO supplementation in both infants and adults.

Given their protective properties, incorporating bioengineered HMOs, such as 2′-FL and 3-FL, into infant formula should be prioritized to improve nutrition and immunity for non-breastfed infants. In addition, the dynamic changes of HMOs in breast milk should attract the attention of formula-producing companies to consider different levels of specific HMOs according to the infant's age. Expanding research to explore the antimicrobial effects of HMOs against a broader range of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens is crucial for understanding their full therapeutic potential. Personalized approaches based on maternal secretor status and infant needs could further optimize HMO supplementation strategies, ensuring tailored benefits for specific populations.

Moreover, deeper mechanistic studies are needed to elucidate the molecular pathways through which HMOs disrupt pathogen adhesion, biofilms, and enzymatic activity, as well as their roles in immune modulation. Public health initiatives should emphasize the importance of breastfeeding and the unique role of HMOs in supporting infant health. Policymakers and stakeholders should support breastfeeding programs while fostering the development of HMO-enriched nutritional products. Furthermore, addressing the impact of geographic variability in HMO composition could enhance personalized nutrition and therapeutic applications. Lastly, randomized controlled trials should be conducted to validate HMO efficacy in clinical settings, ensuring their optimal application in neonatal and pediatric care. By addressing these recommendations, the therapeutic potential of HMOs can be effectively harnessed to improve maternal and infant health, combat antimicrobial resistance, and reduce the global burden of infectious diseases.

Limitations section

This systematic review has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the heterogeneity among the included studies regarding experimental models, methodologies, and outcome measures posed challenges in synthesizing findings. Differences in study design, such as variations in HMO concentration measurement techniques, pathogen models, and experimental conditions, limited the ability to compare results across studies directly. Establishing standardized research methods and reporting guidelines for HMO concentration detection, experimental model selection, and outcome evaluation would enhance comparability across studies and facilitate comprehensive analysis.

A significant portion of the evidence comes from in vitro and animal studies, which may not fully replicate the complex biological interactions in human systems. Many antimicrobial findings stem from in vitro models, which lack the complexity of human physiology. Thus, while these results provide valuable insights, their direct applicability to human neonates remains uncertain. Similarly, animal studies do not fully replicate human gastrointestinal environments. Extrapolating these findings to clinical settings requires caution, particularly for infants and adults. To address this limitation, more high-quality, large-scale human clinical trials with long-term follow-up are necessary to validate findings and ensure reliable translation of in vitro and animal research into clinical applications.

Another limitation is the variability in the types of HMOs investigated. While studies on prominent HMOs like 2′-FL and 3-FL were abundant, data on less common but potentially important HMOs were limited, leaving gaps in understanding their roles. Additionally, maternal factors such as genetic secretor status, diet, and health influence HMO composition and function, but inconsistencies in reporting these variables hinder comprehensive conclusions about personalized HMO interventions. Geographical and population biases were also noted, as many studies originated from specific regions, potentially overlooking variations in HMO profiles and microbial challenges faced by diverse populations. Research from low- and middle-income regions was underrepresented despite potential differences in maternal diet, genetics, and environmental factors influencing HMO secretion. Expanding research to include multi-population and cross-regional studies would help address these biases and establish a more inclusive understanding of HMOs.

The review included only English-language publications, potentially omitting critical research published in other languages. This limitation is particularly significant given that research on breastfeeding and HMOs is conducted worldwide. Future reviews should incorporate multilingual search strategies to minimize selection bias. Additionally, language barriers may prevent the inclusion of studies from non-English speaking regions, potentially missing critical data that could influence conclusions. Translation tools and collaboration with multilingual researchers could help mitigate this issue.

Geographical biases were also evident, with most studies originating from high-income countries such as the United States, Germany, and Japan. Limited research from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) means that potential regional variations in HMO composition due to genetic, dietary, and environmental factors are underexplored. Given that maternal nutrition, microbiome diversity, and breastfeeding practices differ significantly across regions, future studies should focus on conducting research in diverse populations to capture these variations more accurately. Encouraging research collaborations across multiple countries and increasing funding opportunities for HMO research in LMICs could enhance the global applicability of findings.

Furthermore, regional disparities in healthcare access and socioeconomic conditions may influence breastfeeding practices and HMO secretion. Cultural beliefs and traditional infant-feeding practices vary widely across populations and may impact the concentration and composition of HMOs in ways that remain underexplored in current literature. Addressing these knowledge gaps would improve our understanding of how HMOs contribute to infant health on a global scale.

Although bioengineered HMOs demonstrate structural and functional similarities to natural HMOs, data on their long-term safety, metabolic impact, and immunological effects in infants remain limited. More clinical trials are necessary to confirm their efficacy and safety. Conducting clinical trials to assess the long-term health effects of synthetic HMOs and establishing a comprehensive evaluation system for their application in infant formula and clinical treatment are crucial steps moving forward.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlights the dynamic role of HMOs during lactation and their significant antimicrobial properties. HMOs exhibit temporal variation in secretion, influenced by lactation stages, maternal factors, and genetic determinants, such as secretor status. These variations are finely tuned to support the infant’s evolving nutritional, immunological, and microbial needs. The antimicrobial effects of HMOs are multifaceted, encompassing mechanisms such as pathogen adhesion inhibition, biofilm disruption, enzymatic activity impairment, and immune modulation. Both natural and synthetic HMOs demonstrated robust activity against various pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. Synthetic HMOs, such as bioengineered 2′-FL and 3-FL, were particularly effective and offer scalable solutions for enhancing infant formula and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, HMOs exhibited synergistic effects with antibiotics, highlighting their potential as adjuncts to conventional therapies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Despite these promising findings, further research is required to address existing gaps, including the variability in HMO profiles, long-term safety of synthetic HMOs, and broader exploration of their efficacy against diverse pathogens. Clinical trials are essential to validate findings from in vitro and animal studies and explore HMOs' translational potential in improving neonatal and maternal health. HMOs are a cornerstone of breast milk’s bioactive properties, offering a natural, multifaceted approach to enhancing infant immunity, gut health, and resistance to infections. Leveraging the unique properties of HMOs through breastfeeding promotion, supplementation, and therapeutic innovations has the potential to revolutionize maternal and pediatric healthcare, reduce the burden of infectious diseases, and contribute to global health improvements.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Corresponding Author's Membership in Professional Societies: University Medical Center, King Abdulla Medical City; Arabian Gulf University, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Specialty type: Pediatrics

Country of origin: Bahrain

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: El-Shabrawi MHF; Zhang G; Zhou X S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang XD

References
1.  Dieterich CM, Felice JP, O'Sullivan E, Rasmussen KM. Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60:31-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 267]  [Cited by in RCA: 278]  [Article Influence: 23.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Ballard O, Morrow AL. Human milk composition: nutrients and bioactive factors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60:49-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1389]  [Cited by in RCA: 1631]  [Article Influence: 135.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Walsh C, Lane JA, van Sinderen D, Hickey RM. Human milk oligosaccharides: Shaping the infant gut microbiota and supporting health. J Funct Foods. 2020;72:104074.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in RCA: 169]  [Article Influence: 33.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Corona L, Lussu A, Bosco A, Pintus R, Cesare Marincola F, Fanos V, Dessì A. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: A Comprehensive Review towards Metabolomics. Children (Basel). 2021;8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Carr LE, Virmani MD, Rosa F, Munblit D, Matazel KS, Elolimy AA, Yeruva L. Role of Human Milk Bioactives on Infants' Gut and Immune Health. Front Immunol. 2021;12:604080.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 143]  [Cited by in RCA: 140]  [Article Influence: 35.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Rousseaux A, Brosseau C, Le Gall S, Piloquet H, Barbarot S, Bodinier M. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: Their Effects on the Host and Their Potential as Therapeutic Agents. Front Immunol. 2021;12:680911.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 65]  [Article Influence: 16.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Thum C, Wall CR, Weiss GA, Wang W, Szeto IM-Y, Day L. Changes in HMO Concentrations throughout Lactation: Influencing Factors, Health Effects and Opportunities. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bode L, Contractor N, Barile D, Pohl N, Prudden AR, Boons GJ, Jin YS, Jennewein S. Overcoming the limited availability of human milk oligosaccharides: challenges and opportunities for research and application. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:635-644.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in RCA: 93]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Bensimon J, Lu X. Human milk oligosaccharides produced by synthetic biology. J Agric Food Res. 2024;18:101361.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Sims IM, Tannock GW. Galacto- and Fructo-oligosaccharides Utilized for Growth by Cocultures of Bifidobacterial Species Characteristic of the Infant Gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Martin CR, Ling PR, Blackburn GL. Review of Infant Feeding: Key Features of Breast Milk and Infant Formula. Nutrients. 2016;8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 574]  [Cited by in RCA: 498]  [Article Influence: 55.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Sundekilde UK, Downey E, O'Mahony JA, O'Shea CA, Ryan CA, Kelly AL, Bertram HC. The Effect of Gestational and Lactational Age on the Human Milk Metabolome. Nutrients. 2016;8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in RCA: 70]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Y de Vries J, Pundir S, Mckenzie E, Keijer J, Kussmann M. Maternal Circulating Vitamin Status and Colostrum Vitamin Composition in Healthy Lactating Women-A Systematic Approach. Nutrients. 2018;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Sinanoglou VJ, Cavouras D, Boutsikou T, Briana DD, Lantzouraki DZ, Paliatsiou S, Volaki P, Bratakos S, Malamitsi-Puchner A, Zoumpoulakis P. Factors affecting human colostrum fatty acid profile: A case study. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175817.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 41]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Chong HY, Tan LT, Law JW, Hong KW, Ratnasingam V, Ab Mutalib NS, Lee LH, Letchumanan V. Exploring the Potential of Human Milk and Formula Milk on Infants' Gut and Health. Nutrients. 2022;14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Neville MC, Demerath EW, Hahn-Holbrook J, Hovey RC, Martin-Carli J, McGuire MA, Newton ER, Rasmussen KM, Rudolph MC, Raiten DJ. Parental factors that impact the ecology of human mammary development, milk secretion, and milk composition-a report from "Breastmilk Ecology: Genesis of Infant Nutrition (BEGIN)" Working Group 1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023;117 Suppl 1:S11-S27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Favara G, Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Lanza E, Magnano San Lio R, Agodi A. Maternal Lifestyle Factors Affecting Breast Milk Composition and Infant Health: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2024;17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Kim SY, Yi DY. Components of human breast milk: from macronutrient to microbiome and microRNA. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020;63:301-309.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 106]  [Article Influence: 21.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Szyller H, Antosz K, Batko J, Mytych A, Dziedziak M, Wrześniewska M, Braksator J, Pytrus T. Bioactive Components of Human Milk and Their Impact on Child's Health and Development, Literature Review. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Carretero-Krug A, Montero-Bravo A, Morais-Moreno C, Puga AM, Samaniego-Vaesken ML, Partearroyo T, Varela-Moreiras G. Nutritional Status of Breastfeeding Mothers and Impact of Diet and Dietary Supplementation: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Bzikowska-Jura A, Czerwonogrodzka-Senczyna A, Olędzka G, Szostak-Węgierek D, Weker H, Wesołowska A. Maternal Nutrition and Body Composition During Breastfeeding: Association with Human Milk Composition. Nutrients. 2018;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 89]  [Cited by in RCA: 101]  [Article Influence: 14.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Tinghäll Nilsson U, Hernell O, Lönnerdal B, Hartvigsen ML, Jacobsen LN, Kvistgaard AS, Karlsland Åkeson P. Low-Protein Formulas with Alpha-Lactalbumin-Enriched or Glycomacropeptide-Reduced Whey: Effects on Growth, Nutrient Intake and Protein Metabolism during Early Infancy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Ward E, Yang N, Muhlhausler BS, Leghi GE, Netting MJ, Elmes MJ, Langley-Evans SC. Acute changes to breast milk composition following consumption of high-fat and high-sugar meals. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17:e13168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Goldman AS, Garza C, Nichols BL, Goldblum RM. Immunologic factors in human milk during the first year of lactation. J Pediatr. 1982;100:563-567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 219]  [Cited by in RCA: 194]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Wilson CB, Ogra PL. Human Milk. Infect Dis Fetus Newborn. 2011;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Froń A, Orczyk-Pawiłowicz M. Understanding the Immunological Quality of Breast Milk in Maternal Overweight and Obesity. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Leghi GE, Netting MJ, Lai CT, Narayanan A, Dymock M, Rea A, Wlodek ME, Geddes DT, Muhlhausler BS. Reduction in Maternal Energy Intake during Lactation Decreased Maternal Body Weight and Concentrations of Leptin, Insulin and Adiponectin in Human Milk without Affecting Milk Production, Milk Macronutrient Composition or Infant Growth. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Lokossou GAG, Kouakanou L, Schumacher A, Zenclussen AC. Human Breast Milk: From Food to Active Immune Response With Disease Protection in Infants and Mothers. Front Immunol. 2022;13:849012.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 34]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Zhang B, Li LQ, Liu F, Wu JY. Human milk oligosaccharides and infant gut microbiota: Molecular structures, utilization strategies and immune function. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;276:118738.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 54]  [Article Influence: 18.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Wichmann A. Biological effects of combinations of structurally diverse human milk oligosaccharides. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1439612.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Wang M, Zhao Z, Zhao A, Zhang J, Wu W, Ren Z, Wang P, Zhang Y. Neutral Human Milk Oligosaccharides Are Associated with Multiple Fixed and Modifiable Maternal and Infant Characteristics. Nutrients. 2020;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Dinleyici M, Barbieur J, Dinleyici EC, Vandenplas Y. Functional effects of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs). Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2186115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Sudarma V, Sunardi D, Marzuki NS, Munasir Z, Asmarinah, Hidayat A, Hegar B. Human Milk Oligosaccharide Profiles and the Secretor and Lewis Gene Status of Indonesian Lactating Mothers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2023;26:266-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Chaturvedi N, Gupta B, Sahrawat N, Dua S, Kumari C, Mittal S. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: Potential Upshot on Health at Early Life Stage Development. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2024;12:283-295.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Singh RP, Niharika J, Kondepudi KK, Bishnoi M, Tingirikari JMR. Recent understanding of human milk oligosaccharides in establishing infant gut microbiome and roles in immune system. Food Res Int. 2022;151:110884.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Masi AC, Stewart CJ. Untangling human milk oligosaccharides and infant gut microbiome. iScience. 2022;25:103542.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 14.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Bode L. The functional biology of human milk oligosaccharides. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91:619-622.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 262]  [Cited by in RCA: 303]  [Article Influence: 30.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Hill DR, Chow JM, Buck RH. Multifunctional Benefits of Prevalent HMOs: Implications for Infant Health. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Triantis V, Bode L, van Neerven RJJ. Immunological Effects of Human Milk Oligosaccharides. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 158]  [Cited by in RCA: 197]  [Article Influence: 28.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Forchielli ML, Walker WA. The role of gut-associated lymphoid tissues and mucosal defence. Br J Nutr. 2005;93 Suppl 1:S41-S48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 193]  [Cited by in RCA: 170]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Takiishi T, Fenero CIM, Câmara NOS. Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: Shaping our immune responses throughout life. Tissue Barriers. 2017;5:e1373208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 248]  [Cited by in RCA: 569]  [Article Influence: 71.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
42.  Abbas S, Keir AK, Makrides M, Klein LD, Grzeskowiak LE, McPhee AJ, Rumbold AR. Tailoring Human Milk Oligosaccharides to Prevent Necrotising Enterocolitis Among Preterm Infants. Front Nutr. 2021;8:702888.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Berger PK, Ong ML, Bode L, Belfort MB. Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Infant Neurodevelopment: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Chen Y, Xu J, Chen Y. Regulation of Neurotransmitters by the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Cognition in Neurological Disorders. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in RCA: 331]  [Article Influence: 82.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Wiciński M, Sawicka E, Gębalski J, Kubiak K, Malinowski B. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: Health Benefits, Potential Applications in Infant Formulas, and Pharmacology. Nutrients. 2020;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in RCA: 156]  [Article Influence: 31.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Boll EJ, Lopez DV, Terne M, Hessing S, Parschat K, Jensen SR. Human milk oligosaccharides differentially support gut barrier integrity and enhance Th1 and Th17 cell effector responses in vitro. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1359499.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology. 2012;22:1147-1162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 998]  [Cited by in RCA: 1210]  [Article Influence: 93.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Wong CB, Huang H, Ning Y, Xiao J. Probiotics in the New Era of Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs): HMO Utilization and Beneficial Effects of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis M-63 on Infant Health. Microorganisms. 2024;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Soyyılmaz B, Mikš MH, Röhrig CH, Matwiejuk M, Meszaros-Matwiejuk A, Vigsnæs LK. The Mean of Milk: A Review of Human Milk Oligosaccharide Concentrations throughout Lactation. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 137]  [Article Influence: 34.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Moubareck CA. Human Milk Microbiota and Oligosaccharides: A Glimpse into Benefits, Diversity, and Correlations. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 60]  [Article Influence: 15.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Ray C, Kerketta JA, Rao S, Patel S, Dutt S, Arora K, Pournami F, Bhushan P. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: The Journey Ahead. Int J Pediatr. 2019;2019:2390240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Matharu D, Ponsero AJ, Lengyel M, Meszaros-Matwiejuk A, Kolho KL, de Vos WM, Molnar-Gabor D, Salonen A. Human milk oligosaccharide composition is affected by season and parity and associates with infant gut microbiota in a birth mode dependent manner in a Finnish birth cohort. EBioMedicine. 2024;104:105182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Huang C, Lu Y, Kong L, Guo Z, Zhao K, Xiang Z, Ma X, Gao H, Liu Y, Gao Z, Xu L, Chai W, Li Y, Zhao Y. Human milk oligosaccharides in milk of mothers with term and preterm delivery at different lactation stage. Carbohydr Polym. 2023;321:121263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Konieczna M, Koryszewska-Bagińska A, Bzikowska-Jura A, Chmielewska-Jeznach M, Jarzynka S, Olędzka G. Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Factors That Affect Human Milk Oligosaccharides Composition. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Mokhtari P, Schmidt KA, Zamanian H, Babaei M, Machle CJ, Trifonova D, Alderete TL, Holzhausen EA, Ottino-González J, Chalifour BN, Jones RB, Furst A, Yonemitsu C, Bode L, Goran MI. Maternal Diet Associated with Oligosaccharide Abundances in Human Milk from Latina Mothers. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Ojo-Okunola A, Cacciatore S, Nicol MP, du Toit E. The Determinants of the Human Milk Metabolome and Its Role in Infant Health. Metabolites. 2020;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Chen X. Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOS): Structure, Function, and Enzyme-Catalyzed Synthesis. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 2015;72:113-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in RCA: 149]  [Article Influence: 14.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Zeuner B, Teze D, Muschiol J, Meyer AS. Synthesis of Human Milk Oligosaccharides: Protein Engineering Strategies for Improved Enzymatic Transglycosylation. Molecules. 2019;24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in RCA: 73]  [Article Influence: 12.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Paone P, Latousakis D, Terrasi R, Vertommen D, Jian C, Borlandelli V, Suriano F, Johansson MEV, Puel A, Bouzin C, Delzenne NM, Salonen A, Juge N, Florea BI, Muccioli GG, Overkleeft H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. Human milk oligosaccharide 2'-fucosyllactose protects against high-fat diet-induced obesity by changing intestinal mucus production, composition and degradation linked to changes in gut microbiota and faecal proteome profiles in mice. Gut. 2024;73:1632-1649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Munblit D, Peroni DG, Boix-Amorós A, Hsu PS, Van't Land B, Gay MCL, Kolotilina A, Skevaki C, Boyle RJ, Collado MC, Garssen J, Geddes DT, Nanan R, Slupsky C, Wegienka G, Kozyrskyj AL, Warner JO. Human Milk and Allergic Diseases: An Unsolved Puzzle. Nutrients. 2017;9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in RCA: 89]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Nagel EM, Howland MA, Pando C, Stang J, Mason SM, Fields DA, Demerath EW. Maternal Psychological Distress and Lactation and Breastfeeding Outcomes: a Narrative Review. Clin Ther. 2022;44:215-227.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 16.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Wijenayake S, Martz J, Lapp HE, Storm JA, Champagne FA, Kentner AC. The contributions of parental lactation on offspring development: It's not udder nonsense! Horm Behav. 2023;153:105375.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Lang SL, Iverson SJ, Bowen WD. Primiparous and multiparous females differ in mammary gland alveolar development: implications for milk production. J Exp Biol. 2012;215:2904-2911.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Lahdenperä M, Galante L, Gonzales-Inca C, Vahtera J, Pentti J, Rautava S, Käyhkö N, Yonemitsu C, Gupta J, Bode L, Lagström H. Residential green environments are associated with human milk oligosaccharide diversity and composition. Sci Rep. 2023;13:216.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Derrien M, Mikulic N, Uyoga MA, Chenoll E, Climent E, Howard-Varona A, Nyilima S, Stoffel NU, Karanja S, Kottler R, Stahl B, Zimmermann MB, Bourdet-Sicard R. Gut microbiome function and composition in infants from rural Kenya and association with human milk oligosaccharides. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2178793.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Naik NC, Holzhausen EA, Chalifour BN, Coffman MM, Lurmann F, Goran MI, Bode L, Alderete TL. Air pollution exposure may impact the composition of human milk oligosaccharides. Sci Rep. 2024;14:6730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Froń A, Orczyk-Pawiłowicz M. Breastfeeding Beyond Six Months: Evidence of Child Health Benefits. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Pajewska-Szmyt M, Sinkiewicz-Darol E, Gadzała-Kopciuch R. The impact of environmental pollution on the quality of mother's milk. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26:7405-7427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Melki R, Litvak Y. From vacant to vivid: The nutritional landscape drives infant gut microbiota establishment. Mol Microbiol. 2024;122:347-356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Jiang S, Qin J, Shi L, Feng J, Mo J, Su W, Cheng Y, Lv J, Li Q, Li S, Zeng L, Han B, Zhou J. Association among Gestational Weight Gain, Fucosylated Human Milk Oligosaccharides, and Breast Milk Microbiota─An Evidence in Healthy Mothers from Northwest China. J Agric Food Chem. 2024;72:25135-25145.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Masi AC, Beck LC, Perry JD, Granger CL, Hiorns A, Young GR, Bode L, Embleton ND, Berrington JE, Stewart CJ. Human milk microbiota, oligosaccharide profiles, and infant gut microbiome in preterm infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5:101708.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Hauser J, Pisa E, Arias Vásquez A, Tomasi F, Traversa A, Chiodi V, Martin FP, Sprenger N, Lukjancenko O, Zollinger A, Metairon S, Schneider N, Steiner P, Martire A, Caputo V, Macrì S. Sialylated human milk oligosaccharides program cognitive development through a non-genomic transmission mode. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:2854-2871.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Hardy H, Harris J, Lyon E, Beal J, Foey AD. Probiotics, prebiotics and immunomodulation of gut mucosal defences: homeostasis and immunopathology. Nutrients. 2013;5:1869-1912.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 289]  [Cited by in RCA: 307]  [Article Influence: 25.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Ackerman DL, Craft KM, Doster RS, Weitkamp JH, Aronoff DM, Gaddy JA, Townsend SD. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Human Milk Oligosaccharides against Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii. ACS Infect Dis. 2018;4:315-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in RCA: 72]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Dogra SK, Martin FP, Donnicola D, Julita M, Berger B, Sprenger N. Human Milk Oligosaccharide-Stimulated Bifidobacterium Species Contribute to Prevent Later Respiratory Tract Infections. Microorganisms. 2021;9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Altaye M, Jiang X, Guerrero ML, Meinzen-Derr JK, Farkas T, Chaturvedi P, Pickering LK, Newburg DS. Human milk oligosaccharide blood group epitopes and innate immune protection against campylobacter and calicivirus diarrhea in breastfed infants. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2004;554:443-446.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Yu ZT, Nanthakumar NN, Newburg DS. The Human Milk Oligosaccharide 2'-Fucosyllactose Quenches Campylobacter jejuni-Induced Inflammation in Human Epithelial Cells HEp-2 and HT-29 and in Mouse Intestinal Mucosa. J Nutr. 2016;146:1980-1990.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 76]  [Cited by in RCA: 89]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Facinelli B, Marini E, Magi G, Zampini L, Santoro L, Catassi C, Monachesi C, Gabrielli O, Coppa GV. Breast milk oligosaccharides: effects of 2'-fucosyllactose and 6'-sialyllactose on the adhesion of Escherichia coli and Salmonella fyris to Caco-2 cells. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:2950-2952.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Wang Y, Zou Y, Wang J, Ma H, Zhang B, Wang S. The Protective Effects of 2'-Fucosyllactose against E. Coli O157 Infection Are Mediated by the Regulation of Gut Microbiota and the Inhibition of Pathogen Adhesion. Nutrients. 2020;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 21]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Manthey CF, Autran CA, Eckmann L, Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides protect against enteropathogenic Escherichia coli attachment in vitro and EPEC colonization in suckling mice. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:165-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Chambers SA, Townsend SD. Bioorthogonal human milk oligosaccharide probes for antimicrobial target identification within Streptococcus agalactiae. Carbohydr Res. 2020;488:107895.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Ackerman DL, Doster RS, Weitkamp JH, Aronoff DM, Gaddy JA, Townsend SD. Human Milk Oligosaccharides Exhibit Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties against Group B Streptococcus. ACS Infect Dis. 2017;3:595-605.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in RCA: 98]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Lin AE, Autran CA, Szyszka A, Escajadillo T, Huang M, Godula K, Prudden AR, Boons GJ, Lewis AL, Doran KS, Nizet V, Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides inhibit growth of group B Streptococcus. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:11243-11249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in RCA: 111]  [Article Influence: 13.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Moore RE, Spicer SK, Talbert JA, Manning SD, Townsend SD, Gaddy JA. Anti-biofilm Activity of Human Milk Oligosaccharides in Clinical Strains of Streptococcus agalactiae with Diverse Capsular and Sequence Types. Chembiochem. 2023;24:e202200643.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Mysore JV, Wigginton T, Simon PM, Zopf D, Heman-Ackah LM, Dubois A. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in rhesus monkeys using a novel antiadhesion compound. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1316-1325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in RCA: 102]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Parente F, Cucino C, Anderloni A, Grandinetti G, Bianchi Porro G. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection using a novel antiadhesion compound (3'sialyllactose sodium salt). A double blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Helicobacter. 2003;8:252-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Koromyslova A, Tripathi S, Morozov V, Schroten H, Hansman GS. Human norovirus inhibition by a human milk oligosaccharide. Virology. 2017;508:81-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in RCA: 95]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Hanisch FG, Hansman GS, Morozov V, Kunz C, Schroten H. Avidity of α-fucose on human milk oligosaccharides and blood group-unrelated oligo/polyfucoses is essential for potent norovirus-binding targets. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:11955-11965.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
89.  Weichert S, Koromyslova A, Singh BK, Hansman S, Jennewein S, Schroten H, Hansman GS. Structural Basis for Norovirus Inhibition by Human Milk Oligosaccharides. J Virol. 2016;90:4843-4848.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in RCA: 107]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
90.  Derya SM, Spiegel H, Hanisch FG, Morozov V, Schroten H, Jennewein S, Parschat K. Biotechnologically produced fucosylated oligosaccharides inhibit the binding of human noroviruses to their natural receptors. J Biotechnol. 2020;318:31-38.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
91.  Hester SN, Chen X, Li M, Monaco MH, Comstock SS, Kuhlenschmidt TB, Kuhlenschmidt MS, Donovan SM. Human milk oligosaccharides inhibit rotavirus infectivity in vitro and in acutely infected piglets. Br J Nutr. 2013;110:1233-1242.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in RCA: 88]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Comstock SS, Li M, Wang M, Monaco MH, Kuhlenschmidt TB, Kuhlenschmidt MS, Donovan SM. Dietary Human Milk Oligosaccharides but Not Prebiotic Oligosaccharides Increase Circulating Natural Killer Cell and Mesenteric Lymph Node Memory T Cell Populations in Noninfected and Rotavirus-Infected Neonatal Piglets. J Nutr. 2017;147:1041-1047.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
93.  Li M, Monaco MH, Wang M, Comstock SS, Kuhlenschmidt TB, Fahey GC Jr, Miller MJ, Kuhlenschmidt MS, Donovan SM. Human milk oligosaccharides shorten rotavirus-induced diarrhea and modulate piglet mucosal immunity and colonic microbiota. ISME J. 2014;8:1609-1620.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in RCA: 119]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  Laucirica DR, Triantis V, Schoemaker R, Estes MK, Ramani S. Milk Oligosaccharides Inhibit Human Rotavirus Infectivity in MA104 Cells. J Nutr. 2017;147:1709-1714.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in RCA: 87]  [Article Influence: 10.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
95.  Xiao L, Leusink-Muis T, Kettelarij N, van Ark I, Blijenberg B, Hesen NA, Stahl B, Overbeek SA, Garssen J, Folkerts G, Van't Land B. Human Milk Oligosaccharide 2'-Fucosyllactose Improves Innate and Adaptive Immunity in an Influenza-Specific Murine Vaccination Model. Front Immunol. 2018;9:452.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in RCA: 58]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
96.  Mahaboob Ali AA, Vishal A, Nelson EJR. Targeting host-virus interactions: in silico analysis of the binding of human milk oligosaccharides to viral proteins involved in respiratory infections. Sci Rep. 2024;14:4111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
97.  Pandey RP, Kim DH, Woo J, Song J, Jang SH, Kim JB, Cheong KM, Oh JS, Sohng JK. Broad-spectrum neutralization of avian influenza viruses by sialylated human milk oligosaccharides: in vivo assessment of 3'-sialyllactose against H9N2 in chickens. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2563.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
98.  Duska-Mcewen G, Senft AP, Ruetschilling TL, Barrett EG, Buck RH. Human Milk Oligosaccharides Enhance Innate Immunity to Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Influenza in Vitro. Food Nutr Sci. 2014;5:1387-1398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Lin AE, Autran CA, Espanola SD, Bode L, Nizet V. Human milk oligosaccharides protect bladder epithelial cells against uropathogenic Escherichia coli invasion and cytotoxicity. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:389-398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in RCA: 61]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
100.  Martín-Sosa S, Martín MJ, Hueso P. The sialylated fraction of milk oligosaccharides is partially responsible for binding to enterotoxigenic and uropathogenic Escherichia coli human strains. J Nutr. 2002;132:3067-3072.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 104]  [Cited by in RCA: 112]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Noguera-Obenza M, Ochoa TJ, Gomez HF, Guerrero ML, Herrera-Insua I, Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios G, Pickering LK, Guzman CA, Cleary TG. Human milk secretory antibodies against attaching and effacing Escherichia coli antigens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:545-551.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Coppa GV, Zampini L, Galeazzi T, Facinelli B, Ferrante L, Capretti R, Orazio G. Human milk oligosaccharides inhibit the adhesion to Caco-2 cells of diarrheal pathogens: Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, and Salmonella fyris. Pediatr Res. 2006;59:377-382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 229]  [Cited by in RCA: 220]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
103.  Newburg DS, Pickering LK, McCluer RH, Cleary TG. Fucosylated oligosaccharides of human milk protect suckling mice from heat-stabile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 1990;162:1075-1080.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in RCA: 117]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Weichert S, Jennewein S, Hüfner E, Weiss C, Borkowski J, Putze J, Schroten H. Bioengineered 2'-fucosyllactose and 3-fucosyllactose inhibit the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enteric pathogens to human intestinal and respiratory cell lines. Nutr Res. 2013;33:831-838.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 112]  [Cited by in RCA: 114]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
105.  Nguyen TT, Kim JW, Park JS, Hwang KH, Jang TS, Kim CH, Kim D. Identification of Oligosaccharides in Human Milk Bound onto the Toxin A Carbohydrate Binding Site of Clostridium difficile. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:659-665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Fusco W, Lorenzo MB, Cintoni M, Porcari S, Rinninella E, Kaitsas F, Lener E, Mele MC, Gasbarrini A, Collado MC, Cammarota G, Ianiro G. Short-Chain Fatty-Acid-Producing Bacteria: Key Components of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 240]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
107.  Salli K, Hirvonen J, Siitonen J, Ahonen I, Anglenius H, Maukonen J. Selective Utilization of the Human Milk Oligosaccharides 2'-Fucosyllactose, 3-Fucosyllactose, and Difucosyllactose by Various Probiotic and Pathogenic Bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:170-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Article Influence: 20.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
108.  Li Y, Jin L, Chen T. The Effects of Secretory IgA in the Mucosal Immune System. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2032057.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 137]  [Article Influence: 27.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
109.  He Y, He Z, Leone S, Liu S. Milk Exosomes Transfer Oligosaccharides into Macrophages to Modulate Immunity and Attenuate Adherent-Invasive E. coli (AIEC) Infection. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
110.  Moore RE, Xu LL, Townsend SD. Prospecting Human Milk Oligosaccharides as a Defense Against Viral Infections. ACS Infect Dis. 2021;7:254-263.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 62]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
111.  Tonon KM, Chutipongtanate S, Morrow AL, Newburg DS. Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Infants. Adv Nutr. 2024;15:100218.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
112.  Patil K, Ayyar BV, Neill FH, Bode L, Estes MK, Atmar RL, Ramani S. 2'-Fucosyllactose Inhibits Human Norovirus Replication in Human Intestinal Enteroids. bioRxiv. 2024;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
113.  Gozalbo-Rovira R, Ciges-Tomas JR, Vila-Vicent S, Buesa J, Santiso-Bellón C, Monedero V, Yebra MJ, Marina A, Rodríguez-Díaz J. Unraveling the role of the secretor antigen in human rotavirus attachment to histo-blood group antigens. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15:e1007865.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
114.  Schijf MA, Kruijsen D, Bastiaans J, Coenjaerts FE, Garssen J, van Bleek GM, van't Land B. Specific dietary oligosaccharides increase Th1 responses in a mouse respiratory syncytial virus infection model. J Virol. 2012;86:11472-11482.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in RCA: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
115.  Guo Z, Xie Q, Ren Q, Liu Y, Li K, Li B, Li J. Enhancing immune regulation in vitro: the synergistic impact of 3'-sialyllactose and osteopontin in a nutrient blend following influenza virus infection. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1271926.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
116.  Jantscher-Krenn E, Lauwaet T, Bliss LA, Reed SL, Gillin FD, Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides reduce Entamoeba histolytica attachment and cytotoxicity in vitro. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1839-1846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in RCA: 97]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
117.  Chambers SA, Moore RE, Craft KM, Thomas HC, Das R, Manning SD, Codreanu SG, Sherrod SD, Aronoff DM, McLean JA, Gaddy JA, Townsend SD. A Solution to Antifolate Resistance in Group B Streptococcus: Untargeted Metabolomics Identifies Human Milk Oligosaccharide-Induced Perturbations That Result in Potentiation of Trimethoprim. mBio. 2020;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
118.  Andreas NJ, Al-Khalidi A, Jaiteh M, Clarke E, Hyde MJ, Modi N, Holmes E, Kampmann B, Mehring Le Doare K. Role of human milk oligosaccharides in Group B Streptococcus colonisation. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016;5:e99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
119.  Donovan SM, Comstock SS. Human Milk Oligosaccharides Influence Neonatal Mucosal and Systemic Immunity. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;69 Suppl 2:42-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in RCA: 156]  [Article Influence: 19.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
120.  Walsh C, Lane JA, van Sinderen D, Hickey RM. Tailored Combinations of Human Milk Oligosaccharides Modulate the Immune Response in an In Vitro Model of Intestinal Inflammation. Biomolecules. 2024;14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
121.  Ellwanger JH, Veiga ABG, Kaminski VL, Valverde-Villegas JM, Freitas AWQ, Chies JAB. Control and prevention of infectious diseases from a One Health perspective. Genet Mol Biol. 2021;44:e20200256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
122.  Davis EC, Castagna VP, Sela DA, Hillard MA, Lindberg S, Mantis NJ, Seppo AE, Järvinen KM. Gut microbiome and breast-feeding: Implications for early immune development. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;150:523-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 16.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
123.  Azarmi M, Seyed Toutounchi N, Hogenkamp A, Thijssen S, Overbeek SA, Garssen J, Folkerts G, Van't Land B, Braber S. Human Milk Oligosaccharides in Combination with Galacto- and Long-Chain Fructo-Oligosaccharides Enhance Vaccination Efficacy in a Murine Influenza Vaccination Model. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
124.  Wang M, Monaco MH, Hauser J, Yan J, Dilger RN, Donovan SM. Bovine Milk Oligosaccharides and Human Milk Oligosaccharides Modulate the Gut Microbiota Composition and Volatile Fatty Acid Concentrations in a Preclinical Neonatal Model. Microorganisms. 2021;9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
125.  Hegar B, Wibowo Y, Basrowi RW, Ranuh RG, Sudarmo SM, Munasir Z, Atthiyah AF, Widodo AD, Supriatmo, Kadim M, Suryawan A, Diana NR, Manoppo C, Vandenplas Y. The Role of Two Human Milk Oligosaccharides, 2'-Fucosyllactose and Lacto-N-Neotetraose, in Infant Nutrition. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019;22:330-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 68]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
126.  Vandenplas Y, Berger B, Carnielli VP, Ksiazyk J, Lagström H, Sanchez Luna M, Migacheva N, Mosselmans JM, Picaud JC, Possner M, Singhal A, Wabitsch M. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: 2'-Fucosyllactose (2'-FL) and Lacto-N-Neotetraose (LNnT) in Infant Formula. Nutrients. 2018;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 142]  [Cited by in RCA: 180]  [Article Influence: 25.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
127.  Sharma S, Mohler J, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Bruggemann L, Aalinkeel R. Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment. Microorganisms. 2023;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 142]  [Cited by in RCA: 130]  [Article Influence: 65.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
128.  Marotta M, Ryan JT, Hickey RM. The predominant milk oligosaccharide 6′-sialyllactose reduces the internalisation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in human pneumocytes. J Funct Food. 2014;6:367-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
129.  Austin S, De Castro CA, Bénet T, Hou Y, Sun H, Thakkar SK, Vinyes-Pares G, Zhang Y, Wang P. Temporal Change of the Content of 10 Oligosaccharides in the Milk of Chinese Urban Mothers. Nutrients. 2016;8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 118]  [Cited by in RCA: 132]  [Article Influence: 14.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
130.  Yang L, Shi S, Na C, Li B, Zhao Z, Yang T, Yao Y. Rotavirus and Norovirus Infections in Children Under 5 Years Old with Acute Gastroenteritis in Southwestern China, 2018-2020. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;12:292-303.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
131.  Nirwati H, Donato CM, Mawarti Y, Mulyani NS, Ikram A, Aman AT, Peppelenbosch MP, Soenarto Y, Pan Q, Hakim MS. Norovirus and rotavirus infections in children less than five years of age hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis in Indonesia. Arch Virol. 2019;164:1515-1525.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
132.  Ochoa TJ, Contreras CA. Enteropathogenic escherichia coli infection in children. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:478-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 185]  [Cited by in RCA: 198]  [Article Influence: 14.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
133.  Riepl A, Straßmayr L, Voitl P, Ehlmaier P, Voitl JJM, Langer K, Kuzio U, Mühl-Riegler A, Mühl B, Diesner-Treiber SC. The surge of RSV and other respiratory viruses among children during the second COVID-19 pandemic winter season. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1112150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
134.  Hobbs M, Jahan M, Ghorashi SA, Wang B. Current Perspective of Sialylated Milk Oligosaccharides in Mammalian Milk: Implications for Brain and Gut Health of Newborns. Foods. 2021;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
135.  Hundshammer C, Minge O. In Love with Shaping You-Influential Factors on the Breast Milk Content of Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Their Decisive Roles for Neonatal Development. Nutrients. 2020;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
136.  EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Turck D, Castenmiller J, De Henauw S, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Kearney J, Maciuk A, Mangelsdorf I, McArdle HJ, Naska A, Pelaez C, Pentieva K, Siani A, Thies F, Tsabouri S, Vinceti M, Cubadda F, Frenzel T, Heinonen M, Marchelli R, Neuhäuser-Berthold M, Poulsen M, Maradona MP, Schlatter JR, van Loveren H, Colombo P, Knutsen HK. Safety of 3-FL (3-Fucosyllactose) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2021;19:e06662.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
137.  Zuurveld M, van Witzenburg NP, Garssen J, Folkerts G, Stahl B, Van't Land B, Willemsen LEM. Immunomodulation by Human Milk Oligosaccharides: The Potential Role in Prevention of Allergic Diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:801.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 51]  [Article Influence: 10.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
138.  Salih BA. Helicobacter pylori infection in developing countries: the burden for how long? Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:201-207.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 103]  [Cited by in RCA: 137]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
139.  De Leoz ML, Gaerlan SC, Strum JS, Dimapasoc LM, Mirmiran M, Tancredi DJ, Smilowitz JT, Kalanetra KM, Mills DA, German JB, Lebrilla CB, Underwood MA. Lacto-N-tetraose, fucosylation, and secretor status are highly variable in human milk oligosaccharides from women delivering preterm. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:4662-4672.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in RCA: 118]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
140.  Cheema AS, Gridneva Z, Furst AJ, Roman AS, Trevenen ML, Turlach BA, Lai CT, Stinson LF, Bode L, Payne MS, Geddes DT. Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Bacterial Profile Modulate Infant Body Composition during Exclusive Breastfeeding. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 31]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
141.  Berger PK, Bansal R, Sawardekar S, Yonemitsu C, Furst A, Hampson HE, Schmidt KA, Alderete TL, Bode L, Goran MI, Peterson BS. Associations of Human Milk Oligosaccharides with Infant Brain Tissue Organization and Regional Blood Flow at 1 Month of Age. Nutrients. 2022;14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
142.  Asher AT, Mangel L, Ari JB, Gover O, Ahmad WA, Herzlich J, Mandel D, Schwartz B, Lubetzky R. Human Milk Oligosaccharide Profile across Lactation Stages in Israeli Women-A Prospective Observational Study. Nutrients. 2023;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
143.  Akkerman R, Faas MM, de Vos P. Non-digestible carbohydrates in infant formula as substitution for human milk oligosaccharide functions: Effects on microbiota and gut maturation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59:1486-1497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in RCA: 103]  [Article Influence: 14.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
144.  Mao S, Zhao A, Jiang H, Yan J, Zhong W, Xun Y, Zhang Y. Patterns of Human Milk Oligosaccharides in Mature Milk Are Associated with Certain Gut Microbiota in Infants. Nutrients. 2024;16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
145.  Siziba LP, Mank M, Stahl B, Kurz D, Gonsalves J, Blijenberg B, Rothenbacher D, Genuneit J. Human milk oligosaccharide profiles and child atopic dermatitis up to 2 years of age: The Ulm SPATZ Health Study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022;33:e13740.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
146.  Liu S, Cai X, Wang J, Mao Y, Zou Y, Tian F, Peng B, Hu J, Zhao Y, Wang S. Six Oligosaccharides' Variation in Breast Milk: A Study in South China from 0 to 400 Days Postpartum. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
147.  Kortesniemi M, Jafari T, Zhang Y, Yang B. (1)H NMR Metabolomics of Chinese Human Milk at Different Stages of Lactation among Secretors and Non-Secretors. Molecules. 2022;27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
148.  Gurung M, Schlegel BT, Rajasundaram D, Fox R, Bode L, Yao T, Lindemann SR, LeRoith T, Read QD, Simecka C, Carroll L, Andres A, Yeruva L. Microbiota from human infants consuming secretors or non-secretors mothers' milk impacts the gut and immune system in mice. mSystems. 2024;9:e0029424.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
149.  Kassai S, de Vos P. Gastrointestinal barrier function, immunity, and neurocognition: The role of human milk oligosaccharide (hMO) supplementation in infant formula. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2024;23:e13271.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
150.  Zivkovic AM, Barile D. Bovine milk as a source of functional oligosaccharides for improving human health. Adv Nutr. 2011;2:284-289.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in RCA: 116]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
151.  Urrutia-Baca VH, Álvarez-Buylla JR, Gueimonde M, Chuck-Hernández C, Ruas-Madiedo P, González-Iglesias H. Comparative study of the oligosaccharide profile in goat, bovine, sheep, and human milk whey. Food Chem. 2025;463:141123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
152.  Warren CD, Chaturvedi P, Newburg AR, Oftedal OT, Tilden CD, Newburg DS. Comparison of oligosaccharides in milk specimens from humans and twelve other species. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001;501:325-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
153.  Almeida CC, Mendonça Pereira BF, Leandro KC, Costa MP, Spisso BF, Conte-Junior CA. Bioactive Compounds in Infant Formula and Their Effects on Infant Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Food Sci. 2021;2021:8850080.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
154.  Pérez-Escalante E, Alatorre-Santamaría S, Castañeda-Ovando A, Salazar-Pereda V, Bautista-Ávila M, Cruz-Guerrero AE, Flores-Aguilar JF, González-Olivares LG. Human milk oligosaccharides as bioactive compounds in infant formula: recent advances and trends in synthetic methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62:181-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
155.  Zhu Y, Cao H, Wang H, Mu W. Biosynthesis of human milk oligosaccharides via metabolic engineering approaches: current advances and challenges. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;78:102841.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 22]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
156.  Palur DSK, Pressley SR, Atsumi S. Microbial Production of Human Milk Oligosaccharides. Molecules. 2023;28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
157.  Li Y, Li Y, Guo Y, Chen C, Yang L, Jiang Q, Ling P, Wang S, Li L, Fang J. Enzymatic modular synthesis of asymmetrically branched human milk oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;333:121908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
158.  Christian P, Smith ER, Lee SE, Vargas AJ, Bremer AA, Raiten DJ. The need to study human milk as a biological system. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113:1063-1072.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in RCA: 108]  [Article Influence: 27.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
159.  Zhang S, Li T, Xie J, Zhang D, Pi C, Zhou L, Yang W. Gold standard for nutrition: a review of human milk oligosaccharide and its effects on infant gut microbiota. Microb Cell Fact. 2021;20:108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in RCA: 55]  [Article Influence: 13.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
160.  Walsh C, Lane JA, van Sinderen D, Hickey RM. From lab bench to formulated ingredient: Characterization, production, and commercialization of human milk oligosaccharides. J Func Food. 2020;72:104052.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
161.  Seppo AE, Bu K, Jumabaeva M, Thakar J, Choudhury RA, Yonemitsu C, Bode L, Martina CA, Allen M, Tamburini S, Piras E, Wallach DS, Looney RJ, Clemente JC, Järvinen KM. Infant gut microbiome is enriched with Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis in Old Order Mennonites with traditional farming lifestyle. Allergy. 2021;76:3489-3503.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
162.  Wiertsema SP, van Bergenhenegouwen J, Garssen J, Knippels LMJ. The Interplay between the Gut Microbiome and the Immune System in the Context of Infectious Diseases throughout Life and the Role of Nutrition in Optimizing Treatment Strategies. Nutrients. 2021;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 172]  [Article Influence: 43.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
163.  Sarkar A, Yoo JY, Valeria Ozorio Dutra S, Morgan KH, Groer M. The Association between Early-Life Gut Microbiota and Long-Term Health and Diseases. J Clin Med. 2021;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in RCA: 120]  [Article Influence: 30.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
164.  Anachad O, Taouil A, Taha W, Bennis F, Chegdani F. The Implication of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Obesity and Diabetes. Microbiol Insights. 2023;16:11786361231162720.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
165.  Bering SB. Human Milk Oligosaccharides to Prevent Gut Dysfunction and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Neonates. Nutrients. 2018;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 55]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
166.  Palsson OS, Peery A, Seitzberg D, Amundsen ID, McConnell B, Simrén M. Human Milk Oligosaccharides Support Normal Bowel Function and Improve Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020;11:e00276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
167.  Golden RK, Sutkus LT, Donovan SM, Dilger RN. Dietary supplementation of 3'-sialyllactose or 6'-sialyllactose elicits minimal influence on cognitive and brain development in growing pigs. Front Behav Neurosci. 2023;17:1337897.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
168.  Schnaar RL, Gerardy-Schahn R, Hildebrandt H. Sialic acids in the brain: gangliosides and polysialic acid in nervous system development, stability, disease, and regeneration. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:461-518.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 433]  [Cited by in RCA: 531]  [Article Influence: 48.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
169.  Wang Q, Yang Q, Liu X. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and neurodevelopmental disorders. Protein Cell. 2023;14:762-775.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
170.  Huang H, Jiang J, Wang X, Jiang K, Cao H. Exposure to prescribed medication in early life and impacts on gut microbiota and disease development. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;68:102428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
171.  Schalich KM, Buendia MA, Kaur H, Choksi YA, Washington MK, Codreanu GS, Sherrod SD, McLean JA, Peek RM Jr, Acra SA, Townsend SD, Yan F. A human milk oligosaccharide prevents intestinal inflammation in adulthood via modulating gut microbial metabolism. mBio. 2024;15:e0029824.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
172.  Shivani S, Chattopadhyay A, Chuang EY. Targeting the gut microbiome for non-communicable diseases: present and future. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9:361.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
173.  Tang R, Li L. Modulation of Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Potential Therapy Method for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2021;2021:6632266.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
174.  Al-Qadami GH, Secombe KR, Subramaniam CB, Wardill HR, Bowen JM. Gut Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids: Impact on Cancer Treatment Response and Toxicities. Microorganisms. 2022;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
175.  Ambalavanan A, Chang L, Choi J, Zhang Y, Stickley SA, Fang ZY, Miliku K, Robertson B, Yonemitsu C, Turvey SE, Mandhane PJ, Simons E, Moraes TJ, Anand SS, Paré G, Williams JE, Murdoch BM, Otoo GE, Mbugua S, Kamau-Mbuthia EW, Kamundia EW, Gindola DK, Rodriguez JM, Pareja RG, Sellen DW, Moore SE, Prentice AM, Foster JA, Kvist LJ, Neibergs HL, McGuire MA, McGuire MK, Meehan CL, Sears MR, Subbarao P, Azad MB, Bode L, Duan Q. Human milk oligosaccharides are associated with maternal genetics and respiratory health of human milk-fed children. Nat Commun. 2024;15:7735.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]