Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Pediatr. Sep 9, 2023; 12(4): 230-236
Published online Sep 9, 2023. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i4.230
Radiation dose analysis of computed tomography coronary angiography in Children with Kawasaki disease
Mahesh Chandra Bhatt, Manphool Singhal, Subhash Chand Bansal, Niranjan Khandelwal, Pankaj Gupta, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
Rakesh Kumar Pilania, Surjit Singh, Pediatric Allergy Immunology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
ORCID number: Manphool Singhal (0000-0002-1311-7203); Rakesh Kumar Pilania (0000-0002-9015-1704); Niranjan Khandelwal (0000-0002-8326-5164); Pankaj Gupta (0000-0003-3914-3757); Surjit Singh (0000-0002-8738-4582).
Author contributions: Bhatt MC and Singhal M contributed to the data interpretation, writing of first draft, review of literature, editing of manuscript and critical revision of manuscript at all stages; Pilania RK contributed to the patient management, data interpretation, writing of first draft, review of literature, editing of manuscript and critical revision of manuscript at all stages; Bansal SC, Khandelwal N, and Gupta P contributed to the review of literature and editing of manuscript; Singh S contributed to the patient management, review of literature, editing of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript at all stages; Bhatt MC and Singhal M contributed equally; Singhal M finally approved the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The manuscript has been approved by Departmental Publication Review Board (RDG/EC/Pub/27 dated July 03, 2020), No. NK/1837/Res/2890.
Informed consent statement: All study participants or their legal guardian provided informed written consent about personal and medical data collection prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The author(s) declare(s) that they had full access to all of the data in this study and the author(s) take(s) complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Manphool Singhal, MD, DNB, FICR, FSCCT, FSCMR, Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Madhya Marg, Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, India. drmsinghal74@gmail.com
Received: May 17, 2023
Peer-review started: May 17, 2023
First decision: July 4, 2023
Revised: July 12, 2023
Accepted: August 9, 2023
Article in press: August 9, 2023
Published online: September 9, 2023
Processing time: 111 Days and 15.6 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

There is evolving role of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery abnormalities in children with Kawasaki disease (KD). Despite this, there is lack of data on radiation dose in this group of children undergoing CTCA.

AIM

To audit the radiation dose of CTCA in children with KD.

METHODS

Study (December 2013-February 2018) was performed on dual source CT scanner using adaptive prospective electrocardiography-triggering. The dose length product (DLP in milligray-centimeters-mGy.cm) was recorded. Effective radiation dose (millisieverts-mSv) was calculated by applying appropriate age adjusted conversion factors as per recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose was compared across the groups (0-1, 1-5, 5-10, and > 10 years).

RESULTS

Eighty-five children (71 boys, 14 girls) with KD underwent CTCA. The median age was 5 years (range, 2 mo-11 years). Median DLP and effective dose was 21 mGy.cm, interquartile ranges (IQR) = 15 (13, 28) and 0.83 mSv, IQR = 0.33 (0.68, 1.01) respectively. Mean DLP increased significantly across the age groups. Mean effective dose in infants (0.63 mSv) was significantly lower than the other age groups (1-5 years 0.85 mSv, 5-10 years 1.04 mSv, and > 10 years 1.38 mSv) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the effective dose between the other groups of children. All the CTCA studies were of diagnostic quality. No child required a repeat examination.

CONCLUSION

CTCA is feasible with submillisievert radiation dose in most children with KD. Thus, CTCA has the potential to be an important adjunctive imaging modality in children with KD.

Key Words: Computed tomography coronary angiography, Coronary artery abnormalities, Dual source computed tomography, Kawasaki disease, Radiation exposure

Core Tip: Dual source computed tomography (CT) scanners by virtue of high temporal resolution, faster gantry rotation, electrocardiography triggered tube current modulation, large area coverage, body adaptive automatic selection of tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction algorithm have largely addressed the issue of high radiation exposure when subjecting children with Kawasaki disease (KD) to CT coronary angiography. It is now possible to evaluate these patients using submilliseivert radiation exposure. This is a significant advance in management of KD.



INTRODUCTION

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a common childhood medium vessel vasculitis with special propensity for coronary arteries. It typically affects children below 5, however, older children and young adults can also be affected. Diagnosis of KD is based on constellation of clinical features, and there are no pathognomonic laboratory tests. Children with KD fluffing the epidemiological case definition are known as complete KD. Incomplete and atypical forms of disease can constitute up to 50% of patients with KD[1-4]. Coronary artery abnormalities (CAAs) represent the major contributors to both acute as well as long term morbidity and mortality related to KD[4-8]. Timely treatment of KD reduces the CAAs incidence from 25% to < 5%. Timely and precise evaluation of CAAs is important for management of patients with KD[4]. 2D-echocardiography (ECHO) has hitherto been the first line imaging modality for evaluation of CAAs. However, it has some inherent limitations. These include operator dependency, poor acoustic window and lack of visualization of middle and distal segments of coronary arteries[6]. Further, it is difficult to visualize the coronaries in older children who have thick chest walls[9,10]. Catheter angiography (CA) is the gold standard imaging modality but has the disadvantages of being invasive and is associated with high radiation exposure[11-13].

Recently, multi-detector CT (MDCT) and dual source CT (DSCT) platforms have allowed imaging of coronary arteries at any heart rate with attempts at radiation optimization[14-18], which otherwise is a serious concern in children[19,20]. There are limited studies that to with small sample size on radiation dose in children with KD undergoing CTCA on DSCT (Table 1). Radiation dose in these studies was either more or comparable to our study. This study enumerates various methods to optimize the radiation exposure on CTCA in children with KD, an audit of the radiation dose and show that radiation exposure can be reduced to 1mSv or less in majority of children.

Table 1 Comparison of effective radiation dose on dual source computed tomography coronary angiography platforms in patients with Kawasaki disease.
Ref.
Country
Number of cases
Platform
ECG triggering
Age
Radiation dose
Remarks
Duan et al[27], 2012China19DSCTProspectiveRange: 3 mo-5 yrED (mean ± SD): 0.36 ± 0.06 mSv
Kim and Goo[28], 2013Korea51DSCT: (1) 64-Slice: n = 49; and (2) 128-Slice: n = 2Retrospective in most of the patientsMean (range): 13.2 (1-24) yrED (mean ± SD): (1) 64-Slice: 2.6 ± 2.7 mSv; and (2) 128-Slice: 2.1 ± 0.6 mSvED was only 0.6 ± 0.5 mSV in 5 children < 2 yr of age, who underwent prospective ECG-triggering
Ghoshhajra et al[29], 2014United States52DSCT: (1) 64-Slice: n = 16; and (2) 128-Slice: n = 36ProspectiveRange: 0-18 yrMedian (IQR) ED: (1) 64-Slice: 2.9 (0.9-4.1) mSV; and (2) 128-Slice: 1.0 (0.6-2.0) mSVED significantly reduced compared to 16 and 64-Slice Scanner platforms
Kantarcı et al[30], 2019Turkey17128-Slice DSCTDetails NAMean (range): 3 yr (2 mo-11.3 yr)ED range: 1.2-4.3 mGy depending on the patient’s body weight
van Stijn et al[26], 2020Netherlands70DSCT: (1) 2 × 192-Slice: n = 56; and (2) Other CT scanners (64/128/320-Slice): n = 14ProspectiveMedian (range): 15.1 (0.5-59.5) yrMedian (range) ED: (1) 2 × 192-Slice: 1.5 (0.3-9.4) mSv; and (2) Other CT scanner: 3.8 (1.7-20.0) mSvThis is the only study on 3rd generation DSCT platform
Borhanuddin et al[31], 2022Malaysia5264-slice DSCTRetrospectiveMedian (range): 5 (1-18) yrMedian (range) ED: 0.81 (0.4-5.8)
Present study, ChandigarhIndia85128-Slice DSCTProspectiveMedian (range): 5 yr (2 mo-11 yr)Median (IQR) ED: 0.83 (0.68-1.01)Largest study on 128-Slice platform which provides data that CTCA can be performed in sub-millisievert doses
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design

Review of records was carried out during the period December 2013-February 2018. The manuscript has been approved by Departmental Publication Review Board (RDG/EC/Pub/27 dated July 03, 2020). Written informed consent was obtained from parents prior to CTCA.

Patient population

Children with KD who underwent CTCA were either at presentation or on regular follow-up with CAAs on ECHO were included in the analysis. As per International Commission on Radiological Protection-103 (ICRP 103) recommendations, children were grouped as per age into infants (< 1 year), 1-5 years, 5-10 years, > 10 years. System generated radiation exposure dose length product (DLP in milligray-centimeters-mGy.cm) was recorded and effective radiation dose (millisieverts-mSv) was calculated by applying age adjusted conversion factors recommended by ICRP 103[21] and analysis of radiation exposure across groups was done (Table 2).

Table 2 Conversion factors for chest in different age groups at 80 kV according to recent International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations (20).
S.No.
Age group
Tube voltage (kV)
Conversion factor
1< 1 yr800.0823
2> 1 - < 5 yr800.0525
3> 5 - < 10 yr800.0344
4≥ 10 yr800.0248
CTCA technique

CTCA was carried out on a second generation DSCT 128-slice scanner (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using non-ionic contrast (Omnipaque 350, GE Healthcare, Ireland) with the following parameters: Temporal resolution- 75 milliseconds, gantry rotation time-0.28 s, slice thickness-0.6 mm. The scan was conducted in a craniocaudal direction from floor of carina to the diaphragm (till base of heart). CTCA was carried out with adaptive prospective electrocardiography (ECG) triggered sequence (CorAdSeq) tube current modulation to minimize radiation exposures without compromising image quality. With this technique the CT X-ray tube is switched on at the predefined range of R-R interval of ECG (in our study 30%-80% R-R interval) and provides images in systolic and diastolic phases.

Scanning parameters were customized to ensure minimal radiation exposure. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was taken as adjusted by the CT scanner according to body-size adapted protocols-CARE Dose4D (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). With this tube current-time product (mA.s) is automatically calculated for optimal automatic exposure depending on body weight and cross-sectional area. Automatic CARE kV was switched off and adjusted to 80 kilovolt (kVp) in all children. These modifications, along with CARE-Dose 4D tube current modulation, enabled us to further reduce the effective radiation dose. Lowest kVp and mAs values ensured optimal image quality with minimum possible radiation exposure. The current-time product ranged between 32-154 mA.s.

Statistical analysis

Parameters showing normal distribution were depicted as mean and standard deviation, while variables with skewed distribution were expressed as median and interquartile ranges (IQR). A P value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Statistical analysis was accomplished using SPSS statistical software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States).

RESULTS
Demographic characteristics

CTCA of 85 patients [71 (84%) boys; 14 (16%) girls] with KD were acquired. Median age of our cohort was 5 years [IQR: 5 (7, 2)]; range: 2 mo-11 years. As per ICRP 103 recommendations, children were grouped as per age into infants (< 1 year) (n-10; 12%), 1-5 years (n-29; 34%), 5-10 years (n-38; 45%), > 10 years (n-8; 9%).

Radiation dose

The median DLP and effective dose of all 85 patients in our study were 21.0 mGy.cm, IQR = 15 (13, 28) and 0.83 mSv, IQR = 0.33(0.68, 1.01), respectively. Details of DLP and effective CT radiation dose for children in study group are given in Table 3.

Table 3 Effective computed tomography radiation exposure according to age in adaptive prospective electrocardiography-triggered sequence computed tomography coronary angiography on 128-dual source computed tomography platform.
S.No.
Age group
Mean DLP (mGy.cm)
Mean effective radiation dose (mSv)
10-1 yr (n = 10)9.19 ± 2.210.63 ± 0.16
21-5 yr (n = 29)18.82 ± 8.480.85 ± 0.41
35-10 yr (n = 38)31.79 ± 14.141.04 ± 0.37
4> 10 yr (n = 8)55.67 ± 19.391.38 ± 0.48

The mean DLP in infants, 1-5 years, 5-10 years, and > 10 years was 9.19, 18.82, 31.76, and 55.67 mGy.cm, respectively. The mean effective dose in infants, 1-5 years, 5-10 years, and > 10 years was 0.63, 0.83, 1.04, and 1.38 mSv. The DLP showed significant increase with increasing age. The difference in the DLP was statistically significant across all age groups (P value for infants vs 1-5 years, 1-5 years vs 5-10 years, and 5-10 years > 10 years; < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.01, respectively. The mean effective dose in infants (0.63 mSv) was significantly lower than the other age groups (1-5 years 0.85 mSv, 5-10 years 1.04 mSv, and > 10 years 1.38 mSv) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the effective dose among children in the other groups.

All the CTCA studies were of diagnostic quality. No child required a repeat examination.

DISCUSSION

We performed CTCA on 128-DSCT scanner with radiation optimized protocols (CorAdSeq tube current modulation, body-size adapted protocols and reduced tube kilovoltage settings at 80 kVp) to minimize radiation exposures. In total 85 children with median age of 5 years [IQR: 5 (7, 2)]; (range: 2 mo-11years) were scanned. The mean effective radiation dose was 0.83 mSv with radiation exposure significantly lower in infants (0.63 mSv) as compared to other age groups. CTCA can visualize CAAs along the entire course of coronary arteries[6].

KD is a medium vessels vasculitis with special predilection for involvement of coronary arteries[1-4]. ECHO has hitherto been considered the imaging modality of choice for diagnosis and follow-up of CAAs in patients with KD, but with many limitations related to comprehensive evaluation of coronary arteries. CA is the gold standard, but is associated with inordinate radiation exposure, is invasive and cannot be repeated often for follow-up. Moreover, mural abnormalities cannot be depicted on CA[9,22].

With the advent of new high MDCT and DSCT scanners, imaging of coronary arteries is possible. However, until recently the risk of high radiation exposure had precluded the use of CTCA in children with KD. This was probably the limiting factor that prevented its application in pediatrics when cardiac CT on single source 64-slice was made possible. CTCA with single source 64-Slice CT is associated with radiation exposure as high as 3.0-5.7 mSv[23]. Moreover, this technique resulted in sub-optimal image quality due to inability to acquire images at high heart rates in children. Though there are no criteria to define limits of radiation dose in children, authors are of the opinion that this is clearly unacceptable in children and every possible method should be used to reduce radiation exposure in children as per ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle[24]. Higher slice and dual source CT scanners with improvised technologies have emerged as promising platforms for CTCA with possibility for radiation optimization providing a promising imaging modality for assessment of CAAs of KD vis-a-vis CA.

Various dose-saving strategies that can be adopted during CTCA on DSCT are body size-adapted protocols including low tube voltage techniques, ECG-controlled and attenuation-based tube current modulations, and prospectively ECG-triggered scanning[14-18]. Lowering the KVp values (to 80) results in a significant dose reduction with acceptable image quality[25]. We have used adaptive prospective ECG-triggered sequence with tube current modulation, lower tube voltage (80 kVp) and optimized system calculated tube current using CARE-Dose 4D for radiation reduction. Iterative reconstruction algorithm that was used in our protocol in addition provides excellent quality images even at low exposure.

van Stijn et al[26] recently published a study on coronary artery assessment in patients with KD using 3rd generation DSCT platform (2 × 192-Slice CT scanner) on 70 children. The authors achieved a radiation exposure of 1.5 mSv (range 0.3-9.4 mSv)[26]. The radiation dose in our cohort was lower. Median effective dose of radiation 0.83 mSv (0.68-1.01) in our study is amongst the lowest achieved so far on DSCT platform using 128-Slice CT scanner. Further, cohort sizes in the previously published studies have been much smaller than ours[26-31] (Table 1). Having achieved such low radiation exposures and given the fidelity of images acquired on these platforms, it may not be long before CTCA on a DSCT platform becomes the imaging modality of choice for detailed evaluation of CAAs in children with KD.

We recognize several limitations to our study. The data in the current study comes from a single center and more such studies are required for further validation of our results. Further, there were fewer children in individual age groups. The cumulative impact of radiation dose in children who may require follow up CTCA is not known. Though, all the scans were of diagnostic quality, it is desirable to assess image quality along with radiation dose. However, our study was not tailored to assess the image quality.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, DSCT scanners by virtue of high temporal resolution, faster gantry rotation, ECG triggered tube current modulation, large field of view, body adaptive automatic selection of tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction algorithm have largely addressed the issue of high radiation exposure when subjecting children with KD to CTCA. It is now possible to evaluate these patients using submilliseivert radiation exposure. This is a significant advance in management of KD.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

There is evolving role of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery abnormalities in children with Kawasaki disease (KD). Despite this, there is lack of data on radiation dose in this group of children undergoing CTCA.

Research motivation

There is paucity of literature on radiation exposure in children with KD undergoing CTCA for coronary artery assessment.

Research objectives

To estimate the radiation dose exposure in children with KD undergoing CTCA for coronary artery assessment.

Research methods

Children with KD who underwent CTCA were either at presentation or on regular follow were included in the analysis. System generated radiation exposure dose length product (DLP in milligray-centimeters-mGy.cm) was recorded and effective radiation dose (millisieverts-mSv) was calculated by applying age adjusted conversion factors.

Research results

Total 85 children with median age of 5 years were scanned. Mean effective radiation dose was 0.83 mSv with radiation exposure significantly lower in infants (0.63 mSv) as compared to other age groups. CTCA demonstrated coronary artery abnormalities along the entire course of coronary arteries.

Research conclusions

CTCA is feasible with submillisievert radiation dose in most children with KD.

Research perspectives

CTCA has the potential to be an important adjunctive imaging modality in children with KD. To confirm our results multicentric study with larger sample size would be required.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Pediatrics

Country/Territory of origin: India

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Ng HY, China; Zeng C, United States S-Editor: Fan JR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yuan YY

References
1.  Lo MS. A framework for understanding Kawasaki disease pathogenesis. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Friedman KG, Jone PN. Update on the Management of Kawasaki Disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020;67:811-819.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Jindal AK, Pilania RK, Prithvi A, Guleria S, Singh S. Kawasaki disease: characteristics, diagnosis, and unusual presentations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15:1089-1104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Singh S, Jindal AK, Pilania RK. Diagnosis of Kawasaki disease. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21:36-44.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Pilania RK, Jindal AK, Bhattarai D, Naganur SH, Singh S. Cardiovascular Involvement in Kawasaki Disease Is Much More Than Mere Coronary Arteritis. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:526969.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Singhal M, Pilania RK, Jindal AK, Gupta A, Sharma A, Guleria S, Johnson N, Maralakunte M, Vignesh P, Suri D, Sandhu MS, Singh S. Distal coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease: experience on CT coronary angiography in 176 children. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023;62:815-823.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Pilania RK, Singhal M, Singh S. Dense calcifications of giant coronary aneurysms in an 11-year-old girl with Kawasaki disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60:4441-4442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Chakraborty R, Singhal M, Pandiarajan V, Sharma A, Pilania RK, Singh S. Coronary arterial abnormalities detected in children over 10 years following initial Kawasaki disease using cardiac computed tomography. Cardiol Young. 2021;31:998-1002.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Singhal M, Gupta P, Singh S, Khandelwal N. Computed tomography coronary angiography is the way forward for evaluation of children with Kawasaki disease. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2017;2017:e201728.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Pilania RK, Bhattarai D, Singh S. Controversies in diagnosis and management of Kawasaki disease. World J Clin Pediatr. 2018;7:27-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Bakalyar DM, Castellani MD, Safian RD. Radiation exposure to patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization procedures. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;42:121-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  van de Putte S, Verhaegen F, Taeymans Y, Thierens H. Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:504-513.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Bacher K, Bogaert E, Lapere R, De Wolf D, Thierens H. Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation. 2005;111:83-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 213]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 212]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, Yassin A, Clouse ME. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:163-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Sun Z, Choo GH, Ng KH. Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:495-510.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Danad I, Ó Hartaigh B, Min JK. Dual-energy computed tomography for detection of coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015;13:1345-1356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sabarudin A, Sun Z. Coronary CT angiography: Diagnostic value and clinical challenges. World J Cardiol. 2013;5:473-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Singhal M, Singh S, Gupta P, Sharma A, Khandelwal N, Burns JC. Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Evaluation of Children With Kawasaki Disease. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018;47:238-244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-2284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6212]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5592]  [Article Influence: 328.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
20.  National Research Council 2006  Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1015]  [Article Influence: 63.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Tsuda E, Singhal M. Role of imaging studies in Kawasaki disease. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21:56-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Fink C, Krissak R, Henzler T, Lechel U, Brix G, Takx RA, Nance JW, Abro JA, Schoenberg SO, Schoepf UJ. Radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: second-generation dual-source CT versus single-source 64-MDCT and first-generation dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W550-W557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Ogbole GI. Radiation dose in paediatric computed tomography: risks and benefits. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2010;8:118-126.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1809-1817.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 237]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 218]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  van Stijn D, Planken RN, Groenink M, Streekstra GJ, Kuijpers TW, Kuipers IM. Coronary artery assessment in Kawasaki disease with dual-source CT angiography to uncover vascular pathology. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:432-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Duan Y, Wang X, Cheng Z, Wu D, Wu L. Application of prospective ECG-triggered dual-source CT coronary angiography for infants and children with coronary artery aneurysms due to Kawasaki disease. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e1190-e1197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Kim JW, Goo HW. Coronary artery abnormalities in Kawasaki disease: comparison between CT and MR coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2013;54:156-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Engel LC, Celeng C, Kalra MK, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Westra SJ, Abbara S. Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35:171-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Kantarcı M, Güven E, Ceviz N, Oğul H, Sade R. Vascular imaging findings with high-pitch low-dose dual-source CT in atypical Kawasaki disease. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25:50-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Borhanuddin BK, Abdul Latiff H, Mohamed Yusof AK. CT coronary angiogram in children with Kawasaki patients: experience in 52 patients. Cardiol Young. 2022;32:1994-1998.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]