Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Respirol. Jan 17, 2019; 9(1): 1-7
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Published online Jan 17, 2019. doi: 10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1
Table 1 Short term randomized control trial investigating the effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on cardiac functions in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Naughton, 1995[7] | 1 mo | 25 | no-CSA vs CPAP vs CSA-control | Urine and plasma NE↓, LVEF↑, NYHA class↓ |
Naughton, 1995[8] | 3 mo | 29 | no-CSA vs CPAP vs CSA-control | LVEF↑, improve symptoms |
Granton, 1996[30] | 3 mo | 17 | CPAP vs CSA-control | MIP↑, LVEF↑, improve symptoms |
Tkacova, 1997[9] | 3 mo | 17 | CPAP vs CSA-control | LVEF↑, Mitral regurgitant fraction↓, plasma ANP↓ |
Table 2 Short term randomized control trial investigating the effects of adaptive servo ventilation treatment on cardiac functions in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Pepperell, 2003[31] | 1 mo | 30 | Therapeutic mv-ASV vs subtherapeutic mv-ASV | Plasma BNP↓, urinary metadrenaline↓ |
Philippe, 2006[11] | 6 mo | 25 | CPAP vs mv-ASV | Significant increase in LVEF and improvement in QOL in ASV group |
Fietze, 2008[32] | 1.5 mo | 37 | bi-level PAP with standard S/T mode vs mv-ASV mode | LVEF increased more in the bi-level PAP group. Daytime blood pressure and heart rate did not change |
Kasai, 2013[10] | 3 mo | 23 | CPAP vs pf-ASV | LVEF increased more in the ASV group |
O’Connor, 2017[21] (CAT-HF trial)1 | 6 mo | 126 | SDB-control vs mv-ASV | No significant cardiac improvement found |
Table 3 Long term randomized control trials investigating the effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Sin, 2000[12] | 2.2 yr (median) | 66 | No-CSA-control vs no-CSA-CPAP vs CSA-CPAP vs CSA-control | Mortality-cardiac transplantation rate↓ who complied with CPAP, LVEF↑ in CSA-CPAP group |
Bradley, 2005[13] (CANPAP trial) | 2 yr (mean) | 258 | CSA-control vs CPAP | Plasma NE↓, LVEF↑, distance in a 6-min walk test↑ |
Arzt, 2007[14] (Post hoc analysis of CANPAP trial) | 23 mo (mean) | 210 | CSA-control vs CPAP | Patients whose AHI < 15 events/h by CPAP had significantly improved transplant-free survival and greater improvement in LVEF compared with control |
Table 4 Long term randomized control trial investigating the effects of adaptive servo ventilation treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with central sleep apnea
Author, year | Duration | n | Design | Findings |
Cowie, 2015[15] (SERVE-HF trial) | 31 mo (median) | 1325 | mv-ASV vs CSA-control | All-cause and cardiovascular mortality were both increased in ASV group |
- Citation: Murata A, Kasai T. Treatment of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure: Now and future. World J Respirol 2019; 9(1): 1-7
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6255/full/v9/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5320/wjr.v9.i1.1