Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Feb 10, 2017; 6(1): 1-7
Published online Feb 10, 2017. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v6.i1.1
Published online Feb 10, 2017. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v6.i1.1
Teenage (n = 50) | Control (n = 50) | P-value | |
Age, mean (SD) | 21.2 (1.2) | 31.7 (3.1) | < 0.0001 |
Country of birth | |||
Australia | 92% | 65% | < 0.0001 |
Elsewhere | 8% | 35% | |
Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander | 18% | 3% | 0.01 |
Relationship status | |||
Living with partner | 32% | 88% | < 0.0001 |
Not living with partner | 68% | 12% | |
Education | |||
< 12 yr | 24% | 8% | < 0.0001 |
12 yr | 74% | 44% | |
> 12 yr | 2% | 48% | |
Employment | |||
No | 32% | 6% | < 0.0001 |
Yes-locally | 54% | 76% | |
Yes-FIFO | 14% | 18% | |
Hours employed | |||
0-15 | 35% | 10% | < 0.0001 |
15-40 | 61% | 12% | |
40+ | 4% | 78% | |
Smoker | 38% | 20% | 0.0087 |
First time father | 96% | 52% | < 0.0001 |
Pregnancy planning | |||
Natural - planned | 22% | 68% | < 0.0001 |
IVF - planned | 0% | 10% | |
Unplanned | 78% | 22% | |
Childbirth education class | |||
Full class | 20% | 52% | < 0.0001 |
Partial class | 24% | 8% | |
Did not attend | 56% | 40% |
Did you play a role in the following decisions | Teenage (n = 50) | Control (n = 50) | P-value |
Pain relief in labour | |||
Yes | 3 (6%) | 15 (30%) | 0.0002 |
No | 47 (94%) | 35 (70%) | |
Electronic foetal heart rate monitoring | |||
Yes | 1 (2%) | 8 (16%) | 0.0069 |
No | 49 (98%) | 42 (84%) | |
Artificial rupture of the membranes | |||
Yes | 0 (0%) | 4 (8%) | 0.049 |
No | 50 (100%) | 46 (92%) | |
Oxytocic infusion to accelerate labour | |||
Yes | 0 (0%) | 8 (16%) | 0.0058 |
No | 50 (100%) | 42 (84%) | |
Type of birth (by example need for assisted delivery or caesarean section) | |||
Yes | 2 (4%) | 14 (28%) | 0.0002 |
No | 48 (96%) | 36 (72%) | |
Who enters the delivery room | |||
Yes | 9 (18%) | 39 (78%) | < 0.0001 |
No | 41 (82%) | 11 (22%) | |
Who held your baby immediately after the birth | |||
Yes | 8 (16%) | 40 (80%) | < 0.0001 |
No | 42 (84%) | 10 (20%) | |
Timing of the baby’s first feed | |||
Yes | 2 (4%) | 5 (10%) | 0.16 |
No | 48 (96%) | 45 (90%) |
Birth outcomes | Teenage (n = 50) | Control (n = 50) | P-value |
Gestational age of baby | |||
Preterm (< 37 wk) | 6 (12%) | 4 (8%) | 0.15 |
Term (37-41 wk) | 42 (84%) | 41 (82%) | |
Post term (> 41 wk) | 2 (4%) | 5 (10%) | |
Induction of labour | |||
Yes | 9 (18%) | 14 (28%) | 0.02 |
No | 40 (80%) | 31 (62%) | |
N/A (had elective CS) | 1 (2%) | 5 (10%) | |
Newborn gender | |||
Male | 25 (50%) | 27 (54%) | |
Female | 25 (50%) | 23 (46%) | 0.57 |
Birth weight below 10% adjusted for gestational age | |||
Yes | 8 (16%) | 4 (8%) | 0.037 |
No | 42 (84%) | 46 (92%) | |
Delivery mode | |||
Spontaneous vaginal birth | 39 (78%) | 26 (52%) | 0.0007 |
Assisted vaginal birth | 6 (12%) | 8 (16%) | |
Elective Caesarean birth | 1 (2%) | 5 (10%) | |
Non-elective Caesarean birth | 4 (8%) | 11 (22%) | |
Required admission to a neonatal nursery | |||
Yes | 10 (20%) | 5 (10%) | 0.018 |
No | 40 (80%) | 45 (90%) | |
Father attended the birth | |||
Yes | 49 (98%) | 50 (100%) | 0.91 |
No | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | |
Father felt prepared for the birth | |||
Yes | 6 (12%) | 42 (84%) | < 0.0001 |
Neutral | 37 (74%) | 2 (4%) | |
No | 7 (14%) | 4 (8%) | |
Father found midwifery staff to be helpful | |||
Yes | 40 (80%) | 41 (82%) | 0.60 |
Neutral | 8 (16%) | 6 (12%) | |
No | 2 (4%) | 3 (6%) | |
Father found medical staff to be helpful | |||
Yes | 38 (76%) | 41 (82%) | 0.004 |
Neutral | 10 (20%) | 4 (8%) | |
No | 2 (4%) | 5 (10%) | |
Father felt consulted by staff during birth | |||
Yes | 5 (10%) | 40 (80%) | < 0.0001 |
Neutral | 22 (44%) | 6 (12%) | |
No | 23 (46%) | 4 (8%) |
- Citation: Ngweso S, Petersen RW, Quinlivan JA. Birth experience of fathers in the setting of teenage pregnancy: Are they prepared? World J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 6(1): 1-7
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v6/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v6.i1.1