Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Feb 10, 2016; 5(1): 127-133
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.127
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.127
Table 1 Distribution of outcomes and variation of use of menopausal hormone therapy in study cohort
No. of women | ||||
Never-users | Ever-users | |||
No. of events during 14 yr follow-up (% in group) | ||||
Coronary artery disease | 33 | (11.5%) | 29 | (14.3%) |
Stroke | 23 | (8.0%) | 19 | (9.4%) |
Peripheral arteria disease | 10 | (3.5%) | 19 | (9.4%) |
Breast cancer | 20 | (6.9%) | 12 | (5.9%) |
Timing of initiation of therapy from onset of menopause | ||||
“Early start” ( ≤ 3 yr) | - | 162 | (80.2%) | |
“Late start” (> 3 yr) | - | 40 | (19.8%) | |
Type of regimen | ||||
Oestrogen-only | - | 30 | (14.8%) | |
Oestrogen + progestogen | - | 168 | (83.2%) | |
Tibolone | - | 4 | ||
Combination of treatment strategy | ||||
Early start plus oestrogen-only | - | 20 | (9.9%) | |
Early start plus oestrogen + progestogen | - | 140 | (69.3%) | |
Late start plus oestrogen-only | - | 10 | (4.9%) | |
Late start plus oestrogen + progestogen | - | 28 | (13.9%) | |
Other | 4 | |||
Age of patient when treatment started | ||||
20-39 yr | - | 17 | (8.4%) | |
40-49 yr | - | 85 | (42.0%) | |
50-59 yr | - | 82 | (40.6%) | |
60-69 yr | - | 18 | (8.9%) | |
70-79 yr | - | 17 | (8.4%) | |
Age of patient when treatment stopped | ||||
20-39 yr | - | 0 | ||
40-49 yr | - | 20 | (9.9%) | |
50-59 yr | - | 85 | (42.1%) | |
60-69 yr | - | 69 | (34.1%) | |
70-79 yr | - | 28 | (13.9%) | |
Duration of use (yr) | ||||
< 1 | - | 15 | (7.4%) | |
1-5 | - | 67 | (33.2%) | |
6-10 | - | 37 | (18.3%) | |
11-15 | - | 45 | (22.3%) | |
16-20 | - | 19 | (9.4%) | |
21-25 | - | 11 | (5.4%) | |
> 25 | - | 7 | (3.4%) | |
Total No. of women | 287 | 202 |
Table 2 Menopausal hormone treatment and risk of serious outcomes: Ever-use, timing of initiation of treatment and type of regimen
Relative risk estimate (95%Cl) | ||||
Coronaryartery disease | Stroke | Peripheralartery disease | Breastcancer | |
Ever-use | 1.29 (0.76, 2.20) | 1.14 (0.61, 2.14) | 2.16 (0.99, 4.71) | 0.84 (0.40, 1.76) |
P = 0.35 | P = 0.69 | P = 0.051 | P = 0.65 | |
Timing of initiation from onset of menopause | ||||
Early start | 1.02 (0.56, 1.86) | 1.04 (0.52, 2.06) | 1.65 (0.69, 3.94) | 0.97 (0.45, 2.08) |
P = 0.94 | P = 0.92 | P = 0.26 | P = 0.94 | |
Late start | 2.57 (1.15, 5.72) | 1.57 (0.56, 4.37) | 4.42 (1.55, 12.64) | 0.34 (0.05, 2.37) |
P = 0.021 | P = 0.39 | P = 0.0052 | P = 0.28 | |
Type of regimen | ||||
Oestrogen only | 2.34 (0.93, 5.88) | 0.78 (0.18, 3.49) | 5.01 (1.62, 15.48) | 2.05 (0.65, 6.46) |
P = 0.07 | P = 0.75 | P = 0.005 | P = 0.22 | |
Oestrogen + progestogen | 1.16 (0.65, 2.06) | 1.23 (0.64, 2.37) | 1.59 (0.67, 3.79) | 0.67 (0.29, 1.55) |
P = 0.62 | P = 0.53 | P = 0.30 | P = 0.35 | |
Combination of treatment strategy | ||||
Early start plus oestrogen-only | 2.57 (0.88, 7.52) | 1.22 (0.27, 5.56) | 1.32 (0.16, 10.78) | 2.36 (0.64, 8.72) |
P = 0.09 | P = 0.80 | P = 0.80 | P = 0.20 | |
Early start plus oestrogen + progestogen | 0.86 (0.44, 1.66) | 1.03 (0.50, 2.12) | 1.72 (0.70, 4.26) | 0.81 (0.35, 1.89) |
P = 0.65 | P = 0.94 | P = 0.24 | P = 0.62 | |
Late start plus oestrogen-only | 1.92 (0.39, 9.45) | NC | 16.73 (4.12, 67.91) | 1.48 (0.18, 12.29) |
P = 0.42 | P < 0.0012 | P = 0.71 | ||
Late start plus oestrogen + progestogen | 3.08 (1.26, 7.55) | 2.38 (0.83, 6.83) | 0.93 (0.12, 7.46) | NC |
P = 0.011 | P = 0.11 | P = 0.94 |
Table 3 Variation of use of menopausal hormone treatment and risk of serious outcomes : Age of patient and duration of use
Relative risk estimate (95%Cl) | ||||
Coronaryartery disease | Stroke | Peripheral artery disease | Breast cancer | |
Age of patient when treatment started (yr) | ||||
20-39 | 0.48 (0.07, 3.35) | 0.68 (0.09, 5.35) | 1.57 (0.19, 12.79) | 0.83 (0.11, 6.57) |
P = 0.47 | P = 0.72 | P = 0.67 | P = 0.87 | |
40-49 | 1.14 (0.55, 2.37) | 0.98 (0.41, 2.37) | 2.25 (0.85, 5.96) | 0.66 (0.22, 1.97) |
P = 0.72 | P = 0.97 | P = 0.10 | P = 0.45 | |
50-59 | 0.83 (0.37, 1.87) | 1.18 (0.51, 2.75) | 1.63 (0.55, 4.79) | 0.87 (0.32, 2.38) |
P = 0.65 | P = 0.69 | P = 0.37 | P = 0.78 | |
60-79 | 7.7 (2.85, 20.76) | 2.19 (0.59, 8.11) | 5.01 (1.27, 19.80) | 1.67 (0.36, 7.77) |
P < 0.001 | P = 0.24 | P = 0.02 | P = 0.52 | |
Age of patient when treatment stopped (yr) | ||||
20-39 | 1.36 (0.38, 4.88) | 1.22 (0.27, 5.56) | 2.79 (0.57, 13.53) | 1.48 (0.32, 6.85) |
P = 0.64 | P = 0.80 | P = 0.20 | P = 0.61 | |
40-49 | 0.48 (0.18, 1.27) | 0.54 (0.18, 1.59) | 0.92 (0.25, 3.37) | 0.32 (0.97, 1.41) |
P = 0.50 | P = 0.26 | P = 0.90 | P = 0.13 | |
50-59 | 1.3 (0.61, 2.80) | 1.24 (0.51, 3.00) | 2.83 (1.06, 7.60) | 1.75 (0.74, 4.16) |
P = 0.50 | P = 0.64 | P = 0.04 | P = 0.20 | |
60-79 | 4.98 (2.19, 11.55) | 2.99 (1.11, 8.08) | 4.18 (1.24, 14.14) | NC |
P < 0.001 | P = 0.03 | P = 0.02 | ||
Duration of use (yr) | ||||
< 1 | 1.1 (0.24, 5.04) | NC | 3.59 (0.72, 17.75) | 1.91 (0.40, 8.98) |
P = 0.90 | P = 0.12 | P = 0.41 | ||
1-5 | 0.76 (0.31, 1.87) | 1.28 (0.53, 3.11) | 1.18 (0.32, 4.34) | 0.85 (0.28, 2.57) |
P = 0.55 | P = 0.59 | P = 0.81 | P = 0.77 | |
6-10 | 2.12 (0.90, 5.03) | 0.3 (0.04, 2.32) | 1.43 (0.31, 6.74) | 0.37 (0.40, 2.85) |
P = 0.09 | P = 0.25 | P = 0.65 | P = 0.34 | |
11-15 | 0.75 (0.26, 2.20) | 1.69 (0.65, 4.38) | 3.14 (1.04, 9.50) | 0.95 (0.27, 3.35) |
P = 0.60 | P = 0.28 | P = 0.04 | P = 0.94 | |
16-20 | 2.75 (0.93, 8.11) | 1.29 (0.28, 5.92) | NC | 0.74 (0.09, 5.84) |
P = 0.07 | P = 0.74 | P = 0.78 | ||
21-25 | 2.89 (0.73, 11.41) | 2.44 (0.50, 11.92) | 5.57 (1.07, 28.92) | 1.33 (0.16, 10.96) |
P = 0.13 | P = 0.27 | P = 0.04 | P = 0.79 | |
26+ | 1.28 (0.15, 10.97) | 1.83 (0.21, 15.80) | 10.03 (1.75, 57.58) | NC |
P = 0.82 | P = 0.58 | P = 0.01 |
- Citation: Khoo SK, Tripcony L. Variation in use of menopausal hormone treatment on risk of health outcomes. World J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 5(1): 127-133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v5/i1/127.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.127