Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Neurol. Mar 28, 2016; 6(1): 1-13
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.5316/wjn.v6.i1.1
Table 1 Studies of aquaporin-4 expression following spinal cord injury
Ref.SpeciesModelDeviceParametersLevelAQP4 RNAAQP4 proteinAQP4 IHCWater contentBehavioral outcome
Nesic et al[53]Sprague dawley male ratsContusionIH Impactor200 kdynT10↑ AQP4 at 28 d post SCI↑ AQP4 at 28 d post SCI↑ AQP4 at 28 d and 5 m post SCI↑ CNP in animals with increased AQP4
Nesic et al[36]Sprague dawley male ratsContusionIH Impactor150 kdyn,T13↓ AQP4 at 12 h, 24 h, 3 d and 7 d post SCI↑ AQP4 at 5 m post SCI↑ levels at lesion site at 3 d
1 s dwell↑ AQP4 at 14 d, 35 d, 40 d, 56 d, 3.5 m and 9 m post SCIAstrocytes lacking AQP4 at dpi 14↑ levels at all levels at 2 and 5 mo
Nesic et al[47]HumanC5/6, C2, C8↑ AQP4 in spared white matter
↓ AQP4 in lesion epicenter
(1-2 yr post SCI)
Sprague dawley male ratsContusionIH Impactor150 kdyn,T10↑ AQP4 at 2 and 11 m post SCI↑ AQP4-/GFAP+ astrocytes at 14 d post SCI↑ levels at 3 d, 2 and 5 mBBB outcome coorelated with severity of injury
1 s dwell↓ AQP4 in severe SCI at 21 d↑ AQP4 labeling in AQP4+ astrocytes post SCI
↓ AQP4 in moderate SCI at 1, 7 and 14 d↑ AQP4 at 1, 2, 3 and 5 m post SCI
no change in moderate/mild SCI at 21 d
Leonard et al[79]RabbitsCompressionBalloon compression8 atm pressure,T10↑ AQP4 at 5 h, 24 h, 3 d and 14 d post SCI↑ levels at 5 h, 24 h and 3 d↓ Tarlov score and sensory pin prick in SCI animals
5 min hold
Table 2 Studies utilizing therapeutic interventions to alter aquaporin-4 expression after spinal cord injury
Ref.SpeciesModelDeviceParametersLevelTreatmentTiming/ durationAQP4 RNAAQP4 proteinAQP4 IHCWater contentBehavioral outcome
Vitellaro-Zuccarello et al[73]Sprague dawley male ratsContusionUTS Impactor1 N, 1 s dwellT9rhEPO, 5000 UI/kgOnce, 30 min post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 7 d and 28 d↑ in rhEPO treated (BBB)
↑ AQP4 in rhEPO at 7 d and 28 d
Guptarak et al[72]Sprague dawley male ratsContusionIH Impactor150 kdyn, 1 s dwellT10TMX, 1 mgOnce/day, 14 or 28 d post injury (acute), days 42-56 post injury (delayed)↑ AQP4 in untreated and 35 d↑ AQP4 in untreated and 35 d↑ in TMX treated at 14 d and 28 d (acute treatment) no BBB recovery in animals treated from day 42-56 (delayed treatment)
↑ AQP4 in TMX treated at 35 d↑ AQP4 in TMX treated at 35 d
Wu et al[61]C57B/L6 male miceContusionWeight drop5 g weight, 10 mm dropT10Melatonin, 50 mg/kgOnce, post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 48 h↑ levels in untreated at 48 h
↓ AQP4 in melatonin treated at 48 h↓ levels in melatonin treated at 48 h
Jing et al[63]C57B/L6 male miceContusionIH Impactor50 kdynT10Melatonin, 10 mg/kgTwice/day, 2 wk post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 7 d↑ levels in untreated at 7 d↑ in melatonin treated at 7, 10 and 14 d (BMS)
↓ AQP4 in melatonin treated at 7 d↓ levels in melatonin treated at 7 d
Zu et al[69]Sprague dawley male ratsContusionStriking bar150 gcf, 5 cm dropT8Curcumin, 40 mg/kgOnce, 30 min post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 72 h↑ AQP4 in untreated at 72 h↑ AQP4 in untreated at 72 h↑ levels in untreated at 72 hno difference in BBB scores with treatment
↓ AQP4 in curcumin treated at 72 h↓ AQP4 in curcumin treated at 72 h↓ AQP4 in curcumin treated at 72 h↓ levels in curcumin treated at 72 h
Hu et al[24]Sprague dawley female ratsContusionNYU weight drop device10 g weight, 25 mm dropT10Myelotomy, 3.5 mm long, 1-1.5 mm deepOnce, 24 h after injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 2, 4 and 6 d↑ levels in untreated at 4 and 6 d, not at 2 d↑ in myelotomy treated at 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 d
↓ AQP4 in myelotomy treated at 4 and 6 d↓ levels in myelotomy treated at 4 and 6 d(BBB and inclinded plane test)
Mao et al[89]CD1 male miceCompressionVascular clip10 g force, 1 min holdT9SFN, 5 mg/kgOnce, 1 h post injury↓ AQP4 in untreated at 48 h↓ AQP4 in untreated at 48 h↓ AQP4 in untreated at 48 h↑ levels in untreated at 48 h
↑ AQP4 in SFN treated at 48 h↑ AQP4 in SFN treated at 48 h↑ AQP4 in SFN treated at 48 h↓ levels in SFN treated at 48 h
Fan et al[83]Sprague dawley male ratsCompressionWeight application5 g weight, 5 min holdT12AG, 150 mg/kgOnce, 24 h post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 24 h and 48 h↑ AQP4 in untreated at 48h↑ levels in untreated at 12, 24 and 48 h↑ in AG treated (BBB)
↓ AQP4 in AG treated at 24 h and 48 h↓ AQP4 in AG treated at 48 h↓ levels in AG treated 12, 24 and 48 h
Wang et al[82]Sprague dawley male ratsCompressionWeight application50 g weight, 5 min holdT122ME2, 2.5 mg/kgOnce, post injury↑ AQP4 in untreated at 6, 12 and 24 h
↓ AQP4 in 2ME2 treated at 12 h
Ge et al[84]Sprague dawley male ratsCompressionVascular clip30 g force, 1 min holdT12EGCG, 100 mg/kg1 ×/day, 3 d↑ AQP4 in untreated at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h↑ AQP4 in untreated at 24 and 72 h↑ levels in untreated at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h
↓ AQP4 in EGCG treated at 24, 48 and 72 h↓ AQP4 in EGCG treated at 24 and 72 h↓ levels in EGCG treated at 24, 48 and 72 h
Liu et al[58]Sprague dawley male ratsCompressionAneurysm clip5 min holdT12Melatonin, 100 mg/kg1 ×/day, 3 d↑ AQP4 in untreated at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h↑ AQP4 in untreated at 24 and 72 h↑ levels in untreated at 12, 24, 48 and 72 h
↓ AQP4 in melatonin treated at 24, 48 and 72 h↓ AQP4 in melatonin treated at 24 and 72 h↓ levels in melatonin treated at 24, 48 and 72 h
Table 3 Studies utilizing aquaporin-4 null mice
Ref.SpeciesModelDeviceParametersLevelAQP4 IHCWater contentBehavioral outcome
Kimura et al[98]CD1 AQP4 -/- female mice, AQP4 +/+ContusionIH Impactor60 kdynT10↑ levels in -/- compared to +/+↓ in -/- compared to +/+ (BMS, foot print analysis, bladder function)
Saadoun et al[95]CD1 and BL/6 AQP4 -/-, AQP +/+CompressionDumont 5 forcepts1 mm separation, 2 min holdT6↑ AQP4 in +/+ SCI at 2 d↓ levels in -/- compared to +/+↑ in -/- compared to +/+ (BMS, foot print analysis)
Wu et al[68]CD1 AQP4 -/-, AQP4 +/+TransectionLouisville Impactor System Apparatus0.8 mm depth, right hemisectionC4↓ AQP4 in +/+ SCI at 2 d and 7 d↑ levels in both -/- and +/+ at 3 d
↑ AQP4 in +/+ SCI at 42 d↑ levels in -/- compared to +/+ at 3 d