Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Anesthesiol. Nov 27, 2016; 5(3): 67-72
Published online Nov 27, 2016. doi: 10.5313/wja.v5.i3.67
Published online Nov 27, 2016. doi: 10.5313/wja.v5.i3.67
ITM (n = 22) | FNB (n = 32) | Statistical significance | |
Median (IQR) age: Years | 69.0 (62.8-74.3) | 61.0 (57.0-67) | P = 0.002 |
Sex: Numbers | |||
Male | 9 (37.5%) | 15 (62.5%) | P = 0.665 |
Female | 13 (43.3%) | 17 (56.7%) | |
Median (IQR) weight: Kg | 64.3 (53.2-77.2) | 67.3 (61.2-80.2) | P = 0.275 |
Median (IQR) ASA status | 3.0 (2.0-3.0) | 2.0 (2.0-3.0) | P = 0.161 |
Median (IQR) total surgery time in minutes | 117.5 (108.8-135.0) | 107.5 (86.3-128.8) | P = 0.163 |
ITM (n = 22) | FNB (n = 32) | |
Ease of performance | Very easy, no special training | Expertise and training required, special equipment required |
Added cost | Only morphine | Ultrasound machine, special needle and local anesthetic |
Median (IQR) pain score at: | Low | High |
6 h | 0.0 (0.0-0.0) | 2.0 (2.0-4.8) |
12 h | 0.0 (0.0-0.0) | 2.0 (2.0-3.8) |
24 h | 0.0 (0.0-0.3) | 2.0 (2.0-4.0) |
Median (IQR) of morphine requirement (in mg) in 24 h | Low 5.0 (3.8-10.0) | High 16.5 (8.0-21.5) |
Median (IQR) of NSAID unit in 24 h | 2.0 (1.0-2.0) | 1.0 (0.0-1.3) |
Median (IQR) of Paracetamol (G) in 24 h | 3.0 (2.0-3.0) | 3.0 (2.0-4.0) |
Complications | Low | Low |
No PONV since antiemetic prescribed in anticipation | Incidence of PONV was higher since no regular antiemetic given (16 at 6 h, 11 at 12 h and 9 at 24 h) | |
No urinary retention since all patients were catheterized | No urine retention | |
No respiratory depression | No respiratory depression | |
No itching recorded | No itching recorded | |
Number of elective HDU admission status | 3 (15%) | 2 (6.5%) |
Median (IQR) days to discharge | 4.5 (3.0-5.0) | 4.0 (3.0-6.0) |
Patient satisfaction | 18/20 (90.0%) rated good | 4/31 (12.9%) rated good |
- Citation: DeSousa K, Chandran R. Intrathecal morphine vs femoral nerve block for postoperative-analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: A two-year retrospective analysis. World J Anesthesiol 2016; 5(3): 67-72
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6182/full/v5/i3/67.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5313/wja.v5.i3.67