Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2017; 8(6): 471-477
Published online Jun 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i6.471
Published online Jun 18, 2017. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i6.471
Patient | Age (yr) | Bones involved | Open/closed | Initial treatment | Speciments | Time to infection resolution (wk) | Bone defect andintercalary graft size (cm) | Time to healing (mo) |
1 | 27 | Radius | Closed | Intramedullary rod | S. epidermidis | 6 | 2.2 | 5 |
2 | 31 | Ulna | Open | ORIF | S. aureus | 4 | 1.8 | 4 |
3 | 41 | Radius | Closed | ORIF | S. aureus | 6 | 1.5 | 2 |
4 | 24 | Ulna | Closed | ORIF | S. hominis + K. pneumoniae | 8 | 2.0 | 4 |
5 | 19 | Ulna | Closed | Intramedullary rod | S. epidermidis | 6 | 1.8 | 3 |
6 | 42 | Ulna | Closed | ORIF | P. aeruginosa | 8 | 2.0 | 6 |
7 | 39 | Ulna | Open | ORIF | S. aureus | 6 | 1.6 | 3 |
8 | 34 | Radius | Closed | ORIF | S. aureus1+ P. aeruginosa | 20 | 2.2 | 4 |
9 | 45 | Ulna | Closed | Intramedullary rod | S. aureus | 8 | 1.7 | 3 |
10 | 25 | Radius + Ulna | Open | ORIF + intram. rod | S. aureus + P. acnes | 8 | 2.2 | 8 |
11 | 57 | Ulna | Open | External fixator | S. aureus | 10 | 4.0 | 7 |
12 | 38 | Ulna | Closed | ORIF | S. epidermidis | 6 | 1.8 | 4 |
13 | 20 | Radius + Ulna | Open | External fixator | S. aureus | 6 | 2.8 | 8 |
14 | 31 | Ulna | Closed | Close reduction | S. aureus | 10 | 2.0 | 4 |
15 | 52 | Radius | Closed | ORIF | S. aureus | 12 | 2.5 | 5 |
16 | 40 | Ulna | Open | External fixator | S. epidermidis | 6 | 5.0 | 10 |
17 | 22 | Ulna | Closed | Intramedullary rod | S. aureus | 6 | 1.8 | 4 |
18 | 34 | Radius | Closed | ORIF | P. aeruginosa | 12 | 2.5 | 6 |
Patient | Age (yr) | Follow-up (yr) | Anderson | ADLs limitations | Job limitations | VAS |
1 | 27 | 6 | Excellent | No | No | 0 |
2 | 31 | 4 | Satisfactory | No | No | 0 |
3 | 41 | 8 | Satisfactory | No | No | 0 |
4 | 24 | 3 | Satisfactory | Slight | Slight | 1 |
5 | 19 | 10 | Satisfactory | No | No | 0 |
6 | 42 | 4 | Satisfactory | Slight | Slight | 2 |
7 | 39 | 10 | Satisfactory | No | Slight | 1 |
8 | 34 | 8 | Excellent | No | No | 0 |
9 | 45 | 4 | Excellent | No | No | 0 |
10 | 25 | 6 | Satisfactory | No | Slight | 2 |
11 | 57 | 4 | Unsatisfactory | Severe | Severe | 2 |
12 | 38 | 5 | Excellent | No | No | 0 |
13 | 20 | 8 | Satisfactory | Slight | Slight | 2 |
14 | 31 | 8 | Satisfactory | No | No | 0 |
15 | 52 | 2 | Unsatisfactory | Severe | Severe | 3 |
16 | 40 | 4 | Unsatisfactory | Severe | Severe | 3 |
17 | 22 | 6 | Excellent | No | No | 0 |
18 | 34 | 8 | Satisfactory | No | Slight | 1 |
- Citation: Perna F, Pilla F, Nanni M, Berti L, Lullini G, Traina F, Faldini C. Two-stage surgical treatment for septic non-union of the forearm. World J Orthop 2017; 8(6): 471-477
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v8/i6/471.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i6.471