Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2016; 7(5): 301-307
Published online May 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i5.301
Table 1 Case series of valgus osteotomy for nonunion
Ref.nAverage follow-up (yr)Union rate, n/total (%)AVN, n/total (%)ImplantFunctional outcome
Marti et al[10]507.143/50 (86)22/50 (44)DABPHHS: 91
Anglen et al[15]13213/13 (100)2/13 (15)DABPHHS: 93
Wu et al[33]3232/32 (100)2/32 (6)SHS +/- (subtrochanteric osteotomy)NA
Kalra et al[23] (neglected fractures)222.520/22 (85)2/22 (9)DABP75%; excellent to good results
Sringari et al[34]20218/20 (90)NilDABPNA
Magu et al[11]48644/48 (94)2/48 (4)DABPHHS: 86.7
Khan et al[35]162.514/16 (87)NilSHS (120 degree plate)HHS: 88
Said et al[29]363.535/36 (97)5/36 (13)Angled blade plate (prebent 130 degree)NA
Sen et al[26]223.221/22 (91)5/55 (22)DABP + non-vasc fibula66%; excellent to good results
Gadegone et al[7]412.7539/41 (95)7/41 (17)SHS (110-130 prebent plate + non-vasc fibula)HHS: 90.9
Gavaskar et al[28]11111/11 (100)NilSHS + subtrochanteric osteotomy, no wedge takenOxford score: 40
Gupta et al[36]603.556/60 (93)4/60 (6)SHS (135 degree subtrochanteric osteotomy)HHS: 87.5
Varghese et al[14]32529/32 (91)13/32 (44)DABPHHS: 82