Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2016; 7(1): 61-68
Published online Jan 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61
Table 1 Different industries with brand names, guide type, implant name and scanning modality
Dupuy-SynthesSmith and NephewZimmerBiomet
PSGTrumatchVisionairePSISignature
GuidesCutCutPinPin
ImplantSigma CRGenesis IINexGenVanguard CR
Imaging protocolCT1MRI2CT or MRI1CT or MRI1
Table 2 Baseline demographics per alignment method, n (%)
TrumatchVisionairePSISignatureConventionalP value
Number of patients1513141560
Mean age, yr (range)72 (57-90)72 (63-82) 69 (52-86)68 (56-74)65 (50-83)0.097
Male6 (40)7 (54)7 (50)7 (47)34 (57)0.967
Mean BMI (range)30 (23-36)30 (23-37) 30 (26-36)30 (23-38)28 (21-37)0.373
Severity OA
Moderate13 (87)11 (85)13 (93)14 (93)53 (88)0.991
Severe2 (13)2 (15)1 (7)1 (7)7 (12)0.959
Table 3 Inter observer correlation coefficients
HKAFFCFTCLFCLTC
Inter CC0.8110.8790.8830.8500.943
Table 4 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the patient specific matched guides and the conventional group, n (%)
OutliersPSGConventionalP value
HKA outliers7 (12.28)11 (18.33)0.424
Mean (SD)179.49 (2.24)178.54 (2.27)0.015
FFC outliers0 (0)11 (18.33)0.000
Mean (SD)89.44 (1.73)88.03 (1.73)0.000
FTC outliers1 (1.75)0 (0)1.000
Mean (SD)89.87 (1.32)90.37 (1.38)0.058
LFC outliers9 (15.78)35 (58.33)0.000
Mean (SD)86.09 (2.86)86.04 (3.14)0.314
LTC outliers9 (15.78)25 (41.67)0.033
Mean (SD)92.86 (2.64)87.43 (2.63)0.000
Table 5 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the patient specific matched guides groups, n (%)
TrumatchVisionairePSISignatureP value
HKA outliers3 (20.00)1 (7.69)2 (14.28)1 (6.66)0.819
Mean (SD)178.5 (2.3)181.3 (1.6)180.6 (1.6)177.9 (1.8)0.000
FFC outliers00001.000
Mean (SD)89.9 (1.6)90.1 (1.5)89.9 (1.2)87.9 (1.8)0.000
FTC outliers001 (7.14)01.000
Mean (SD)89.3 (1.4)90.0 (1.2)89.9 (1.6)90.6 (1.3)0.081
LFC outliers2 (13.33)2 (15.38)1 (7.14)4 (26.66)0.663
Mean (SD)85.7 (1.6)85.4 (2.1)87.4 (1.9)85.8 (4.5)0.307
LTC outliers2 (13.33)4 (30.76)2 (14.28)1 (6.66)0.594
Mean (SD)92.7 (2.4)91.2 (3.0)94.8 (1.2)92.8 (2.7)0.000
Table 6 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the cut (n = 28, Trumatch and Visionaire) and pin (n = 29, patient-specific instrument and signature) patient specific matched guides group, n (%)
Cut PSGPin PSGP value
HKA outliers4 (14.3)3 (10.3)1.000
Mean (SD)179.9 (2.4)179.3 (2.2)0.342
FFC outliers001.000
Mean (SD)90.0 (1.5)89.6 (1.8)0.022
FTC outliers01 (3.4)1.000
Mean (SD)89.6 (1.3)90.2 (1.5)0.115
LFC outliers4 (14.3)5 (17.21.000
Mean (SD)85.6 (1.8)86.6 (3.5)0.184
LTC outliers6 (21.4)3 (10.3)0.477
Mean (SD)92.0 (2.7)93.8 (2.3)0.009
Table 7 Published level I studies with significant percentage of outliers of > 3˚ deviation between the patient specific matched guides and conventional intramedular and/or extramedular alignment method for hip-knee-ankle angle axis, frontal femoral component, frontal tibial component, flexion/extension of the femur component, lateral tibial component and axial rotation of the femur and/or tibia component controlled with postoperative X-ray (long-leg standing and/or lateral X-rays) and/or computed tomography
Outliers (%) > 3° deviationPSG systemModalityConventionalControlSample sizeSignificant outliers (%)
femur/tibia(PSG/conventional)(PSG/conventional)
Boonen et al[16]SignatureMRIIntraX-ray90/90LFC (49/65)1
Chareancholvanich et al[17]PSIMRIIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT40/40FFC (0/18)1
Chotanaphuti et al[18]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT40/40NA
Hamilton et al[19]TruMatchScout CTIntra/ExtraX-ray26/26LTC (65/50)2
Ng et al[22] [Outliers (%) > 2° deviation]PSIMRIIntraCT51/27FTC (27/67)2, Femoral rotation (16/67)2, Tibial rotation (22/95)2
Pfitzner et al[24]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT(30/30)/30HKA (30/7/43)2
VisionaireMRI + X-rayFTC (13/3/23)1
Femoral rotation (1/13 /50)1
Victor et al[25]SignatureMRI, CTIntra/ExtraX-ray and CT(16/16/16/16)/64  FTC (15/3)1
TruMatchMRI + X-rayLTC (21/3)2
VisionaireMRIHKA (6/25/45/19)1, 3
PSILFC (62/20/20/56)2, 3
Kotela et al[26]SignatureCTIntra/ExtraX-ray49/46FTC (39/20)1
Woolson et al[27]TruMatchCTIntra/ExtraCT22/26LTC (32/8)1
Current studySignatureMRIIntraX-ray(15/13/14/15)/60FFC (022)2
TruMatchCTLFC (16/67)2
VisionaireMRI + X-rayLTC (16/42)1
PSIMRI