Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2016; 7(1): 61-68
Published online Jan 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61
Published online Jan 18, 2016. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61
Table 1 Different industries with brand names, guide type, implant name and scanning modality
Table 2 Baseline demographics per alignment method, n (%)
Trumatch | Visionaire | PSI | Signature | Conventional | P value | |
Number of patients | 15 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 60 | |
Mean age, yr (range) | 72 (57-90) | 72 (63-82) | 69 (52-86) | 68 (56-74) | 65 (50-83) | 0.097 |
Male | 6 (40) | 7 (54) | 7 (50) | 7 (47) | 34 (57) | 0.967 |
Mean BMI (range) | 30 (23-36) | 30 (23-37) | 30 (26-36) | 30 (23-38) | 28 (21-37) | 0.373 |
Severity OA | ||||||
Moderate | 13 (87) | 11 (85) | 13 (93) | 14 (93) | 53 (88) | 0.991 |
Severe | 2 (13) | 2 (15) | 1 (7) | 1 (7) | 7 (12) | 0.959 |
Table 3 Inter observer correlation coefficients
HKA | FFC | FTC | LFC | LTC | |
Inter CC | 0.811 | 0.879 | 0.883 | 0.850 | 0.943 |
Table 4 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the patient specific matched guides and the conventional group, n (%)
Outliers | PSG | Conventional | P value |
HKA outliers | 7 (12.28) | 11 (18.33) | 0.424 |
Mean (SD) | 179.49 (2.24) | 178.54 (2.27) | 0.015 |
FFC outliers | 0 (0) | 11 (18.33) | 0.000 |
Mean (SD) | 89.44 (1.73) | 88.03 (1.73) | 0.000 |
FTC outliers | 1 (1.75) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 89.87 (1.32) | 90.37 (1.38) | 0.058 |
LFC outliers | 9 (15.78) | 35 (58.33) | 0.000 |
Mean (SD) | 86.09 (2.86) | 86.04 (3.14) | 0.314 |
LTC outliers | 9 (15.78) | 25 (41.67) | 0.033 |
Mean (SD) | 92.86 (2.64) | 87.43 (2.63) | 0.000 |
Table 5 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the patient specific matched guides groups, n (%)
Trumatch | Visionaire | PSI | Signature | P value | |
HKA outliers | 3 (20.00) | 1 (7.69) | 2 (14.28) | 1 (6.66) | 0.819 |
Mean (SD) | 178.5 (2.3) | 181.3 (1.6) | 180.6 (1.6) | 177.9 (1.8) | 0.000 |
FFC outliers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 89.9 (1.6) | 90.1 (1.5) | 89.9 (1.2) | 87.9 (1.8) | 0.000 |
FTC outliers | 0 | 0 | 1 (7.14) | 0 | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 89.3 (1.4) | 90.0 (1.2) | 89.9 (1.6) | 90.6 (1.3) | 0.081 |
LFC outliers | 2 (13.33) | 2 (15.38) | 1 (7.14) | 4 (26.66) | 0.663 |
Mean (SD) | 85.7 (1.6) | 85.4 (2.1) | 87.4 (1.9) | 85.8 (4.5) | 0.307 |
LTC outliers | 2 (13.33) | 4 (30.76) | 2 (14.28) | 1 (6.66) | 0.594 |
Mean (SD) | 92.7 (2.4) | 91.2 (3.0) | 94.8 (1.2) | 92.8 (2.7) | 0.000 |
Table 6 Mean (SD) values and amount of patients and percentages of outliers of > 3˚ deviation of the planned alignment and postoperative alignment compared between the cut (n = 28, Trumatch and Visionaire) and pin (n = 29, patient-specific instrument and signature) patient specific matched guides group, n (%)
Cut PSG | Pin PSG | P value | |
HKA outliers | 4 (14.3) | 3 (10.3) | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 179.9 (2.4) | 179.3 (2.2) | 0.342 |
FFC outliers | 0 | 0 | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 90.0 (1.5) | 89.6 (1.8) | 0.022 |
FTC outliers | 0 | 1 (3.4) | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 89.6 (1.3) | 90.2 (1.5) | 0.115 |
LFC outliers | 4 (14.3) | 5 (17.2 | 1.000 |
Mean (SD) | 85.6 (1.8) | 86.6 (3.5) | 0.184 |
LTC outliers | 6 (21.4) | 3 (10.3) | 0.477 |
Mean (SD) | 92.0 (2.7) | 93.8 (2.3) | 0.009 |
Table 7 Published level I studies with significant percentage of outliers of > 3˚ deviation between the patient specific matched guides and conventional intramedular and/or extramedular alignment method for hip-knee-ankle angle axis, frontal femoral component, frontal tibial component, flexion/extension of the femur component, lateral tibial component and axial rotation of the femur and/or tibia component controlled with postoperative X-ray (long-leg standing and/or lateral X-rays) and/or computed tomography
Outliers (%) > 3° deviation | PSG system | Modality | Conventional | Control | Sample size | Significant outliers (%) |
femur/tibia | (PSG/conventional) | (PSG/conventional) | ||||
Boonen et al[16] | Signature | MRI | Intra | X-ray | 90/90 | LFC (49/65)1 |
Chareancholvanich et al[17] | PSI | MRI | Intra/Extra | X-ray and CT | 40/40 | FFC (0/18)1 |
Chotanaphuti et al[18] | TruMatch | CT | Intra/Extra | X-ray and CT | 40/40 | NA |
Hamilton et al[19] | TruMatch | Scout CT | Intra/Extra | X-ray | 26/26 | LTC (65/50)2 |
Ng et al[22] [Outliers (%) > 2° deviation] | PSI | MRI | Intra | CT | 51/27 | FTC (27/67)2, Femoral rotation (16/67)2, Tibial rotation (22/95)2 |
Pfitzner et al[24] | TruMatch | CT | Intra/Extra | X-ray and CT | (30/30)/30 | HKA (30/7/43)2 |
Visionaire | MRI + X-ray | FTC (13/3/23)1 | ||||
Femoral rotation (1/13 /50)1 | ||||||
Victor et al[25] | Signature | MRI, CT | Intra/Extra | X-ray and CT | (16/16/16/16)/64 | FTC (15/3)1 |
TruMatch | MRI + X-ray | LTC (21/3)2 | ||||
Visionaire | MRI | HKA (6/25/45/19)1, 3 | ||||
PSI | LFC (62/20/20/56)2, 3 | |||||
Kotela et al[26] | Signature | CT | Intra/Extra | X-ray | 49/46 | FTC (39/20)1 |
Woolson et al[27] | TruMatch | CT | Intra/Extra | CT | 22/26 | LTC (32/8)1 |
Current study | Signature | MRI | Intra | X-ray | (15/13/14/15)/60 | FFC (022)2 |
TruMatch | CT | LFC (16/67)2 | ||||
Visionaire | MRI + X-ray | LTC (16/42)1 | ||||
PSI | MRI |
- Citation: Schotanus MG, Boonen B, Kort NP. Patient specific guides for total knee arthroplasty are ready for primetime. World J Orthop 2016; 7(1): 61-68
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i1/61.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.61