Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 290-297
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290
Ref. | Article type | Sample size | Comparison of accuracy | Dimensional accuracy |
Ensini et al[25] | Prospective randomized trial | 25 CT PSI and 25 MRI PSI | Intra-operative navigation system and post-operative radiographic alignment | Comparable outcome |
Cenni et al[9] | Prospective randomised trial | 23 CT and 21 MRI PSI | Post-operative radiograph | Comparable outcome |
Fritschy et al[26] | Prospective controlled trial | 10 PSI patient, 10 standard TKAs (control) | Intra-operative navigation and post-operative long standing X-ray | Comparable outcome |
Van den Broeck et al[27] | Human cadaveric study | 9 cadaveric tibia | Comparison with bone dimensions using optical white-light scanner | Comparable outcome |
White et al[28] | Animal study | 10 ovine knees | Direct comparison with bone dimensions | CT > MRI |
Rathnayaka et al[29] | Animal study | 5 ovine limbs | Direct comparison with bone dimensions | Comparable outcome |
Ref. | Comparison | Type of study | System used | Imaging used | No. of patients | % outliers > 3% |
Boonen et al[8] | PSI with disposable guides vs conventional intramedullary guides | Case control | Signature | MRI | 40 | 29 |
Barrett et al[12] | PSI vs conventional - absolute mechanical axis measure | Prospective cohort study | Trumatch | CT | 66 | 19 |
Bugbee et al[33] | PSI vs conventional | Retrospective cohort | Trumatch | CT | 25 | 4 |
Chareancholvanich et al[13] | PSI vs conventional instrumentation | RCT | Zimmer | MRI | 80 | 2.5 |
Koch et al[31] | PSI vs computer-navigated | My knee | CT | 301 | 12.4 | |
Chen et al[15] | PSI vs conventional TKA | Randomised control study | Zimmer PSI | MRI | 30 | 31 |
Roh et al[32] | PSI vs conventional | RCT | Signature | CT | 50 | 12 |
Manufacturer | Product | Imaging | Type of guide | Launched |
Biomet | Signature-vanguard | CT or MRI | Pinning | MRI-2007 CT-2010 |
DePuy | Trumatch | CT | Cutting | 2009 |
Smith and nephew | Visionaire | MRI | Pinning | 2008 |
Wright medical | Prophecy | CT or MRI | Pinning | 2009 |
Zimmer | PSI | MRI | Pinning | 2009 |
Conformis | Conformis iTotal | CT | Cutting | 2011 |
Medacta | My knee | CT | Cutting | 2009 |
-
Citation: Stirling P, Valsalan Mannambeth R, Soler A, Batta V, Malhotra RK, Kalairajah Y. Computerised tomography
vs magnetic resonance imaging for modeling of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 290-297 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/290.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.290