Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 269-277
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.269
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.269
Ref. | Design | Diagnosis/procedures | Type of graft | Main outcomes | Level of evidence |
Clinical studies of DBM used in fractures | |||||
Lindsey et al[33] | Prospective, randomized pilot study | Patients treated for long bone fractures | DBM (Grafton®) + bone marrow n = 10 Iliac crest autograft n = 8 | Full bone formation in 90% with DBM + marrow and 75% with autograft at 12/12 Totally 100% healed with DBM + marrow and 63% heal with autograft | II |
Cheung et al[34] | Retrospective comparative study | Periarticular fractures (n = 28) | Allograft conductive cancellous chips + DBM Grafton® (n = 13) Allograft conductive cancellous chips + DBM Orthoblast (n = 15) | Healing on the first graft attempt without complications DBM Grafton®: 69% DBM Orthoblast: 100% | III |
Bibbo et al[35] | Retrospective comparative study | Patients treated for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures | DBM + CaSO4 + vancomycin n = 33 Control group n = 11 | Union in 8.2 wk with graft, while 10.4 wk in control group P < 0.05 Wound problems in 15% in graft group | III |
Clinical studies of DBM used in nonunions | |||||
Hierholzer et al[36] | Retrospective consecutive cohort study | Patients with an aseptic, atrophic delayed union or nonunion of a humeral shaft fracture were treated with ORIF and graft | Autologous iliac crest bone graft n = 45 DBM (Grafton®) n = 33 | Union in 100% with autologous graft vs 97% in DBM group Union in 4.5 mo with autologous graft vs 4.2 mo in DBM group 44% of the autologous graft group had donor site morbidity | III |
Wilkins et al[37] | Prospective clinical study | Patients with stiff nonunions of long bones (n = 66) | Percutaneous use of a mixture of autologous bone marrow and allograft DBM (AlloMatrix) | 61 of 69 patients with stiff nonunion went on to union in an average of 8.1 mo; 7 more healed after a second procedure | IV |
Wilkins et al[39] | Retrospective clinical study | Patients undergoing surgical intervention for removal of benign tumors (n = 41) or treatement of nonunions in multiple bone types (n = 35) | AlloMatrix Injectable Putty | 38 of 41 patients with benign tumors healed within an average of 4.8 mo, and 30 of 35 patients with nonunion went on to union in an average of 3.5 mo | IV |
Ziran et al[38] | Consecutive patients | Patients required bone grafting for atrophic/avascular nonunions | AlloMatrix + morselized cancellous allograft chips (1:1 ratio) n = 41 | 51% developed postoperative drainage, 34% developed deep infection, 32% required surgical intervention | IV |
Clinical studies of DBM used in bone cysts | |||||
Park et al[40] | Retrospective comparative study | Calcaneal unicameral cysts were treated with graft | Lyophilized irradiated CAB + bone marrow n = 13 DBM + bone marrow n = 10 | Complete healing in 9/13 in CAB group vs 5/9 in DBM group Healed with defect in 4/13 in CAB group and 3/9 in DBM group No infections or pathologic fractures during 48/12 follow up | III |
Di Bella et al[41] | Retrospective comparative study | 184 patients treated for unicameral bone cysts with cortical erosion | Multiple injection of corticosteroid Single injection of DBM + bone marrow concentrate | 38% healed with steroids at 48/12 and 71% healed with DBM + BMC at 20/12 Failure rate after 1 steroid injection was 63% vs 24% with DBM + BMC | III |
Rougraff et al[42] | Consecutive patients | Active unicameral bone cyst (n = 23) | Trephination and percutaneous injection of a mixture of demineralized bone matrix (Grafton) and autologous bone marrow | Healing on the first graft attempt: 78% | IV |
Kanellopoulos et al[43] | Consecutive patients | Active unicameral bone cyst (n = 19) | Combination of percutaneous reaming, injection of a mixture of allogenic DBM (AlloMatrix) and autologous bone marrow | Healing on the first graft attempt: 89.5% | IV |
Hass et al[44] | Retrospective case series | Treatment of juvenile bone cysts at all sites with DBM | Juvenile bone cysts packed with DBM (n = 9) | Totally osteodense images after an average of 8 mo, with no other significant changes in 2 yr follow-up | IV |
Sung et al[45] | Retrospective comparative study | Patients, younger than 20, treated for humeral and femoral unicameral bone cysts | Corticosteroid injection n = 94, curretage + bone graft n = 39, Steroids + DBM + bone marrow aspirate n = 34 | Failure rate was 84% with steroids, 64% with curretage and 50% with SDB P < 0.001. Retreatment in 76% with steroids, 63% with curretage and 71% with SDB | III |
Clinical studies of DBM used in tumor surgery | |||||
Kim et al[46] | Retrospective comparative study | Bony defects after tumor surgery of various bone tumors | ICS n = 28 DBM n = 28 | ICS and DBM success rate = 85.7% (24/28) and 88.9% (24/27) P < 0.05 Average healing time for ICS and DBM was 17.3 wk and 14.9 wk P < 0.05 | III |
Wilkins et al[39] | Retrospective clinical study | Patients undergoing surgical intervention for removal of benign tumors (n = 41) or treatment of nonunions in multiple bone types (n = 35) | AlloMatrix injectable putty | 38 of 41 patients with benign tumors healed within an average of 4.8 mo, and 30 of 35 patients with nonunion went on to union in an average of 3.5 mo | IV |
Clinical studies of DBM used in various long bone applications | |||||
Dallari et al[47] | Prospective, randomized control trial | High tibial osteotomy for genu varus | DBSint® (Mg-hydroxyapatite + DBM) n = 9 SINTlife®n = 13 Lyophilised bone chips n = 9 | 6/52 DBSint® showed higher osseointegration rate than lyophilized bone chips (P < 0.01) 52/52 DBSint® was demonstrated as effective and safe as SINTlife® and bone chips | II |
Hatzokos et al[48] | Retrospective comparative study | Patients were managed with bone transport for the treatment of a tibial bone defect, with 3 types of docking procedures (n = 43) | Group A: closed compression Group B: autologous iliac graft Group C: BMC + DBM | Healing time was significantly longer in the compression group as compared with the BMC + DBM P < 0.05, no significant difference among the groups in terms of complication rates | III |
Wilkins et al[49] | Prospective clinical study | Patients requiring bone grafting procedures (n = 50) | Combination product of bioassayed DBM (AlloGro®) and calcium sulfate pellets | Healing rate of 98% within an average period of 11.8 wk | IV |
Clinical studies of DBM used in osteonecrosis of femoral head | |||||
Feng et al[50] | Retrospective comparative study | Treatment of large osteonecrotic lesions of the femoral head with graft | OsteoSet®2 DBM + free vasculated fibular graft n = 2, Free vasculated fibular graft + autologous cancellous bone n = 24 | Improvement in the mean Harris hip score was noted in both groups P < 0.001, no significant differences in Harris hip score and clinical outcomes between groups | III |
Clinical studies of DBM used in acetabular revision | |||||
Etienne et al[51] | Retrospective clinical study | Acetabular revision surgery (n = 20) | Acetabular reconstruction using a mixture of DBM (ALLOMATRIX™ C Bone Putty) and cancellous allograft chips | Successful graft incorporation in 18 of 20 patients (90%) | IV |
Clinical studies of DBM used in fusion | |||||
Thordarson et al[52] | Retrospective Comparative Study | Complex ankle or hindfoot fusion with commercially available DBM formulations that did or did not contain crushed cancellous allograft bone (n = 63) | Grafton® + allograft cancellous bone chips n = 37 Orthoblast + allograft cancellous bone chips n = 26 | Clinical and radiological fusion In DBM Grafton: 86% In DBM Orthoblast: 92% | III |
- Citation: Drosos GI, Touzopoulos P, Ververidis A, Tilkeridis K, Kazakos K. Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 269-277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/269.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.269