Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2015; 6(2): 244-251
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244
Published online Mar 18, 2015. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244
Table 1 Shoulder scoring systems used in 2012 and 2013
Shoulder scoring system | No. of times used | No. of times used | No. of times used in |
in articles in 2012 | in articles in 2013 | articles in 2012 and 2013 | |
CS | 47 | 44 | 91 |
American shoulder and elbow surgeons evaluation form | 41 | 32 | 73 |
The disability of the arm, shoulder and hand score | 22 | 13 | 35 |
SST | 16 | 13 | 29 |
University of California/Los Angeles shoulder score | 15 | 13 | 28 |
Western ontario osteoarthritis score | 6 | 0 | 6 |
The OSS | 4 | 6 | 10 |
SF-12 general health | 3 | 7 | 10 |
Western ontario rotator cuff score | 3 | 5 | 8 |
SF-36 general health | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Penn shoulder score | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Shoulder pain and disability index | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Western ontario shoulder instability score | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Rowe shoulder instability score | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Single assessment numeric evaluation score | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Kerlan-Jobe orthopaedic clinic overhead athlete score | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Hospital for special surgery shoulder score | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OSIS | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Table 2 Estimated normal constant scores for age and sex[15]
Age (yr) | Men | Women |
50-59 | 95 ± 2 | 88 ± 2 |
60-69 | 92 ± 2 | 85 ± 2 |
70-79 | 89 ± 2 | 82 ± 2 |
80-89 | 86 ± 2 | 79 ± 2 |
Table 3 Constant and oxford shoulder scores for the vaios anatomic shoulder replacements
Outcome measure | No. of | Oxford score | Pain | ADL | ROM | Strength | Total CS | Constant score adjusted |
shoulders | (/48) | (/15) | (/20) | (/40) | (/25) | (/100) | for age and sex (%) | |
Pre-op mean (SD) | 49 | 16.8 (7.8) | 4.8 (3.2) | 6.7 (3.7) | 10.1 (5.1) | 1.0 (2.2) | 21.9 (9.7) | 29.2 (12.4) |
Post-op 1 yr mean (SD) | 49 | 33.0 (12.8) | 11.3 (4.1) | 13.3 (4.7) | 20.0 (11.3) | 4.0 (4.8) | 44.6 (17.6) | 59.6 (24.0) |
Post-op 2 yr Mean (SD) | 30 | 36.5 (12.3) | 12.0 (3.9) | 14.0 (6.0) | 20.5 (10.7) | 6.7 (6.0) | 47.2 (19.4) | 62.1 (22.8) |
Post-op 3 yr mean (SD) | 8 | 38.4 (10.6) | 10.8 (2.9) | 11.8 (4.0) | 16.4 (6.2) | 6.4 (3.6) | 45.4 (10.4) | 63.6 (21.0) |
Table 4 Constant and oxford shoulder scores for the vaios inverse shoulder replacements
Outcome measure | No. of shoulders | Oxford score | Pain | ADL | ROM | Strength | Total CS | Constant score adjusted |
(/48) | (/15) | (/20) | (/40) | (/25) | (/100) | for age and sex (%) | ||
Pre-op mean (SD) | 63 | 18.9 (9.0) | 6.6 (4.0) | 8.0 (4.2) | 11.2 (8.1) | 0.8 (2.1) | 25.9 (13.1) | 37.0 (18.2) |
Post-op 1 yr mean (SD) | 63 | 35.4 (11.7) | 12.3 (3.7) | 13.5 (5.4) | 22.8 (10.5) | 4.7 (5.3) | 49.4 (18.1) | 69.0 (25.5) |
Post-op 2 yr mean (SD) | 28 | 34.4 (13.8) | 12.4 (3.7) | 13.7 (5.5) | 23.9 (11.5) | 5.6 (4.3) | 49.8 (19.0) | 69.7 (27.7) |
Post-op 3 yr mean (SD) | 6 | 33.0 (10.6) | 11.8 (4.7) | 16.3 (3.9) | 24.0 (9.8) | 7.8 (0.5) | 59.8 (17.0) | 81.6 (23.5) |
Table 5 Categories of outcome after shoulder arthroplasty using the constant score
Category | Total CS (/100) | Age and sex adjusted CS (%) |
Average shoulder function before arthroplasty | < 30 | < 40 |
Post-op unsatisfactory | < 30 | < 40 |
Post-op fair outcome | 30-39 | 40-49 |
Post-op good outcome | 40-59 | 50-69 |
Post-op very good outcome | 60-69 | 70-79 |
Post-op excellent outcome (i.e., a virtually normal shoulder) | ≥ 70 | ≥ 80 |
Table 6 Stratified outcome for the vaios primary total shoulder replacements using the adjusted constant score (adjusted for age and sex)
Post-op outcome | Adjusted CS (%) | No. of anatomic TSRs n = 46 | % anatomic TSRs using adjusted CS | No. of inverse TSRs n = 58 | % inverse TSRs using adjusted CS |
Unsatisfactory outcome | < 40 | 10 | 22 | 9 | 16 |
Fair outcome | 40-49 | 9 | 20 | 5 | 9 |
Good outcome | 50-69 | 9 | 20 | 14 | 24 |
Very good outcome | 70-79 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
Excellent outcome | ≥ 80 | 15 | 33 | 25 | 43 |
Totals | 46 | 100 | 58 | 100 |
- Citation: Booker S, Alfahad N, Scott M, Gooding B, Wallace WA. Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2015; 6(2): 244-251
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v6/i2/244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.244