Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2014; 5(1): 30-37
Published online Jan 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.30
Published online Jan 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.30
Ref. | Study design | Diagnosis/procedures | Type of graft | Main outcomes | Level of evidence |
Cervical spine | |||||
An et al[48] | 2-Center randomized prospective control trial | Patients undergone anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disc disease, n = 77 | Freeze-dried allograft augmented with DBM (Grafton®), n = 39. Iliac Crest Autograft, n = 38 | Pseudarthrosis rate was 46.2% in DBM-allograft Group vs 26.3% in autograft group, but with no significant differences. Graft collapse ≥ 2 mm occurred in 39.7% in DBM-allograft group than 24.4% in autograft group (P = 0.09) | II |
Vaidya et al[49] | Retrospective comparative study | Patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, n = 46 | PEEK cages + morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), n = 22 Allograft spacers + DBM, n = 24 | No significant difference in pain scores between groups. Probable fusion at latest follow up in 23/24 of DBM group vs 22/22 in rhBMP-2 group. 85% of rhBMP-2 and 56% of DBM reported difficulty in swallowing. The cost of implants in patients treated with rhBMP-2 and PEEK spacers was more than three times the cost of the other group | III |
Park et al[52] | Prospective, case series study | Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion | PEEK cages and DBM (Grafton®), n = 31 | 97% fusion rate (41/42 levels), neck and arm pain improved after surgery and significanly improved in 12/12 follow-up, P < 0.05 | IV |
Topuz et al[50] | Retrospective, case series study | Patients underwent 2-level contiguousanterior cervical discectomy and fusion | PEEK cages and DBM (Grafton®) and autologous blood, n = 79 | 87.3% "excellent" and "good" clinical outcomes, final fusion rate 91.7% (145/158 levels) | IV |
Moon et al[51] | Retrospective case series | Patients undergone 2-level, non-instrumented cervical fusion for degenerative disk disease, n = 27 (54 levels) | PEEK cages and DBM | Fusion rate was 88.9% of levels. All patients showed improvements in clinical outcomes (VAS score, neurologic pain and JOA myelopathy score) | IV |
Demircan et al[53] | Prospective case series | Patients undergone non-instrumented anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disk disease, n = 16 (42 levels) | Polyetheretherketone cages packed with autologous blood, curettage microchip material, and DBM (Grafton®) | Fusion rate was 90.5% of levels, at 18 mo after surgery with improved clinical outcomes using JOA score (P = 0.004) | IV |
Lumbar spine | |||||
Kang et al[54] | Prospective multicenter randomized clinical trail | Patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar fusion | DBM (Grafton®) + local bone, n = 30. Autologous iliac crest bone graft, n = 16 | Fusion rates were 86% (Grafton®) vs 92% (autologous graft). Grafton showed consistently higher physical function scores at 24 mo. There was a greater mean intraoperative blood loss in the autologous group. | I |
Cammisa et al[3] | Prospective multicenter control trial | Patients undergone posterolateral lumbar, instrumented fusion, n = 120 | Iliac Crest Autograft on one side DBM (Grafton®) + Iliac crest autograft on contralateral side of same patient | Radiographic fusion rates at 24 mo after surgery in Grafton DBM side was 52% and in Iliac Crest Bone Autograft side was 54% | II |
Vaccaro et al[55] | Prospective, comparative study | Patients undergone instrumented posterolateral lumbosacral spinal fusion | DBM (Grafton®) + Bone Marrow, n = 19, DBM + Iliac crest autograft, n = 27 Autograft, n = 27 | Fusion rates were 63% with DBM + Bone Marrow, 70% DBM + autograft and 67% with autograft | III |
Sassard et al[56] | Retrospective comparative study | Instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with rigid pedicle screw fixation (n = 108) | Iliac crest bone graft (n = 52). Local autograft-Grafton® (n = 56) | Fusion rates at 24 mo after surgery: In Iliac crest bone graft group: 56% and in local autograft-Grafton group: 60% | III |
Schizas et al[57] | Retrospective case control study | Patients undergone posterolateral, one or two-level, instrumented, lumbar fusion, n = 59 (78 levels) | DBM (Accell Connexus® putty) with Iliac crest autograft or local decompression material, n = 33. Iliac crest autograft or local decompression material, n = 26 | Fusion rate was 69.7% with DBM vs 76.9% without DBM. There were no differences in complication rates, ODI or VAS pain score | III |
Epstein et al[58] | Prospective, clinical study | Patients undergone multilevel lumbar laminectomies, 1-level (n = 95) and 2-levels (n = 45) | Lamina autograft + DBM (Osteofil), n = 140 | 1-level fusion rates: 98%, 2-levels fusion rates: 96%. Revealed essentially comparable outcomes on 6 of 8 Health Scales of SF-36 | IV |
Thalgott et al[61] | Prospective case series study | Patients undergone lumbar interbody fusion (n = 50) | Titanium mesh cages filled with coralline hydroxyapatite (ProOsteon™ 500R) and DBM (Grafton®) | 96% fusion rate, decrease in mean pain scores by 60% from baseline | IV |
Girardi et al[60] | Retrospective case series study | Instrumented lumbar spinal fusion for various diagnoses (n = 65) | Combination of autologous bone graft and allograft DBM (AlloMatrix® Injectable Putty) | Gradual and constant improvement based on radiographic measurements taken 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo after surgery | IV |
Thalgott et al[62] | Retrospective case series | Patients undergone instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion, n = 40 | Coralline hydroxyapatite (Pro Osteon™ 500) + DBM (Grafton®), n = 28 Pro Osteon™ 500 alone, n = 12 | Radiographic fusion rates was 100% with coralline hydroxyapatite alone, than 89.3% with Grafton added. | IV |
Epstein[59] | Prospective case series | Geriatric patients undergone posterolateral non-instrumented lumbar fusion, n = 75 | Lamina autograft mixed with DBM (Osteofil) in 1:1 ratio | Fusion rate was 82.7% of levels. Improved clinical outcomes using SF-36 score. | IV |
Idiopathic scoliosis | |||||
Weinzapfel et al[63] | Retrospective comparative study | Anterior thoracic discectomies with video Assisted thoracoscopic surgery in idiopathic scoliosis | Morselized allograft bone, n = 12. DBM (Grafton®), n = 28 | Curve correction was similar for both groups (68% vs 67%). Radiological fusion fusion: 82% in allograft group vs 92% in DBM group | III |
- Citation: Tilkeridis K, Touzopoulos P, Ververidis A, Christodoulou S, Kazakos K, Drosos GI. Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion. World J Orthop 2014; 5(1): 30-37
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i1/30.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.30