Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2014; 5(1): 14-22
Published online Jan 18, 2014. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.14
Table 1 Pre-operative angle values and scores of all cases
Age, yrCE angleAcetabular indexSharp angleAHIHLIJOASHHS
Case 119-9314844.20.636370
Case 22013204665.80.547380
Case 3275204557.80.715259
Case 4299194560.00.695259
Case 54316144770.50.658093
Case 6430265452.20.565473
Table 2 Post-operative angle values and scores of all cases
CE angleAcetabular indexSharp angleAHIHLIJOASHHS
Case 12592680.00.5295100
Case 253-11297.70.6395100
Case 310153666.70.7091100
Case 421153773.90.7091100
Case 52623580.00.708896
Case 61893572.30.657896
Table 3 The mean values of pre-operative and post-operative angles and scores
Pre-op (mean ± SD)Post-op (mean ± SD)P value
CE angle5.67 ± 8.2625.5 ± 13.40.01841
Acetabular index21.7 ± 5.446.33 ± 9.00.00981
Sharp angle47.5 ± 3.0930.2 ± 9.0< 0.00011
AHI58.4 ± 8.6078.4 ± 9.80.00631
HLI0.63 ± 0.060.65 ± 0.10.6286
JOAS62.3 ± 10.989.7 ± 6.50.00061
HHS72.3 ± 11.998.7 ± 1.90.00061
Table 4 The advantages and demerits of triple osteotomy
AdvantagesDemerits
EAsier than Bernese osteotomy or RAORisk of non-union of pubis and ischium
Applicable regardless of whether the triradiate cartilage remains fused or notRequire the long period before weight bearing
Low riskDifficulty and limitation of sufficient acetabular correction and femoral head medicalization
Osteonecrosis of acetabulum
Major vessel injury
No shortening of lower limbPossibly narrowing the pelvic cavity for childbirth