Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2013; 4(4): 287-290
Published online Oct 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.287
Table 1 Suitability of the implant size
FrequencyPercentage
FemurYes2958%
No2142%
TibiaYes2550%
No2550%
Table 2 Differences between the measured size and the size implanted in the femur and tibia
FrequencyPercentage
Femur
-2 (2 sizes smaller)24%
-1 (1 size smaller)1122%
0 (same size)2754%
1 (1 size larger)816%
2 (2 sizes larger)24%
Tibia
-2 (2 sizes smaller)00%
-1 (1 size smaller)1122%
0 (same size)2448%
1 (1 size larger)1326%
2 (2 sizes larger)24%
Table 3 Intraclass correlation coefficient inter- and intraobserver values
FemurTibia
Observer 10.9890.974
Observer 20.9600.944
Before operation0.9940.942
After operation0.9430.863
ICC0.7350.806