Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2013; 4(4): 248-258
Published online Oct 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.248
Published online Oct 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.248
All | Dropout within6 wk, n = 8 | Followed 6-wkprogram, n = 31 | P value | |
Age (yr) | 77.7 ± 8.7 | 77.2 ± 8.3 | 77.9 ± 9.0 | 0.8 |
Women | 33 (85) | 7 (21) | 26 (79) | 1.0 |
Men | 6 (15) | 1 (17) | 5 (83) | |
Cervical femoral fracture | 23 (59) | 4 (17) | 19 (83) | 0.8 |
Intertrochanteric fracture | 12 (31) | 3 (25) | 9 (75) | |
Subtrochanteric fracture | 4 (10) | 1 (25) | 3 (75) | |
New mobility score (0-9): | ||||
Pre-fracture functional level | 9 (9-9) | 9 (8.5-9) | 9 (9-9) | 0.8 |
Baseline functional level | 4 (3-4) | 4 (3-4) | 4 (3-4) | 0.9 |
Barthel-20 (0-20) | 18 (17-20) | 8 (17-19.5) | 18 (17-20) | 0.9 |
Balance, tandem test (0-30) | 30 (23-30) | 27 (24-30) | 30 (22-30) | 0.5 |
Timed up and go test, seconds | 21.0 ± 7.2 | 22.4 ± 10 | 20.2 ± 6.0 | 0.4 |
Ten-meter fast speed walk, m/s | 0.72 ± 0.22 | 0.65 ± 0.31 | 0.74 ± 0.19 | 0.3 |
Six min walk test, meters | 198 ± 79 | 189 ± 80 | 201 ± 80 | 0.7 |
Fractured, knee-extension strength, Nm/kg | 0.47 ± 0.16 | 0.39 ± 0.16 | 0.49 ± 0.16 | 0.1 |
Non-fractured, knee- extension strength, Nm/kg | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.69 ± 0.29 | 0.81 ± 0.28 | 0.2 |
Baseline | 6 wk | Percentagechange | P value | |
New mobility score (0-9) | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 59 | < 0.001 |
Barthel (0-20) | 18 (17-20) | 20 (18-20) | 11 | < 0.001 |
Balance, tandem test (0-30) | 30 (22-30) | 30 (29-30) | 0 | < 0.001 |
Timed up and go test, seconds | 20.2 ± 6.0 | 13.9 ± 3.2 | -31 | < 0.001 |
Ten-meter fast speed walk, m/s | 0.74 ± 0.19 | 0.99 ± 0.2 | 34 | < 0.001 |
Six-min walk, meters | 200.6 ± 79.5 | 322.8 ± 68.5 | 61 | < 0.001 |
Short-form 36, physical component summary | 33.8 ± 9 | 37.1 ± 8 | 10 | 0.035 |
Short-form 36, mental component summary | 45.5 ± 11.1 | 46.4 ± 9.6 | 2 | 0.639 |
Fractured knee-extension strength, Nm/kg | 0.49 ± 0.16 | 0.82 ± 0.32 | 67 | < 0.001 |
Non-fractured knee-extension strength, Nm/kg | 0.82 ± 0.28 | 0.99 ± 0.34 | 21 | < 0.001 |
Weight loads in kilograms (kg), fractured knee-extension: | First session | Last session | ||
15 RM sessions, n: 34 | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 5 ± 1.7 | 52 | < 0.001 |
12 RM sessions, n: 32 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 6.6 ± 2.3 | 25 | < 0.001 |
10 RM sessions, n: 31 | 6.8 ± 2.4 | 7.7 ± 2.6 | 13 | < 0.001 |
Weight loads (kg), bilateral leg press: | ||||
15 RM training sessions | 50.3 ± 13.4 | 90.8 ± 40.0 | 81 | < 0.001 |
12 RM training sessions | 91.2 ± 38.8 | 108.9 ± 47.7 | 19 | < 0.001 |
10 RM training sessions | 108.9 ± 47.7 | 121.9 ± 54.0 | 12 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Overgaard J, Kristensen MT. Feasibility of progressive strength training shortly after hip fracture surgery. World J Orthop 2013; 4(4): 248-258
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v4/i4/248.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.248