Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2025; 16(8): 107064
Published online Aug 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.107064
Published online Aug 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.107064
Table 1 Comparison of conventional vs artificial intelligence/machine learning enhanced spine care
Aspect | Conventional approach | AI/ML-enhanced approach | Advantages of AI/ML | Ref. |
Diagnosis of spinal disorders | Manual interpretation of MRI/CT scans by radiologists | Automated image analysis using deep learning (e.g., CNNs) to detect abnormalities | Faster, more accurate, and consistent diagnosis with reduced subjectivity | [20] |
Scoliosis detection | Manual measurement of Cobb angles from X-rays | AI algorithms for automated Cobb angle measurement and severity classification | Reduced time, improved accuracy, and early detection | [16] |
Surgical planning | Generic surgical plans based on population data and surgeon experience | AI-driven predictive models for personalized surgical planning and outcome prediction | Improved precision, reduced complications, and better patient outcomes | [21] |
Intraoperative navigation | Manual guidance using fluoroscopy and surgeon expertise | AI-powered robotic systems and AR for real-time navigation | Enhanced precision, reduced radiation exposure, and fewer surgical errors | [22] |
Post-operative monitoring | In-person follow-ups and subjective patient feedback | Wearable AI devices and remote monitoring systems for real-time tracking of recovery | Continuous monitoring, improved adherence, and early detection of complications | [23] |
Rehabilitation | Standardized physiotherapy protocols | AI-powered virtual physiotherapy and personalized exercise recommendations | Tailored rehabilitation, increased accessibility, and cost-effectiveness | [24] |
Pain management | Generalized pain management protocols | AI models predicting pain progression and recommending personalized interventions | Improved pain control and patient satisfaction | [25] |
Spinal tumor classification | Manual classification of tumors from imaging data | Deep learning models for automated tumor classification and grading | Faster and more accurate diagnosis, improved treatment planning | [26] |
Degenerative disease prediction | Reliance on patient history and imaging without predictive analytics | ML models predicting the progression of degenerative spine diseases | Early intervention and reduced disease severity | [27] |
Implant design | Standardized implants based on average patient anatomy | AI-driven generative design for patient-specific implants | Better fit, reduced complications, and improved outcomes | [28] |
Telemedicine | Limited to in-person consultations | AI-powered telemedicine platforms for remote diagnosis and consultation | Increased access to care, especially in underserved areas | [29] |
Surgical complication prediction | Surgeon intuition and experience-based risk assessment | ML models predicting risks of infection, blood loss, or implant failure | Reduced surgical risks and improved patient safety | [30] |
Radiation dose optimization | Fixed imaging protocols with high radiation exposure | AI-enhanced imaging protocols reducing radiation dose while maintaining image quality | Safer imaging with reduced radiation exposure | [31] |
Biomechanical analysis | Manual analysis of spinal movement patterns | AI models analyzing spinal biomechanics for surgical and rehabilitation planning | Enhanced precision and personalized care | [14] |
Patient adherence tracking | Reliance on patient self-reporting and manual documentation | AI-powered wearable devices and apps tracking adherence to rehabilitation protocols | Improved patient compliance and outcomes | [32] |
Table 2 Artificial intelligence/machine learning applications in spine care: Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation
Application area | AI/ML technique used | Example use case | Clinical benefits | Challenges | Ref. |
Automated spinal image analysis | Deep learning (CNN, RNN) | MRI/CT segmentation for detecting vertebral fractures, herniated discs, and stenosis | Increased diagnostic precision, reduced human error | Data scarcity, model generalization issues | [45] |
Predictive analytics for spinal degeneration | Machine learning (random forest, SVM) | Identifying early signs of degenerative disc disease using patient history and imaging | Early intervention, reduced disease progression | Need for longitudinal datasets | [46] |
AI-guided scoliosis detection | Deep learning (CNN) | Automated scoliosis classification from spinal X-rays | Faster screening, improved sensitivity | Variability in X-ray quality | [47] |
AI-assisted surgical planning | Reinforcement learning, predictive analytics | ML models optimizing screw placement and implant selection for spinal fusion | Reduced complications, better surgical outcomes | Lack of real-world validation | [48] |
Robotic-assisted spine surgery | AI-powered robotics | AI-guided navigation in minimally invasive spinal surgeries | Higher precision, reduced recovery time | High costs, regulatory approval challenges | [49] |
AI-driven post-operative monitoring | Wearable AI and IoT | Continuous tracking of patient mobility and spinal alignment post-surgery | Improved rehabilitation adherence | Data privacy and security risks | [22] |
ML for spinal trauma prognosis | Supervised learning (SVM, decision trees) | Predicting recovery outcomes in spinal cord injuries | Personalized treatment plans | Need for real-world validation | [50] |
AI-based virtual physiotherapy | NLP and AI chatbots | AI-powered virtual physiotherapy apps for home rehabilitation | Increased accessibility, cost reduction | Limited personalization | [24] |
Deep learning for tumor classification | CNN-based image recognition | Automated classification of spinal tumors from MRI scans | Faster diagnosis, improved treatment planning | Need for diverse datasets | [51] |
AI-enabled pain management | ML-based pain prediction models | Predicting chronic pain progression using patient-reported data and imaging | Personalized pain management | Variability in pain perception | [52] |
AI in spinal deformity progression prediction | ML-based predictive modeling | Forecasting scoliosis progression based on patient history | Early intervention, reduced severity | Need for larger datasets | [53] |
Multimodal AI for spine care | Integration of imaging, genetics, and clinical data | Personalized spinal disease prediction using multimodal AI | Holistic patient assessment | Computational complexity | [54] |
AI for radiation dose optimization | AI-enhanced imaging protocols | Reducing radiation exposure during spinal X-rays and CT scans | Safer imaging techniques | Balancing image quality with low radiation | [15] |
NLP in spine care | AI-powered NLP models | Extracting spine-related clinical insights from medical records | Improved documentation, faster research | Need for domain-specific NLP models | [55] |
AI-enhanced spinal biomechanics analysis | ML for motion prediction | Studying spinal movement patterns for biomechanical modeling | Enhanced surgical and rehab planning | Complexity of real-world biomechanics | [56] |
AI in AR for spine surgery | AR + AI integration | Real-time AR overlays for spinal anatomy during surgery | Enhanced precision, reduced surgical errors | High costs, technical complexity | [57] |
- Citation: Jawed AM, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Ahmed W, Wang H. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine care: Advancing precision diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. World J Orthop 2025; 16(8): 107064
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i8/107064.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.107064