Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2025; 16(7): 105111
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.105111
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.105111
Table 1 Population characteristics
Patients | Frequency (n = 50) | Percentage (%) |
Age (years) | ||
Under 35 | 25 | 50 |
35-60 | 17 | 34 |
Over 60 | 8 | 16 |
Sex | ||
Male | 26 | 52 |
Female | 24 | 48 |
Hip disease | ||
Childhood disease sequelae | 16 | 32 |
Post-traumatic coxarthrosis | 15 | 30 |
Dysplastic coxarthrosis | 7 | 14 |
Ankylosis of the hip | 7 | 14 |
Neglected hip dislocations | 3 | 6 |
Protrusive coxarthrosis | 2 | 4 |
Table 2 Difficulties and surgical techniques to overcome them
Technical difficulties | Surgical techniques to overcome difficulties | Number of patients (n = 50) | Percentage (%) |
Malunion acetabular bone defect | Acetabular autologous bone graft from the femoral head | 5 | 10 |
Difficulty removing material | Careful, gradual material removal: Use of adapted materials. Cementing implants | 6 | 12 |
Insufficient acetabular coverage, shallow and porous neoacetabulum or paleoacetabulum, difficulty identifying the true acetabular cavity | Shelf operation and/or bone grafting ± fixation with screws. Progressive reaming until achieving a sufficiently deep acetabular cavity | 7 | 14 |
Difficult or impossible hip dislocation | Initial osteotomy followed by dislocation and fragmentary removal of the femoral head ± creation of a new acetabulum if difficulty arises during the removal of the head from the acetabulum | 9 | 18 |
Cavitary defect in the acetabular floor, fusion of the femoral head and acetabulum | Impaction of autogenous bone graft from the femoral head and cemented cup ± use of support rings or anti-protrusion cages if available | 4 | 8 |
Proximal femoral ascent: Limb length discrepancy Narrow femoral canal | Careful and progressive hip dislocation. Small, long-stem prosthesis | 12 | 24 |
Soft tissue contracture | Careful and progressive hip dissection | 25 | 50 |
Table 3 Implant features
Number of patients (n = 50) | Frequency (%) | |
Year of surgery | ||
2013-2018 | 19 | 38 |
2019-2023 | 31 | 62 |
Implant type | ||
Dual-mobility | 7 | 14 |
Conventional | 43 | 86 |
Fixation methods | ||
Cemented | 44 | 88 |
Uncemented | 1 | 2 |
Reverse hybrid | 5 | 10 |
Bearing couples | ||
Metal-polyethylene | 29 | 58 |
Ceramic-polyethylene | 21 | 42 |
Support ring/anti-protrusion cage | 4 | 8 |
- Citation: Manasse H, Daoulas T, Rohimpitiavana AS, Solofomalala GD, Dubrana F, Razafimahandry HJC. Surgical techniques and outcomes of difficult total hip replacements: A challenge in a low-income country. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 105111
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i7/105111.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.105111