Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2025; 16(5): 105590
Published online May 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590
Published online May 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of study data
Variable | Group | Frequency (%) |
Gender | Male | 77 (87.5) |
Female | 11 (12.5) | |
Age (arbitrary classifications) | 3-5 years old | 17 (19.3) |
6-8 years old | 16 (18.2) | |
9-11 years old | 18 (20.5) | |
12-14 years old | 36 (40.9) | |
Site of fracture | Epiphyseal | 15 (17.0) |
Metaphyseal | 27 (30.7) | |
Diaphyseal | 46 (52.3) | |
Type of fixation/surgery | Closed reduction | 65 (73.9) |
Open reduction | 12 (13.6) | |
Internal fixation | 11 (12.5) | |
CRIF | 1 (1.1) | |
ORIF | 1 (1.1) | |
Debridement | 1 (1.1) | |
Epiphysiodesis | 1 (1.1) | |
One K wire fixation | 58 (65.9) | |
Two K wire fixation | 13 (14.8) | |
TENS | 11 (12.5) | |
Complications | Yes | 2 (2.3) |
No | 86 (97.7) | |
Change in management plan | Yes | 8 (9.1) |
No | 80 (90.9) | |
Second operation | Yes | 4 (4.5) |
No | 84 (95.5) |
Table 2 Postoperative X-ray follow-up intervals and frequencies
X-ray post op | Frequency (%) |
1-2 weeks | 54 (61.4) |
3-4 weeks | 40 (45.5) |
5-6 weeks | 14 (15.9) |
7-8 weeks | 19 (21.6) |
9-10 weeks | 4 (4.5) |
11-12 weeks | 4 (4.5) |
13-14 weeks | 4 (4.5) |
4 months | 3 (3.4) |
5 months | 6 (6.8) |
6 months | 2 (2.3) |
7 months | 1 (1.1) |
8 months | 2 (2.3) |
9 months | 1 (1.1) |
10 months | 2 (2.3) |
11 months | 1 (1.1) |
1 year | 5 (5.7) |
1 year and a half | 1 (1.1) |
2 years | 2 (2.3) |
3-4 years | 1 (1.1) |
Table 3 Frequency of second operation follow-up X-ray
Second operation X-ray | Frequency (%) |
1-2 weeks | 2 (50) |
3-4 weeks | 2 (50) |
6 weeks | 2 (50) |
9 weeks | 2 (50) |
3 months | 1 (25) |
9 months | 1 (25) |
Table 4 Bivariate analysis to assess the influence of the number of X-rays on the study variables
Variable | Frequency (%) | Total X-rays (median) (IQR) | Test (P value) |
Gender | - | - | Mann-Whitney U = 348.500 (0.328) |
Male | 77 (87.5) | 2.00 (1) | |
Female | 11 (12.5) | 1.00 (3) | |
Age | Kruskal-Wallis H = 0.378 (0.223) | ||
3-5 years old | 17 (19.3) | 2.00 (2) | |
6-8 years old | 16 (18.2) | 2.00 (1) | |
9-11 years old | 18 (20.5) | 2.00 (2) | |
12-14 years old | 36 (40.9) | 2.00 (2) | |
Site of fracture | Kruskal-Wallis H = 0.201 (0.905) | ||
Epiphyseal | 15 (17.0) | 2.00 (1) | |
Metaphyseal | 27 (30.7) | 2.00 (1) | |
Diaphyseal | 46 (52.3) | 2.00 (2) | |
Complications | Mann-Whitney U = 75.00 (0.774) | ||
Yes | 2 (2.3) | 1.50 (0) | |
No | 86 (97.7) | 2.00 (1) | |
Change in management plan | Mann-Whitney U = 307.00 (0.845) | ||
Yes | 8 (9.1) | 2.00 (3) | |
No | 80 (90.9) | 2.00 (1) | |
Second operation | Mann-Whitney U = 148.500 (0.706) | ||
Yes | 4 (4.5) | 1.50 (3) | |
No | 84 (95.5) | 2.00 (1) |
Table 5 Bivariate analysis to assess the association between the number of X-rays and the type of fixation
Type of fixation | Frequency (%) | Total X-rays Median (IQR) | Mann-Whitney U test (P value) |
Closed reduction | 65 (73.9) | 2.00 (1) | 584.00 (0.108) |
Open reduction | 12 (13.6) | 2.00 (1) | 317.50 (0.082) |
Internal fixation | 11 (12.5) | 2.00 (1) | 312.00 (0.146) |
ORIF | 4 (4.5) | 1.00 (2) | 110.00 (0.261) |
One K wire fixation | 58 (65.9) | 2.00 (1) | 778.00 (0.403) |
Two K wire fixation | 13 (14.8) | 2.00 (2) | 431.00 (0.492) |
TENS | 11 (12.5) | 2.00 (4) | 387.00 (0.634) |
Other1 | 3 (3.4) | 3.00 (0) | 95.00 (0.481) |
Table 6 Odds ratio to compare the variables that significantly influence the number of X-rays (≤ 1 X-ray or ≥ 2 X-rays)
Variables | OR1 | 95%CI |
Gender | ||
Female | 1 | - |
Male | 2.897 (0.112) | 0.780-10.758 |
Age | ||
3-5 years old | 1 | - |
6-8 years old | 1.143 (0.849) | 0.290-4.507 |
9-11 years old | 3.111 (0.129) | 0.720-13.443 |
12-14 years old | 0.993 (0.991) | 0.313-3.155 |
Site of fracture | ||
Epiphyseal | 1 | - |
Metaphyseal | 1.273 (0.710) | 0.357-4.542 |
Diaphyseal | 1.361 (.607) | 0.421, 4.405 |
Complications | ||
No | 1 | - |
Yes | 0.686 (0.793) | 0.042-11.342 |
Change in management plan | ||
No | 1 | - |
Yes | 1.170 (0.837) | 0.261-5.239 |
Second operation | ||
No | 1 | - |
Yes | 0.680 (0.707) | 0.091-5.064 |
Table 7 Odds ratio to compare the type of fixation that significantly influence the number of X-rays (≤ 1 X-ray or ≥ 2 X-rays)
Type of fixation | OR1 | 95%CI |
Closed reduction | 0.305 (0.035) | 0.101-0.919 |
Open reduction | 4.048 (0.084) | 0.830-19.731 |
Internal fixation | 3.558 (0.119) | 0.721-17.568 |
ORIF | 0.680 (0.707) | 0.091-5.064 |
K wire fixation | 0.615 (0.300) | 0.246-1.542 |
2 K wire fixation | 1.674 (0.424) | 0.473-5.924 |
TENS | 1.244 (0.743) | 0.336-4.609 |
Other2 | 3.723 (0.240) | 0.416-33.308 |
- Citation: Alomran AK, Alzahrani BA, Alamoud DS, Alsultan LS, AlSaud MM, Althobaiti RG, Alruwaili BS. Role of post-operative X-rays in distal-radius fractures among pediatric patients. World J Orthop 2025; 16(5): 105590
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i5/105590.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590