Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2025; 16(3): 105318
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.105318
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.105318
Table 1 Comparison of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with traditional total hip arthroplasty
MIS-THA | Traditional THA | |
Advantages | Reduced trauma and faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, smaller incision and better aesthetics | Excellent surgical field of vision and broader application range, mature technology with simpler operative procedures |
Disadvantages | Higher surgical complexity and steeper learning curve | Greater trauma and longer recovery time, more extensive tissue damage |
Long-term efficacy and outcomes | Superior early rehabilitation outcomes, comparable to traditional THA | Stable long-term efficacy |
- Citation: Liu QZ, Sun NZ. Investigation on the quality of life after anterior minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Commentary on recent findings. World J Orthop 2025; 16(3): 105318
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i3/105318.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.105318