Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2025; 16(2): 102856
Published online Feb 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i2.102856
Published online Feb 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i2.102856
Table 1 Search strategies presented to the main databases
Databases | Search strategy |
Medline/PubMed | (“Rotator cuff” OR shoulder impingement syndrome OR subacromial bursitis OR subacromial impingement OR rotator cuff injuries OR rotator cuff tendinosis OR shoulder pain OR supraspinatus OR infraspinatus OR subscapular OR teres minor) AND (hyaluronic acid OR hyaluronic acid injection OR sodium hyaluronate OR hyaluronate sodium OR viscosupplement platelet rich plasma injection OR platelet rich plasma OR PRP OR corticoid injection OR glucocorticoid OR corticosteroid injection OR prolotherapy OR dextrose injection) NOT (arthroscopy OR surgery OR adhesive capsulitis OR frozen shoulder) |
Filters: Humans, randomized controlled trial, controlled clinical trial, randomized, from 1900/1/1-2023/3/1 | |
The Cochrane Library | #1 (rotator cuff): ti, ab, kw* #2 (shoulder impingement syndrome): ti, ab, kw #3 (subacromial bursitis): ti, ab, kw #4 (rotator cuff tendinosis): ti, ab, kw #5 (subacromial impingement): ti, ab, kw #6 (rotator cuff injuries): ti, ab, kw #7 (rotator cuff lesions): ti, ab, kw #8 (hyaluronic acid): ti, ab, kw #9 (hyaluronate sodium): ti, ab, kw #10 (viscosupplement): ti, ab, kw #11 (platelet rich plasma): ti, ab, kw #12 (PRP): ti, ab, kw #13 (corticoid): ti, ab, kw #14 (corticosteroid): ti, ab, kw #15 (glucocorticoid): ti, ab, kw #16 (prolotherapy): ti, ab, kw #17 (dextrose): ti, ab, kw #18 (arthroscopy): ti, ab, kw #19 (surgery): ti, ab, kw #20 (adhesive capsulitis): ti, ab, kw #21 (frozen shoulder): ti, ab, kw #22 (#1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7) #23 (#8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 OR #15 OR #16 OR #17) |
EMBASE | (“rotator cuff” OR “shoulder impingement syndrome” OR “subacromial bursitis” OR “subacromial impingement” OR “rotator cuff injuries” OR “rotator cuff tendinosis” OR “rotator cuff lesions” OR “shoulder pain” OR “supraspinatus” OR “infraspinatus” OR “subscapular” OR “teres minor”) AND (“hyaluronic acid” OR “viscosupplement” OR “hyaluronate sodium” OR “PRP” OR “platelet rich plasma” OR “corticoid” OR “corticosteroid” OR “glucocorticoid” OR “prolotherapy” OR “dextrose injection”) NOT (“arthroscopy” OR “surgery” OR “adhesive capsulitis” OR “frozen shoulder”) |
LILACS | TW*: (“rotator cuff” or “shoulder impingement syndrome” or " “rotator cuff injuries" or “rotator cuff lesions” or “rotator cuff tendinosis” or “subacromial bursitis” or “subacromial impingement”) AND (“hyaluronic acid” or “viscosupplement” or “hyaluronate sodium” or “PRP” or “platelet rich plasma” or “corticoid” or “corticosteroid injection” or “glucocorticoid” or “prolotherapy” or “dextrose injection”) AND NOT (“arthroscopy” OR “surgery” OR “adhesive capsulitis” OR “frozen shoulder”) |
Table 2 The main characteristics of the included studies for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
Ref. | Technique | Follow-up | Intervention | Pain score | Functional score | Complementary imaging examination | Adverse effects | |||||||
S | M | L | PL | HA | PRP | HA+PRP | CE | PR | ||||||
Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears | ||||||||||||||
Cai et al[44] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | Yes | 47 | 44 | 45 | 48 | - | - | VAS | ASES CMS | MRI | NE |
Chou et al[45] | Not guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | No | Yes | 26 | 25 | - | - | - | - | VAS | CMS | NE | None |
Kesikburun et al[46] | Guided by US intratendineous | Yes | Yes | Yes | 20 | - | 20 | - | - | - | VAS | ROM SPADIWORC | NE | NE |
Moghtaderi et al[47] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 20 | 20 | - | - | - | - | VAS | CMS | NE | NE |
Shams et al[48] | Not guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | - | - | 20 | - | 20 | - | NE | ASES CMS SST | MRI | NE |
Schwitzguebel et al[49] | Guided by US sub-acromial | No | Yes | Yes | 39 | - | 41 | - | - | - | VAS | ASES CMS SANE | MRI | Local pain for more than 48h, frozen shoulder, and lesion progression |
Kwong et al[50] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | Yes | - | - | 47 | - | 52 | - | VAS | ASESWORC | US | None |
Dadgostar et al[51] | Guided by US sub-acromial + intratendineous | Yes | Yes | No | - | - | 30 | - | 28 | - | VAS | DASHROMWORC | US | NE |
Sari and Eroglu[52] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 30 | - | 30 | - | 30 | 30 | VAS | ASESWORC | NE | NE |
Table 3 The main characteristics of the included studies for rotator cuff tendinopathy
Ref. | Technique | Follow-up | Intervention | Pain score | Functional score | Complementary imaging examination | Adverse effects | |||||||
S | M | L | PL | HA | PRP | HA+PRP | CE | PR | ||||||
Rotator cuff tendinopathy | ||||||||||||||
Akgün et al[33] | Not guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 16 | - | - | - | 32* | - | VAS | CMS | NE | Dyspepsia |
Alvarez et al[34] | Not guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 28 | - | - | - | 30 | - | VAS | ASES DASH ROM WORC | NE | NE |
Barreto et al[35] | Not guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | - | - | 26 | - | 25 | - | NE | CMS DASH UCLA | NE | None |
Lin et al[36] | Guided by US intratendineous | Yes | Yes | No | 28 | - | - | - | - | 29 | VAS | ROM SPADI | US | NE |
Chang et al[37] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 25 | - | - | - | - | 25 | VAS | ROM SPADI | US | NE |
Kim et al[38] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | - | 38 | - | - | 42 | - | VAS | ASES ROM | NE | Nasopharynx, musculoskeletal pain, local pain, and cough |
Cole et al[39] | Guided by US sub-acromial + intratendineous | Yes | Yes | No | - | - | - | - | 19 | 17 | Likert | ROM | US | NE |
Hsieh et al[40] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | No | 58 | 60 | - | - | 68 | - | VAS | ROM SD SF-36 SPADI | NE | NE |
Damjanov et al[41] | Guided by US peritendineous + enthesis | Yes | Yes | No | - | - | 15 | - | 16 | - | VAS | CMS | NE | Headache, arterial hypertension, facial erythema, and moon face |
Lin et al[42] | Guided by US intratendineous | Yes | No | No | 15 | - | - | - | - | 6 | VAS | ROM SPADI | US | None |
Meloni et al[43] | Guided by US sub-acromial | Yes | Yes | Yes | 28 | 28 | - | - | - | - | VAS | ROM | US | None |
Table 4 Summary of findings
Table 5 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for pain improvement Visual Analogue Scale in the short term
Hyaluronic acid | HA + PRP | Corticosteroids | PRP | Prolotherapy | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | -0.28 [-1.86; 1.30] | |||||
-0.56 [-1.54; 0.42] | -0.28 [-1.90; 1.35] | |||||
-0.92 [-2.00; 0.16] | -0.64 [-2.22; 0.93] | -0.37 [-1.25; 0.52] | ||||
-1.43 [-2.66; -0.20] | -1.15 [-2.90; 0.60] | -0.88 [-1.99; 0.24] | -0.51 [-1.67; 0.65] | |||
-1.48 [-2.37; -0.59] | -1.20 [-2.74; 0.34] | -0.92 [-1.73; -0.12] | -0.56 [-1.45; 0.33] | -0.05 [-0.95; 0.86] |
Table 6 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement Constant Murley Score in the short term
HA + PRP | Hyaluronic acid | PRP | Corticosteroids | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 0.53 [-6.22; 7.28] | ||||
3.15 [-3.89; 10.18] | 2.62 [-3.89; 9.12] | ||||
5.84 [-4.07; 15.75] | 5.31 [-4.00;14.62] | 2.69 [-5.51; 10.89] | |||
10.7 [4.01; 17.42] | 10.18 [4.96; 15.41] | 7.57 [1.31; 13.82] | 4.87 [-3.69; 13.43] |
Table 7 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment in the short term
HA + PRP | Corticosteroids | Hyaluronic acid | Placebo | Prolotherapy | PRP | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 6.15 [-5.00; 17.31] | |||||
7.09 [-3.79; 17.97] | 0.93 [-7.47; 9.34] | |||||
8.97 [-1.61; 19.55] | 2.82 [-4.94; 10.57] | 1.88 [-7.18; 10.94] | ||||
9.95 [-4.36; 24.25] | 3.79 [-7.41; 15.00] | 2.86 [-10.01; 15.73] | 0.98 [-10.38; 12.34] | |||
10.61 [0.11; 21.11] | 4.45 [-2.37; 11.28] | 3.52 [-5.23; 12.26] | 1.64 [-6.00; 9.27] | 0.66 [-10.44; 11.76] |
Table 8 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for pain improvement Visual Analogue Scale in the medium term
Hyaluronic acid | PRP | Placebo | Corticosteroids | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | -0.24 [-2.21; 1.74] | |||
-1.50 [-3.48; 0.48] | -1.27 [-2.38; -0.16] | |||
-1.80 [-4.01; 0.41] | -1.56 [-2.88; -0.25] | -0.30 [-1.51; 0.91] |
Table 9 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement Constant Murley Score in the medium term
HA + PRP | PRP | Hyaluronic acid | Corticosteroids | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 13.81 [-12.54; 40.16] | ||||
15.87 [-12.23; 43.97] | 2.06 [-24.30; 28.41] | ||||
21.42 [-16.63; 59.48] | 7.61 [-19.84; 35.06] | 5.55 [-32.50; 43.61] | |||
22.73 [-3.62; 49.08] | 8.92 [-11.28; 29.11] | 6.86 [-19.49; 33.21] | 1.30 [-32.78; 35.38] |
Table 10 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment in the medium term
HA + PRP | PRP | Hyaluronic acid | Prolotherapy | Corticosteroids | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 19.09 [0.37; 37.81] | |||||
20.29 [-0.38; 40.76] | 1.10 [-17.67; 19.87] | |||||
23.63 [-1.58; 48.84] | 4.54 [-14.22; 23.30] | 3.44 [-21.81; 28.69] | ||||
26.44 [4.86; 48.02] | 7.35 [-6.09; 20.80] | 6.25 [-15.37; 27.88] | 2.81 [-16.37; 22.00] | |||
26.72 [8.02; 45.41] | 7.63 [-3.98; 19.23] | 6.53 [-12.23; 25.28] | 3.09 [-15.71; 21.89] | 0.27 [-13.34; 13.88] |
Table 11 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for pain improvement Visual Analogue Scale in the long term
Hyaluronic acid | PRP | Corticosteroids | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | -0.48 [-5.72; 4.76] | |||
-1.59 [-9.41; 6.23] | -1.11 [-6.91; 4.69] | |||
-2.59 [-7.83; 2.65] | -2.11 [-5.49; 1.27] | -1.00 [-7.72; 5.71] |
Table 12 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement Constant Murley Score in the medium term
HA + PRP | PRP | Hyraluronic acid | Placebo | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 8.24 [7.26; 9.22] | |||
19.47 [18.51; 20.43] | 11.23 [10.20; 12.26] | |||
32.64 [31.66; 33.62] | 24.40 [23.35; 25.45] | 13.17 [12.14; 14.20] |
Table 13 League Table with the results of the network meta-analysis for function improvement American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment in the long term
HA + PRP | Corticosteroids | Hyaluronic acid | Placebo | Prolotherapy | PRP | |
Network meta-analysis-MD | 6.15 [-5.00; 17.31] | |||||
7.09 [-3.79; 17.97] | 0.93 [-7.47; 9.34] | |||||
8.97 [-1.61; 19.55] | 2.82 [-4.94; 10.57] | 1.88 [-7.18; 10.94] | ||||
9.95 [-4.36; 24.25] | 3.79 [-7.41; 15.00] | 2.86 [-10.01; 15.73] | 0.98 [-10.38; 12.34] | |||
10.61 [0.11; 21.11] | 4.45 [-2.37; 11.28] | 3.52 [-5.23; 12.26] | 1.64 [-6.00; 9.27] | 0.66 [-10.44; 11.76] |
- Citation: Goulart LT, Matsunaga FT, Belloti JC, Netto NA, Paim TS, Tamaoki MJS. Effectiveness of sub-acromial injections in rotator cuff injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2025; 16(2): 102856
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i2/102856.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i2.102856