Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2025; 16(1): 100173
Published online Jan 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i1.100173
Table 1 Demographic data
Demographic variable
Result
Age (year), mean ± SD44 ± 7.5
Side of surgery as left/right/bilateral72/52/26
IndicationAvascular necrosis with secondary arthritis (n =65); femoral neck fracture (n = 22); ankylosing spondylitis (n = 13); psoriatic arthritis (n = 12); post-infection sequelae (n = 12)
Mean duration of surgery (minute), mean ± SD140 ± 25
Average blood loss (mL), mean ± SD160 ± 50
Follow-up (year)15
Table 2 Preoperative and postoperative functional scores at last follow-up
Functional score
Preoperative score
Postoperative score at final follow-up
Modified Harris Hip Score, mean ± SD< 70 (poor): 100%; mean score: 19.75 ± 15.0090-100 (excellent): 80%; 80-89 (good): 16%; 70-79 (fair): 4%; mean score: 91.66 ± 7.50
Oxford hip score, mean ± SD12.04 ± 3.0040.54 ± 4.50
WOMAC score85.1619.16
Visual analogue score, mean ± SD7.1 ± 2.71.4 ± 0.7
Table 3 Complications
Type of complication
Patients (n)
Heterotopic ossification    6
Varus malposition    0
Infection    1
Aseptic loosening    1
Limb length discrepancy > 1.5 cm    0
Sciatic nerve palsy    0