Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes

doi:10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (65)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-2)

Tables (1-5)

Sum=59

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=1

Aug 18, 2024 (publication date) through Aug 14, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Orthop. Aug 18, 2024; 15(8): 744-753
Published online Aug 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744

Table 1 Patient demographics

Item	n = 87
Age (years), mean (range)	31.5 (12.0-62.0)
Sex (male:female)	60:27
Laterality (left:right)	44:43
Graft type (hamstring:BTB)	60:27
Height (cm), mean ± SD	174.3 ± 8.8
Weight (kg), mean ± SD	84.1 ± 18.0
BMI (kg/m²), mean ± SD	27.5 ± 5.4

BTB: Bone-patella tendon-bone; BMI: Body mass index.

Table 2 Post-operative radiological parameters

Item	Median (inter-quartile range)
Coronal position tibial tunnel (%)	46.3 (42.7-49.6)
Coronal angle tibial tunnel (º)	70.8 (66.7-76.4)
Coronal angle femoral tunnel (º)	45.7 (39.8-52.0)
Sagittal position tibial tunnel (%)	44.8 (38.4-54.5)
Transplant orientation to joint (º)	68.3 (60.7-72.7)
Position along Blumensaat’s line (%)	47.2 (36.3-53.8)
Angle of femoral tunnel to femur (º)	38.9 (35.2-43.7)

Table 3 Post-operative patient reported outcome measures data

Item	Median (inter-quartile range)
KOOS pain	89 (78-97)
KOOS symptom	79 (68-86)
KOOS ADL	97 (90-100)
KOOS sport/rec	75 (60-85)
KOOS QoL	63 (44-75)
KOOS overall	81 (70-87)
IKDC	75 (64-86)
Lysholm	87 (76-91)
Tegner	5 (4-7)
EQ-5D index	0.837 (0.728-1.000)
EQ-5D VAS	85 (70-90)
SF-12 MCS	53 (45-58)
SF-12 PCS	54 (47-57)

PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; IQR: Inter-quartile range; KOOS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/rec: Sport and recreation function; QoL: Quality of life; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Score; SF-12: Short Form 12; MCS: Mental component summary; PCS: Physical component summary; EQ-5D: EuroQol-5D; VAS: Visual analogue score.

Table 4 Comparison of post-operative patient reported outcome measures with EndoButton position

	Anterior, median (IQR)	Middle, median (IQR)	Posterior, median (IQR)	P value¹	H
KOOS pain	88 (73-97)	85 (67-95)	88 (82-91)	0.748	0.6
KOOS symptom	79 (68-89)	79 (57-83)	83 (68-88)	0.612	1.0
KOOS ADL	98 (87-100)	92 (71-97)	95 (92-96)	0.227	3.0
KOOS sport/rec	78 (61-85)	73 (45-75)	73 (51-75)	0.393	1.9
KOOS QoL	57 (25-80)	56 (31-65)	57 (40-69)	0.820	0.4
KOOS overall	81 (64-85)	77 (59-82)	79 (67-83)	0.440	1.6
IKDC	75 (53-77)	69 (56-77)	71 (64-72)	0.664	0.8
Lysholm	88 (71-94)	85 (74-89)	83 (74-89)	0.722	0.7
Tegner	5 (3-7)	5 (3-7)	4 (2-5)	0.454	1.6
EQ-5D index	1 (0.746-1.000)	0.750 (0.657-0.919)	0.704 (0.668-0.810)	0.097	4.7
EQ-5D VAS	74 (61-84)	88 (64-91)	73 (70-86)	0.161	3.6
SF-12 MCS	51 (47-59)	54 (40-59)	54 (37-58)	0.964	0.1
SF-12 PCS	55 (50-57)	52 (35-56)	46 (44-47)	0.266	2.7

¹Kruskal Wallis H test.

No statistically significant results. IQR: Inter-quartile range; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; KOOS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/Rec: Sport and recreation function; QoL: Quality of life; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Score; SF-12: Short form 12; MCS: Mental component summary; PCS: Physical component summary; EQ-5D: EuroQol-5D; VAS: Visual analogue score.

Table 5 Correlation between post-operative patient reported outcome measures and radiological parameters¹

		Coronal position TT	Coronal angle TT	Coronal angle FT	Sagittal position TT	TOJ	Position along Blumensaat’s line	Angle of FT to femur	EndoButton position
KOOS pain	rho	0.150	-0.160	0.040	0.200	0.030	0.370	0.090	-0.090
	P value	0.297	0.251	0.801	0.158	0.809	0.109	0.603	0.621
KOOS symptom	rho	0.030	-0.150	-0.030	0.210	-0.050	-0.050	0.060	-0.050
	P value	0.828	0.285	0.818	0.127	0.709	0.823	0.736	0.778
KOOS ADL	rho	0.093	-0.140	0.190	0.200	-0.060	0.140	-0.150	-0.240
	P value	0.507	0.317	0.178	0.150	0.688	0.548	0.410	0.170
KOOS sport/rec	rho	0.110	-0.040	0.200	0.120	0.010	0.320	0.030	-0.220
	P value	0.436	0.771	0.166	0.410	0.944	0.190	0.864	0.220
KOOS QoL	rho	0.230	-0.110	0.200	0.430	-0.200	0.080	0.010	-0.020
	P value	0.097	0.441	0.147	0.002^a	0.157	0.735	0.956	0.928
KOOS overall	rho	0.170	-0.040	0.160	0.250	-0.090	0.230	0.020	-0.140
	P value	0.220	0.757	0.255	0.080	0.551	0.344	0.919	0.423
IKDC	rho	0.180	-0.100	0.150	0.260	0.070	0.260	0.170	-0.160
	P value	0.202	0.517	0.288	0.060	0.635	0.268	0.358	0.381
Lysholm	rho	0.010	-0.210	-0.110	0.200	-0.020	0.290	0.290	-0.140
	P value	0.921	0.139	0.446	0.166	0.898	0.232	0.105	0.453
Tegner	rho	-0.040	0.200	-0.020	0.200	0.140	0.130	0.130	-0.180
	P value	0.766	0.178	0.913	0.900	0.333	0.582	0.500	0.355
EQ-5D index	rho	0.060	-0.150	-0.010	0.260	-0.100	0.310	0.070	-0.380
	P value	0.659	0.285	0.933	0.068	0.491	0.192	0.698	0.028^a
EQ-5D VAS	rho	0.030	0.020	-0.080	0.360	-0.180	0.010	0.130	0.240
	P value	0.820	0.891	0.566	0.010^a	0.213	0.962	0.461	0.174
SF-12 MCS	rho	0.000	-0.140	-0.070	0.110	-0.010	0.110	0.040	0.050
	P value	0.999	0.339	0.650	0.459	0.956	0.641	0.822	0.797
SF-12 PCS	rho	0.170	-0.110	0.120	0.220	-0.100	0.290	-0.070	-0.280
	P value	0.244	0.467	0.405	0.144	0.524	0.223	0.732	0.129

¹Spearman’s rank correlation test.

^aP < 0.05.

rho: Correlation coefficient; PROM: Patient reported outcome measures; KOOS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; ADL: Activities of daily living; Sport/rec: Sport and recreation function; QoL: Quality of life; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Score; SF-12: Short Form 12; MCS: Mental component summary; PCS: Physical component summary; EQ-5D: EuroQol-5D; VAS: Visual analogue score; TT: Tibial tunnel; FT: Femoral tunnel; TOJ: Transplant orientation to joint angle.

Citation: Mann O, Al-Dadah O. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes. World J Orthop 2024; 15(8): 744-753
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i8/744.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744