Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2024; 15(6): 560-569
Published online Jun 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.560
Table 1 Example of data collection
Patient
Age at the surgery
S1DE
Sex
Type of fracture (AO/OTA)
Fracting score
NURD score
LEG-NUI score
Union
Non-union
Follow-up (months)
122DXM4.2C975X18
228SNM4.2A656X12
382DXM4.2A654X12
Table 2 Descriptive statistics for scores and age on outcome of nonunion and sex

Female (n = 47)
Male (n = 83)
Total
Nonunion (n = 7)
Union (n = 40)
Nonunion (n = 34)
Union (n = 49)
Age
Min/Max32/8418/8619/8218/8718/87
Med (IQR)52 (43; 55.5)54 (42.2; 62)45 (28.2; 57.8)45.0 (27; 60)46.5 (34; 60)
mean ± SD52.1 ± 16.452.5 ± 17.544.6 ± 17.944.5 ± 20.047.4 ± 18.7
FRACTING
Min/Max5.0/101.0/10.05.0/10.02.0/9.01.0/10.0
Med (IQR)8.0 (6.0; 9.5)5.0 (3.0; 7.0)8.0 (6.0; 9.0)4.0 (3.0; 7.0)6.0 (4.0; 8.0)
mean ± SD7.7 ± 2.15.2 ± 2.37.8 ± 1.85.1 ± 2.26.0 ± 2.4
NURD
Min/Max0/7.00/8.01.0/11.00/8.00/11.0
Med (IQR)1.0 (1.0; 3.5)1.0 (1.0; 3.0)4.5 (3.0; 7.0)2.0 (1.0; 4.0)3.0 (1.0; 4.0)
mean ± SD2.4 ± 2.41.8 ± 1.84.9 ± 2.82.9 ± 2.13.1 ± 2.5
LEG-NUI
Min/Max1.0/6.00/7.01.0/6.01.0/6.00/7.0
Med (IQR)3.0 (2.0; 4.0)2.0 (1.0; 3.0)4.0 (3.2; 5.0)2.0 (1.0; 3.0)2.0 (1.0; 4.0)
mean ± SD3.1 ± 1.72.1 ± 1.54.1 ± 4.12.2 ± 1.22.7 ± 1.6
Table 3 Patients grouped by age
Age
Nonunion (%)
Union (%)
Total (%)
18-4521 (34)41 (66)62 (48)
46-6013 (35)24 (65)37 (28)
> 607 (23)24 (77)31 (24)
Table 4 Nonunion risk determination confusion matrix

Union
Nonunion
Total
Predicted union8937126
Predicted nonunion044
Total8941130
Table 5 Tibia FRACTure prediction healING days confusion matrix

Union
Nonunion
Total
Predicted union771592
Predicted nonunion122638
Total8941130
Table 6 Leeds-Genoa Nonunion Index confusion matrix

Union
Nonunion
Total
Predicted union811798
Predicted nonunion82432
Total8941130
Table 7 Score evaluation performance metrics
Score
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
F-measure (%)
FRACTING63.4186.5268.4283.7067.00
NURD14.6396.63/7018
LEG-NUI58.5491.0775.3183.2758.06