Survival analysis in nonagenarian patients with non-hip lower limb fractures

Table 1 Patient demographics, fracture type, treatment type, number of comorbidities, length of hospital stay, admission residence, discharge destination and time from admission to death in both surgical and conservative groups

Patient No.	Sex	Age, yr	Fracture type	Treatment	Number of co-morbidities	Length of hospital stay, d	Admission residence	Discharge destination	Time from admission to death, d
1	F	98	Periprosthetic – THR	Surgery	3	22	Home	Institution	Alive
2	F	98	Distal femur	Surgery	3	25	Home	Home	Alive
3	F	96	Periprosthetic - Thompsons	Surgery	4	29	Institutional	Dead	29
4	F	96	Distal femur	Surgery	0	21	Home	Institution	Alive
5	F	96	Distal femur	Surgery	0	30	Home	Home	Alive
6	F	95	Periprosthetic – Thompsons	Conservative	5	20	Home	Institution	Alive
7	F	95	Distal femur	Surgery	3	8	Home	Institution	Alive
8	F	95	Periprosthetic – Thompsons	Surgery	3	12	Home	Institution	Alive
9	F	95	Distal tibia/fibula	Conservative	4	17	Institutional	Institution	237
10	F	95	Distal femur	Surgery	0	11	Home	Institution	300
11	F	94	Distal tibia/fibula	Surgery	0	18	Home	Institution	Alive
12	F	94	Periprosthetic – THR	Conservative	7	17	Home	Institution	376
13	F	94	Distal femur	Surgery	0	12	Home	Institution	429
14	F	94	Distal femur	Surgery	3	14	Home	Institution	264
15	F	93	Distal tibia/fibula	Surgery	3	24	Home	Institution	Alive
16	F	92	Periprosthetic – Thompsons	Conservative	2	24	Institutional	Institution	Alive
17	F	92	Periprosthetic – THR	Surgery	2	11	Home	Institution	Alive
18	F	92	Distal femur	Surgery	0	11	Home	Institution	Alive
19	F	92	Distal femur	Surgery	1	15	Home	Institution	39
20	F	92	Distal tibia/ fibula	Surgery	2	39	Home	Institution	50
21	F	91	Distal femur- bilateral	Conservative	2	13	Home	Institution	Alive
22	F	91	Femoral shaft	Surgery	3	16	Home	Institution	50
23	F	91	Distal femur – Bilateral	Surgery	3	28	Home	Institution	Alive
24	F	90	Periprosthetic – THR	Surgery	1	28	Home	Institution	Alive
25	F	90	Periprosthetic – Thompsons	Surgery	8	28	Home	Institution	505
26	M	90	Distal femur	Surgery	4	11	Home	Institution	451
27	F	90	Femoral shaft	Surgery	2	17	Home	Institution	Alive
28	F	90	Proximal tibia/fibula	Surgery	1	5	Home	Institution	Alive

F: Female; M: Male; THR: Total hip replacement.

Table 2 Summary showing discharge outcomes of both surgical (group 1) and conservative (group 2)

	No. of patients (%)
Gender
Male	1 (3.6)
Female	27 (96.4)
Fracture type
Distal femur	12 (40)
Periprosthetic	11 (37)
Distal tibia/fibular	4 (13)
Femoral shaft	2 (7)
Proximal tibia/fibula	1 (3)
Type of operation
Open reduction internal fixation	8 (27)
Revision arthroplasty	5 (17)
Intramedullary nail	10 (33)
Distal femoral replacement	1 (3)
No operation	6 (20)
Surgical (Group 1)
Admitted from home	22 (96)
Admitted from an institution	1 (4)
Discharged home	2 (9)
Discharged to an institution	21 (91)
Conservative (Group 2)
Admitted from home	3 (60)
Admitted from an institution	2 (40)
Discharged home	0 (0)
Discharged to an institution	5 (100)