Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Orthop. Jun 18, 2023; 14(6): 471-484
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.471
Published online Jun 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.471
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Acute toe phalanx fractures | Toe sesamoid fractures |
Stress toe phalanx fractures | Toe joint dislocation without fracture |
Elite or recreational athletes | Toe joint fracture dislocation |
Return rate to sporting activity reported | Toe ligament injuries |
Time to return to sporting activity reported | No sporting outcome data reported |
Two or more injuries reported | Concomitant upper or lower limb fractures |
Peer-reviewed journals | Reviews, case reports, abstracts, or anecdotal articles |
English language | Animal, cadaver, or in vitro studies |
Table 2 Demographic data - acute fractures
Ref. | n | Study type | Mean age (yr) | Male:Female | Follow-up, % | Sport | Level of sport | Most common MOI | Location | Modified coleman score | MINORS score |
General cohort | |||||||||||
Robertson et al[15], 2012 | 8 | Case series | 21.1 | 8:0 | 6 (75) | Soccer | General population | Tackle (50%) | Great toe (n = 6) 2nd Toe (n = 1); 3rd Toe (n = 1) | 44 | 12 |
Larsson et al[16], 2016 | 18 | Case series | N/A | 18:0 | 18 (100) | Soccer | Elite/Professional | N/A | N/A | 39 | 12 |
Chan et al[17], 2021 | 53 | Case series | N/A | 32:21 | 53 (100) | US Collegiate Sports | Collegiate | N/A | N/A | 54 | 12 |
Diaz et al[18], 2022 | 69 | RCS | N/A | 69:0 | 69 (100) | Soccer | Elite | N/A | N/A | 41 | 18 |
Intra-Articular (Physeal) base of proximal phalanx fractures | |||||||||||
Maffulli[19], 2001 | 2 | Case series | 12.5 | 2:0 | 2 (100) | Soccer (n = 1), Judo (n = 1) | Recreational | Tackle | Great toe proximal phalanx | 65 | 9 |
Perugia et al[20], 2014 | 4 | Case series | 13-15 | N/A | 4 (100) | Gymnastics | Adolescent high level | Dismount | Great toe proximal phalanx | 67 | 11 |
Bariteau et al[21], 2015 | 2 | Case series | 12.5 | 0:2 | 2 (100) | Gymnastics | Elite | Dismount | Great toe proximal phalanx | 62 | 11 |
Table 3 Demographic data - stress fractures
Ref. | n | Study type | Mean age (yr) | Male:Female | Follow-up, % | Sport | Level of sport | Location | Associated deformity | Modified coleman score | MINORS score |
Yokoe et al[22], 1986 | 3 | Case series | 16.3 (12-21) | 1:2 | 3 (100) | Sprinting (n = 1), Rugby (n = 1), Kendo (n = 1) | Amateur | Great Toe Proximal Phalanx | Hallux valgus (n = 3) | 34 | 8 |
Shiraishi et al[23], 1993 | 3 | Case series | 13.7 (12-17) | 1:2 | 3 (100) | Volleyball (n = 1), Long Distance Running (n = 1), Soccer (n = 1) | Amateur | Great toe proximal phalanx | 51 | 9 | |
Yokoe et al[8], 2004 | 10 | Case series | 16.3 (12-21) | 2:8 | 10 (100) | Sprinting (n = 6), Distance Running (n = 1), Basketball (n = 1), Rugby (n = 1), Kendo (n = 1) | N/A | Great toe proximal phalanx | Hallux valgus (n = 9) | 35 | 8 |
Pitsis et al[24], 2004 | 2 | Case series | 29 (17-41) | 0:2 | 2 (100) | Triathlon (n = 1), Gymnastics (n = 1) | Non-professional/Elite | Great toe proximal phalanx | Hallux valgus (n = 1) | 46 | 8 |
Munemoto et al[25], 2009 | 4 | Case series | 14.5 (13-17) | 2:2 | 4 (100) | Short track running (n = 3), Soccer (n = 1) | Amateur | Great toe proximal phalanx | Hallux valgus (n = 3) | 55 | 8 |
Yamaguchi et al[26], 2017 | 4 | Case series | 14.8 (13-16) | 4:0 | 4 (100) | Soccer (n = 3), Baseball (n = 1) | N/A | 2nd toe proximal phalanx | Claw toe (n = 1) | 52 | 8 |
Table 4 Outcome data - acute fractures
Ref. | n | Treatment (%) | Return to sport (%) | Return to the same level of sport (%) | Return time to sport | Secondary surgery - return rate (RR)/Return time (RT) | Persisting symptoms (%) | Complications |
General cohort | ||||||||
Robertson et al[15], 2012 | 6 | PCM (100) | 3 (50) | 3 (50) | 7.0 wk (mean) | 3 (50) | Nil | |
Larsson et al[16], 2016 | 18 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 26 d (mean) | N/A | 1 re-fracture | |
Chan et al[17], 2021 | 53 | PCM (100) | 53 (100) | N/A | 8.5 d (median) | N/A | 1 re-fracture | |
Diaz et al[18], 2022 | 69 | N/A | N/A | 30 d (median) | N/A | Nil | ||
Intra-articular (Physeal) base of proximal phalanx fractures | ||||||||
Maffulli[19], 2001 | 2 | PCM (50) PSM (50) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) | By 6 mo | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Perugia et al[20], 2014 | 4 | PSM (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | By 3 mo | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Bariteau et al[21], 2015 | 2 | PCM (50) PSM (50) | 1 (50) (PSM) | 1 (50) (PSM) | 5 mo | 1 – RR 100%/RT 14 wk | 0 (0) | 1 re-fracture (PCM) |
Table 5 Outcome data - stress fractures
Ref. | n | Treatment (%) | Return to sport (%) | Return to the same level of sport (%) | Time to return to sport (mean) | Secondary surgery - return rate (RR)/Return time (RT) | Factors associated with secondary surgery | Persisting symptom (%) | Complications (%) |
Yokoe et al[22], 1986 | 3 | PCM (67) PSM (33) | 3 (100) | N/A | PCM - 3 mo; PSM - N/A | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
Shiraishi et al[23], 1993 | 3 | PCM (100) | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 6 wk | 1 (33) | 1 non-union for a patient who did not stop training (33) | ||
Yokoe et al[8], 2004 | 10 | PCM (100) | 6 (60) | 6 (60) | N/A | 4 (40) – RR 100% | Hallux valgus deformity (n = 3) | 0 (0) | 3 delayed unions with PCM (50) |
Pitsis et al[24], 2004 | 2 | PCM (100) | 0 (0)a | 0 (0)a | N/A | 1 (50) – RR 100% | 2-yr delay to diagnosis | 0 (0) | 1 non-union with PCM (50) |
Munemoto et al[25], 2009 | 4 | PCM (50) PSM (50) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | PCM - 8.5 wk, PSM - 10 wk | 0 (0) | 1 mild deformity with PCM (50) | ||
Yamaguchi et al[26], 2017 | 4 | PCM (100) | 3 (75) | 3 (75) | 5 wk | 1 (25) – RR 100%/RT 4 mo | 1-yr delay to diagnosis/Claw toe deformity | 0 (0) | 1 non-union and claw toe deformity with PCM (25) |
- Citation: Robertson GAJ, Sinha A, Hodkinson T, Koç T. Return to sport following toe phalanx fractures: A systematic review. World J Orthop 2023; 14(6): 471-484
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v14/i6/471.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i6.471