Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2022; 13(7): 631-643
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631
Table 1 Demographic information
With GHOA | Without GHOA | ||||||||
Tear size group | Tear size group | ||||||||
Overall (n = 142) | Case overall (n = 71) | Small (0-1 cm) (n = 21) | Medium (1-3 cm) (n = 28) | Large (3-5 cm) (n = 22) | Control overall (n = 71) | Small (0-1 cm) (n = 28) | Medium (1-3 cm) (n = 30) | Large (3-5 cm) (n = 13) | |
Age (in yr) at surgery, median (IQR) | 64 (60, 70) | 64 (60, 70) | 63 (62, 67) | 63 (58, 67.5) | 66 (62, 71) | 64 (60, 70) | 63 (59.5, 68.5) | 65 (61, 70) | 63 (61, 69) |
BMI, median (IQR) | 29.2 (25.8, 32.9) | 29.8 (26.7, 33.2) | 32.9 (29.4, 35.9) | 28.1 (24.5, 30.8) | 29 (27.3, 33.2) | 28.5 (25.5, 31) | 29.9 (27, 31) | 27.2 (24.5, 30.4) | 27.5 (24.7, 32.1) |
Time (in yr) since DOS, median (IQR) | 8.1 (6.9, 9.3) | 8.2 (6.9, 9.3) | 8 (7.1, 9.4) | 8 (6.4, 9.3) | 8.3 (7.1, 8.9) | 8.1 (6.8, 9.3) | 8.3 (6.8, 9.6) | 8 (7.5, 8.8) | 7.8 (6.9, 9.3) |
Tear size, median (IQR) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3.5) | 1 (1, 1) | 2 (1.7, 2.6) | 4 (3.5, 4) | 1.5 (1, 2.5) | .5 (.5, 1) | 2 (1.5, 2.5) | 4 (3.7, 4.3) |
Male | 82 (57.7) | 41 (57.7) | 10 (47.6) | 13 (46.4) | 18 (81.8) | 41 (57.7) | 13 (46.4) | 19 (63.3) | 9 (69.2) |
Sex, n (%) | |||||||||
Female | 60 (42.3) | 30 (42.3) | 11 (52.4) | 15 (53.6) | 4 (18.2) | 30 (42.3) | 15 (53.6) | 11 (36.7) | 4 (30.8) |
Smoking, n (%) | |||||||||
Never | 84 (59.2) | 41 (57.7) | 16 (76.2) | 14 (50.0) | 11 (50.0) | 43 (60.6) | 19 (67.9) | 19 (63.3) | 5 (38.5) |
Previous | 53 (37.3) | 29 (40.8) | 5 (23.8) | 13 (46.4) | 11 (50.0) | 24 (33.8) | 7 (25.0) | 10 (33.3) | 7 (53.8) |
Current | 5 (3.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 4 (5.6) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (7.7) |
Diabetes, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 115 (81.0) | 57 (80.3) | 18 (85.7) | 24 (85.7) | 15 (68.2) | 58 (81.7) | 22 (78.6) | 27 (90.0) | 9 (69.2) |
Yes | 27 (19.0) | 14 (19.7) | 3 (14.3) | 4 (14.3) | 7 (31.8) | 13 (18.3) | 6 (21.4) | 3 (10.0) | 4 (30.8) |
Preoperative samilson-prieto score, n (%) | |||||||||
None | 71 (50.0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 70 (98.6) | 28 (100.0) | 29 (96.7) | 13 (100.0) |
Mild (< 3 mm) | 62 (43.7) | 61 (85.9) | 18 (85.7) | 27 (96.4) | 16 (72.7) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Moderate (3 mm-7 mm) | 9 (6.3) | 9 (12.7) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 6 (27.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Goutallier classification, n (%) | |||||||||
Grade 0 (normal muscle) | 95 (66.9) | 47 (66.2) | 18 (85.7) | 19 (67.9) | 10 (45.5) | 48 (67.6) | 23 (82.1) | 20 (66.7) | 5 (38.5) |
Grade 1 (some fattystreaks) | 36 (25.4) | 18 (25.4) | 2 (9.5) | 7 (25.0) | 9 (40.9) | 18 (25.4) | 5 (17.9) | 8 (26.7) | 5 (38.5) |
Grade 2 (< 50% fattymuscle atrophy) | 11 (7.7) | 6 (8.5) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (7.1) | 3 (13.6) | 5 (7.0) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 3 (23.1) |
Muscle atrophy (warner grading system), n (%) | 0 (0) | ||||||||
None | 107 (75.4) | 50 (70.4) | 18 (85.7) | 21 (75.0) | 11 (50.0) | 57 (80.3) | 24 (85.7) | 24 (80.0) | 9 (69.2) |
Mild | 29 (20.4) | 17 (23.9) | 2 (9.5) | 5 (17.9) | 10 (45.5) | 12 (16.9) | 4 (14.3) | 5 (16.7) | 3 (23.1) |
Moderate | 6 (4.2) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (7.7) |
Primary GHOA, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 71 (50.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 71 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 30 (100.0) | 13 (100.0) |
Yes | 71 (50.0) | 71 (100.0) | 21 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Table 2 Operative data and type of operation
With GHOA | Without GHOA | ||||||||
Tear size group | Tear size group | ||||||||
Overall (n = 142) | Overall Case (n = 71) | Small (0-1 cm) (n = 21) | Medium (1-3 cm) (n = 28) | Large (3-5 cm) (n = 22) | Overall Control (n = 71) | Small (0-1 cm) (n = 28) | Medium (1-3 cm) (n = 30) | Large (3-5 cm) (n = 13) | |
Single row, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 124 (87.3) | 60 (84.5) | 16 (76.2) | 24 (85.7) | 20 (90.9) | 64 (90.1) | 26 (92.9) | 26 (86.7) | 12 (92.3) |
Yes | 18 (12.7) | 11 (15.5) | 5 (23.8) | 4 (14.3) | 2 (9.1) | 7 (9.9) | 2 (7.1) | 4 (13.3) | 1 (7.7) |
Double row, n (%) | |||||||||
Yes | 122 (85.9) | 60 (84.5) | 17 (81.0) | 23 (82.1) | 20 (90.9) | 62 (87.3) | 24 (85.7) | 26 (86.7) | 12 (92.3) |
No | 20 (14.1) | 11 (15.5) | 4 (19.0) | 5 (17.9) | 2 (9.1) | 9 (12.7) | 4 (14.3) | 4 (13.3) | 1 (7.7) |
Medial row, n (%) | |||||||||
Yes | 138 (97.2) | 69 (97.2) | 19 (90.5) | 28 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 69 (97.2) | 28 (100.0) | 28 (93.3) | 13 (100.0) |
No | 4 (2.8) | 2 (2.8) | 2 (9.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
Lateral row, n (%) | |||||||||
Yes | 120 (84.5) | 61 (85.9) | 18 (85.7) | 23 (82.1) | 20 (90.9) | 59 (83.1) | 24 (85.7) | 24 (80.0) | 11 (84.6) |
No | 22 (15.5) | 10 (14.1) | 3 (14.3) | 5 (17.9) | 2 (9.1) | 12 (16.9) | 4 (14.3) | 6 (20.0) | 2 (15.4) |
Arthrotunneler, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 139 (97.9) | 71 (100.0) | 21 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 71 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 28 (93.3) | 12 (92.3) |
Yes | 3 (2.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 1 (7.7) | ||
Medial row fixation type, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 6 patients | |||||||||
Suture tied | 135 (95.1) | 67 (94.4) | 19 (90.5) | 26 (92.9) | 22 (100.0) | 68 (95.8) | 28 (100.0) | 28 (93.3) | 12 (92.3) |
Knotless | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
Medial row anchor type, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 11 patients | |||||||||
PEEK | 86 (60.6) | 53 (74.6) | 16 (76.2) | 21 (75.0) | 16 (72.7) | 33 (46.5) | 16 (57.1) | 12 (40.0) | 5 (38.5) |
Knotted | 35 (24.6) | 10 (14.1) | 2 (9.5) | 5 (17.9) | 3 (13.6) | 25 (35.2) | 10 (35.7) | 11 (36.7) | 4 (30.8) |
Knotless | 7 (4.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (9.9) | 1 (3.6) | 5 (16.7) | 1 (7.7) |
Plastic | 3 (2.1) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Lateral row fixation type, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 23 patients | |||||||||
Knotless | 90 (63.4) | 46 (64.8) | 13 (61.9) | 16 (57.1) | 17 (77.3) | 44 (62.0) | 20 (71.4) | 18 (60.0) | 6 (46.2) |
Suture tied | 29 (20.4) | 15 (21.1) | 5 (23.8) | 7 (25.0) | 3 (13.6) | 14 (19.7) | 4 (14.3) | 6 (20.0) | 4 (30.8) |
Lateral row anchor type, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 29 patients | |||||||||
PEEK | 70 (49.3) | 28 (39.4) | 12 (57.1) | 8 (28.6) | 8 (36.4) | 42 (59.2) | 21 (75.0) | 15 (50.0) | 6 (46.2) |
Plastic | 20 (14.1) | 20 (28.2) | 3 (14.3) | 8 (28.6) | 9 (40.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Knotted | 17 (12.0) | 6 (8.5) | 1 (4.8) | 4 (14.3) | 1 (4.5) | 11 (15.5) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (13.3) | 4 (30.8) |
Knotless | 6 (4.2) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 3 (10.0) | 0 (0) |
Concurrent procedures | |||||||||
Distal clavicle excision, n (%) | |||||||||
Yes | 79 (55.6) | 41 (57.7) | 15 (71.4) | 16 (57.1) | 10 (45.5) | 38 (53.5) | 16 (57.1) | 17 (56.7) | 5 (38.5) |
No | 63 (44.4) | 30 (42.3) | 6 (28.6) | 12 (42.9) | 12 (54.5) | 33 (46.5) | 12 (42.9) | 13 (43.3) | 8 (61.5) |
Subacromial decompression, n (%) | |||||||||
Yes | 142 (100.0) | 71 (100.0) | 21 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 22 (100.0) | 71 (100.0) | 28 (100.0) | 30 (100.0) | 13 (100.0) |
Capsular release, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 133 (93.7) | 66 (93.0) | 20 (95.2) | 25 (89.3) | 21 (95.5) | 67 (94.4) | 26 (92.9) | 30 (100.0) | 11 (84.6) |
Yes | 9 (6.3) | 5 (7.0) | 1 (4.8) | 3 (10.7) | 1 (4.5) | 4 (5.6) | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (15.4) |
Labral debridement, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 125 (88.0) | 63 (88.7) | 20 (95.2) | 24 (85.7) | 19 (86.4) | 62 (87.3) | 24 (85.7) | 26 (86.7) | 12 (92.3) |
Yes | 17 (12.0) | 8 (11.3) | 1 (4.8) | 4 (14.3) | 3 (13.6) | 9 (12.7) | 4 (14.3) | 4 (13.3) | 1 (7.7) |
Chondroplasty, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 120 (84.5) | 54 (76.1) | 14 (66.7) | 20 (71.4) | 20 (90.9) | 66 (93.0) | 25 (89.3) | 28 (93.3) | 13 (100.0) |
Yes | 22 (15.5) | 17 (23.9) | 7 (33.3) | 8 (28.6) | 2 (9.1) | 5 (7.0) | 3 (10.7) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
Biceps tenotomy, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 92 (64.8) | 44 (62.0) | 11 (52.4) | 20 (71.4) | 13 (59.1) | 48 (67.6) | 18 (64.3) | 23 (76.7) | 7 (53.8) |
Yes | 50 (35.2) | 27 (38.0) | 10 (47.6) | 8 (28.6) | 9 (40.9) | 23 (32.4) | 10 (35.7) | 7 (23.3) | 6 (46.2) |
Biceps tenodesis, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 99 (69.7) | 54 (76.1) | 20 (95.2) | 19 (67.9) | 15 (68.2) | 45 (63.4) | 18 (64.3) | 17 (56.7) | 10 (76.9) |
Yes | 43 (30.3) | 17 (23.9) | 1 (4.8) | 9 (32.1) | 7 (31.8) | 26 (36.6) | 10 (35.7) | 13 (43.3) | 3 (23.1) |
If biceps tenodesis, n (%) | |||||||||
Suprapectoral | 37 (26.1) | 11 (15.5) | 0 (0) | 5 (17.9) | 6 (27.3) | 26 (36.6) | 10 (35.7) | 13 (43.3) | 3 (23.1) |
Subpectoral | 6 (4.2) | 6 (8.5) | 1 (4.8) | 4 (14.3) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Table 3 Postoperative complications
With GHOA | Without GHOA | ||||||||
Tear size group | Tear size group | ||||||||
Overall (n = 142) | Case Overall (n = 71) | Small (0-1cm) (n = 21) | Medium (1-3cm) (n = 28) | Large (3-5cm) (n = 22) | Control Overall (n = 71) | Small (0-1cm) (n = 28) | Medium (1-3cm) (n = 30) | Large (3-5cm) (n = 13) | |
Reoperation post RCR, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 125 (88.0) | 60 (84.5) | 19 (90.5) | 23 (82.1) | 18 (81.8) | 65 (91.5) | 26 (92.9) | 28 (93.3) | 11 (84.6) |
Yes | 17 (12.0) | 11 (15.5) | 2 (9.5) | 5 (17.9) | 4 (18.2) | 6 (8.5) | 2 (7.1) | 2 (6.7) | 2 (15.4) |
Complications, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 1 patient | |||||||||
No | 111 (78.2) | 53 (74.6) | 16 (76.2) | 22 (78.6) | 15 (68.2) | 58 (81.7) | 22 (78.6) | 24 (80.0) | 12 (92.3) |
Yes | 30 (21.1) | 17 (23.9) | 4 (19.0) | 6 (21.4) | 7 (31.8) | 13 (18.3) | 6 (21.4) | 6 (20.0) | 1 (7.7) |
Wound issues, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 131 patients | |||||||||
No | 11 (7.7) | 9 (12.7) | 2 (9.5) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (18.2) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
Infection, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 131 patients | |||||||||
No | 11 (7.7) | 9 (12.7) | 2 (9.5) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (18.2) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
Stiffness, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 126 patients | |||||||||
Yes | 8 (5.6) | 5 (7.0) | 3 (14.3) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (3.6) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
No | 8 (5.6) | 7 (9.9) | 0 (0) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (18.2) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Rotator cuff retear, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 122 patients | |||||||||
Yes | 17 (12.0) | 9 (12.7) | 0 (0) | 4 (14.3) | 5 (22.7) | 8 (11.3) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (13.3) | 1 (7.7) |
No | 3 (2.1) | 2 (2.8) | 2 (9.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Other complication, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 128 patients | |||||||||
No | 8 (5.6) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (3.6) | 2 (6.7) | 1 (7.7) |
Yes | 6 (4.2) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (4.8) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 3 (4.2) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Other complication description, n (%) | |||||||||
Pain | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Block related neuropraxia | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Weakness | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Median nerve neuropathy | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Greater tuberosity fx | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Heterotopic ossification | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
1st reoperation diagnosis, n (%) | |||||||||
Other | 13 (9.2) | 9 (12.7) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (14.3) | 3 (13.6) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (3.3) | 2 (15.4) |
Stiffness | 3 (2.1) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Hardware pain | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
1st reoperation other diagnosis, n (%) | |||||||||
Rotator cuff arthropathy | 4 (2.8) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
Rotator cuff retear | 4 (2.8) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Inflammatory arthritis | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Glenohumeral arthritis | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Retear RTC, rotator cuffarthropathy | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Greater tuberosity fracture | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Rotator cuff arthropathy | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
1st reoperation procedure, n (%) | |||||||||
Conversion to RTSA | 8 (5.6) | 5 (7.0) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (7.1) | 2 (9.1) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 2 (15.4) |
Other | 6 (4.2) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 3 (4.2) | 1 (3.6) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0) |
Lysis of adhesions | 2 (1.4) | 2 (2.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Conversion to TSA | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
1st reoperation other procedure, n (%) | |||||||||
Revision rotator cuff repair | 4 (2.8) | 3 (4.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (7.1) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Removal of heterotopicossification | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Removal of hardware, RTC debridement | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
2nd reoperation post RCR, n (%) | |||||||||
Missing for 1 patient | |||||||||
No | 14 (9.9) | 10 (14.1) | 1 (4.8) | 5 (17.9) | 4 (18.2) | 4 (5.6) | 1 (3.6) | 2 (6.7) | 1 (7.7) |
Yes | 2 (1.4) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
2nd reoperation diagnosis, n (%) | |||||||||
Other | 2 (1.4) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
2nd reoperation other diagnosis, n (%) | |||||||||
Insufficiency due to subscapularis failure | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Instability | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
2nd reoperation procedure, n (%) | |||||||||
Other | 2 (1.4) | 1 (1.4) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
Conversion to TSA/RTSA within 2 yr post index DOS, n (%) | |||||||||
No | 139 (97.9) | 69 (97.2) | 20 (95.2) | 28 (100.0) | 21 (95.5) | 70 (98.6) | 28 (100.0) | 30 (100.0) | 12 (92.3) |
Yes | 3 (2.1) | 2 (2.8) | 1 (4.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (7.7) |
Table 4 Patient-reported outcomes
Overall (n= 142) | With GHOA, Small tear (0-1 cm) (n= 21) | Without GHOA, Small tear (0-1 cm) (n= 28) | P value | With GHOA, Medium tear (1-3 cm) (n= 28) | Without GHOA, Medium tear (1-3 cm) (n= 30) | P value | With GHOA, Large tear (3-5 cm) (n= 22) | Without GHOA, Large tear (3-5 cm) (n= 13) | P value | |
MCS, median (IQR) | 57.1 (46.5, 61.6) | 60.9 (37.6, 64.1) | 56.3 (44.4, 61.5) | > 0.99 | 59.3 (44.6, 61.3) | 58.3 (50, 62.8) | > 0.99 | 54.4 (48, 57.9) | 51 (47.3, 60.2) | > 0.99 |
PCS, median (IQR) | 49.1 (40, 52.6) | 40.2 (29.6, 49.1) | 51.4 (42.4, 55) | 0.148 | 50 (44.9, 51.8) | 46.4 (35.1, 50.8) | > 0.99 | 52.7 (49.7, 55.4) | 41.8 (34.4, 53.3) | > 0.99 |
VAS pain, median (IQR) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | > 0.99 | 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) | > 0.99 | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | > 0.99 |
VAS instability, median (IQR) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | > 0.99 | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | - | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | - |
ASES shoulder right, median (IQR) | 98.3 (93.3, 100) | 100 (95, 100) | 99.2 (95, 100) | > 0.99 | 98.3 (91.7, 100) | 95 (91.7, 100) | > 0.99 | 98.3 (93.3, 98.3) | 100 (95, 100) | > 0.99 |
ASES shoulder left, median (IQR) | 98.3 (90, 100) | 100 (85, 100) | 98.3 (91.7, 100) | > 0.99 | 100 (93.3, 100) | 95.8 (87.5, 100) | > 0.99 | 100 (91.7, 100) | 90 (66.7, 100) | > 0.99 |
SANE, median (IQR) | 95 (85, 100) | 96.5 (90, 100) | 100 (92.5, 100) | > 0.99 | 100 (95, 100) | 95 (80, 100) | > 0.99 | 90 (85, 95) | 85 (50, 100) | > 0.99 |
- Citation: Hong IS, Rao AJ, CarlLee TL, Meade JD, Hurwit DJ, Scarola G, Trofa DP, Schiffern SC, Hamid N, Connor PM, Fleischli JE, Saltzman BM. Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears in the setting of mild to moderate glenohumeral osteoarthritis. World J Orthop 2022; 13(7): 631-643
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i7/631.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631