Maccagnano G, Solarino G, Pesce V, Vicenti G, Coviello M, Nappi VS, Giannico OV, Notarnicola A, Moretti B. Plate vs reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: The psychological health influence the choice of device? . World J Orthop 2022; 13(3): 297-306 [PMID: 35317248 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Giuseppe Solarino, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sensory Organs, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Bari, Orthopaedics Unit, General Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, Bari 70124, Italy. giuseppe.solarino@uniba.it
Research Domain of This Article
Orthopedics
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2022; 13(3): 297-306 Published online Mar 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.297
Table 1 The range value of variables analyzed for the study group
Age (yr)
Female
Men
CLASS 1 (70-74)
30
1
CLASS 2 (75-80)
15
3
CLASS 3 (80-85)
13
1
Total
58
5
Table 2 Analysis of the fracture pattern
Total
Three-part fractures
Four-part fractures
Number
63
41
22
Table 3 Analysis of distribution considering age class and fracture personality
Age class (yr)
Neer classification
70-75
75-80
80-90
Three-part fractures
10
27
4
Four-part fractures
5
7
10
Table 4 Postoperative clinical and psychological mean values at T0 follow-up
Group A
Group B
DASH
50.8
54.6
CONSTANT
36.1
32.0
GAD-7
5.4
6.4
CSS
5.0
6.2
Table 5 Description of clinical and psychological scores at T1 follow-up
Group A
Group B
DASH
42.1
39.1
CONSTANT
47.3
43.2
GAD-7
4.3
5.7
CSS
3.9
5.5
Table 6 Analysis of clinical and psychological scores at T2 follow-up
Group A
Group B
DASH
32.8
33.6
CONSTANT
60.0
52.9
GAD-7
3.2
4.3
CSS
3.1
4.5
Table 7 Group C clinical and psychological mean values at three different follow-ups
DASH
CONSTANT
GAD-7
CSS
T0
51.1
33.2
5.9
5.7
T1
38.8
46.9
4.9
4.5
T2
29.9
65.5
3.1
3.0
Table 8 Score distribution between treatment open reduction and internal fixation and PI
TO
T1
T2
O.R.I.F. (n = 31)
RSA (n = 32)
P value
O.R.I.F. (n = 31)
RSA (n = 32)
P value
O.R.I.F. (n = 31)
RSA (n = 32)
P value
DASH
50.0 (7.5)
57.5 (7.0)
0.002
45.0 (12.5)
36.5 (12.3)
0.256
30.0 (24.0)
32.0 (5.5)
0.587
CONSTANT
38.0 (7.5)
31.5 (6.0)
0.008
48.0 (19.0)
42.0 (7.3)
0.110
60.0 (31.0)
51.0 (5.8)
0.049
GAD-7
5.0 (2.5)
6.0 (2.3)
0.015
4.0 (2.5)
6.0 (2.0)
0.002
3.0 (3.0)
4.0 (1.3)
0.012
CSS
5.0 (2.0)
6.5 (2.3)
0.008
4.0 (2.5)
6.0 (1.3)
0.001
3.0 (2.5)
4.0 (2.3)
0.005
Table 9 Comparison between surgical and conservative treatment
n = 32
T0
P value
T1
P value
T2
P value
DASH
53 (44.5)
0.344
39 (35)
0.421
30 (26)
0.014
CONSTANT
32 (30)
0.223
48.5 (42)
0.063
65.5 (60)
< 0.001
GAD-7
6 (5)
0.827
5 (3.3)
0.548
3 (2)
0.002
CSS
6 (5)
0.481
5 (3)
0.090
3 (2)
0.001
Citation: Maccagnano G, Solarino G, Pesce V, Vicenti G, Coviello M, Nappi VS, Giannico OV, Notarnicola A, Moretti B. Plate vs reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: The psychological health influence the choice of device? . World J Orthop 2022; 13(3): 297-306