Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2022; 13(2): 160-170
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.160
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.160
Table 1 Osteoporosis risk factors utilised in Fracture Risk Assessment Tool predictive tool for osteoporotic fractures[29]
Clinical risk factors |
Age |
Gender |
Weight |
Height |
Previous fracture |
Parent fractured hip |
Current smoking |
Glucocorticoid use |
Rheumatoid arthritis |
Secondary osteoporosis risk factors — Type I diabetes mellitus, osteogenesis imperfecta, hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, premature menopause, chronic malnutrition or malabsorption, chronic liver failure |
Alcohol — 3 or more units per day |
Bone mineral density |
Table 2 World Health Organisation classification of osteoporosis[29]
Terminology | T-score definition |
Normal | T ≥ -1.0 |
Osteopenia | -2.5 < T < -1.0 |
Osteoporosis | T ≤ -2.5 |
Severe osteoporosis | T ≤ -2.5 in the presence of one or more fragility fracture |
Table 3 Patient demographic data
Patient demographic | |
Number of patients (n) | 69 |
Age yr (mean, range) | 74.1 (61-98) |
Height cm (mean, range) | 161.9 (141-190) |
Weight kg (mean, range) | 67.7 (31-150) |
BMI (mean, range) | 25.7 (16-63) |
Gender (male:female) | 25:44 |
Menopause age (mean, range) | 46.6 (32-56) |
Laterality (left:right) | 27:42 |
Table 4 Pattern of fracture neck of femur
n (%) | |
Intra-capsular fracture | 36 (52.2) |
Extra-capsular fracture | 33 (47.8) |
Table 5 Surgical management of fracture neck of femur
n (%) | |
Total hip replacement | 24 (34.8) |
Hemi-arthroplasty | 10 (14.5) |
Dynamic hip screw | 31 (45.0) |
Intra-medullary nail | 4 (5.7) |
Table 6 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan results
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan | |
FRAX major (mean ± SD) | 19.87 ± 11.01 |
FRAX hip (mean ± SD) | 7.75 ± 8.09 |
BMD hip (mean ± SD) | 0.62 ± 0.13 |
T-score hip (mean ± SD) | -2.20 ± 1.05 |
z-score hip (mean ± SD) | -0.60 ± 0.97 |
BMD spine (mean ± SD) | 0.88 ± 0.30 |
T-score spine (mean ± SD) | -1.36 ± 1.65 |
z-score spine (mean ± SD) | 0.37 ± 1.72 |
Table 7 Comparison of mean bone mineral density femoral neck and lumbar spine in males and females
Male (n = 25) | Female (n = 44) | P value1 | |
BMD femoral neck | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.364 |
BMD lumbar spine | 1.01 | 0.85 | 0.135 |
Table 8 Analysis between World Health Organization classification of femoral neck bone mineral density and mean menopause age of female patients (n = 39)
n | Menopause age (mean ± SD) | P value1 | |
Normal | 5 | 45.0 ± 7.4 | 0.086 |
Osteopenia | 16 | 44.8 ± 5.1 | |
Severe osteoporosis | 18 | 48.4 ± 5.1 |
Table 9 Analysis between World Health Organization classification of lumbar spine bone mineral density and mean menopause age of female patients (n = 40)
n | Menopause age (mean ± SD) | P value1 | |
Normal | 15 | 47.2 ± 5.7 | 0.835 |
Osteopenia | 15 | 46.1 ± 5.3 | |
Severe osteoporosis | 10 | 46.3 ± 6.1 |
Table 10 Analysis between World Health Organization classification of femoral neck bone mineral density and the pattern of fracture neck of femur (n = 62)
Intra-capsular (n) | Extra-capsular (n) | P value1 | |
Normal | 6 | 2 | 0.026 |
Osteopenia | 17 | 7 | |
Severe osteoporosis | 10 | 20 |
- Citation: Elamin Ahmed H, Al-Dadah O. Bone mineral density in fracture neck of femur patients: What's the significance? World J Orthop 2022; 13(2): 160-170
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i2/160.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.160