Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2022; 13(10): 932-939
Published online Oct 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.932
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the treatment and control groups
Group
Sex, M/F
Age (yr)
BMI in kg/m2
Educational level, illiterate/primary school/senior high school/ junior college/college and university
Surgical limb, L/R
Treatment, n = 406/3467.28 ± 5.5124.44 ± 2.372/1/23/12/2/022/18
Control, n = 4010/3069.07 ± 6.5424.92 ± 2.240/1/26/11/0/225/15
χ2/t1.2501.3321.0206.2270.464
P value0.2640.1870.3100.2850.496
Table 2 Comparison of visual analog scale scores between the two groups
Group
-3rd d
3rd d
7th d
14th d
Treatment, n = 406.75 ± 0.925.30 ± 0.792.57 ± 0.840.80 ± 0.93
Control, n = 406.60 ± 0.845.65 ± 0.804.00 ± 0.852.70 ± 1.04
t0.7581.9657.5368.563
P value0.4510.0530.0000.000
Table 3 Comparison of skin temperature between the two groups (°C)
Group
-3rd d
3rd d
7th d
14th d
Treatment, n = 4037.34 ± 0.2837.21 ± 0.2636.93 ± 0.2136.63 ± 0.31
Control, n = 4037.29 ± 0.3437.24 ± 0.3237.09 ± 0.2736.94 ± 0.32
t0.7550.4222.9684.423
P value0.4520.6740.0040.000
Table 4 Comparison of lower limb swelling between the two groups

Group
t
P value
Treatment, n = 40
Control, n = 40
Upper circumference in cm
-3 d53.35 ± 4.9451.83 ± 4.341.4610.148
3 d52.83 ± 4.9151.51 ± 4.291.2740.206
7 d48.32 ± 4.5750.53 ± 3.972.3150.023
14 d45.68 ± 4.6947.96 ± 3.892.3740.020
Lower circumference in cm
-3 d39.59 ± 3.5838.16 ± 3.781.7340.087
3 d38.96 ± 3.5537.50 ± 3.851.7680.081
7 d36.71 ± 2.9539.21 ± 6.862.1210.037
14 d34.96 ± 2.9636.70 ± 4.352.0950.039
Table 5 Comparison of knee range of motion and knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score between the two groups of patients
GroupKnee range of motion in degrees
KOOS score
-3rd d
14th d
-3rd d
14th d
Treatment, n = 4095.23 ± 2.11115.32 ± 2.1265.83 ± 1.3985.52 ± 0.82
Control, n = 4095.14 ± 2.24113.34 ± 2.1665.73 ± 1.3380.32 ± 1.13
t0.1854.1380.32923.556
P value0.8540.0000.7430.000