Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2020; 11(7): 328-344
Published online Jul 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i7.328
Published online Jul 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i7.328
Ref. (level of evidence) | Species (n) | Surgical model and scaffold(s) used | Experimental groups (n) | Assessment method and time point | Fusion rate (no. fused/total) |
Johnson et al[21], 2011 (V) | Rat (n = 59) | L4–L5 PLF using a collagen sponge supplemented with Oxy341, Oxy49, or rhBMP-2 | A. DMSO only (control) (n = 9) | No motion bilaterally via manual palpation at 9 wk post-operatively | A. 0% (0/9) |
B. 5-μg rhBMP-2 (n = 10) | B. 100% (10/10) | ||||
C. 0.2-mg Oxy34 (n = 10) | C. 0% (0/10) | ||||
D. 2-mg Oxy34 (n = 10) | D. 50% (5/10) | ||||
E. 20-mg Oxy34 (n = 10) | E. 100% (10/10) | ||||
F. 20-mg Oxy49 (n = 10) | F. 100% (10/10) | ||||
Stappenbeck et al[20], 2012 (V) | Rat (n = 30) | L4-L5 PLF using a collagen sponge supplemented with Oxy41, Oxy18, or Oxy212 | A. 2-mg Oxy4 (n = 10) | Fusion rate was not reported; however, via μ-computed tomographic analysis, treatment with Oxy21 led to significantly larger de novo bone volumes compared to treatment with Oxy4, which was comparable to treatment with Oxy18 | |
B. 2-mg Oxy18 (n = 10) | |||||
C. 2-mg Oxy21 (n = 10) | |||||
Montgomery et al[19], 2014 (V) | Rat (n = 38) | L4-L5 PLF using a collagen sponge supplemented with Oxy1332 or rhBMP-2 | A. DMSO only (control) (n = 7) | No motion bilaterally via manual palpation at 8 wk post-operatively | A. 0% (0/7) |
B. 5-μg rhBMP-2 (n = 8) | B. 100% (8/8) | ||||
C. 0.2-mg Oxy133 (n = 8) | C. 0% (0/8) | ||||
D. 2-mg Oxy133 (n = 8) | D. 50% (4/8) | ||||
E. 20-mg Oxy133 (n = 7) | E. 86% (6/7) | ||||
Scott et al[31], 2015 (V) | Rabbit (n = 22) | L4-L5 PLF using iliac crest autograft supplemented with Oxy133 or rhBMP-2 | A. Saline only (control) (n = 5) | No motion bilaterally via manual palpation at 8 wk post-operatively | A. 0% (0/5) |
B. 30-μg rhBMP-2 (n = 6) | B. 83.3% (5/6) | ||||
C. 20-mg Oxy133 (n = 6) | C. 83.3% (5/6) | ||||
D. 60-mg Oxy133 (n = 5) | D. 80% (4/5) | ||||
Buser et al[33], 2017 (V) | Rat (n = 64) | L3-L5 posterolateral fusion (PLF) using a collagen sponge supplemented with Oxy133 and/or rhBMP-2 | A. DMSO only (control) (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | No motion at the operated segment via manual palpation at 8 wk post-operatively | A. 0% (0/32) |
B. 0.5-µg rhBMP-2 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | B. 69% (22/32) | ||||
C. 5-µg rhBMP-2 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | C. 100% (32/32) | ||||
D. 5-mg Oxy133 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | D. 100% (32/32) | ||||
E. 20-mg Oxy133 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | E. 100% (32/32) | ||||
F. 0.5-µg rhBMP2 + 5-mg Oxy133 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | F. 100% (32/32) | ||||
G. 0.5-µg rhBMP2 + 20-mg Oxy133 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | G. 100% (32/32) | ||||
H. 5-µg rhBMP2 + 20-mg Oxy133 (n = 32, 8 rats/4 segments each) | H: 100% (32/32) |
Ref. (level of evidence) | Species (n) | Surgical model and scaffold(s) used | Experimental groups (n) | Assessment method and time point | Bone regeneration (%):1 | |
Lee et al[35], 2017 (V) | Rat (n = 9) | Regeneration of critical-size alveolar defects (left and right maxillary first molars) using equimolar amounts of 20(S)-OHC and 22(S)-OHC (dissolved in 1% DMSO in PBS) or rhBMP-2 in solution | A. DMSO only (control) (n = 3) | Bone regeneration as assessed via µ-CT at 15 days of healing. | A. Approximately 45% | |
B. 15-µg rhBMP-2 (n = 3) | B. Approximately 53% | |||||
C. 0.40-µg of 20(S)-OHC and 22(S)-OHC (n = 3) | C. Approximately 65% | |||||
Bakshi et al[37], 2019 (V) | Rat (n = not reported) | Regeneration of a critical-size alveolar defect (7 mm × 4 mm × 3 mm) using a collagen sponge supplemented with rhBMP-2 or a mixture of 20(S)-OHC and 22(R)-OHC oxysterols | A. No treatment | Bone regeneration as assessed via µ-CT at 8 weeks of healing. | A. Approximately 65% | |
Collagen sponge | B. No additive | B. Approximately 72% | ||||
C. 12.5-µg of rhBMP-2 | C. Approximately 92%a | |||||
D. 20-mg of 20(S)-OHC and 22(R)-OHC | D. Approximately 90%a |
Ref. (level of evidence) | Species (n) | Surgical model and scaffold(s) used | Experimental groups (n) | Assessment method and time point | Bone regeneration (%):1 |
Aghaloo et al[17], 2007 (V) | Rat (n = 15) | Regeneration of critical-sized, bilateral parietal defects (5-mm) using PLGA (porosity: 92%) scaffolds supplemented with 20(S)-OHC and 22(S)-OHC. | A. PBS only (control) (n = 12 defects) | Bone regeneration as assessed via µ-CT at 6 weeks of healing. | A. approximately 12% |
B. 70-ng 20(S)-OHC + 70-ng 22(S)-OHC (n = 9 defects) | B. approximately 21%a | ||||
C. 700-ng 20(S)-OHC + 700-ng 22(S)-OHC (n = 9 defects) | C. approximately 22%a | ||||
Hokugo et al[30], 2014 (V) | Rat (n = not reported) | Regeneration of critical-sized, right parietal defects (5-mm) using a gelatin hydrogel soaked with 20(S)-OHC or incorporating 20(S)-OHC-containing micelles. | A. No implantation (empty defect) (n = 4 defects) | Percent bone regeneration was not reported; however, via μ-CT observation at 6 wk, “no” bone regeneration was observed in untreated defects, “some” bone formation was noted in the periphery of defects implanted with gelatin hydrogel and gelatin hydrogel + 20(S)-OHC, and “robust” bone formation was observed in defects treated with gelatin hydrogel + 20(S)-OHC-micelle. | |
B. Gelatin hydrogel alone (n = 4 defects) (mass not reported) | |||||
C. 20(S)-OHC-gelatin hydrogel (without micelle) (n = 4 defects) (mass not reported) | |||||
D. 20(S)-OHC-micelle-gelatin hydrogel (n = 4 defects) (mass not reported) | |||||
Hokugo et al[32], 2016 (V) | Rabbit (n = 25) | Regeneration of critical-sized cranial defect (6-mm; 4 defects/cranium) using a collagen sponge supplemented with rhBMP-2 and/or Oxy49. | A. No treatment (empty defect) (n = 5) | Bone regeneration as assessed via µ-CT at 6 weeks of healing. | A. approximately 10%a |
B. Collagen sponge only (n = 5) | B. approximately 35% | ||||
C. 75-μg rhBMP-2 (n = 5) | C. approximately 65%a | ||||
D. 1-mg Oxy49 (n = 5) | D. approximately 55%a | ||||
E. 10-mg Oxy49 (n = 5) | E. approximately 65%a | ||||
Li et al[36], 2017 (V) | Rabbit (n = not reported) | Regeneration of critical-sized cranial defect (8-mm; 4 defects/cranium) using a collagen sponge supplemented with Oxy1332 and/or rhBMP-2. | A. No treatment (n ≥ 6 defects) | Percent bone regeneration was not reported; however, via micro-CT analysis at 6 wk, significantly greater bone formation was observed following treatment with either 10-mg Oxy133 or 7-μg rhBMP-2 relative to treatment with collagen alone. | |
B. Collagen sponge only (n ≥ 6 defects) | |||||
C. 7-μg rhBMP-2 (n ≥ 6 defects) | |||||
D. 1-mg Oxy133 (n ≥ 6 defects) | |||||
E. 10-mg Oxy133 (n ≥ 6 defects) | |||||
Cui et al[34], 2017 (V) | Mouse (n = 12) | Regeneration of critical-sized, right side cranial defects (3-mm) using MeGC hydrogels supplemented with BMSCs and either SA/Cholesterol or SA/20(S)-OHC sterosomes. | A. No treatment (empty defect) (n = 4) | Bone regeneration as assessed via µ-CT at 6 wk of healing. | A. 7% |
B. SA/Cholesterol sterosome (n = 4) (mass not reported) | B. 31% | ||||
C. SA/20(S)-OHC sterosome (n = 4) (mass not reported) | C. 61%a | ||||
Huang et al[38], 2019 (V) | Rabbit (n = 6) | Regeneration of critical-sized cranial defect (6-mm; 4 defects/cranium) using an inorganic bovine bone graft (Bio-Oss) supplemented with SVA and/or 20(S)-OHC. | A. No supplementation (Bio-Oss only; control) (n = 6 defects) | Percent bone regeneration was not reported; however, via histological analysis at 4 wk, bone regeneration was increased following treatment with SVA, 20(S)-OHC, and, especially, SVA + 20(S)-OHC, relative to no supplementation (Bio-Oss only control). A synergistic effect was observed with combinatorial treatment of SVA and 20(S)-OHC. | |
B. 0.5-mg of SVA (n = 6 defects) | |||||
C. 1.0-μg of 20(S)-OHC (n = 6 defects) | |||||
D. 0.5-mg of SVA + 1.0-μg of 20(S)-OHC (n = 6 defects) |
Oxysterol name | Change from cholesterol1 | Effect on in vivo bone formation (defect model) | Ref. |
20(S)-OHC | OH group at C20(S) | Increase2 (alveolar and calvarial) | Aghaloo et al[17], 2007; Hokugo et al[30], 2014; Lee et al[35], 2017; Cui et al[34], 2017; Bakshi et al[37], 2019; Huang et al[38], 2019 |
22(R)-OHC | OH group at C22(R) | Increase2,3 (alveolar) | Bakshi et al[37], 2019 |
22(S)-OHC | OH group at C22(S) | Increase2,3 (calvarial) | Aghaloo et al[17], 2007 |
Oxy4/Oxy34 | OH group at C20(S), single bond between C5 and C6, OH group at C6(S) | Increase2 (spinal fusion) | Johnson et al[21], 2011; Stappenbeck et al[20], 2012 |
Oxy18 | OH group at C20(S), single bond between C5 and C6, OH group at C6(S), deuterated carbons at C22 and C23 | Increase4 (spinal fusion) | Stappenbeck et al[20], 2012 |
Oxy21/Oxy133 | OH group at C20(S), single bond between C5 and C6, OH group at C6(S), n-hexane at C20(S) | Increase2 (spinal fusion, calvarial) | Stappenbeck et al[20], 2012; Montgomery et al[19], 2014; Scott et al[31], 2015; Li et al[36], 2015; Buser et al[33], 2017 |
Oxy49 | OH group at C20(S), single bond between C5 and C6, OH group at C6(S), double bond between C25 and C27 | Increase2 (spinal fusion, calvarial) | Johnson et al[21], 2011; Hokugo et al[32], 2016 |
- Citation: Cottrill E, Lazzari J, Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Schilling A, Dirckx N, Theodore N, Sciubba D, Witham T. Oxysterols as promising small molecules for bone tissue engineering: Systematic review. World J Orthop 2020; 11(7): 328-344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i7/328.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i7.328