Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. May 18, 2020; 11(5): 252-264
Published online May 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i5.252
Published online May 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i5.252
Table 1 Results of bacterial culture and colony counts
Organism | Cell phones (n)1 | Colony count, n (%) | ||
Low | Medium | High | ||
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus | 62 | 58 (93.5) | 3 (4.9) | 1 (1.6) |
Micrococcus | 41 | 41 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Bacillus | 26 | 26 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Pseudomonas species | 10 | 10 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Fungi | 6 | 6 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Corynebacterium | 5 | 4 (80) | 0 | 1 (20) |
Streptococcus species | 4 | 4 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Enterobacter | 3 | 0 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) |
Acinetobacter | 2 | 0 | 1 (50) | 1 (50) |
Klebsiella | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 |
E. coli | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 |
Table 2 Antibiotic resistance analysis
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (n = 62) | Enterobacter (n = 3) | Pseudomonas species (n = 10) | |||
Drug | Resistant (%) | Drug | Resistant (%) | Drug | Resistant (%) |
Clindamycin | 26 (41.3) | Augmentin | 3 (100) | Augmentin | 9 (90) |
Erythromycin | 40 (63.5) | Gentamycin | 0 | Amikacin | 1 (10) |
Levofloxacin | 15 (23.8) | Ceftriaxone | 3 (100) | Aztreonam | 10 (100) |
Penicillin | 62 (98.4) | Ciprofloxacin | 3 (100) | Imipenem | 9 (90) |
Clotrimazole | 19 (29.7) | Tetramycin | 3 (100) | Piptazobactam | 0 |
Tetramycin | 12 (19.0) | Meropenem | 3 (100) | Gentamycin | 0 |
Oxacillin | 34 (54.0) | Ceftriaxone | 10 (100) | ||
Tetramycin | 1 (10) | ||||
Ciprofloxacin | 3 (30) | ||||
Meropenem | 8 (80) |
Table 3 Factors affecting bacterial colonization of cell phones
Variable | Total | Bacterial colonization present, n (%) | P value |
Specialty | |||
Orthopedics | 43 | 39 (90.7) | 1.000 |
Anesthesia | 42 | 39 (92.9) | |
Appointment1 | |||
Surgeon | 22 | 21 (95.5) | 1.000 |
Resident | 30 | 27 (90) | 0.425 |
Technician | 33 | 30 (90.9) | 0.681 |
Nursing | 15 | 15 (100) | 0.590 |
Age group (yr) | 1.000 | ||
≤ 30 | 52 | 48 (92.3) | |
> 30 | 48 | 45 (93.8) | |
Gender | |||
Male | 81 | 75 (92.6) | 1.000 |
Female | 19 | 18 (94.7) | |
Type of cell phone | |||
Smart phone | 93 | 86 (92.5) | 1.000 |
Basic | 7 | 7 (100) | |
Mobile cover | |||
Present | 67 | 65 (97) | 0.038 |
Absent | 33 | 28 (84.8) | |
Keypad | |||
Present | 10 | 10 (100) | 1.000 |
Absent | 90 | 83 (92.2) | |
Cracked screen | |||
Yes | 42 | 42 (100) | 0.020 |
No | 58 | 51 (87.9) | |
Cell phone cleaning | |||
Yes | 55 | 48 (87.3) | 0.040 |
No | 45 | 45 (100) | |
Duration since last cell phone cleaning | |||
< 24 h | 33 | 26 (78.8) | 0.034 |
> 24 h | 22 | 22 (100) | |
Duration since last hand wash | |||
< 10 min | 46 | 44 (95.7) | 0.666 |
≥ 10 min | 42 | 39 (92.9) |
Table 4 Demographic/job related and cell phone related factors for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species
Variable | Colonized cell phones (%) | Crude odds ratio | P value | Adjusted odds ratio | P value |
Demographic/job related factors | |||||
Orthopedic surgeon | 0.067 | 0.085 | |||
No | 58.4 | 1 | 1 | ||
Yes | 90.9 | 7.12 (0.87, 58.01) | 6.47 (0.77, 54.15) | ||
Anesthesia consultant | 0.906 | ||||
No | 63.6 | 1 | |||
Yes | 55 | 0.91 (0.30, 3.97) | |||
Orthopedic residents | 0.332 | ||||
No | 51 | 1 | |||
Yes | 73.3 | 1.83 (0.54, 6.23) | |||
Anesthesia resident | 0.455 | ||||
No | 63.5 | 1 | |||
Yes | 53.3 | 0.66 (0.22, 1.98) | |||
Orthopedic technician | 0.185 | 0.241 | |||
No | 59 | 1 | 1 | ||
Yes | 76.5 | 2.26 (0.68, 7.51) | 2.10 (0.61, 7.28) | ||
Anesthesia technician | 0.009 | 0.043 | |||
No | 67.9 | 1 | 1 | ||
Yes | 31.3 | 0.22 (0.07, 0.68) | 0.29 (0.09, 0.96) | ||
Nursing staff | 0.455 | ||||
No | 63.5 | 1 | |||
Yes | 53.3 | 1.52 (0.50, 4.61) | |||
Gender | 0.682 | ||||
Female | 57.9 | 1 | |||
Male | 63 | 1.24 (0.45, 3.42) | |||
Age (yr) | 0.951 | ||||
< 30 | 1 | ||||
30-50 | 0.78 (0.17, 3.58) | ||||
≥ 50 | 0.82 (0.18, 3.65) | ||||
Cell phone related factors | |||||
Type of cell phone | 0.290 | ||||
Basic phone | 42.9 | 1 | |||
Smart phone | 63.4 | 2.31 (0.49, 10.96) | |||
Mobile cover | 0.001 | 0.004 | |||
No | 39.4 | 1 | 1 | ||
Yes | 73.1 | 4.19 (1.73, 10.13) | 8.31 (1.95, 35.40) | ||
Keypad | 0.414 | ||||
No | 63.3 | 1 | |||
Yes | 50 | 1.73 (0.47, 6.41) | |||
Cracked screen | 0.395 | ||||
No | 65.5 | 1 | |||
Yes | 57.1 | 0.70 (0.31, 1.59) | |||
Cleans their cell phone | 0.601 | ||||
No | 60 | 1 | |||
Yes | 65.5 | 1.26 (0.53, 3.03) | |||
Duration since last cell phone cleaning | 0.013 | 0.032 | |||
< 24 h | 51.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
≥ 24 h | 86.4 | 5.82 (1.46, 23.17) | 5.30 (1.16, 24.34) |
- Citation: Qureshi NQ, Mufarrih SH, Irfan S, Rashid RH, Zubairi AJ, Sadruddin A, Ahmed I, Noordin S. Mobile phones in the orthopedic operating room: Microbial colonization and antimicrobial resistance. World J Orthop 2020; 11(5): 252-264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i5/252.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i5.252