Systematic Review
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2019; 10(2): 101-114
Published online Feb 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i2.101
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Acute scaphoid fractures Scaphoid Fracture Delayed Union or Non-Union Elite or recreational athletes No sporting outcome data reported Return rates to sporting activity reported Paediatric fractures (age under 15) Time to return to sporting activity reported Concomitant upper or lower limb fractures Two or more fractures reported Reviews, case reports, abstracts or anecdotal articles Peer-reviewed journals Animal, cadaver or in vitro studies English language
Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies
Ref .Study location n Fracture type/ location Gender (count) Mean age Study design Treatment Sport activity Level of sport Adolfsson et al [10 ] (2001) Linkoping & Lund, Sweden 5 Waist (5) N/A 31 (15-75) RCT PSF (3); Conservative (2) Soccer (3); Swimming (1); Squash (1) National level Bedi et al [25 ] (2007) Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 6 B2 (6) N/A 25 (16-62) RCS ORIF (6) Sport (6) Collegiate/ Professional Ellsasser and Stein[27 ] (1979) St. Louis, Missouri, United States 2 - M: 2 N/A CS Conservative (2); Returned immediately American football (2) Professional Huene[28 ] (1979) Fresno, California, United States 4 - N/A N/A CS ORIF (4) Sport (4) N/A McQueen et al [9 ] (2008) Edinburgh, United Kingdom 55 B1 (1); B2 (54) M: 50 F: 10 29.4 (17-65) RCT PSF (28); Conservative (27) N/A N/A Muramatsu et al [24 ] (2002) Yamaguchi, Japan 10 A2 (3); B2 (6); B3 (1) M: 10 17.3 (13-22) RCS ORIF (10) Badminton (1); Baseball (2); Basketball (2); Boxing (2); Handball (1); Judo (2); Rugby (1); Soccer (16); Tennis (1); Track (2) N/A Rettig et al [22 ] (1994) Indianapolis, Indiana, United States 30 MT (30) M: 25 F: 5 18.3 RCS ORIF (18); Conservative (12); Returned immediately Sport (30) N/A Rettig and Kollias[23 ] (1996) Indianapolis, Indiana, United States 12 MT (10) PT (2) M: 11 F: 1 21 (17-31) RCS ORIF (12) Baseball (2); Basketball (8); Archery (2) N/A Riester et al [21 ] (1985) Syracuse, New York, United States 14 MT (11) PT (3) M: 13 F: 1 N/A RCS Conservative (14); Returned immediately American Football (12); Basketball (1); Soccer (1) Intercollegiate/ High school Robertson et al [26 ] (2012) Edinburgh, United Kingdom 20 MT (11); PT (4); DT (5) M: 20 26.1 RCS PSF (2); Conservative (18) Soccer (20) N/A Robertson et al [29 ] (2014) Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2 MT (1); DT (1) M: 2 21 CS Conservative (2) Rugby (2) N/A
Table 3 Scaphoid fractures - only fractures with follow-up data included (mean values unless otherwise stated).
Ref .n Mean follow-up Coleman score Return Rate Return rate by treatment modality Return rate to same level of sport Return time (range) Return time (range) by treatment modality Rate of union Time to union (range) Complications by treatment modality Adolfsson et al [10 ] (2001) 5 - 70 5/5 C: 2/2; S: 3/3 C: 2/2; S: 3/3 8.2 (6-12) wk C: 11.5 (11-12) wk; S: 6 wk C: 2/2; S: 3/3 C: N/A; S: N/A C: Persistent radial border wrist pain (1); S: Nil Bedi et al [25 ] (2007) 6 98 (12-272) wk 64 5/6 S: 5/6 S: 5/6 N/A S: N/A S: N/A S: N/A S: Non-union (6%) ; Scar sensitivity (6%) Ellsasser & Stein[27 ] (1979) 2 - 42 2/2 C: 2/2 C: 2/2 0 wk C: 0 wk S: N/A S: N/A C: Nil Huene[28 ] (1979) 4 - 48 4/4 S: 4/4 S: 4/4 7 (6-8) wk S: 7 (6-8) wk S: N/A S: N/A S: SRNN (40%) McQueen et al [9 ] (2008) 55 1 yr 82 53/55 C: 26/27; S: 27/28 C: 26/27; S: 27/28 10.9 (2-26) wk C: 15.5 (6-26) wk; S: 6.4 (2-20) wk C: 23/27; S: 27/28 C: 13.9 (8-36) wk; S: 9.2 (8-18) wk C: Non-union (4); Malunion (3); AVN (2); CRPS (1); Radioscaphoid OA(1); S: Peri-operative breakage of the cannulated screwdriver (2) Symptomatic metalwork (1); Non-union (1) Muramatsu et al [24 ] (2002) 10 - 66 10/10 S: 10/10 n/a 10.7 (6-13) wk S: 10.7 (6-13) wk S: 10/10 S: 9.2 (6–16) wk S: nil Rettig et al [22 ] (1994) 30 C: 48.7 (9-136) wk; S: 49.3 (5-164) wk 63 29/30 (96.7%) C: 11/12; S: 18/18 n/a 6.6 (0-21) wk C: 4.3 (0-10) wk; S: 8 (3-21) wk C: 11/12; S: 18/18 C: 14.2 (8-26) wk; S: 11.2 (4-24) wk C: Non-union (1); S: nil Rettig & Kollias[23 ] (1996) 12 2.9 yr 66 12/12 (100%) S: 12/12 S: 12/12 5.8 (1-10) wk S: 5.8 (1-10) wk S: 11/12 S: 9.8 (6-18) wk S: Non-union (1) Riester et al [21 ] (1985) 14 47 mo (3.9 yr) 65 12/14 C: 12/14 (85.7%) C: 12/14 0 wk C: 0 (0-0) wk C: 11/14 C: N/A C: Non-union (3) (of which 2 patients required surgical intervention) Robertson et al [26 ] (2012) 20 30 (24-36) mo 44 16/20 C: 14/181; S: 2/2 C: 13/181; S: 2/2 12.2 (6-24) wk C: 12.7 (6-24) wk; S: 8.5 (8-9) wk C: N/A; S: N/A C: N/A; S: N/A C: Non-union (3) (all 3 patient required delayed conversion to surgical fixation); S: Nil Robertson et al [29 ] (2014) 2 40 (34-46) mo 44 2/2 C: 2/2 C 2/2 4 (4-4) wk C: 4 (4-4) wk C: N/A C: N/A C: Nil
Table 4 Summary of the return rates to sport and return times to sport by treatment modality
Mode of treatment n Return rates to sport Mean return times to sport Return rate to pre-injury level of sport Union rate Mean time to union All[9 ,10 ,21 - 29 ] 160 150/160 (94%)[9 ,10 ,21 - 29 ] 8.4 wk[9 ,10 ,21 - 24 ,26 - 29 ] 110/120 (92%)[9 ,10 ,21 ,23 ,25 - 29 ] 116/126 (92%)[9 ,10 ,21 - 24 ] 11.3 wk[9 ,22 - 24 ] Conservative[9 ,10 ,21 ,22 ,26 ,27 ,29 ] 77 69/77 (90%)[9 ,10 ,21 ,22 ,26 ,27 ,29 ] 9.6 wk[9 ,10 ,21 ,22 ,26 ,27 ,29 ] 57/65 (88%)[9 ,10 ,26 ,29 ] 47/55 (85%)[9 ,10 ,21 ,22 ] 14.0 wk[9 ,22 ] Conservative - return in cast[21 ,22 ,27 ] 28 25/28 (89%)[21 ,22 ,27 ] 1.9 wk[21 ,22 ,27 ] 14/16 (88%)[21 ,27 ] 22/26 (85%)[21 ,22 ] 14.2 wk[22 ] Conservative - return after cast[9 ,10 ,26 ,29 ] 49 44/49 (90%)[9 ,10 ,26 ,29 ] 13.9 wk[9 ,10 ,26 ,29 ] 43/49 (88%)[9 ,10 ,26 ,29 ] 25/29 (86%)[9 ,10 ] 13.9 wk[9 ] Surgical[9 ,10 ,22 - 26 ,28 ] 83 81/83 (98%)[9 ,10 ,22 - 26 ,28 ] 7.3 wk[9 ,10 ,22 - 24 ,26 ,28 ] 53/55 (96%)[9 ,10 ,23 ,25 ,26 ,28 ] 69/71 (97%)[9 ,10 ,22 - 24 ] 9.8 wk[9 ,22 - 24 ] ORIF[22 - 25 ,28 ] 50 49/50 (98%)[22 - 25 ,28 ] 7.9 wk[22 - 24 ,28 ] 21/22 (95%)[23 ,25 ,28 ] 39/40 (98%)[22 - 24 ] 10.3 wk[22 - 24 ] PSF[9 ,10 ,26 ] 33 32/33 (97%)[9 ,10 ,26 ] 6.5 wk[9 ,10 ,26 ] 32/33 (97%)[9 ,10 ,26 ] 30/31 (97%)[9 ,10 ] 9.2 wk[9 ]