Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2025; 16(7): 107957
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107957
Broader perspective on the role of peroneus longus tendon in ligament reconstruction
Murat Yuncu, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Elmali State Hospital, Antalya 7700, Türkiye
ORCID number: Murat Yuncu (0000-0001-8567-6509).
Author contributions: Yuncu M contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; and manuscript drafting and review.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Murat Yuncu, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Elmali State Hospital, 49280 Sokak, Yeni Mahalle Sk, Antalya 7700, Türkiye. m-yuncu@yandex.com
Received: April 1, 2025
Revised: April 21, 2025
Accepted: May 23, 2025
Published online: July 18, 2025
Processing time: 107 Days and 4.3 Hours

Abstract

This article offers additional clinical and biomechanical insights into using the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. While recent studies report favorable knee outcomes, concerns remain regarding donor site morbidity. The PLT plays a key role in foot biomechanics, and its harvesting may lead to subtle changes, as suggested by imaging and pedobarographic studies. Tendon regeneration may limit long-term morbidity, but further studies are needed. We recommend that future research include gait analysis, long-term follow-up, and insights from anterior cruciate ligament literature.

Key Words: Peroneus longus tendon; Autograft; Reconstruction; Ankle; Regenerative

Core Tip: This article used biomechanical and imaging data from the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction literature to highlight the importance of considering the long-term consequences of donor site morbidity in peroneus longus tendon (PLT) grafting. It discusses the functional role of the PLT in foot and ankle biomechanics, highlights concerns raised by tendon harvesting, and cites studies demonstrating possible tendon regeneration. The article advocates for future research, including gait analysis and long-term follow-up, to ensure safe and effective graft selection.



TO THE EDITOR

We read with great interest the recent meta-analysis evaluating the use of the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The study demonstrated promising functional outcomes and reflects the growing interest in PLT as a viable graft option for cruciate ligament surgery[1]. While these findings are encouraging, we would like to offer a broader biomechanical and clinical perspective on the role of the PLT in ligament reconstruction, particularly regarding donor site morbidity.

In the current literature, the focus is generally limited to knee joint function, with insufficient emphasis on functional effects on the foot and ankle.In addition to serving as a structural graft, the PLT functions as a dynamic stabilizer in ankle biomechanics. It plays a key role in foot eversion, plantarflexion, and maintaining the integrity of the medial longitudinal arch[2,3]. This role in lower extremity kinematics suggests that harvesting the PLT may lead not only to improved clinical scores but also broader functional effects. Long-term outcomes from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction suggest that harvesting the PLT may lead to subtle biomechanical changes in foot function. Pedobarographic studies have demonstrated alterations in plantar pressure distribution, even without changes in standard clinical scores[4]. Furthermore, cadaveric and imaging studies underscore the role of PLT in stabilizing the first metatarsal and preserving the transverse arch of the foot[2,5].

These anatomical features support a more controlled and individualized approach to graft selection in patients with underlying foot deformities or instability. Interestingly, magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that tendon-like tissue may regenerate within the sheath of the harvested PLT over time, potentially explaining the minimal donor site morbidity observed in long-term follow-up[5]. Nevertheless, additional studies are warranted to determine whether the regenerated tissue possesses sufficient structural integrity and functional capacity. This regenerative potential warrants further exploration, especially in physically active individuals, where even minor disruptions in foot stability may impair performance or predispose to secondary complications.

We commend the authors for their valuable contribution to the literature and recommend that future research on PLT grafts - particularly in the context of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - include advanced biomechanical evaluations, dynamic gait analysis, and long-term follow-up. Standardized protocols that include subjective and objective measurements could greatly increase the comparability and generalizability of future studies. Integrating insights from anterior cruciate ligament-related studies may help further elucidate the broader implications of PLT harvesting in knee ligament surgery.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Orthopedics

Country of origin: Türkiye

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Emara KM S-Editor: Bai Y L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Yousif Mohamed AM, Salih M, Mohamed M, Abbas AE, Elsiddig M, Abdelsalam M, Elhag B, Mohamed N, Ahmed S, Omar D, Ahmed S, Mohamed D. Functional outcomes of peroneus longus tendon autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. World J Orthop. 2025;16:101841.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Oner K. Is Peroneus Longus Tendon the Ideal Graft for ACL Reconstruction? Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025;2:1-3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
3.  Rhatomy S, Abadi MBT, Setyawan R, Asikin AIZ, Soekarno NR, Imelda LG, Budhiparama NC. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon versus hamstring tendon: a comparison of functional outcome and donor site morbidity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:1045-1051.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Mirza K, Menezes RJ, Acharya PU, Austine J, d'Almeida VR, Kamath A. Donor-site morbidity following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34:3171-3180.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Kerimoğlu S, Koşucu P, Livaoğlu M, Yükünç I, Turhan AU. Magnetic resonance imagination of the peroneus longus tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:35-39.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]