Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2013; 4(3): 144-153
Published online Jul 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.144
Published online Jul 18, 2013. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.144
Figure 1 Functional rating system for clubfoot.
Reproduced from by Laaveg et al[5].
Figure 2 Radiographic parameters most commonly measured on plain films.
Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) standing foot radiographs of a patient with clubfoot showing the anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle (a), anteroposterior calcaneus-fifth metatarsal angle (b), anteroposterior talus-first metatarsal angle (c), lateral talocalcaneal angle (d), lateral talus-first metatarsal angle (e), and lateral first-fifth metatarsal angle (f).
Figure 3 Flow chart summary of the literature.
Figure 4 Success rate of Ponseti method vs soft-tissue release for clubfoot management based on Laaveg-Ponseti score.
- Citation: Lykissas MG, Crawford AH, Eismann EA, Tamai J. Ponseti method compared with soft-tissue release for the management of clubfoot: A meta-analysis study. World J Orthop 2013; 4(3): 144-153
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v4/i3/144.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.144