Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2022; 13(7): 631-643
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631
Published online Jul 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631
Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram of patients included in study.
RCR: Rotator cuff repair; GHOA: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Figure 2 Anteroposterior radiograph.
A: Anteroposterior radiograph of right shoulder demonstrating Samilson-Prieto grade 0 (normal); B: Anteroposterior radiograph of right shoulder demonstrating Samilson-Prieto grade 1 (mild); C: Anteroposterior radiograph of right shoulder demonstating Samilson-Prieto grade 2 (moderate).
Figure 3 Magnetic resonance imaging.
A: Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating small (0-1 cm) tear of rotator cuff; B: Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating medium (1-3 cm) tear of rotator cuff; C: Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating large (3-5 cm) tear of rotator cuff.
- Citation: Hong IS, Rao AJ, CarlLee TL, Meade JD, Hurwit DJ, Scarola G, Trofa DP, Schiffern SC, Hamid N, Connor PM, Fleischli JE, Saltzman BM. Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears in the setting of mild to moderate glenohumeral osteoarthritis. World J Orthop 2022; 13(7): 631-643
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i7/631.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i7.631