Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2022; 13(2): 139-149
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139
Published online Feb 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139
Figure 1 Measurements in digital templating before and after hip stem placement.
Arrow 1: Teardrop. Arrow 2: Femoral axis determination box. Line 1: acetabular offset. Line 2: femoral offset.
Figure 2 Femoroacetabular offset difference vs caput-colllum-diaphyseal angle for student and resident.
Reference lines for varus (< 120°) and valgus (> 135°) angles. CCD: Caput-colllum-diaphyseal angle; FAO: Femoroacetabular offset.
Figure 3 Femoroacetabular offset difference vs femoroacetabular offset pre-templating for student and resident.
Reference line at cutoff point of 80.5 mm pre-templating Femoroacetabular offset (FAO) for the student, reference line at cutoff point of 81.25 mm pre-templating FAO for the resident. FAO: Femoroacetabular offset.
- Citation: de Waard S, Verboom T, Bech NH, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Femoroacetabular offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty; Digital templating a short stem vs a conventional stem. World J Orthop 2022; 13(2): 139-149
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i2/139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.139