Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (6319)
All Articles published online
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
Dec 18, 2016 (publication date) through Dec 22, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Orthopedics
ISSN
2218-5836
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Viveen J, Prkic A, The B, Koenraadt KLM, Eygendaal D. Effect of introducing an online system on the follow-up of elbow arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2016; 7(12): 826-831 [PMID: 28032036 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.826] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v7/i12/826.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Arno A. Macken, Ante Prkić, Niels Vermeulen, Iris van Oost, Koen L.M. Koenraadt, Bertram The, Denise Eygendaal. The influence of short-term complications on the outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty. JSES International 2021; 5(4): 804 doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.02.015
|
| 2 |
Arno A. Macken, Ante Prkic, Izaäk F. Kodde, Jonathan Lans, Neal C. Chen, Denise Eygendaal. Global trends in indications for total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of national registries. EFORT Open Reviews 2020; 5(4): 215 doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190036
|
| 3 |
How can augmented care experience (ACE) improve ACLR patient’s participation to web questionnaires. International Journal of Surgery Open 2022; 47: 100560 doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100560
|
| 4 |
Yvette Pronk, Peter Pilot, Justus M. Brinkman, Ronald J. van Heerwaarden, Walter van der Weegen. Response rate and costs for automated patient-reported outcomes collection alone compared to combined automated and manual collection. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2019; 3(1) doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0121-6
|
| 5 |
Claire Sokas, Frances Hu, Maria Edelen, Rachel Sisodia, Andrea Pusic, Zara Cooper. A Review of PROM Implementation in Surgical Practice. Annals of Surgery 2022; 275(1): 85 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005029
|
| 6 |
Brocha Z. Stern, Jiwoo Park, Bryana Banashefski, Saad B. Chaudhary, Jashvant Poeran. Strategies to increase response rates for patient‐reported outcome measures in orthopaedics: A scoping review. Musculoskeletal Care 2024; 22(2) doi: 10.1002/msc.1910
|
| 7 |
Cedric Lester Magaway, Gerard Malanga. Patient registries in orthopedics and orthobiologic procedures: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2022; 23(1) doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05416-4
|
| 8 |
Fady Y. Hijji, Daniel A. London, Andrew D. Schneider, Garrhett G. Via, Orrin I. Franko. Automating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Hand Surgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery 2024; 49(12): 1272.e1 doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.007
|
| 9 |
Yvette Pronk, Walter van der Weegen, Rein Vos, Justus-Martijn Brinkman, Ronald Johannes van Heerwaarden, Peter Pilot. What is the minimum response rate on patient-reported outcome measures needed to adequately evaluate total hip arthroplasties?. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2020; 18(1) doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01628-1
|