Minireviews
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2017; 8(6): 437-446
Published online Dec 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i6.437
Table 1 Comparing maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy vs metronomic chemotherapy
Maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy (conventional) Metronomic chemotherapy Dose High doses Low doses or biologic optimal doses Administration Administered at defined intervals (3 weekly, weekly) determined by the recovery of bone marrow Dosing frequency is continuous (weekly, every other day, daily) Plasma concentration Rise and fall of the plasma concentration of the drug Sustained plasma concentration of the drug Target Proliferating tumor cells Endothelial cells in the growing vasculature of the tumor Toxicity Acute and cumulative toxicity is a concern Acute toxicity is rare. Cumulative toxicity is unknown, except for etoposide (related to leukemia)
Table 2 Neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
Ref .Type of study n Patient characteristic Regimens pCR Adverse events Only MC Hildebrand et al [34 ] Single arm phase II 18 TNBC, ≥ T2 Part 1 (12 wk) 47.60% Neutropenia G3-G4: 62% 2016 T4: 5 patients Weekly DX 24 mg/m2 IV Febrile neutropenia: 24% Node +: 12 patients Daily CTX 60 mg/m2 PO EC II: 47.4% Followed by Part 2 (12 wk) EC III: 28.6% Weekly PTX 80 mg/m2 IV Weekly C 2AUC IV Tiley et al [35 ] Single arm phase II 17 TNBC, T2-T4, N0-N1 Part 1 (12 wk) 46.60% Thrombocytopenia G3: 5% 2012 Median age: 45 yr (25-83) Inflammatory breast cancer: 3 Weekly DX 24 mg/m2 IV Neutropenia G4: 29% Daily CTX 60 mg/m2 PO Neuropathy G3: 5% Followed by Part 2 (12 wk) Weekly PTX 80 mg/m2 IV Weekly C 2AUC IV Ignatova et al [36 ] Single arm phase II 40 TNBC cТ2-4, N2-3, M0 Part 1 (9 wk) 60% Neutropenia G3-4: 22.2% 2016 Median age: 50 yr (27-69) Weekly PTX 60 mg/mm2 IV Mucositis 8.3% Histologic grade 3: 33.3% Weekly C 2AUC IV Hand-foot syndrome G3: 5.6% Ki67 > 20%: 100% Then followed by Part 2 (9 wk) Weekly DX 25 mg/m2 IV Daily CTX 50 mg bid PO Daily X 500 mg tid PO Hybrid Masuda et al [37 ] Single arm phase II 40 ER < 10%, T2-T4, N0-N1 Part 1 ( 4 Cycles every 21 d) 47.50% Neutropenia G3-4: 35% 2014 Median age 52 yr (33-69) Day 1, 7, 14 PTX 80 mg/m2 IV Hand foot syndrome G3-4: 8% N1: 40% Daily CTX 50 mg PO ER < 10%: 17.5% Daily X 1200 mg PO EC I: 12.5% Followed by Part 2 (4 Cycles every 21 d) EC II: 77.5% Day 1 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV EC IIIA: 10% Day 1 E 100 mg/m2 IV Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2 IV Cancello et al [38 ] Single arm phase II 34 ER ≤ 10%, PR ≤ 10%, Her2-Median age: 45 yr (31-64) Part 1 (4 cycles every 21 d) 56% Neutropenia G3-4: 38% 2015 Premenopausal: 73% Day 1 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day continuous Anemia G3-4: 3% EC II: 35% Day 1, 2 E 25 mg/m2 IV EC III: 67% Day 1, P 60 mg/m2 IV Histologic grade 3: 82% Followed by Part 2 (three cycles every 28 d) Day 1, 7, 14 PTX 90 mg/m2 Daily CTX 50 mg/d
Table 3 Adjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
Ref .Study design n Regimens Characteristics Outcome Adverse events MTD plus MC Nars et al [40 ] 2015 Phase III : 158 Arm A: Median age: 46 yr Median DFS = 2 Arm A A: 78 Part 1 (3 cycles) TNBC Arm A: 28 mo Neutropenia G3: 19% Day 1 5FU 500 mg/m2 PO Stages II-III Arm B: 24 mo Neutropenia G4: 1.9% Day 1 E 100 mg/m2 Tumor size > 1.0 cm P = 0.05Febril neutropenia G3: 12% Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2 Positive or negative axillary lymph nodes; Nausea, vomiting G3: 12% Day 1-2 MTX 2.5 mg twice/d PO ECOG < 2 OS : Part 2 (3 cycles) Arm A: 37 mo Day 1 T 80 mg/m2 Arm B: 29 mo Day 1 Ca 5AUC P = 0.04Followed by MC × 1 yr Arm B: Daily CTX 50 mg/d PO Neutropenia G3: 17% B: 80 Arm B: Febril Neutropenia G3: 9% Part 1 (3 cycles) Day 1 5FU 500 mg/m2 PO Day 1 E 100 mg/m2 Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2 Part 2 (3 cycles) Day 1 T 80 mg/m2 FIN XX et al [41 ] 2011 Phase III A: 753 Arm A : Median age: 52 yr DFS 5 yr (P = 0.087) 6 deaths related to treatment Part 1 - every 3 wk for 3 cycles Luminal, TNBC, Her2 A: 86.6% Arm A: 4 patients Day 1 T 60 mg/m2 IV T1: 46%, T2: 47% B: 84.1% Arm B: 2 patients Day 1-15 X 900 mg/m2 twice/d PO 1-3 positive axillary nodes: 62% Followed > 3 positive axillary nodes: 28% Subgroup: Discontinued treatment Part 2 -every 3 wk for 3 cycles Grade 3: 42% TNBC > 3 axillary nodes: Arm A: 24% Day 1 CTX 600 mg/m2 IV ER negative: 24% HR, 0.64; 95%CI: 0.44 to 0.95 Arm B: 3% Day 1 E 75 mg/m2 IV Her 2 +: 19% (P = 0.027) B: 747 Day 1-15 X 900 mg/m2 twice/d PO Arm B: Part 1 ( every 3 wk x 3 cycles) Day 1 T 80 mg/m2 IV Part 2 ( every 3 wk x 3 cycles) Day 1 CTX 600 mg/m2 IV Day 1 E 75 mg/m2 IV Day 1 5FU 600 mg/m2 IV Main- tenance IBCSG Trial 22 Phase III n: 1086 Arm A: (every week for 1 yr) Median age: 51 yr 6.9 yr OS: Arm A Oct. 2016[42 ] A: 542 Daily CTX 50 mg/d PO TNBS, Her 2 HR 0.84; 95%CI, 0.66 to 1.06; P = 0.14); Grade 3-4 treatment related AE: 14% patients Day 1-2 MTX 2.5 mg twice/d PO on Premenopausal: 45% TNBC: (n = 814; HR = 0.80; 95%CI: 0.60 to 1.06) Node positive disease 42% Hypertransaminasemia G3 G4: 7% B: 539 Arm B: Her2 +: 19%, only 52% received trastuzumab TNBC, node-positive disease: n = 340 Observation TNBC: 75% HR = 0.72; (95%CI: 0.49 to 1.05) Leukopenia G3-G4 : 2% Tumor > 2 cm: 54% Grade 3: 84% 2 patients with AML 1-3 node +: 25% > 3 node +: 16% Prior anthracycline: 60% Prior anthracycline + taxane: 26.1% CREATE-X trial Phase III n : 455Arm A: (every 3 wk for 8 cycles) Luminal TBNC patients 5 yr DFS: (P = 0.00524). Arm A: 2015[43 ] Day 1-14 X 1250 mg/m2 twice/d Prior: Neoadyuvant no pCR or node positive A: 74.1% HFS G3: 10.9% Arm B: Anthracycline and/or taxane: 80% B: 67.7% Observation 5FU regimen: 60% 30% reduction in risk Six cycles completed: 58% Eight cycles completed: 38% 5 yr OS P < 0.01 A: 89.2% B: 83.9% Ongoing CIBOMA/2004-01/GEICAM 2003-11 trial Phase III A: 207 Arm A: every 3 wk for 8 cycles Median age: 51 yr Ongoing Arm A: 2010[45 ] Day 1–14 X 1000 mg/m2 per twice day PO TNBC HFS G3: 17.4% B: 193 Arm B: Caucasian: 63.9% Diarrhea: 2.9% Observation Postmenopausal: 68.2% Fatigue: 1.9% Basal phenotype: 82% Neoadjuvant: 9.7% Adjuvant: 86.4% Complete 8 cycles: 77.3% ECOG – ACRIN Cancer Research Group EA 1131 trial[46 ] Phase III Expected 562 Arm A: observation TNBC Ongoing Ongoing Arm B: Carboplatin / Cisplatin day 1 IV every 3 wk for 4 cycles Stage II-III Arm C: Capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14 every every 3 wk for 6 courses Residual basal like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Table 4 Maintenance for triple negative breast cancer
IBCSG Trial 22, Oct. 2016 CREATE-X trial, 2015 Study design Phase III Phase III Accrual time 2000-2012 2007-2012 Number of patients N: 1086 CM: 542 Obs: 539 N: 910 X: 455 Obs: 455 Setting Prior adjuvant ± RT Prior neoadyuvant ± RT Study population TNBC: 75% HER2+: 19% Luminal or TNBC No pCR o node positive Previous treatment A + CMF: 60% CMF: 16% AT sequential + CMF: 26% H: 59% (of HER2+) A: 4.1% AT sequential: 81% AT concurrently: 13.6% TC: 5% Study treatment C 50 mg/d PO Daily M 2.5 mg bid PO Days 1-2 vs Observation X 1250 mg/m2 twice/d PO Day 1-14 Observation Time of treatment Every week for 1 yr Every 3 wk for 8 cycles (6 mo) DFS 5 yr DFS: CM: 78.1% Obs: 74% HR = 0.84 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.06; P = 0.14) TNBC: n = 814; HR = 0.80; 95%CI: 0.60-1.06 TNBC, node-positive disease: n = 340; HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.49-1.05 5 yr DFS: X: 74.1% Obs: 67.7% HR (95%CI): 0.70 (0.53-0.93); P = 0.00524 30% reduction in risk OS No results 5 yr OS X: 89.2% Obs: 83.9%, P < 0.01 Adverse events Hipertransaminasemia G3-G4: 7% Leukopenia: 2% X: HFS G3: 10.9% Neutropenia G3: 6.6% Diarrhea G3: 3% Obs: Neutropenia 1.6% Diarrhea: 0.4%