Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2017; 8(6): 437-446
Published online Dec 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i6.437
Table 1 Comparing maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy vs metronomic chemotherapy
Maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy (conventional)Metronomic chemotherapy
DoseHigh dosesLow doses or biologic optimal doses
AdministrationAdministered at defined intervals (3 weekly, weekly) determined by the recovery of bone marrowDosing frequency is continuous (weekly, every other day, daily)
Plasma concentrationRise and fall of the plasma concentration of the drugSustained plasma concentration of the drug
TargetProliferating tumor cellsEndothelial cells in the growing vasculature of the tumor
ToxicityAcute and cumulative toxicity is a concernAcute toxicity is rare. Cumulative toxicity is unknown, except for etoposide (related to leukemia)
Table 2 Neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Type of studynPatient characteristicRegimenspCRAdverse events
Only MCHildebrand et al[34]Single arm phase II18TNBC, ≥ T2Part 1 (12 wk)47.60%Neutropenia G3-G4: 62%
2016T4: 5 patientsWeekly DX 24 mg/m2 IVFebrile neutropenia: 24%
Node +: 12 patientsDaily CTX 60 mg/m2 PO
EC II: 47.4%Followed by Part 2 (12 wk)
EC III: 28.6%Weekly PTX 80 mg/m2 IV
Weekly C 2AUC IV
Tiley et al[35]Single arm phase II17TNBC, T2-T4, N0-N1Part 1 (12 wk)46.60%Thrombocytopenia G3: 5%
2012Median age: 45 yr (25-83) Inflammatory breast cancer: 3Weekly DX 24 mg/m2 IVNeutropenia G4: 29%
Daily CTX 60 mg/m2 PONeuropathy G3: 5%
Followed by Part 2 (12 wk)
Weekly PTX 80 mg/m2 IV
Weekly C 2AUC IV
Ignatova et al[36]Single arm phase II40TNBC cТ2-4, N2-3, M0Part 1 (9 wk)60%Neutropenia G3-4: 22.2%
2016Median age: 50 yr (27-69)Weekly PTX 60 mg/mm2 IVMucositis 8.3%
Histologic grade 3: 33.3%Weekly C 2AUC IVHand-foot syndrome G3: 5.6%
Ki67 > 20%: 100%Then followed by Part 2 (9 wk)
Weekly DX 25 mg/m2 IV
Daily CTX 50 mg bid PO
Daily X 500 mg tid PO
HybridMasuda et al[37]Single arm phase II40ER < 10%, T2-T4, N0-N1Part 1 ( 4 Cycles every 21 d)47.50%Neutropenia G3-4: 35%
2014Median age 52 yr (33-69)Day 1, 7, 14 PTX 80 mg/m2 IVHand foot syndrome G3-4: 8%
N1: 40%Daily CTX 50 mg PO
ER < 10%: 17.5%Daily X 1200 mg PO
EC I: 12.5%Followed by Part 2 (4 Cycles every 21 d)
EC II: 77.5%Day 1 5-FU 500 mg/m2 IV
EC IIIA: 10%Day 1 E 100 mg/m2 IV
Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2 IV
Cancello et al[38]Single arm phase II34ER ≤ 10%, PR ≤ 10%, Her2-Median age: 45 yr (31-64)Part 1 (4 cycles every 21 d)56%Neutropenia G3-4: 38%
2015Premenopausal: 73%Day 1 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day continuousAnemia G3-4: 3%
EC II: 35%Day 1, 2 E 25 mg/m2 IV
EC III: 67%Day 1, P 60 mg/m2 IV
Histologic grade 3: 82%Followed by Part 2 (three cycles every 28 d)
Day 1, 7, 14 PTX 90 mg/m2
Daily CTX 50 mg/d
Table 3 Adjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
Ref.Study designnRegimensCharacteristicsOutcomeAdverse events
MTD plus MCNars et al[40] 2015Phase III: 158Arm A:Median age: 46 yrMedian DFS = 2Arm A
A: 78Part 1 (3 cycles)TNBCArm A: 28 moNeutropenia G3: 19%
Day 1 5FU 500 mg/m2 POStages II-IIIArm B: 24 moNeutropenia G4: 1.9%
Day 1 E 100 mg/m2Tumor size > 1.0 cmP = 0.05Febril neutropenia G3: 12%
Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2Positive or negative axillary lymph nodes;Nausea, vomiting G3: 12%
Day 1-2 MTX 2.5 mg twice/d POECOG < 2OS :
Part 2 (3 cycles)Arm A: 37 mo
Day 1 T 80 mg/m2Arm B: 29 mo
Day 1 Ca 5AUCP = 0.04
Followed by MC × 1 yrArm B:
Daily CTX 50 mg/d PONeutropenia G3: 17%
B: 80Arm B:Febril Neutropenia G3: 9%
Part 1 (3 cycles)
Day 1 5FU 500 mg/m2 PO
Day 1 E 100 mg/m2
Day 1 CTX 500 mg/m2
Part 2 (3 cycles)
Day 1 T 80 mg/m2
FIN XX et al[41] 2011Phase IIIA: 753Arm A :Median age: 52 yrDFS 5 yr (P = 0.087)6 deaths related to treatment
Part 1 - every 3 wk for 3 cyclesLuminal, TNBC, Her2A: 86.6%Arm A: 4 patients
Day 1 T 60 mg/m2 IVT1: 46%, T2: 47%B: 84.1%Arm B: 2 patients
Day 1-15 X 900 mg/m2 twice/d PO1-3 positive axillary nodes: 62%
Followed> 3 positive axillary nodes: 28%Subgroup:Discontinued treatment
Part 2 -every 3 wk for 3 cyclesGrade 3: 42%TNBC > 3 axillary nodes:Arm A: 24%
Day 1 CTX 600 mg/m2 IVER negative: 24%HR, 0.64; 95%CI: 0.44 to 0.95Arm B: 3%
Day 1 E 75 mg/m2 IVHer 2 +: 19%(P = 0.027)
B: 747Day 1-15 X 900 mg/m2 twice/d PO
Arm B:
Part 1 ( every 3 wk x 3 cycles)
Day 1 T 80 mg/m2 IV
Part 2 ( every 3 wk x 3 cycles)
Day 1 CTX 600 mg/m2 IV
Day 1 E 75 mg/m2 IV
Day 1 5FU 600 mg/m2 IV
Main- tenanceIBCSG Trial 22Phase IIIn: 1086Arm A: (every week for 1 yr)Median age: 51 yr6.9 yr OS:Arm A
Oct. 2016[42]A: 542Daily CTX 50 mg/d POTNBS, Her 2HR 0.84; 95%CI, 0.66 to 1.06; P = 0.14);Grade 3-4 treatment related AE: 14% patients
Day 1-2 MTX 2.5 mg twice/d PO onPremenopausal: 45%TNBC: (n = 814; HR = 0.80; 95%CI: 0.60 to 1.06)
Node positive disease 42%Hypertransaminasemia G3 G4: 7%
B: 539Arm B:Her2 +: 19%, only 52% received trastuzumabTNBC, node-positive disease: n = 340
ObservationTNBC: 75%HR = 0.72; (95%CI: 0.49 to 1.05)Leukopenia G3-G4 : 2%
Tumor > 2 cm: 54%
Grade 3: 84%2 patients with AML
1-3 node +: 25%
> 3 node +: 16%
Prior anthracycline: 60%
Prior anthracycline + taxane: 26.1%
CREATE-X trialPhase IIIn: 455Arm A: (every 3 wk for 8 cycles)Luminal TBNC patients5 yr DFS: (P = 0.00524).Arm A:
2015[43]Day 1-14 X 1250 mg/m2 twice/dPrior: Neoadyuvant no pCR or node positiveA: 74.1%HFS G3: 10.9%
Arm B:Anthracycline and/or taxane: 80%B: 67.7%
Observation5FU regimen: 60%30% reduction in risk
Six cycles completed: 58%
Eight cycles completed: 38%5 yr OS P < 0.01
A: 89.2%
B: 83.9%
OngoingCIBOMA/2004-01/GEICAM 2003-11 trialPhase IIIA: 207Arm A: every 3 wk for 8 cyclesMedian age: 51 yrOngoingArm A:
2010[45]Day 1–14 X 1000 mg/m2 per twice day POTNBCHFS G3: 17.4%
B: 193Arm B:Caucasian: 63.9%Diarrhea: 2.9%
ObservationPostmenopausal: 68.2%Fatigue: 1.9%
Basal phenotype: 82%
Neoadjuvant: 9.7%
Adjuvant: 86.4%
Complete 8 cycles: 77.3%
ECOG – ACRIN Cancer Research Group EA 1131 trial[46]Phase IIIExpected 562Arm A: observationTNBCOngoingOngoing
Arm B: Carboplatin / Cisplatin day 1 IV every 3 wk for 4 cyclesStage II-III
Arm C: Capecitabine twice daily on days 1-14 every every 3 wk for 6 coursesResidual basal like disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Table 4 Maintenance for triple negative breast cancer
IBCSG Trial 22, Oct. 2016CREATE-X trial, 2015
Study designPhase IIIPhase III
Accrual time2000-20122007-2012
Number of patientsN: 1086 CM: 542 Obs: 539N: 910 X: 455 Obs: 455
SettingPrior adjuvant ± RTPrior neoadyuvant ± RT
Study populationTNBC: 75% HER2+: 19%Luminal or TNBC No pCR o node positive
Previous treatmentA + CMF: 60% CMF: 16% AT sequential + CMF: 26% H: 59% (of HER2+)A: 4.1% AT sequential: 81% AT concurrently: 13.6% TC: 5%
Study treatmentC 50 mg/d PO Daily M 2.5 mg bid PO Days 1-2 vs ObservationX 1250 mg/m2 twice/d PO Day 1-14 Observation
Time of treatmentEvery week for 1 yrEvery 3 wk for 8 cycles (6 mo)
DFS5 yr DFS: CM: 78.1% Obs: 74% HR = 0.84 (95%CI: 0.66 to 1.06; P = 0.14) TNBC: n = 814; HR = 0.80; 95%CI: 0.60-1.06 TNBC, node-positive disease: n = 340; HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.49-1.055 yr DFS: X: 74.1% Obs: 67.7% HR (95%CI): 0.70 (0.53-0.93); P = 0.00524 30% reduction in risk
OSNo results5 yr OS X: 89.2% Obs: 83.9%, P < 0.01
Adverse eventsHipertransaminasemia G3-G4: 7% Leukopenia: 2%X: HFS G3: 10.9% Neutropenia G3: 6.6% Diarrhea G3: 3% Obs: Neutropenia 1.6% Diarrhea: 0.4%