Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 10, 2017; 8(1): 37-53
Published online Feb 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i1.37
Published online Feb 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i1.37
CKI | Mechanism of action |
Nivolumab | Anti-PD-1 |
Pembrolizumab | Anti-PD-1 |
Atezolizumab | Anti-PD-L1 |
Durvalumab | Anti-PD-L1 |
Avelumab | Anti-PD-L1 |
BMS936559 | Anti-PD-L1 |
Pidilizumab | Anti-PD-1 |
Trial name/NCT | Cancer type | Immune checkpoint inhibitor | Arms | Primary endpoint | Expected primary completion date | No. of patients |
KEYNOTE-054[20] | Melanoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs placebo | RFS | 2018 | 900 |
NCT02506153[21] | Melanoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs high dose recombinant interferon-α-2B or ipilimumab | OS | 2020 | 1378 |
KEYNOTE-091 (PEARLS)[22] | NSCLC | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs placebo | DFS | 2021 | 1380 |
IMvigor010[23] | Bladder cancer | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs observation | DFS | 2021 | 440 |
IMpower010[24] | NSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs BSC after adjuvant CT1 | DFS | 2020 | 1127 |
NCT02768558[25] | NSCLC (locally advanced) | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs placebo (after CT1-RT) | OS | 2022 | 660 |
ANVIL[26] | NSCLC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs observation | DFS | 2018 | 714 |
CheckMate 238[27] | Melanoma | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + placebo vs ipilimumab + placebo | RFS | 2018 | 800 |
CheckMate 274[28] | Urothelial cancers | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs placebo | DFS | 2020 | 640 |
CheckMate 577[29] | Esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (locally advanced) | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs placebo (after CT1-RT and surgery) | DFS | 2019 | 760 |
PACIFIC[30] | NSCLC (locally advanced) | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs placebo (after CT1-RT) | OS | 2017 | 702 |
NCT02273375[31] | NSCLC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs placebo | DFS | 2025 | 1100 |
Trial name/NCT | Cancer type | Immune checkpoint inhibitor | Arms | Treatment line | Primary endpoint | Expected primary completion date | No. of patients |
STOP-GAP[15] | Melanoma | PD-1 inhibitor (any) | Intermittent vs continuous therapy | Any | OS | 2025 | 550 |
NCT02752074[16] | Melanoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab + epacadostat vs pembrolizumab + placebo | I line | PFS | 2018 | 600 |
MASTERKEY-265[17] | Melanoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab + talimogene laherparepvec vs pembrolizumab + placebo | I line | PFS | 2018 | 660 |
KEYNOTE-048[82] | HNSCC | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs CT1 + pembrolizumab vs CT1 | I line | PFS | 2018 | 780 |
KEYNOTE-040[38] | HNSCC | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs methotrexate or docetaxel or cetuximab | From II line | OS | 2017 | 466 |
KEYNOTE-204[39] | Hodgkin lymphoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs brentuximab | From II line | PFS | 2019 | 300 |
KEYNOTE-045[40] | Urothelial cancers | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel, docetaxel or vinflunine | From II line | OS | 20172 | 470 |
NCT02811861[41] | Renal cell carcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab + lenvatinib vs lenvatinib + everolimus vs sunitinib | I line | PFS | 2020 | 735 |
KEYNOTE-426[102] | Renal cell carcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab + axitinib vs sunitinib | I line | PFS, OS | 2019 | 840 |
KEYNOTE-240[42] | HCC | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs BSC | II line | PFS | 2019 | 408 |
KEYNOTE-189[43] | NSqNSCLC | Pembrolizumab | Platinum and pemetrexed ± pembrolizumab | I line | PFS | 2017 | 570 |
KEYNOTE-407[44] | SqNSCLC | Pembrolizumab | CT1± pembrolizumab | I line | PFS | 2018 | 560 |
KEYNOTE-042[45] | NSCLC PD-L1-positive | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs platinum based CT1 | I line | OS | 2018 | 1240 |
KEYNOTE-010[46] | NSCLC | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs docetaxel | From II line | OS | 2019 | 1034 |
KEYNOTE-119[47] | Triple negative breast cancer | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs monochemotherapy | II-III line | PFS | 2017 | 600 |
KEYNOTE-355[48] | Triple negative breast cancer | Pembrolizumab | CT1 + pembrolizumab vs CT1 + placebo | I line | PFS | 2019 | 858 |
KEYNOTE-177[49] | MSI-H or dMMR colorectal carcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs CT1 | I line | PFS | 2019 | 270 |
KEYNOTE-181[50] | Esophageal/esophago-gastric junction carcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs monochemotherapy1 | II line | PFS | 2018 | 600 |
KEYNOTE-061[51] | Esophageal/esophago-gastric junction adenocarcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs paclitaxel | II line | PFS | 2017 | 720 |
KEYNOTE-062[52] | Esophageal/esophago-gastric junction carcinoma | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab vs CT1 + pembrolizumab vs CT1 | I line | PFS | 2019 | 750 |
JAVELIN Ovarian 200[53] | Ovarian cancer (platinum resistant) | Avelumab | Avelumab vs avelumab plus PLD vs PLD | From II line | OS | 2018 | 550 |
JAVELIN Ovarian 100[54] | Ovarian cancer | Avelumab | CT1vs CT1 followed by avelumab maintenance vs CT1 + avelumab followed by avelumab maintenance | I line | PFS | 2019 | 951 |
JAVELIN Renal 101[55] | Renal cell cancer | Avelumab | Avelumab with axitinib vs sunitinib | I line | PFS | 2018 | 583 |
JAVELIN Bladder 100[56] | Urothelial cancer | Avelumab | Avelumab vs BSC (maintenance after CT1) | I line maintenance | OS | 2019 | 668 |
JAVELIN Gastric 100[57] | Adenocarcinoma of the stomach or of the gastro-esophageal junction | Avelumab | CT1 continuation vs avelumab in maintenance after CT1 | I line | OS | 2018 | 666 |
JAVELIN Gastric 300[58] | Adenocarcinoma of the stomach or of the gastro-esophageal junction | Avelumab | Avelumab + BSC vs CT1 + BSC vs BSC | III line | OS | 2017 | 330 |
JAVELIN Lung 100[59] | NSCLC (PD-L1 positive) | Avelumab | Avelumab vs platinum based CT1 | I line | PFS | 2017 | 420 |
JAVELIN Lung 200[60] | NSCLC (PD-L1 positive) | Avelumab | Avelumab vs docetaxel | From II line | OS | 2017 | 650 |
OAK[61] | NSqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs docetaxel | From II line | OS | 2017 | 1225 |
IMvigor211[62] | Bladder cancer | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs monochemotherapy | II line | OS | 2017 | 932 |
IMvigor130[63] | Urothelial carcinoma (ineligible for cisplatin) | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + CT1vs placebo + CT1 | I line | PFS | 2019 | 435 |
IMpower110[64] | NSqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs platin + pemetrexed | I line | PFS | 2019 | 570 |
IMpower111[65] | SqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs gemcitabine + platin | I line | PFS | 2017 | ND |
IMpower131[66] | SqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin vs atezolizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin vs nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin | I line | PFS | 2023 | 1200 |
IMpower210[67] | NSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab vs docetaxel | II line | OS | 2019 | 563 |
IMpower130[68] | NSqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin vs nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin | I line | PFS | 2019 | 550 |
IMpower150[69] | NSqNSCLC | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel ± bevacizumab vs carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab | I line | PFS | 2017 | 1200 |
IMpassion130[70] | Triple negative breast cancer | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel vs placebo + nab paclitaxel | I line | PFS | 2020 | 900 |
IMmotion151[71] | Renal cell carcinoma | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs sunitinib | I line | PFS | 2020 | 900 |
IMpower133[72] | SCLC | Atezolizumab | Carboplatin and etoposide ± atezolizumab | I line | OS | 2019 | 400 |
NCT02788279[73] | Colorectal carcinoma | Atezolizumab | Atezolizumab + cobimetinib vs atezolizumab vs regorafenib | From III line | OS | 2019 | 360 |
KESTREL[74] | HNSCC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC | I line | PFS | 2017 | 628 |
MYSTIC[75] | NSCLC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC | I line | PFS | 2017 | 1092 |
Danube[76] | Bladder cancer | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC1 | I line | PFS | 2017 | 525 |
Lung-MAP[77] | SqNSCLC (biomarker-targeted) | Durvalumab, nivolumab | Docetaxel vs durvalumab vs erlotinib vs AZD4547 vs ipilimumab vs palbociclib vs rilotumumab vs taselisib | Any | PFS | 2022 | 10000 |
CAURAL[78] | NSCLC T790M mutation positive | Durvalumab | AZD9291 + durvalumab vs AZD9291 | II-III line | PFS | 2018 | 350 |
NCT02369874[79] | HNSCC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC1 | II line | OS | 2018 | 720 |
NEPTUNE[80] | NSCLC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC1 | I line | OS | 2018 | 800 |
ARCTIC[81] | NSCLC | Durvalumab | Durvalumab vs durvalumab + tremelimumab vs SOC1 | II-III line | OS | 2016 | 730 |
NCT02224781[18] | Melanoma BRAFV600 mutated | Nivolumab | Dabrafenib + trametinib followed by ipilimumab + nivolumab vs ipilimumab + nivolumab followed by dabrafenib + trametinib | I line | OS | 2019 | 300 |
NIBIT-M2[14] | Melanoma brain metastases | Nivolumab | Fotemustine vs ipilimumab + fotemustine vs ipilimumab + nivolumab | Any | OS | 2018 | 168 |
CheckMate 026[37] | NSCLC PD-L1 positive (all) | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs CT1 | I line | PFS | 20162 | 535 |
CheckMate 651[83] | H&N SCC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab | I line | OS | 2020 | 490 |
CheckMate 459[84] | HCC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs sorafenib | I line | TTP | 2017 | 726 |
NCT02267343[85] | Gastric cancer | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs placebo | From II line | OS | 2017 | 480 |
NCT02569242[86] | Esophageal cancer | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs docetaxel/paclitaxel | From II line | OS | 2019 | 390 |
CheckMate 214[87] | Renal cell carcinoma | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs sunitinib | I line | PFS | 2019 | 1070 |
CheckMate 143[88] | Glioblastoma | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs bevacizumab | II line | OS | 2017 | 440 |
CheckMate 141[89] | H&N SCC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs cetuximab/methotrexate/docetaxel monotherapy | Any | OS | 2018 | 360 |
CheckMate 227[90] | NSCLC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs nivolumab + ipilimumab vs nivolumab + platinum doublet CT1 | I line | OS | 2018 | 1980 |
CheckMate 451[91] | SCLC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs nivolumab + ipilimumab vs placebo after platinum based CT1 | Maintenance after I line | OS | 2018 | 810 |
CheckMate 498[92] | Glioblastoma (unmethylated MGMT) | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + RT vs temozolomide + RT | I line | PFS | 2019 | 550 |
CheckMate 331[93] | SCLC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs topotecan/amrubicin | II line | OS | 2018 | 480 |
CheckMate 078[94] | NSCLC | Nivolumab | Nivolumab vs docetaxel | From II line | OS | 2018 | 500 |
NCT02339571[95] | Melanoma | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + ipilimumab ± sargramostim | I line | OS | 2021 | 400 |
CheckMate 401[96] | Melanoma | Nivolumab | Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs nivolumab | I line | OS | 2021 | 615 |
- Citation: Bersanelli M, Buti S. From targeting the tumor to targeting the immune system: Transversal challenges in oncology with the inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8(1): 37-53
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v8/i1/37.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i1.37